Reviews

5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Leonardo (2021– )
5/10
Criticism of the TV fiction Leonardo (small spoilers)
7 April 2021
Warning: Spoilers
The television series on Leonardo aired in Italy in the world premier has brought with it a series of controversies regarding the relevance to the historical facts on which the plot of the fiction unfolds. It is a product designed for an international audience and as such respects the need to make the life of Leonardo da Vinci spectacular, which in some ways could instead appear rather boring. Leonardo was a scholar and not an adventurer; he spent most of his days observing and understanding natural phenomena, designing machines, until he ran out of paper and candles.

The most beautiful definition of Leonardo is probably in the title of a beautiful 2011 BBC documentary: The man who wanted to know everything. Leonardo devoted a good part of his days to reading books and studying. The result is the thousands of pages of his codes, there are 6,000 left, but it is thought that they could be up to three times more. At the court of Ludovico il Moro he was also very busy organizing parties and entertaining the court with his charm as a great storyteller and entertainer. He was considered one of the greatest improvisers of musical pieces that he accompanied with his arm lyre.

The most controversial point of the airing of this television series is which image of Leonardo it transmits to the public. This idea will also be the one that will remain fixed in many of the people who watch it, some perhaps not quite aware of the fact that it is a fictional fiction and largely not based on historical facts. Leonardo, also based on what Giorgio Vasari tells us, was a boy and then an adult of extraordinary beauty and refinement whom he dressed in a sophisticated way. In the fiction Leonardo appears as little more than a rough boy with dirty hands and coarse ways. Leonardo, on the other hand, fascinated the greats of his time with his refinement and grace, the king of France wanted Leonardo with him only for the pleasure of enjoying his presence and being able to converse with him. Vasari at the end of the chapter of the Lives dedicated to Leonardo writes: "With the splendor of his air, how beautiful he was, he calmed every sad soul, and with his words he turned every hard intention to yes and no." Unfortunately, none of this transpires from the Leonardo of the fiction.

Spectacularizing Leonardo's biography to package a product for the general public using a series of tricks and inventions is an operation of great interest. In the series, however, numerous historical forcings appear that were introduced by the authors with the aim of creating an enjoyable fiction that attracts viewers. The risk is, as usual, of using the Leonardo brand sure that it is an easy reminder, just mix a little mystery and secrets and combine them with the word genius. The forcing of the series, however, touches the image of a collective icon in a certain sense sacred and of which everyone has his own personal representation. Many of these historical inventions could have been avoided, for example the quarrel between Leonardo and his father who accuses him of being a failure, or the refusal of Amerigo Benci, the father of Ginevra de Benci, most likely already dead when Leonardo made the painting. , to pay for his daughter's portrait because he did not like it.

Insisting on homosexuality with blatant scenes is a choice of the screenwriters, who have nevertheless included an invented female character, Caterina da Cremona, as a counterpart. Leonardo had actually been accused of sodomy when he was in Florence with a group of boys but it was most likely a politically instrumental accusation as it involved many young people from important Florentine families, so much so that it was quickly withdrawn. Leonardo's personality was very complex and in some ways indecipherable even from a sexual point of view. Carlo Pedretti, Leonardo's most famous scholar, has published a document with which he proves that he had a relationship with a prostitute. Furthermore, Carlo Pedretti always observed that "a female nude like Leda has no equal for sex appeal either before or after him, not even today". In the fiction Leonardo even kisses another man in public. Showing two men kissing publicly on the mouth would probably not have been tolerated even in the permissive Renaissance where the accusation of sodomy could cost a lot.

When the master Andrea del Verrocchio shows in public the Baptism of Christ to which Leonardo da Vinci had collaborated, moreover only in the realization of the face of an angel, the presentation of the painting resembles more a vernissage in New York than to what could have happened in a Renaissance workshop. On the other hand, the ball that Verrocchio will make for the dome according to the authors had a diameter of 2.5 meters and a weight of eighteen tons, despite the fact that the metric system was far from being introduced. Other expressions used such as "stretched like a violin string" would hardly have been pronounced, considering that at the time of Leonardo the liras were used and the first protoviolins of which we have evidence date back to the mid-1500s.

To conclude, Leonardo, scholar and innovator, is instead pigeonholed in a reassuring way in the word genius, without considering the context in which he found himself, a historical moment in which many like him have contributed to tracing a new path made of culture, beauty and ingenuity in the most great innovation movement born in Florence and known as the Renaissance.
38 out of 64 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
This movie sucks
5 April 2021
This film is a disaster. Actors who think they're funny with idiotic jokes. Alessandro Gassman who recites only because of the name he bears but acts like a dog, his father (Vittorio) is turning in his grave. The script is heartbreaking. I wonder how they found a producer. Vote 2/10.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
An old TV movie worth to be view
29 November 2015
Watching "Il Conte di Montecristo" have been impressed by the very faithful adaptation of the work of Dumas, valuable feuilleton published in serial form in the Journal des Debats between 1844 and 1846, with a screenplay by Edmo Fenoglio, also Director, and Fabio Storelli, able to prune when needed to bring out the best and with a rare effectiveness the main themes of the novel, by viewing them with suggestive gradually, envy and human pettiness towards his fellow men, the desire for revenge that turns gradually into a sort of omnipotence superman. Edmond Dantès thinks to replace God in equally distribute justice, forgiveness and mercy, then come to terms with himself, with his own past and haunted memories of a love interrupted but not dormant, giving that happiness which failed and perhaps never will never enjoy, opening the doors to hope anyway.

I was also fascinated by the accurate staging, a theatrical film in one breath but certainly impact strongly dilution of various events, albeit with a slowness in the proposition that dumbfounding compared to today's rhythms, not just television, but fascinating for how the actors manage to hold the first and earliest plans, a characteristic of Fenoglio, with an emphatic ever acting or over the top careful, measured, from Andrea Giordana, almost debutant, at ease as much as Dantès than in those of the count of Monte Cristo, as well as in various disguises, emphasizing pains and torments of mind, divine fury and earthly troubles.

But the whole cast, mostly from theatrical experience, is capable of great interpretations and characterizations, from Mercedes to Giuliana Lojodice, Fernando Alberto Terrani Mondego, through Achille Millo (Danglars), Quinto Parmeggiani (Caderousse) and Enzo Tarascio (Villefort), not to mention Sergio Tofano, unforgettable Abbe Faria, Luigi Pavese (Morrel) or the brief appearance by Mario Scaccia in the role of Louis XVIII.

I'd like to mention the costumes by Danilo Donati, music by Gino Marinuzzi jr., Lasoi scenes and photography by Mario Bernardo all contribute in short to make this drama, even in consideration of the time of accomplishment, something unique and certainly memorable as a whole, I recommend the vision of this old TV movie, especially to the younger ones that may notice the palpable difference, for the better, with what currently passes the monastery without the necessary exceptions, of course.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Great performances of Gino Cervi and Gian Maria Volontè
12 March 2014
This television drama produced by the official Italian broadcaster RAI in 1965, is a small masterpiece made by director Mario Landi with the help of the masterful interpretation of two great actors: Gino Cervi and Gian Maria Volontè. Gino Cervi is an old school actor that still is teached in the schools of dramatic art. Gino Cervi's interpretation of Maigret is probably the best even if someone think that the best is Bruno Cremer but in my humble opinion Cervi was 30 years earlier and deserves more. Volontè is really a magical actor, capable of adapting to absolute any character, for instance from Lulù the laborer to Aldo Moro the Italian politician assassinated by Red Brigates and last but not least as El Indio in For Few Dollars More the second of the trilogy made by Sergio Leone. Volontè here is able to give a great performance in a character that all the actors who have played in the different versions of this piece were all overacting. This Georges Simenon piece of crime fiction is magistrally interpreted by others very good actors all coming from theater, something not anymore usual nowadays. I recommend the vision of this drama.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
La cittadella (1964– )
9/10
Great TV piece of Cronin's masterpiece
15 February 2014
These were the times when the theater quality can be see also on TV. Today you can see it only in the theaters, and only for those who can afford it thus removing too many a slice of culture. When they aired this on Italian TV in '64 was an incredible success and fully deserved. Majano (Director) thanks to the kindness of interpretation of Alberto Lupo and other actors of theater school was able to make the full spirit of Cronin's masterpiece. Realism, seasoned with romantic notes that never "sells" the free rhetoric. You start to look at this piece to remain enthralled, almost enjoying the pleasure of watching a great novel even after more than 50 years away.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed