Reviews

19 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Ikiru (1952)
10/10
Simply Brilliant - Kurosawa's Greatest
29 December 2004
Kanji Watanabi is a quiet, melancholy man who has spent all his life behind his office desk doing sweet eff-all. When he is diagnosed with stomach cancer he realizes that he has been petty much dead his whole life, and searches desperately for away to live again.

This is Akira Kurosawa's masterpiece, yes, even better than Rashomon and The Seven Samauri. It is a perfect true story of everybody's life- how we don't even realize we have it until we know it will be over in a short while. Watanabi's quest for self-discovery is one of the greatest from any motion picture ever made. The all-too-true paradox is one to end all paradoxes- that Watanabi is dead, and had been all his life, until he realized he was sick, which is when he began living for the first time. Takashi Shimura, the actor best known for his role as the wise, bald-headed Samauri in The Seven Samauri, and the professor out of the early Godzilla films, plays Watanabi perfectly- in my mind, it's one of the greatest film performances of all time.

Not everyone will love this movie. It was made a long time ago, the main character is an old fogey, it has subtitles, and it's pretty long. Many people today, especially young kids, would find it boring. Well, let 'em. There's no need to worry about them, they'll always have Pirates of the Carribbean, they'll always have The Matrix. Leave Ikiru and films like it to the true lovers of cinema.
144 out of 185 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Fanboys (2004)
Forget Spaceballs- funniest Star Wars parody ever
13 September 2004
A group of Star Wars fans conceive of the perfect plot to steal "The Phantom Menace" and watch it two weeks before the film opens.They pose as real-life Jedi Knights, and convince a die-hard Star Wars nerd that the beloved movies are in fact propaganda created by the Rebellion to generate sympathy on other planets. "The Phantom Menace", double-ended light sabers, droid armies, and Jar Jar Binks, are part of an Imperial plot to generate sympathy for the Galactic Empire, and he must steal the movie from the local cinema in order to bring peace and justice to the galaxy. The plot turns sour, however, when a double-agent emerges from the group with his own agenda.

Very funny, well-written, both poking fun at and showing affection towards die-hard Star Wars dorks. Up there with Hardware Wars as one of the best Star Wars parodies ever.
7 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Cold Mountain (2003)
"Gone With The Wind" for chumps
14 August 2004
I An overly-dramatic civil war love story that really, really wants to be Gone With the Wind but just ain't. Nicole Kidman plays the young Southern belle Ada Monroe. Kidman is usually excellent in everything she's in, but this role is really weak, unbelievable, full of forced sympathy that just doesn't work, topped with a truly horrible fake Southern accent. Jude Law is alright as the deserting soldier Inman who makes his way back to his true love. There is virtually no chemistry between the two, and I didn't really care that much about either of them. As Inman makes his way back to Cold Mountain, the locals are all harassed by the overly-evil, cruel heartless bastards of the North Carolina Home Guard (these are essentially the same guys who were the villainous Redcoats in The Patriot) Renee Zellwegger, in the role that earned her a Best Supporting Actress award, plays Jar Jar Binks in the form of the obnoxious tomboy Ruby Thewes. A few of the supporting cast is very good, Brendan Gleeson, Donald Sutherland, and Kathy Baker give fairly good though sadly short performances. Jack White from the White Stripes sings a song, which is kinda cool. Natalie Portman is the standout of the whole film as a desperate young widow and mother who Jude Law encounters on his journey, her scene is the only truly great bit in this whole film. The whole thing is just too long and unengaging, the storyline is completely pradictable, OF COURSE Jude Law is gotta get a cap in his ass so that Nicole Kidman can pout and wimper some more. If you want a beautiful, romantic masterpiece of an epic set in the Civil War, watch Gone With the Wind. If you want a movie with real facts, watch Ken Burns' PBS documentary series about the Civil War. If you want two ours of overdone Hollywood re- written history a la The Patriot, then watch this.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A fun monster-rumble
7 August 2004
Director Ishiro Honda, who first brought The Big G to the screen in the brilliant 1954 film GOJIRA (re-edited in the US as Godzilla King of the Monsters) decided to scrap the heavy messages and themes of the original film when he made King Kong vs. Godzilla, however he does appeared to have had a great deal of fun making this goofy rubber monster classic. Godzilla breaks out of an iceberg he was imprisoned in and heads to knock down Tokyo. Meanwhile, a pharmaceutical company discovers King Kong on an island full of Japanese actors in blackface playing the natives (!) and the flamboyant CEO decides to bring Kong to Japan as a publicity stunt. The government decides to pit the two titans against each other on the top of Mount Fuji in the climatic scene of the movie. Much of this film is film is intentionally goofy, particularly the island scenes. The screenwriters decided that electricity makes King Kong stronger, but it weakens Godzilla (to make sure it would be a fair fight). Honda also put in several homages (parodies) to the original 1933 King Kong. The final battle on Mount Fuji is similar to watching WWF wrestling, except better, because they're wearing monster suits. If you want a film with epic romance and sweeping drama, you should watch Gone With the Wind, but if you're in the mood for campy monsteriffic fun like only the Japanese can do, watch this.
21 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Magical Mystery Tour (1967 TV Movie)
Pretty dumb
3 February 2004
Damn. I love the Beatles, and I thought this movie was terrible. There is no plot whatsoever, (quite visibly) no script, just the Beatles and their busload of druggy hippie friends messing around with 16mm cameras. However, it's bad in a Plan 9 from Outer Space way (read- laughably silly) and not in a Die Another Day way (read- painfully stupid). And the musical segments for The Fool on the Hill and Blue Jay Way are actually pretty cool.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Psycho (1960)
The best suspense/horror ever - Spoilers.
29 April 2003
Warning: Spoilers
"A boy's best friend is his mother."

