Reviews

12 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Stella (II) (2022)
7/10
A Reimagining of the CINDERELLA tale
17 June 2023
This is a reimagining of the Cinderella tale. Cinderella is Stella, a German Jewish refugee who is working for a fascist who lives in a manor home in rural Scotland, teaching his children German. He doesn't realize she's Jewish, of course.

The film has received several awards, it was filmed during the pandemic (an accomplishment in and of itself) and it doesn't seem to be getting a fair shake here. I'd encourage readers to find reviews that were published in newspapers and magazines to get a better idea of what this film is all about.

It is a little slow, but the acting is fine, the writing is good, too, and if you like the subject matter and the premise, you won't be disappointed.

The costumes are good and the cinematography is lovely. The Scottish countryside deserves a best supporting actor nomination, as the setting adds much to the mood of the film.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Boss (2016)
10/10
In the post-election era, this film is HILARIOUS
9 February 2017
Think Female Donald Trump (if life were accurate and fair) meets Martha Stewart. I don't want to ruin the plot so I won't elaborate beyond that. I will say this about the film, though:

Melissa McCarthy is one of the most brilliant comedians of the 21st Century--she's "all in" to her performance and completely believable (and hilarious).

If you need a laugh in these dark days of 2017 onward, I strongly recommend this film. It's not realistic, it has formulaic elements, but the production values are great, the actors commit to their roles and it's an enjoyable escape. And McCarthy is superb--as are the rest of the cast members.
9 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
This movie is one of the worst efforts I've ever seen-the script/premise is horrid.
25 September 2016
Professional, capable actors, quality camera work, great lighting, superb scenery and sets....all that cannot rescue what is the cruddiest premise for a film I've ever seen. The plot is stupid. It's not believable. I can only surmise that the actors in this film either needed the money or owed someone a favor--they HAD to know that this was a dog of a script; I can't imagine this looking any better on the printed page than it does with the words issuing from the actors' mouth.

The actors did the best they could--Sarandon is unlikable (her part calls for that), Goldblum is is suitably callous and cretinous, but the thing just doesn't work. There's no polite way to say it--this film stinks on ice. I would not advise anyone save my worst enemy to watch this hot mess. It's awful. I offer two stars in recognition of the technical work; the camera work, the lighting, the set decoration, even the wardrobes are quite good, and of course, the people who did the continuity work, etc., did a fine job. But the script? The script is the latticework upon which the film hangs, and the script was a pile of junk.
3 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
The Actors Struggle Mightily Against a Ghastly Script-No One Talks Like That!
17 September 2016
Completely unbelievable premise. Characters are drawn like cartoons. The plot is terribly formulaic -- you will say "Oh come on, I could write this," more than once while you roll your eyes at the plot twists and turns.

Again, the actors cannot be faulted. They plow through those lines as best anyone can; they don't over-act even as the director blocks them in silly poses and they spit out "romance novel" lines.

I'll be honest, I kind of think that was a big chunk of time I'll never get back. If I knew then what I know now, I would have chosen something else to watch.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Public Morals (2015)
1/10
Whoever does the sets and staging should be fired.
1 November 2015
The objections I have to this work are many, and they are technical in nature. The scripts are poor--they don't resonate. The parts are too broadly played. Further, the costuming is even worse--full of anachronisms. The cars on the street aren't even right. The series likes to pretend it is accurately representing the era, but anyone who was alive back then knows better. How hard is it to hire someone in their sixties--or (gasp) their early seventies with a little attention to detail? Or simply check the DATES on things?

This is a bad production that gets worse with each episode, and there's no reason that it had to be so awful. If you spend a lot of money on a series, at least try to find someone who won't put 1970s cars in a production that takes place in the sixties, women dressed like they are ready to go to the disco in the seventies, present-day 'five o'clock shadows,' and plastic- looking leather coats back in the sixties when these things were not part of the scene.

This could have been good--instead it is dreadful. A crying shame.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Land Ho! (2014)
9/10
Quirky as all get out...but I liked it.
22 June 2015
It made me laugh, it made me cringe.

But I KNOW people like the characters in this movie, warts and all and that's why I found the film so appealing--in real life, not everyone speaks in complete sentences, or has a clever retort; sometimes, people are clumsy and there are awkward pauses--and there's plenty of that in this film. That might drive some people nuts, but I found it to be a feature, not a bug.

The scenes of Iceland were breathtaking, it was like a travelogue in some respects, but (I keep coming back to this) I liked the dialogue; it seemed very unscripted, the way that real people talk. The conversations between the American and Australian ex-brothers in law were hilarious at times and annoying at other times, and poignant, still, at others, and the work just seemed more like a goofy reality-type documentary than a film.

It will most assuredly NOT be to everyone's taste--it is a weird film, one feels almost like a voyeur watching it, but I found it a good use of my time.

If your tastes are a bit oddball, you will get a kick out of this film--let it unroll at its own pace, ya can't force it...!
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
This film doesn't know what it wants to be.
19 April 2015
It does come off, as another reviewer noted, like a high school documentary film. The narration is a bit stultifying. If you want to learn about JS Bach's life, though, you will by watching this movie. The actors do the best they can, but the format could have been better--the narrator/scene/narrator/scene exposition gets a bit plodding after a while.

Costumes? Superb. Sets? Wonderful. With the exception of one actress whose makeup looks like she went to Lancome to get her face painted, and to Sassoon for her hair to be styled, the rest of the group look half-way believable.

There's enough of JS Bach's music peppered throughout the film that you'll get a nice helping of it, so that's a plus, too.

What's unfortunate, though, is that they clearly didn't spare the horses in terms of expense when it came to visual and auditory details...it's just a shame that the exposition of the story was so, well, lame.

Bottom line: Like Bach? Your time won't be wasted watching this film. If you're not madly in love with the guy and his music, though, this might not give you the "period drama" fix you seek.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Not Good. Not the fault of the actors.
18 April 2015
I won't give you ANY spoilers, but I will say that the cast struggles mightily against a formulaic script. Amy Pohler did a comedy about formulaic movies, and this film reminds me of what she was referencing.

The camera work isn't bad. The lighting is OK. The prop people did their job, for the most part. I'm trying to stay positive, here, and that's the best I can do.

The only name I recognize is that of Daniel J. Travanti of HILL STREET BLUES fame. It was interesting to see how he's aged (and he has aged--he has a very expressive face in his dotage).

I can't in good conscience recommend this movie. It just doesn't have enough good points to merit an investment of a couple of hours.
6 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Indian Summers (2015–2016)
10/10
Breathtaking!
27 March 2015
Each episode builds on the one before it. It is stunning.

I'm not going to give any spoilers away, but this is the most visually astounding thing I've ever seen come out of UK, and that includes Downton Abbey.

The acting is amazing, there are so many strong performances that it's impossible to pick out just one; the storyline riveting, the costumes are pitch-perfect, and there's more than a little sex, drinking, and romance.

The tension is palpable, and if you know anything about history, you know why.

Don't miss it, watch it twice. It's a feast.
35 out of 45 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The Lead Was Miscast
12 March 2011
There's no way, even suspending reality to the Nth degree, that Tyrone Power is in any way, shape or form "believable" as a fresh faced graduate of the Massachusetts School of Pharmacy. The deep, unforgiving wrinkles around his eyes make him look more like the DEAN of the school! I know that Hollywood had a bad habit (still does) of casting people up to the age of forty as teens and young adults, but Tyrone doesn't look at all "young" in this role--he was just too doggone old.

And like every picture made in the era, there's no accuracy when it comes to make-up or hairstyles, either. It's a shame, too, because the costumes aren't horrible, and good hair and make-up would have helped immeasurably. Kim Novak looks like she dropped in from the Technicolor fifties! Still and all, for a schlocky, sentimental, typical-of-the-era film, it's not awful--it'll pass the time if you're in an escapist mood.
8 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A copy of this film is available from the Filmmuseum in the Netherlands
13 May 2008
Warning: Spoilers
In this short but scene-rich and action-packed film, King Baggot plays a weakling who is madly in love with a woman, played by Violet Horner. However, his rival for the lady's affections (William Robert Daly) is quite fit and confident, and, unlike the weakling, who is unable to budge the piano when asked to move it so the young lady can play, is able to move it with ease.

Shamed by his lack of strength, the hero goes home, smoking and in despair. He sees an advertisement in the paper for a strength gymnasium with guaranteed results. After trying to build himself up on his own, without success, and to the great displeasure of his lady neighbor, who is disturbed by his efforts at physical culture, he takes himself off to see the Professor at the gym, and, after a course of instruction that culminates with Baggot's character knocking out the professor with a mighty blow, he gains newfound strength.

Newly strong, he returns to his beloved, pushes his rival aside (several times, quite amusingly) and demonstrates his prowess as he lifts one end of the piano off the floor with one hand. He then tells the woman they are to be wed, and she protests vigorously. Paying no mind, he shoves a ring onto her finger, and carries her off in his arms to the preacher to be married.

An amusing sequence ensues where Baggot, carrying his beloved in his arms, dumps Horner on the ground several times: first, to put on his hat, then, to confront a policeman, breaking his nightstick and appropriating his gun, then tossing it after him as the policeman runs away, again, while opening the door and finally, dumping Miss Horner unceremoniously onto a chair, as he presents the preacher with the marriage license.

As the preacher begins to marry the couple (the heroine does not look too pleased), the policeman, running away from the fierce brute who has disarmed him, runs into William Robert Daly's character and the heroine's father, running in the opposite direction to her rescue. They force the frightened policeman to turn around and engage in pursuit of the "Cave Man" who has abducted the young woman.

Violet Horner's character, after being wed, is furious and unhappy, but Baggot the Cave Man places her on his lap and gives her a kiss. She decides she likes it, and kisses him back. As the "rescue party" arrives, the newlyweds are in each other's arms and quite affectionate. The film concludes with Violet Horner's character forcefully tossing the policeman, the rival, and the father out the door, and returning to canoodle once more with her "Cave Man" beloved.

The quality of this film, overall, is quite good for its age. You can clearly see the character's faces, which look very fresh and natural and aren't slathered with the "too white" make up that is sometimes a characteristic of silent films. King Baggot's once-famous shock of white hair is plainly visible in this film, and he acquits himself quite well in the "physical comedy" department. Violet Horner delivers a strong performance as the young lady being carried off to be wed, and William Robert Daly is smoothly professional as the rival.

An especially amusing aspect of the film is the gymnasium sequences. The "gym rats" who cheer on the boxing matches, though uncredited extras in the film, and only on camera briefly, are a delight to observe. The gentleman playing Professor S. Trong (erroneously identified as William Robert Daly in many references to this film, but it plainly is NOT him, but another actor altogether--taller, burlier, and balding) does a good job as a tough, no nonsense boxing coach.

The Filmmuseum copy of this film is available on DVD in PAL format, without a soundtrack, for a fee. The quality is quite good, particularly considering the age of the film, and the film is fairly complete. There are Dutch intertitles included in this copy of the film, though no main titles or cast/credit listings.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Up Against It (1912)
10/10
The Filmmuseum in Amsterdam has a copy of this amusing silent film.
9 May 2008
The quality of the film that the FILMMUSEUM possesses is quite good, though the ending is a bit truncated, and, since it is a silent, there is no soundtrack associated with it, not even music. They can provide it on a disk for a fee in PAL format. King Baggot and William Robert Daly are in especially rare form in this picture, with King Baggot playing a comedic role as a hapless soul, and William Robert Daly, particularly resplendent in evening clothes and a top hat during most of the picture, playing the very outgoing brother of Louise. It is quite plain to even the casual observer that Baggot and Daly work very well together (as they did for many years in films that are, unfortunately, lost to time). Though the title cards are in Dutch, it's not terribly hard to get the gist of this rather amusing tale. The quality of the copy is quite good, too, considering the age of the film.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed