Reviews

15 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Fluctuations (1970)
10/10
Art.....or Atrocious??
7 August 2007
What on Earth is this?

This movie is quite simply indescribable, but I'm going to have a good try.

On the surface this is just another 1960s sleazy black and white soft core porn movie that 'Something Weird Video' seem to specialise in. But this is a total off-the-wall oddity! There is ABSOLUTELY no plot to speak of here. What we have is a series of sexual scenes that seem to have been filmed, then re-filmed with other actors who appear in the film, then cut up and pasted together with no sense of continuity. We see a progression of various sexual encounters; couple, threesome, foursome, lesbian, whipping, (light)bondage, but the scenes often jump and other actors from different scenes appear in the scene taking the place of a previous actor. There is a bizarre karate fight at the start of the film between two men....this then turns into a fight between a man and a woman. The actress is wearing no underwear and some of the shots are extremely explicit. There is no real soundtrack to the film....there are a few minutes of library vibraphone music near the start, but that soon ends and the soundtrack becomes a loop of a woman moaning with pleasure(and using expletives). Add to this the sound of the karate fight(which often appears over the top of sex scenes), a phone-sex conversation which goes on for a while(and is EXTREMELY graphic...which adds to the erotic power of the film), the sound of clumping feet, and various extracts of conversation and sexual conversations...none of which ever match what is happening on screen. The acting is really odd to. Some of the actors(for example,the couple who engage in the naked karate scuffle, and who later share a bath) seem to be enjoying the experience; others seem very blank and emotionless. Especially the bearded actor who seems completely unmoved, even during the sexual scenes.

It's very difficult to tell what this all about, and what exactly the film makers had in mind when they made this. If Dali and Bunuel had decided to make ''L'Age D'or'' as a porn movie, this is probably what it would have looked like. Despite it's amateurishness, the film has a hypnotic power that keeps you watching throughout it's short (69mins) running time....which is not something you can say about a lot of these type of movies.

I'd love to have been in the Times Square dirty-mac crowd when this turned up on screen.

I've given in 10 out of 10 purely because it's such a peculiar, one-off experience....and possibly a true example of pure cinema.
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A Pleasant Surprise
19 April 2006
I really expected this to be awful, clichéd and embarrassing....BUT, this turned out to be a pleasant surprise.

Whilst strictly a teen-movie(in premise at least) there is a fair amount of nudity and swearing to lift this out of the cheese-factor. Emil Hirsch is an amiable male lead, while Elisha Cuthbert looks far more beautiful here than she ever did in '24', although it's interesting that she looks better when appearing natural, than when dolled up as a porn-starlet. Timothy Olyphant adds a certain menacing charm to proceedings by apparently playing a watered-down version of the character he plays in 'Go'.

All in all a pretty good little movie that deserves better than the lukewarm reviews it got upon it's release. Better suited for older teens though.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The Loathsome Generation
15 January 2006
Warning: Spoilers
This is actually a pretty solid little drive-in filler, that is better than it really ought to be.

The only real problem that I have with the film is that I find the three main protagonists(Acid, Daisey and Dum-dum) to be three of the most loathsome individuals in the annals of exploitation movies. The cold-blooded manner in which they strangle, harpoon, humiliate, rape and especially shoot people(mostly innocents) is pretty difficult to take over the 90 minutes and can make the movie a pretty nihilistic experience. However, all of this does mean that when they are eventually killed themselves, it's almost a blessed release.

The film's plus-points are that it is pretty well acted, although the actor playing the perpetually stoned Acid does obviously have to ham it up a bit in order to appear out of it. The film also has a pretty good psychedelic acid-drenched guitar score. Also, when Acid is gunned down and killed, the psychedelic trip he experiences in his death throes is one of the best, and most convincing, ever filmed.

Not a classic of the genre, but well worth catching.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Bad Critics Go To Hell
8 January 2006
Warning: Spoilers
It's a pity that so many non-porno movies that dare to deal solely with the issue, and repercussions of(whisper it)...sex, are often dumped in the bins marked 'Worst Movies Ever Made'. Once this happens, so many interesting movies just seem to disappear, totally under-valued.