The great grandaddy of all the slash-'n-stab horror movies is also the best out of the whole bunch. Marion Crane, a young woman who works at a real estate company, steals a large sum of money from her office and makes a run for it. She arrives at the seemingly innocent Bates Motel, next door to an old mansion, run by young Norman Bates and his unseen, tyrannical mother. Norman is a friendly but quiet fellow who stuffs birds and runs the Bates Motel primarily by himself, and explains to her that his mother raised him alone, but has become deathly ill, and he now looks after her. When Marion asks why he doesn't leave his mother, he explains how he is psychologically chained to her. Later, when Marion goes back to her room to take a shower, she is stabbed to death by a mysterious figure in a dress, who we assume is Norman's mother. The next day, Norman, mortified by what his mother has done, puts Marion's body in her car trunk and buries it in a swamp. Later, a private detective comes searching for Marion, who meets his end when Norman's mother stabs him and pushes him down the stairs. Convinced that something is horribly wrong, Marion's sister, Lila Crane, and fiance Tom go to the motel to investigate. Lila is horrified when she goes into the basement and finds Mrs. Bates's carcass down there, still dressed in her clothes and wig. Suddenly Norman bursts through the doorm, about to kill her, when Tom wrestles him to the ground. When Norman is finally in jail, a psychiatrist explains to Lila and Tom about his bizzarre split personality. During Norman's growing up, his mother had found another lover, and Norman had gone insane and poisoned them both. He then dug up his mother's corpse from the cemetary and kept her in the house, pretending she was still alive, imitating her voice and conversing with her, dressing in her clothes, and pretending to be her. He developed two seperate personalities- one that was his own, and one that was his mother's. Because Norman was attracted to Marion Crane, "his mother" became jealous and killed her. Norman was completely oblivious to any of this happening, but when he was caught and arrested, his personality was completely erased and his mother's took over him completely. As he says at the film's end: "They're probably watching me. Well, let them. Let them see what kind of person I am...I hope they are watching. They'll see. They'll see, and they'll know, and they'll say... 'Why, she wouldn't even harm a fly!'

As I said before, this movie spawned bazillions of imitators, some good, some bad, some truly horrible, but this stands above them all as the best horror/suspense movie of all time and Alfred Hitchcock's masterpiece. There are surprisingly few jump-out-the-closet scenes in this film- while it's true that the shower-stab scene, the death of the private detective, and the revelation of Mrs. Bates' corpse are effective in getting the audience's blood flowing, most of the movie's real substance occurs on a human level. Anthony Perkins is brilliant as Norman Bates, who goes from being cheerful, intimidating, and truly disturbed, and leads the audience through the film to its conclusion. There are times when the audience even feels sorry for him, in all of his madness, which is more than can be said about a buttload of modern movie serial killers. Hitchcock's master direction shines through, cramming every frame with symbolism, detail, atmosphere and mood. This movie is something that every single person on this planet should see, at least once. If you haven't yet, you should.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Overrated, chick-flickey and weird.
23 April 2003
I was suckered into renting this because it looked like a horror. Boy was I wrong. I haven't read any of Anne Rice's books, and after the before-the-movie featurette where she told us that she has never been happier with a movie, I don't think I'm ever gonna. This movie is a homo-erotic, romantic chick-flick that happens to have fangs. It's definatley one for the girls- more hunky actors that my sister likes than you can shake a stick at, and not nearly enough bloodletting. Antonio Banderas is a bad-ass as always, unfortunatley he is criminally underused (his name is there on the box, I spent the first 2/3's of the movie thinking "To blazes with this chick-flickery, when's Antonio going to arrive on the scene?") and Kirsten Dunst is surprisingly good as a little kid vampire (h er performance was actually stonger than Cruise's and Pitt's). I don't think I'd reccomend this movie to anyone who isn't a 12-14 year old female gothic poet wannabe.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Wonderful World of Disney: Oliver Twist (1997)
Season 1, Episode 9
Naff.
20 April 2003
Haven't read the book, but this movie was Naff. Elijah Wood was bloody horrible (has he ever even been in a decent movie apart from Lord of the Rings?). Richard Dreyfuss tried his best to have some fun, but this has gotta be the weakest of all his roles. My dad read the book and he said they changed everything around. There was way too much family mushiness.
3 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Sleepy Hollow (1999)
I don't care what anyone says, I adore this movie!
10 April 2003
The general concensus of everyone I've talked to seems to dislike this movie. Well pooh-pooh to them. This movie is one of the most fun things I've ever watched. Johnny Depp is a great actor and is both intruiging and hilarious as Ichabod Crane. Christina Ricci's acting is great too, not to mention she is gorgeous. Christopher Walken has a great cameo as the Hessian Horseman. Four out of five stars.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Cast Away (2000)
Not Zemeckis's best, but far from Hanks' worst.
9 April 2003
A modernization of Robinson Carusoe starring Tom Hanks could've been waaay better. The conversation with the volleyball was pushing it a bit too far. So was the product placement from Federal Express. Zemeckis has been known to put lots of product placement in his movies (Back to the Future was filled with it, but it was done in a way that didn't get annoying) but this movie overdid it. The whole movie basically jumped up and down and screamed "Give me an oscar!" Robert Zemeckis has done much better (Back to the Future, Who Framed Roger Rabbit, Forrest Gump) but Tom Hanks has done much worse (You've Got Mail, Sleepless in Seattle) Rent it, but don't buy it.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Baby Geniuses (1999)
Horrific!
9 April 2003
A group of scientists kidnap young children and try to figure out the secrets of the universe by decoding baby langugae. Of course, there's a kung-fu master baby named Sebastian who beats them up, and a lots of babies who talk to each other but not to the audience.

This movie was intororably bad on almost every level. I am almost ashamed of Christopher Lloyd, who is one of my favorite actors, for being involved in this "Look Who's Talking" ripping-off pile of diaper gravy.
5 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Astoundingly good!
2 April 2003
Wes Anderson, the director of Bottle Rocket and Rushmore, has brought us a movie that stands head-and-shoulders above your average, run-of-the-mill, jerk-father-becomes-terminally-ill-and-tries-to-spend-time-with-his-kids movies. Unlike the usual, tear-jerking sorts of movies that use that kind of plot format, this movie is a a biting satire and a moving black comedy.

The movie starts out by introducing the characters to us- Royal Tenenbaum (Hackman) and his wife, Etheline, (Huston) and their three prodigal kids. Chas is financial genius who is buying real estate at the age of 14, Richie is a champion tennis player, and the adopted daughter Margot is a celebrated playwright. When the kids are in their pre-teens, their parents split up, and the children never really see their father again.

Years later, kids have grown up. Chas (Stiller) got married and had two kids, but lost his wife in a plane crash that he and his kids were on but survived, and is now a bitter and paranoid safety freak. Margot (Paltrow) hasn't written a play for years and now lives in an unhappy marriage with psychologist Raleigh St. Clair (Bill Murray). Richie (Luke Wilson) quit playing tennis and lived at sea for a few years. He wrote a letter to his friend Eli Cash (Owen Wilson) saying that he is in love with his adopted sister. Eli is an egotistical writer. Etheline has been proposed to by her accountant, Henry Sherman (Danny Glover).

After the Tenenbaum children come back to live at home, Royal tells Etheline that he has stomach cancer and wants to spend time with his kids before he dies. Richie accepts his dad's proposal with open arms, but Chas hates his father passionatley and wants for he and his kids to have nothing to do with Royal. Shortly after he moves in, Sherman exposes him of having lied about his illness, and Chas kicks him out. The following events include persue of love, attempted suicide, and waves of melancholy as the whole family comes together again in the end.

This movie was a whole lot better than I expected. Owen Wilson and Ben Stiller have a horrible knack of being in bad movies (like The Haunting, Shanghai Noon, Meet the Parents, and Zoolander) but in this movie they were phenomenal. Gene Hackman, Luke Wilson, Anjelica Huston, Danny Glover, and the two kids are great in their roles too, though Bill Murray's character is a wee bit underused. The real star of the movie, however, is Wes Anderson's directing. His movies are very much in a one-man genre that he has created. His movies, this one in particular, works similarly to the way that Edward Scissorhands does- it's set in a world that is not quite our own, with characters that are finely exaggerated enough for us to laugh and cry with them. Sort of like a cinematic version of a J.D. Salinger novel. I thourougly enjoy Anderson's movies, and hope he makes more of them soon.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
What do leeches do, folks? That's right- they SUCK!
28 March 2003
I am quite a fan of the "unintentionally funny" and "so bad it's good" genre's of cheap, old, dumb movies, but this one nearly put me to sleep. With that kind of title you'd expect there to be lots of running around, hysteria, and people being gorily devoured by big leeches. If so, you would be let down, like I was. For one thing, this movie moves as fast as a really long, drawn out bowel movement. There are a few country bumpkins that mysteriously Then this innkeeper discovers that his wife's been two-timing him with some guy in the woods, so he chases them with a shotgun into a swamp and they become food for living sleeping bags, sorry, I mean giant leeches. Then the extremely wooden guy-hero and his horrifically whiny girlfriend try to convince the town's grumpy sherrif that the victims were not mauled by a giant alligator, or killed by the innkeeper, but actually eaten by big leeches, which are the result of some kind of evolutionary mutation. This takes up most of the movie, and may be trying to give off some element of mystery that is only effective on people who haven't read the video box and knew that the film featured giant leeches. Then they chuck some dynamite in the pond and the leeches blow up. Sorry, but this is one to miss. Many people consider it to be a classic (along with Phantasm and the first Evil Dead movie, which proves that more people than you think are out of their bloody minds) but this movie is really terrible.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Pretty naff.
19 March 2003
I have not seen the original Tuck Everlasting nor read the book, but this movie was bad. It pushed the bounds of tear-jerking sentiment too far, trying to be "Old Yeller" but ended up falling flat on its face, making me care nothing about any of the characters. It was also bogged down by the horrible performances of the young Tiger Beat hunk and the main girl character (I can't even be bothered to recall the actors' names) and fairly naff performances from William "Lost in Space" Hurt, Sissy Spasek, and the guy who plays the Irish guy in Titanic. The narration was so corny it made my head hurt, and people who have not read the book spend the first half of the movie being totally confused by everything they see, and in the end not caring at all. The only character I found interesting and well-acted was the unnamed villain, but all by his lonesome he couldn't pull this movie out of it's mushy, candy-coated quagmire. This is definatley one to miss.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Ring (2002)
Boring, confusing, and dull.
7 March 2003
A young, lamely-acted journalist is investigating about a mysterious videotape, when viewed by lamely-acted teenagers, they recieve a phone call, and the person on the other end says "seven days." After seven days, they mysteriously drop dead and look like sad imitations of Reagen from The Exorcist. It's as if the first half of the movie was written by a moderately unskilled writer who had some idea of where he was going with this lame, seen-it-all-before story, and the second half by someone with alzheimer's desease, who couldn't remember anything that he had just wrote. The scared blonde woman, the likeable guy hero character, the spooky little kid who sees dead people, it's all been seen before. The movie throws things at the bewildered viewer, all of which have no relevence and add up to nothing. A woman killed her daughter, a horse jumped off the side of a boat, a man electrocuted himself in a bathtub, a girl crawled out a TV set and killed a guy, and then the journalist and her son watched the movie on two TV sets at once and the damn thing just ends. Oh no, the tv is leaking! Oh no, I'm getting a nosebleed! The audience is left more confused at the end of the film than they were when they watched it. What was the point of making this thing? I give it one star out of five.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ed Wood (1994)
Brilliant! Marvelous! Fantastic!
23 February 2003
This movie is genius Tim Burton's tribute to the infamous "Worst Director of All Time" Edward D. Wood Jr. All of the performances in this film are great- Johnny Depp, Martin Landeau (in the role that won him an Oscar), Jeffrey Jones and Lisa Marie shine through in particuarly. The film also benifits hugely from Tim Burton's keen visual eye, which faithfully re-creates scenes from Gen or Glenda?, Bride of the Monster, and Plan 9 from Outer Space down to the very last detail. I watched this movie right after viewing Plan 9, so all the images were fresh in my mind- and it's often hard to believe that they did not use footage from the actual movies. I give this movie a 10/10
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The worst movie I have ever seen in my life
23 February 2003
This oddball, stock footage-riddled pseudo-documentary/b-flick, directed by the infamous Ed Wood, makes The Phantasm look like The Empire Strikes Back. Ed Wood plays Glen, his autobiographical movie counterpart, a closet transvestite who worries about confessing his habit to his fiancee. The film starts out reading like one of those duck-and-cover educational videos as it tries to scientifically explain the transvestite phenomena to what it assumes to be a 5-year-old, or someone with equal intelligence. Then there is a totally bizzarre dream sequence that makes absolutely no sense, and the whole thing goes downhill from there until the viewer feels as if their brain is being slowly sucked out of a very small hole. This film is one of the worst things I have ever seen- and I don't just mean movies! Rent this if you want to see just how bad a movie is capable of being.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Snow Day (2000)
This movie was so horrible that it made me want to cry
26 January 2003
Painful to watch from beginning to end. All of the characters are gigantic cartoon exaggerations (which can be executed well, I might add. See a movie like Airplane! for an example. it's just that in this pile of garbage, they're not.) There's the evil snowplowman who tries to run kids over in his truck, the school principal who gets hit with snowballs thrown by invisible kids throughout the whole film, the flatulent fat kid, all the kids, for that matter, Chevy Chase's annoying weatherman character, and the teen stars that could all be rejects from Saved by the Bell. This movie is an insult to everybody's intelligence, even the stupidest little kid on the planet. If you like self-torture, rent this.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Phantasm (1979)
One of the most entertainingly stupid things I have ever seen!
14 January 2003
Warning: Spoilers
SPOILER Sinister things are happening at a funeral home. Strange little Jawa-like things are running around and chopped-off fingers turn into giant bugs. not to mention people having sex in a graveyard of all places. A man and his little brother decide to investigate these matters further, and discover that the dwarves are actually shrunk-down corpses brought back to life and given mustard for blood, and somehow they are also aliens that enter to this world through some kind of gateway. Later we find out that the whole thing was a dream, the kid's older brother is actually dead, and we're more confused by the end of the film than we were before we sat down. The best (funniest? dumbest?) scene is when a little flying orb with knives attached to it flies straight into some guy's head, drills a hole in it, and shoots blood all over like a firehose and he just stands there and screams, making no attempt to pull it off. If you're a fan of Mystery Science Theater 3000 and like movies that are so stupid they're funny, rent this, but don't expect it to make any sense or be at all good.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed