First off, compared to directors such as Cameron, Spielberg or Scorcese, I always considered Peter Jackson over rated and a total scam. For one simple reason: he can't write a story.
Let's just review his 3 biggest hits: 1) Lord of the Rings > Book from Tolkien 2) Kink Kong > well, a cover of a cover from the 1933 movie 3) Lovely Bones > another adaptation from a book
I mean, can't Jackson write his own story for god's sake???
Spielberg and Cameron are great story tellers, but Jackson is just good at directing a CGI team for his visual effects, but that's about it, no 'vision' whatsoever behind them.
Anyway, back to the movie...
I'm an atheist, thus my opinion about the story is off course slightly biased, but still, I can appreciate a good screenplay dealing with after-life, such as the movie 'Ghost' with the late Patrick Swayze or The Sixth Sense with Bruce Willis.
With this movie, at best Jackson succeeds in achieving a bad M. Night Shyamalan movie. A lifetime B-series rehashed story about a ghost not willing to 'let-go'.
The girl is OK, but besides the opening scene when she saves her brother, I wasn't really convinced. She was... meh.
Mark Wahlberg's acting skills are close to pathetic. Seriously, Peter, what were you thinking?... Wahlberg should've sticked to his already pathetic career as a member of New Kids on the Block. This guys has no place in a movie, period.
Rachel Weisz is a different story, I'm deeply in love with her, so I can forgive her pretty much anything, including bad career moves such as this terrible movie.
If you want to really see stunning visual effects with a compelling story, go rent 'The Fountain' instead, also with Rachel Weisz.
Lovely Bones has visual effects so terrible (not in quality but in CONTENT) that they reminded me of Robin William's "What Dreams May Come", a movie from 12 years ago with a similar story and visuals as pathetically uncreative as this one.
For me, Jackson is an over rated average director. And don't start with the CGI, because if you worked in this field, you'd know Jackson has ZERO knowledge on 3DStudio, Maya etc... whatsoever. At best, he was good at recruiting a guy who supervised a guy who was the project manager for a team of CGI graphists. And even that is not so sure, as most of the time, these teams are imposed by the studios.
What's left then? Poor character development (you won't care neither for the girl, nor for the parents. Too bad for a movie that's supposed to be a drama) and scenes with nothing original, neither in direction nor in camera moves or angles.
Really, go see Avatar instead.
Let's just review his 3 biggest hits: 1) Lord of the Rings > Book from Tolkien 2) Kink Kong > well, a cover of a cover from the 1933 movie 3) Lovely Bones > another adaptation from a book
I mean, can't Jackson write his own story for god's sake???
Spielberg and Cameron are great story tellers, but Jackson is just good at directing a CGI team for his visual effects, but that's about it, no 'vision' whatsoever behind them.
Anyway, back to the movie...
I'm an atheist, thus my opinion about the story is off course slightly biased, but still, I can appreciate a good screenplay dealing with after-life, such as the movie 'Ghost' with the late Patrick Swayze or The Sixth Sense with Bruce Willis.
With this movie, at best Jackson succeeds in achieving a bad M. Night Shyamalan movie. A lifetime B-series rehashed story about a ghost not willing to 'let-go'.
The girl is OK, but besides the opening scene when she saves her brother, I wasn't really convinced. She was... meh.
Mark Wahlberg's acting skills are close to pathetic. Seriously, Peter, what were you thinking?... Wahlberg should've sticked to his already pathetic career as a member of New Kids on the Block. This guys has no place in a movie, period.
Rachel Weisz is a different story, I'm deeply in love with her, so I can forgive her pretty much anything, including bad career moves such as this terrible movie.
If you want to really see stunning visual effects with a compelling story, go rent 'The Fountain' instead, also with Rachel Weisz.
Lovely Bones has visual effects so terrible (not in quality but in CONTENT) that they reminded me of Robin William's "What Dreams May Come", a movie from 12 years ago with a similar story and visuals as pathetically uncreative as this one.
For me, Jackson is an over rated average director. And don't start with the CGI, because if you worked in this field, you'd know Jackson has ZERO knowledge on 3DStudio, Maya etc... whatsoever. At best, he was good at recruiting a guy who supervised a guy who was the project manager for a team of CGI graphists. And even that is not so sure, as most of the time, these teams are imposed by the studios.
What's left then? Poor character development (you won't care neither for the girl, nor for the parents. Too bad for a movie that's supposed to be a drama) and scenes with nothing original, neither in direction nor in camera moves or angles.
Really, go see Avatar instead.
Tell Your Friends