So let's hear it for Doris Wishman and this, which may well be her greatest movie. 'Bad Girls Go To Hell' is a gem, a highly individualistic fever-dream of erotic(but never pornographic) intensity.

The movie benefits greatly from it's star, the astonishing looking Gigi Darlene, who appears to be in every frame of the movie's running time. She is quite simply one of the most beautiful screen-stars I have ever seen. In 'Emmanuelle', Sylvia Kristel was praised for looking sexy(or sexual) without even being aware that she was being so. Well it's the same with Gigi here, every movement she makes on screen seems somehow sexually charged, without her having the slightest inkling of her power. Men become weak and slobbering before her, unable to control their vile sexual lusts and frustrations, and as always seems to be the case, it's Gigi who suffers as a result.

Driven from her domestic bliss(her husband is the only man in the movie who seems capable of controlling his desires while around her) after killing a deviant who attacks her, Gigi finds herself in New York where she is befriended by a struggling alcoholic man who invites her to stay at his place. After mistakenly giving him alcohol as a 'thank-you' for his kindness, the man goes berserk and beats her, causing her to flee again. She next finds herself living with a lesbian who involved with a sleazy pornographer(pimp?), again it all ends in tears. The ambiguous ending to the film is either a happy ending or a bad ending depending really upon the viewer.

Whilst I have praised Gigi Darlene highly for this film, the main credit must go to Doris Wishman. Often ridiculed, the simple truth is that if Doris was male and/or European, she would be hailed in the same breaths as Godard, Resnais and Truffaut. Her camera work and simplistic, minimal cinematography are simply excellent. The film moves with a beat and tempo all it's own. There is no doubt that this is a purely singular vision at work, an auteur's vision. It's almost incredible that Gigi Darlene can spend so much of the movie in state of complete undress, yet we see NOTHING. The movie would hardly earn a PG certificate these days, certainly not for nudity. It's a masterclass of editing. The clear crisp photography gives the movie a look all of it's own, especially in the scenes in (a bizarrely empty) Central Park. Further credit should go to the excellent score. The jaunty flute-laden music that accompanies the scene where Gigi prepares coffee in the kitchen at the beginning of the movie, and the garage-rock style accompaniment to the scene where the two girls are dancing, are both fantastic.

There are a couple of mysteries though. Both involving images that accompany the opening title sequence. Some of the images in the titles NEVER appear in the film. Given that one of the images is also one of the most frequently used as a poster for the film(Darlene Bennett in her underwear), makes me wonder if a lot of footage was never used, or has simply been lost over the years.

Nevertheless, I cant rate this movie highly enough, even though it clearly wont be to everyones tastes. It is, in my opinion, Doris Wishman's best film, and given that Gigi Darlene appears to have so few movies, I would say it's her star turn.

Bad Girls Go To Movie Heaven.
9 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Lay off all the "World's Worst Movie" nonsense.
16 December 2005
What is it with everyone being so callous towards this movie? It's all the Medved brothers fault for including it in their '50 Worst Movies Of All Time' book. Remember, they also once said that 'Grease' was the second worst movie of all-time(after 'Plan 9...'), and that Romero's 'Night Of The Living Dead' was one of the worst movies of all time. So what do they know? Look at the the simple facts; its a Christmas movie! It's a silly sci-fi romp! It's, y'know, for kids. If you're looking for Resnais, Fellini, Brakhage, Ozu etc, don't come looking for this. And therefore don't go dissing it so severely. Have some of you NO sense of humour, or any kind of 'inner-child'? Aren't there far more unworthy movies deserving of such a verbal kicking?(Gigli, Ishtar, Swept Away etc)

Some of the plus-points the movie has, I would say, are; the Martian Home sets, which look like something straight out of the pages of Outre Magazine. The hilarious polar bear.....come on, admit that it makes you laugh. The Martian Mommy....a bit of a retro-chic thing going on, one for the older (male) kids. The theme song....be honest! You can't help singing along, especially when the karaoke-style lyric boards come up at the end.

Obviously the Mystery Theatre version will highlight the myriad flaws the movie has, so get the original version.

Hooray for Santy Claus!!

Hooray for Santy Claus Conquers The Martians!!!
13 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Criminally under-rated Belushi gem.
10 December 2005
John Belushi's screen persona is fixed in most peoples minds thanks to his performances in the raucous, knock-about comedies 'The Blues Brothers' and 'Animal House'. But here he gets the rare chance to put in a performance of exceptional depth and nuance. Belushi plays hard-boiled investigative journalist Ernie Souchak who finds himself a little too close to some major City Hall corruption, and so, on the advice of his editor and friend, he heads to the mountains of Colorado, to chill and to write a piece on a reclusive conservationist, played to exquisite perfection by Blair Brown.

The film begins as a serious piece on political corruption but soon turns into a charming, bittersweet 'fish-out-of-water' romance. The scenes set amongst the Colorado mountains feature some of the most breathtaking cinematography I've ever seen. The movie belongs to John Belushi though. He puts in a splendid mature performance, dominating the action like a major presence. It is through this movie, rather than his more famous works, that I feel we now sense the feeling of loss that his tragic early death gave the world of cinema. He carries all the weight and clout of a genuinely gifted actor, and his comic timing, even in the smallest scenes, is a joy to behold. Blair Brown, too, is another enigma. Why is she not much more famous than she is? Her performance is both tough and sexy, and she and Belushi make a great screen partnership. Throw into the mix one of the rare screen appearances from the great Tony Ganios, and this really is a movie worthy of rediscovery.

Watch for it.
30 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
California (1977)
9/10
Exceptional Civil War Era 'Spaghetti'
8 December 2005
Warning: Spoilers
The American Civil War often serves as a back-drop for 'Spaghetti' Westerns, 'The Good, The Bad & The Ugly' being the ultimate example. And while this movie never reaches the heady heights of that masterpiece, this is one of the best 'Spaghetti Westerns' I've seen to date. The first half of the movie, in particular, is outstanding. Beginning as the war ends, we find ourselves amongst Confederate prisoners looking downbeat and dejected amidst some striking rain-lashed cinematography. The bleak, muddy landscape is a perfect setting for the sad, broken figures that begin the process of returning to The South to begin the Reconstruction. Amongst them is 'California' played by Guiliano Gemma, a former Captain, who befriends enthusiastic young private Willy Preston. But their return South is hampered by renegade Union soldiers and Northern vigilantes. When Willy is killed in a barbaric fashion, California decides to take vengeance on behalf of Willy's family.

The cinematography and acting are top-notch, and the very mournful score is outstanding. It's a pity there doesn't seem to be proper DVD release for this, but keep an eye out for it on TV, or at Movie Fairs. It's well worth it.

A small classic.
10 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Corman's masterpiece.......ludicrously underrated.
17 April 2005
Despite an lengthy and variously successful career in sci-fi and horror movies, it is this movie that I personally feel is the crowning glory of Roger Corman's career. It is also, I feel, one of the greatest and most underrated gangster movies of all time. It should definitely be held in the same high regard as movies like 'Goodfellas', 'Once Upon A Time In America' and, dare one even suggest, 'The Godfather'.

Everything about this movie is superb. The lush, opulent, colour-saturated widescreen cinematography; the fantastic acting; the meticulous attention to period detail that rivals that of 'Once Upon....America'. Also, the authoritative voice-over that runs the entire length of the movie pre-dates 'Goodfellas' by some 20-odd years.

At first one might think that Jason Robards is woefully miscast as Al Capone, but this is not so. He gives Capone an edgy, lean and utterly menacing persona. The rest of the cast reads like a Who's-who of exploitation cinema; Ralph Meeker(excellent as Bugs Morant), Dick Bakalyan, Bruce Dern, Alex Rocco and John Agar. Throw in a couple of cameos from Corman regulars Dick Miller and Jack Nicholson, and this really is a cast to die for...quite literally.

