Reviews

65 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
The Village (2004)
4/10
Its really scary, it is so bad, it is extremely scary...
10 January 2005
Warning: Spoilers
I don't know what is wrong all the reviewers. I also do not know what is wrong with Mr. Night. It seemed that he just gone from great with his Sixth Sense to bad to worst. Writing your own scripts and directing it is an excellent move, however, it does not mean it will always work out. In the later cases of Night's movies, it appeared that he rushed his scripts and did not take any care at all on examining his plot or characters. When you have characters explaining things near the end of the film to the audience and when the dialogs are said purely to explain something to us, we know there is something wrong. And when the plot had to be twisted so much in order to fit everything in and rendered it so twisted it became disfigured and disjointed, it is another bad sign.

Mr. Night used to be compared with Mr. Hitchcock, I would dare say this comparison is getting a little too absurd. Intelligent scripts are not easy to come by and intelligent scripts with symbolic meanings are even harder to come by. If one is to argue the fact that this movie is also about the supression of a community through the usage of fear etc...I would have to conclude that you had watched very little old films of the great eras of Hithcocks and other great directors.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Great Film
19 May 2004
Films in their nature is an experience of the extroverted. We see another person suffer, we see their emotional state through actions and their facial gestures. Some films however, managed to use this extroverted medium to express introspection. 'And What Time is it there?' accomplished this perfectly. But in order to do this, the film can not be rushed. For the longer a shot can substain within a time frame but remain interesting, the longer the audience have to concentrate. In due time, the aduience have to actively think about the scene and they will somehow perform this introspection within themselves. If a film can do that to an audience, it is a masterpiece. Of course there are as many interpretations to this film as people say it is slow moving. But for me, it is a philosophical journey, where the changing of time is an indication of desires and wanting to escape. Since the protangonist can not go there, he decided to change his environment instead. But of course, we can also see this as an indication of the lack of progress in life, of wanting to turn back time and the drift into isolation and loneliness. But as we can see, this hope is trivial but its existence is necessary for one's own survival. So in an outsider's view, the actions may look irrational or pointless, but amongst the circular motions of repetition of fears and anger, it is these very action itself that gives life a purpose.
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Chicken Ranch (1982)
don't let the rating put you off...
10 March 2004
I am a script writer and I am currently writing a theme on prostitution and its characterization. I was so glad I saw this documentary on SBS the other night because it was exactly what I was hoping for. The dialogues are very realistic and after watching this you do get a somewhat good indication of the lives of a 'common' prostitute. It really does depict the contradictions of life and its limitations. So if you do enjoy the study of human interactions and characterizations, this is the film for you. I rate it 8/10
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Mystic River (2003)
script's expositional problems
28 November 2003
This movie is good, but it could have been better. Instead of 'showing' the problem, it was explain verbally to us. This produced an effect of detachment from the audience and the characters. Another issue I had was the dialogues sometimes were 'twisted' inorder to give expositions. What this means is, in their natural character self, they may not talk about something, but because it must be explained to the audience, the character was forced to 'explain' something which may seem out of context in the conversation.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Little Voice (1998)
9/10
all star cast
13 August 2003
Wow, I saw this floating around the video shop for a while but never had the guts to pick it up. That is until I saw the name of Jane Horrocks on the credits. And after reading the names that popped up in the movie, I knew I had to watch it. Overall I think the movie is good with an above average storyline with great casting.

This movie is better appreciated I think if you had seen some of the actors other movies. Coming from having watched, "life is sweet" starring Jane Horrocks, "Secrets and Lies" starring Brenda Blethyn playing the great Cynthia, and of course Ewen and Caine we all know about. And of course, I must not forget the Jim Broadbent in many a movies like 'Crying Game', 'Life is Sweet' and 'Moulin Rouge'. Come on, you got to love the cast! Each one of them can lead a movie by themselves!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
rather surpirsed
20 May 2003
Warning: Spoilers
SPOILERS I was surpirsed to see not many liked this film for I personally really loved it. The directing was well done and the dialogs is excellent. The struggle within the police is evident. The movie is devided in three acts. First being an introduction and setting of premises. Second is a character study of the main character why showing secondary qualities of the police. Third is the struggle of this new understanding/knowledge and the conflict between the two characters. The script was written cleverly and reminds me sort of the script of the 'crying game'; with plenty of dialogs and tension. This film is a must see, but only if you have an open mind and a love to films.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
amazing...
6 May 2003
I remember I was somewhat younger then. A more mature friend told me that there was a great film on one of the arthouse cinema and I had no clue what the hell it was. I saw it. I thought it was strange and there was 'something' there but that was what I left it to be: weird.

Fast forward five years later, many things had changed. I took an interest in films and started watching many great films and I stummbled upon a director named Kubrick. I saw many of his other films by then and I was curious what I would think now about Clockwork Orange five years later from my first viewing.

And I was glad that I watched it again because so many things had changed for me the second time round. Apart from all the directing, camera works etc..., what I loved most are the comments on certain issues. Most people had already commented that the film critizises on social choice and individual freedom, however, I think there is another side of the coin which some of us had missed; which makes this movie even more of a masterpiece. As I see it, Alex (or many of us for that matter), is a victim that holds little freedom. But not just from social limitations but also from nature. From the beginning I could see this 'animalistic' conditioning and the movie progresses to social conditionings and later towards the end back to nature conditionings. It is just like the 9th symthony.

EVEN IF SOCIETY SOMEHOW MANAGES TO PROVIDE INDIVIDUAL FREEDOM, WE STILL NEED PERMISSION FROM NATURE
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Pianist (2002)
one too many
20 April 2003
Warning: Spoilers
spoilers. I do want to like this film. I have high hopes when I enter in the cinema after hearing so many good things about the film. But I can't help myself from thinking that this idea had been done once too many times. There are just too many films made about world war 2 and the Nazis.

I personally did not feel that the concept of the main character being a 'pianist' is very necessary to the plot structure, (they don't have a very close link), and also I felt that Brody did a good job, but I think Jack was better in schmidt. I did not really get into the film's emotional side, there were many graphic scenes, people are shot at close range, and people jumping out from buildings. As usual, we will see that the Germans are evil enemies and one of them will be nice just to prove the point that not all are bad; a plot devise also used too many times.

Good film, if this is made few years ago, maybe it is better. I perfer Life is Beautiful more than this film.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Kandahar (2001)
Depressing but worth watching
29 December 2002
When I watched this film, I did not think about the recent events of 9/11. Instead, what I saw was art, philosophy and universal human conditions being displayed extremely well on the screen. It maybe about Kandahar and the people there, but what I saw was a universal message about everyone in all countries. When it comes to the end of the road, and there is nothing else to live for, hope becomes the meaning. I don't think it is a good idea to watch this film as a source of documentary, I think it is better to watch this in the state of mind of watching something beautiful/sorrowful/artful/philosophical all at the same time. I don't think this film is a comment on 9/11, but a comment on the human conditions that is common to all of us.
6 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Straw Dogs (1971)
One needs to be an animal to survive among animals
13 December 2002
This movie is very disturbing. Not just visually, but emotionally as well. It is sometimes hard for me to understand what are the intensions in some scenes, whether if it is to just shock the viewers or actually trying to send across a message. The infamous rape scene is not graphic, it is disturbing in another sense. I don't know if I totally agree with Sam's directions, but I feel that this movie is a good social/character comment. This controversial film I think as a whole is a message against violence and rape, although it also suggests a very fundamental problem of mankind. We still cannot, no matter how hard we try or fast we run away from the animal conditions that exist within all of us. Philosophy is a rich man's sport. When it comes down to poverty and desperation, one will inevitably level back to the animal conditions one knows so well. Whether if it is for desires, physical satisfactions or emotional stability. If one lives among animals, no matter how intelligent or sophisticated one is, inorder to survive, one will have to act like an animal.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ghost Ship (2002)
5/10
Gabriel must be desperate
5 December 2002
I never imagine there will be a day for me to say that a movie is crap, but this movie is crap. Steve Beck is good in visual effects, but directing is somewhat different. Anyone with half an intelligence will not like this movie...if it was not because of a group viewing, I will never get caught dead watching this film. I thought 5.5 IMDB rating was alittle harsh, but now I think otherwise
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
John Q (2002)
7/10
This could had been good
3 December 2002
The movie started off really well and acting by Denzel was excellent. But somehow, something went wrong in the middle and made the whole thing looked silly. It is a waste really since Denzel is a very good actor. It is the directing and the script that stuffed it all up
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
'I don't know what you want me to do'
29 November 2002
Warning: Spoilers
Spoilers.

That was what Billy said to Halle and that was what I thought the movie was about, there was not alot of direction.

The movie was pretty fast paced, and that may not be a bad thing but it can have a problem of viewers not being able to get involved in the story. There was not a moment I can feel that Billy was racist, it just seems like the actors are going through the motions but really can't connect emotionally. Bill is an excellent actor, I loved him in "Man who wasn't there", but I don't feel he got enough chance to perform here. Halle, well, she is famous for being beautiful and she got paid one extra milion for the sex scene, but can she really act? I don't know, the film didn't give her enough room to show that.

I think the main problem with this film is the story. It doesn't flow very well. One second Hank's son die and the next Leticia 's son die and tension was not even being built for these supposed 'important scenes', I got the feeling that the director wanted to get these over and done with so that we can get to the main concern in the movie, that is the relationship between Leticia and Hank. It was way too easy for Hank to feel sorry Leticia if he is a racist. And what is up with Leticia's son being killed by a car? One second they were walking on the street and the next second he was on the ground with his mom by his side.

If one just want to watch a film where a man who is extremely racial prejudice against a race and later learns to accept and ask for redemption, watch American History X. The acting in that is alittle bit more realistic.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
I am too old
28 November 2002
This is the first time I went in to see a film and I felt that I am too old for it. Not even when I saw Toy Story 2. Happy Potter I guess is not a bad movie, but I don't know why they somehow can manage to limit their target audience. I would prefer the first Harry Potter, at least it was all fresh and it is not as drained out. The problem this movie has is similar to many other sequals like Austin Powers, james bond, rocky... The sequal is the same as the first. However, those comedy movies like 'powers' do not try to take itself seriously, this one does and that is what makes it unbearable.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Ring (2002)
6/10
Don't even try to work it out...
14 November 2002
Warning: Spoilers
Spoiler

I didn't want to see this movie in the cinema. But a friend insisted and I went. The first few minutes into the movie and I see how the movie was carried out, I knew that I will be in for a long boring sleep session. When the girls heard the phone rang and they were spooked to get it and later found out it was her parent, I was about to leave the cinema. The rest of the movie was just a thriller investigation of what 'the ring' is.

I have never feel so strong negatively in my opinions towards a movie before, but this is the first one. (Not even towards Eight Legged Freaks) I thought it was really a waste of my time and degrading my intelligence. The only good part of the movie was a few seconds near the end...but of course, the damage was done...

it is infact a serious joke this movie is 7.9 HIGHER than The Birds and Rope by Hitchcock. Now that is very scary.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Rope (1948)
I love this movie
3 November 2002
Warning: Spoilers
Spoilers

Besides from Vertigo, this is probably one of my favourite of Hitchcocks. The filming technique was interesting and also the way it absorbs the viewers. Hitchcock had a very good way of doing that. It doesn't matter if the film was made many years ago, it still have this affect of triggering certain emotions.

An interesting note I think was that the reason why the guys got caught was due to their 'inferior moral' characters. They got caught because in their own terms, they are limited, obligated by their human morals. If they were not restricted in this sense, I don't think they will get caught.

A very interesting movie. 8.2/10
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
not bad drama
27 October 2002
The plot, directing and the acting is not bad. I emjoyed watching it. The ending was alittle silly sort of ruined the story. I don't know if it deserved so many nominations. If you haven't seen 'Ordinary People' yet, it is a better alternative to this movie.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Panic Room (2002)
7/10
no matter
18 October 2002
Warning: Spoilers
Spoilers.

no matter how great the directing is, if the film has a bad script, there is nothing one can do to save it. The 'baddies' in the movie are similar to the guys in 'Home Alone'; just plain stupid. When Jodie was smashing all the cameras and one of the guy said, "now why didn't we think of that" gives big indication of bad script writing. But considering the person that did the script also am responsible for Jarassic Park, I guess it is expected. David's direction is not bad, he attempted to bring in a few interesting shots and camera angles, but the 'computer generated' effect is alittle too obvious. If we are to talk about suspense and tension build ups, it is still a long way from the standards of Hitchcock.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
come here! No, you come here!
30 September 2002
Considering this was done after Taxi Driver, I would say this is very close to becoming a classic. If viewers were hopeing to see a happy musical, you may be disappointed. Why I think this movie is so good is because it is a typical Marty's movie. It is a character study. I really liked this movie. I think Bobby did a really good job here although some people may say he overacted. So if you want to watch a happy films with likeable characters, this is not for you. The only complaint I have is that the film can drag on a little. But this is a minor problem. Whether this is good or bad depends on which mind set you have and what you expect out of it.
0 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
stupid
27 September 2002
I don't know what to say...why do they always make these type of movies again and again? Many people complained about the plot holes in 'Signs'...well, all I can say, comparing to this movie, 'Signs' is a God. They could have done so much but instead retreated back to the stupid story line which had been used to death. Even 'Mars Attack' is better than this movie.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Heat (1995)
director vs script vs actors
23 September 2002
First there was Heat. Two of the best actors, Al and Robert in a movie that has a very normal (even close to boring) storyline. The story had been done to death and no great acting can save it. To make things worst, there are no (or not many) great camera work inorder to make it interesting to watch. Second came "Sleepers". We had one of the biggest all star casts but the storyline was too weak to allow the actors to do anything. The directing in this is alittle better but it is no GoodFellas.

So my conclusion is that the most important thing is the script, then comes the directing and lastly the acting. Of course, the salaries for these guys are the opposite. Actors, Directors and script writers.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
its been awhile...
21 September 2002
It gets harder and harder to find a film that you really can connect with. And it is even harder to find a film that can come close to the classic Taxi Driver. But Midnight Cowboy, dare I say, comes very close to the standards of Taxi Driver. And considering that this movie was done 9 years earlier than TD, I must say that it is pretty impressive. Jon is pretty good in this movie but I must say that Dustin is on a league on his own with Bobby D.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
done before...
17 September 2002
I don't really like to compare films. But I do feel that American Beauty is really a remake of the film Ordinary People directed by Reford. The only difference really would be that AB attempts to be a comedy also. But seriously, if you like this movie because of its acting/dramatic qualities, please watch Ordinary People.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Freaks (1932)
Sad
4 September 2002
It is rather sad to see a director would use real life people exploit their apperance and use them in a 'horror' film. What is so disturbing is even the title suggested that the human beings in the film are freaks. It is these kind of movies that sterotype and degrade men into nothing more than entertainment. I guess this movie will appeal to those that enjoy shallow, superficial movies.

I am not an animal! I am a human being! I am a man! - John Merrick
1 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Sleepers (1996)
classic example...
1 September 2002
This movie is a classic example that inspite of excellent casts, without good direction and plot the movie will still not get very far. This movie is good. But given the amount of talents avaliable, I would expect better. I mean come on, we got an all star casts here!!! Dustin, Pitt, Bobby, Kevin..whats more do you want? But somehow, there was no chance for them to reach their optimal performance in the script.

Movie is good, 6.8/10 but with the casts I would expect 9/10.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

Recently Viewed