If there is a problem with the movie, it's that with the subject being so viciously evil, and knowing that EVERY character and event is real, the movie has a bit of a sour tone, and can be a bit of a downbeat experience to some people. That said, I suppose the purpose of the movie is to show EXACTLY what happened, and to humanise the victims, rather than treat them as some statistics in the annals of crime. Like all the great gangster movies, this doesn't glamourise the gangster life, but makes us glad that we are not a part of that dangerous world.
45 out of 60 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Fascinating Document Of The Time
27 March 2005
Warning: Spoilers
"San Fransisco in the middle 60's was a very special time and place to be part of", wrote the late great Hunter S Thompson, and this documentary, shot as it actually occurred, tries to prove this. However time has been rather unkind to both that period of history, and indeed this movie itself.

Most of the footage was shot in the Haight-Ashbury district in the Spring and Summer of 1967. The entire area seems swamped with hippies, beatniks and weirdos. Long hair, beards, kaftans, flowers, flutes, bongos, and wild wacky jerky dancing seem to the requirements of the day.

What makes this documentary stand out from other similar films of the time(Mondo Mod for example), is that there is no arch wise-cracking patronising voice-over narration here. None of that "Hey Daddio, check these groovy cats out....Man, that's a blast. Far Out!!!" stuff. Instead we get genuine voice-overs from the people who were there. Some are very lucid and intelligent(even if they have evidently been ingesting some mind-altering substances), others however drawl and slur and talk gibberish, but this all adds to the realness of the piece. Also, there's no ADR of those interviewed on screen, so what we hear on the soundtrack are the genuine sounds of the time.

My favourite sequence occurs about half way through, in a segment called 'Life In A Commune'. A young man tells us about life in the 'Strawberry Fields' commune. As he enthuses, the camera pans around to show nothing but absolute squalor. He goes on to tell how a young woman had too many candles in her abode and how it caught fire. He saved her but she received 60% burns to her body. We see the burnt remains of her shack, and as his voice breaks with emotion, the camera closes in on a burnt and melted copy of 'The Free Wheelin Bob Dylan'. Next up is a young mother who regales all her hippie friends(and we the viewers) with her mystical/drug-related stories. She may well be tripping, but she remains lucid and enthusiastic in her oration. "We USE dope, but dope is NOT our world" she tells us. Then she goes on to explain how she took LSD even before she had even gotten high on liquor. "And on that first trip I saw the face of Jesus" she goes on, while some mournful guitar-and-flute piece plays in the background.

The film ends with footage of an anti-Vietnam rally, at which Muhammed Ali is present. Here, the movie loses a point for it's subjective editing. A clean-cut 'square' young marine tells us he's going to Vietnam in 30 days for a 1 year tour of duty. He is then harangued by some bearded, wild haired hippy who tells him that most decent American citizens want the troops home, but before the young marine has a chance to answer, the scene cuts away. We hear the rally being declared unlawful, and then the police in riot-gear move in. Instead of showing us any conflict that may have occurred, we see the placards and banners lying broken and in tatters. A powerful and moving last image.

Time has also been unkind to the film-stock that was used. What was probably a very colourful time is now reduced to murky browns and oranges, giving the film an Autumnal, sepia tone, which actually works as this is now a period curio and nothing else. The film also loses a point for the lengthy 'trip-out' sequences, as pounding acid-rock instrumentals play out, we are bombarded with strobes and oil-lights. This is okay for a few minutes, but it goes on and on and on.

A real curio, and an intriguing portrait of a strange time and place. Definitely worth seeing.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
L'Avventura (1960)
10/10
Shallow Characters In A Very Deep Film
22 March 2005
There's something strange going on in this film.

The first time I watched it, it seemed to wash over me without affecting me in anyway. Later on(and I've read this in other people's comments here as well) I found images and dialogue from the movie creeping into my subconscious; entire dreams would take place upon the island where Anna goes missing(often in monochrome), or I'd start to compare real life events to those that occur during the film. Did Antonioni plant subliminal messages within the movie? Probably not. It's more likely the masterful pace he employs here, coupled with the busy, deep cinematography is the cause of this. Notice how the backgrounds NEVER go out of focus, no matter how much is going on within the frame. Check out the scene about an hour and ten minutes in, where Sandro and the old man are talking in the middle of an extremely busy street; nothing blurs or goes out of focus, even when a tram comes in and out of the shot, nothing loses it's perspective, and as the scene ends and they walk deep into the shot we can see way past them and far, far into the distance.

This seems to be why the film has such a deep affect on the subconscious. The characters are deliberately shallow and are placed at the very foreground of every shot, yet the backgrounds are rich tableaux bustling with life. In the scenes on the island where Anna disappears, we see the main characters always in shot, yet in the background there is a feeling that something strange within nature itself is going on. The darkening of the clouds, the sudden mist upon the water, the rocks falling to the sea, even the sudden appearance of the old hermit character, all give a certain unease.

There's also the haunting feeling of the film, as Anna's friends begin, almost immediately to forget about her. Soon, they don't seem to care a jot about her, and neither, in a sense, do we. It's this feeling of loose ends and guilt on our part(for joining her so called 'friends' in forgetting about her so quickly) that leaves the deepest impression. The characters in this film are so morally shallow(the ending bears this out) yet they are the reason this film leaves such a strong impression on those who watch it, and who become captivated by it.

I cant recommend this film to everyone because I know that the Hollywood Blockbuster has reduced most modern cinema-goers attention spans to almost zero. But if you fancy a challenge, or merely wish to luxuriate in classic cinema.....begin here.
223 out of 258 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Crowd (1928)
10/10
A Silent Roller-coaster
20 March 2005
The phrase 'A Real Roller-coaster Of A Movie' has become a cliché of late, but it more than adequately describes this silent masterpiece.

The opening 15 minutes themselves zing along with a tempo and fury seldom seen outside of Scorsese's 'Goodfellas', and the film manages to maintain this pace for most of it's running time. Whilst director King Vidor at least got an Oscar nomination, it's editor Hugh Wynn who is the unsung star of this picture. His montage shots of the bustle of an overcrowded New York at times recall the more modern Koyaanisqatsi/Powaqqatsi movies.

Unlike many other silent movies, the acting here is restrained(in contrast to the pace of the film). There's no flailing arms, wide-eyed stares and melodramatic posturing that often spoils silent works. Both James Murray and Eleanor Boardman put in excellent performances which accentuate both the joy and tragedy that befalls the couple.

I find the scenes where the couples happy marriage first appears to falling apart extremely similar to Carl Dreyer's 'Master Of The House'(1925), yet where Dreyer's film moves as if it were wading through molasses, Vidor's film still moves at an exhillarating pace.

All in all then, a very modern looking silent movie, and a richly rewarding experience.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Vamos A Matar, Companeros!!!
24 April 2004
Warning: Spoilers
:Spoilers: :Spoilers: :Spoilers:

The only thing disappointing about this film is the weak-tea reviews being dished out by some critics. Critics who should know better. There's an unhealthy air of 'Kill-The-King' Syndrome doing the rounds.

Let's not beat about the bush, this film is a MASTERPIECE, and is infinately better than Vol.1. All the kick-and-rush of Vol.1 is replaced here with pacing, depth and texture. This is a homage, not just to Spaghetti Westerns in general, but to the ultimate Spaghetti; Leone's "Once Upon A Time In The West". The opening scene with Bill and Beatrix outside the Two Pines Chapel is played out against almost total silence, pretty much like the opening of Leone's marvel. Beatrix then makes a long, slow methodical process of elimination as she wipes out those who surround Bill, almost in identical fashion to Charles Bronson's 'Harmonica' as he edges closer and closer to Henry Fonda's reptilian villain, 'Frank'. The final confrontation between Beatrix and Bill is also similar to the meeting of Harmonica and Frank; it is long and never rushed(there's almost 50 minutes between Beatrix bursting through the door, and the eventual outcome). Just as Harmonica and Frank's confrontation is dealt with in mutual respect, dignity and understanding, so Bill and Beatrix's final meeting is touching and emotional as both still love each other, but must ultimately kill each other. Bill's death is dignified and romantic, a master-stroke from Tarantino.

The film is heavilly littered, or should that be bejeweled with references to the great Spaghetti Westerns; the backwards tracking shot out of the Chapel as the Deadly Vipers move in is pure Leone; the mariachi trumpet score from 'A Fistful Of Dollars' and the whistling motif from Sergio Corbucci's 'Il Mercenario'; and the whole chapter of Budd and his reformed 'gun-slinger' taking on a lousy job but being dragged into one last job for a suitcase full of cash, these are all classic Italian Western traits. Just as Vol.1 was his Eastern, so Tarantino now gives us his Western.

The acting in this movie is astonishing. David Carradine is an utter revelation, and his lengthy monologues are a joy to listen to. Uma Thurman again delivers, and kudos to Daryl Hannah and Michael Madsen for putting in the performances of their career.

The 'buried-alive' sequence comes as blessed relief to someone like me who was haunted by the denouement of George Sluizer's 'Spoorloos', and remains surely the most atmospheric and realistic burial scene in movie history.

Only two loose-ends bother me; What happened to Sofie Fatale? And if Bill felt Beatrix could never lose her Assasin mantle and live a normal life, how come he allowed Vernita to do just that? She married, had a child and settled into the family-routine. Hmmmm......

That aside, this is a work of genius, PURE GENIUS. 10/10.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The Little Girls Understand....
31 March 2004
The 'Spaghetti Western' fan's Bible, 'The Good, The Bad and The Violent' by Thomas Weisser really gives this movie a hard time, even voting it one of the Top 10 Worst Spaghetti Westerns Of All Time(No.9 to be exact)...but that's all a little too harsh. Compared to the Franco and Ciccio efforts, or any movie by Demofilo Fidani, or indeed any of the cheap, shoddy Sartana cash-ins; this is quite a solid little movie.

And it's good for a laugh.

Weisser and his cohorts even admit that the sequences in the movie featuring Django are quite droll. As are the scenes with Johnny Ringo and Black Star(called Black 'Stand' in the subtitles of the version I watched). Indeed, the scenes which parody the Spaghetti Western cliches are extremely stylish and very well done.

The song and dance numbers, often cut from American prints, are quite bizarre and I feel that this movie would be better served on a double-bill with 'Head', the Monkees movie.

A word of warning though, if you see this movie on the Japanese DVD then you'd be as well turning the English Subtitles OFF if you want to follow the plot as they make no sense whatsoever...especially in the lyrics to the songs. Or keep them on and get an extra few laughs for your money.

All in all I enjoyed this fun movie and it's certainly an alternative to, say, the vile misogyny of something like Cut-Throats Nine.
19 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
God's Gun (1976)
5/10
Kosher cowboys
7 March 2004
I don't suppose many Westerns were made in Israel, but this seems to be the most famous. It looks like they've gone for the 'Spaghetti Western' look rather than the conventional and so should appeal to those who like those movies. Well....if they can get past the terrible direction, wonky camera-work, and Leif Garrett's acting.

Van Cleef plays a preacher(looking like Satan) who is gunned down in cold blood by Palance's vicious gang. Garrett, who witnesses the event is struck dumb and heads off to Mexico to find Van Cleef's twin brother, a top gunman who vowed to his brother he would never kill with a gun again. Van Cleef heads back to avenge his brother's death, but tries to do so in a manner that doesn't involve shooting them all.

There's clearly a good Western here, but it's lost beneath the ineptitude of the film makers. That said, Van Cleef's twin performance is excellent, and Palance hams(pun not intended) it up like only he can. 5/10
12 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Cheap 'spaghetti' lacks flavour
7 March 2004
This is a very cheap and rough looking movie, even for a Euro-Western. What makes it worth catching is that it doesn't follow the usual plot of most Spaghetti Westerns, i.e. it doesn't feature the American Civil War or the Mexican Revolution as it's backdrop.

Jim(called Jeremiah in the version I saw) is the only survivor of an attack by Native Americans on his homestead. His entire family are killed, and he grows up to be a hate-filled Indian killer. This changes when he saves an Indian girl from a humiliating 'tar-and-feathering' in the local town. We later find out that it was evil property developers who organised the raid on his homestead and made it look like Indians did it. Jim/Jeremiah takes his revenge.

This has an excellent sub-Morricone guitar driven score, but is ultimately let down by it's cheap look.

And a word of caution; avoid the DVD version that's around at the moment. It claims to be widescreen but is horribly cropped and renders certain scenes nonsensical. 4/10.
5 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed