Reviews

15 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Sin City Diaries (2007–2008)
10/10
The best late-night premium cable program . . . EVER!
26 September 2007
Warning: Spoilers
When I was a kid, my family had premium cable. My hormone-saturated brain couldn't get enough of the late night programming in my adolescence. It was clearly evident that I liked to watch movies and shows with naked women. I've never lost that. However, as the march of time has mellowed me out, I need more than T&A to hold my attention. I need a quality product with good-looking people, great passion, and captivating plots. "Sin City Diaries" delivers all three, and so much more.

The first reason this show is so good is technical; it's in High-Definition. It's the second HD late-night program on the network, but it's is the best, IMO. I found "Erotic Traveler" too serious.

Everyone is good-looking. Everyone! "Sin City Diaries" employs the best looking actors and actresses available. What's more, sex scenes have heat. I credit the show's creators and directors in addition to the actors. They translated the energy and passion they have for the project into their work, and it's clearly visible on screen.

On the note of good-looking, Amber Smith plays Angelica. Wow! When I saw the original commercial for the show, I pinched myself. "That can't be right. It's too good to be true!" Oh, it's true, MrBark. When she didn't have any sex scenes in the first few episodes, I thought I recognized the con, the bait-and-switch. "She's not doing any of the scenes, herself. She's just the focal point, almost a narrator, if you will." Wrong MrBark, she has scenes. Oh boy, does she have scenes! She even has a lesbian scene in one episode. That surprised me even more. God love Amber Smith!

However, this show is not just about sex. It has plot. It has strong plots. Every episode stood on it's own. At it's worst, the episode's plot would not drop below "average" for a typical television show. At it's best, it's riveting television. Even better than the individual episodes having plot, there was a story arc! A season-long story arc that flamed the fires of love and romance with Angelica's assistants so well, it could melt the Arctic ice cap all on it's own. It was a highlight of the show's first season, perfectly paced.

Finally, the bumpers round out my praise. Shortly before and after the show, it's not uncommon to have a three minute bumper, a photo shoot, an interview, etc. My favorite was the reporter deciding whether or not to play the role of chef when the booked actor didn't make it. He decided to pass. This bumper was the first one I saw, and I would have to wait all season to see who they got for the role . . . a woman! They had to go lesbian for that scene because they didn't have a male actor, and the part was generic enough that the switch was relatively easy for being necessary. Such an insightful little bumper into the nature of film-making, I loved watching it and the episode it chronicled. The bumpers would make a great DVD special feature.

Which brings me to my conclusion, the need for a DVD release. Normally, I can leave watching a show like this and forget about it within five minutes. Not this show, it's too good. It deserves to be on DVD. I give my whole-hearted endorsement, and I don't give it lightly. This show is a work of art. Kudos! To use a baseball metaphor, not only was this show a home run, not only was it a grand slam, this show was a grand slam that ripped the baseball apart! The covering and threads fell into the outfield seats, and the core went into orbit. NASA is tracking it right now!

Can you tell I liked the show? I hope you can, because I don't have one negative comment about it. If you have Cinemax or plan to get it, check out "Sin City Diaries," hopefully with that special someone. Trust me, it will be the last television show you watch that night.
20 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Classic Tragedy of 1980s Materialism
20 May 2004
Warning: Spoilers
Many will say Weekend at Bernie's is a comedy, but is it really? This review will contain SPOILERS, so discontinue reading if you do not wish to know the story.

The tragic anti-hero is Bernie, a man who seemingly has it all. He has a great NYC apartment, a house at the beach, a boat, a high-priced sports car, women falling at his feet, and a great toupee. He is the symbol of 1980s material success. Any of us would love to be in his position, right?

Perhaps not, for all great tragedies possess a fall from grace. Bernie is successful because of his involvement in the NYC organized crime underground. This combined with his lack of self-control in regards to the Don's girlfriend results in his untimely end.

The tragedy is this: in death, no one notices. Bernie's supposed "friends" continue to use his boat, party at his house, drink his booze, and yet no one realizes he is dead. The woman who indirectly caused his death defiles and molests his corpse without noticing. This is an insult not only to his person, but his sexual prowess as well. It would seem Bernie lacked any real emotional attachments. Instead, he plunged himself into the seedy world of 1980s materialism. It was this world that would not only cause his death, but would also insult his humanity through the implication that his life was irrelevant.

Indeed, Bernie became in death what he could not attain in life, a hero. While dead, Bernie's corpse protects two losers from meeting their own untimely ends at the hands of both the New York mafia and Neptune's realm. In death, Bernie was able to give pleasure to all those around him through his possessions and, in the case of his girlfriend, his body. However philanthropy and necrophilia aside, all of these redeeming acts are meaningless because when those around him find out that he is really dead, some do not believe while others express shock. However the shock is not from losing a dear friend, but from the realization that they were too absorbed in their material lifestyle to take notice of the recently departed.

The tale of Bernie is a tragic one. A man unloved in life and death, let his story guide you. For it is not the material success that brings one happiness and love, rather it is the depth of friendship.
56 out of 72 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Fantastic! One of the best.
20 April 2004
My skill as a writer does not do this movie justice. I'm a follower of this genre. The purpose of movies like Hollywood Sins is to bring men and women together. Don't laugh. I'm serious. This movie lacks the harsh edge of those *other* films, but trust me when I say that this film pushed the softcore edge farther than I have ever seen. Guys will be happy.

For those of us who prefer a little substance, Hollywood Sins has that too. Its comedy is down right hilarious. With the exception of Rod Steele, it's the most charming comedy for late night programming I have seen. Hal Hutton is the Hugh Grant of Skinemax with a performance that often reminded me of Captain Jack Sparrow! Also, romance is definitely here. Fantastic execution of the love angle between Hutton and Tracy Ryan. I do mean fantastic. I first saw Ryan in Forbidden, but I have come to really like her. I would say she's my favorite, and like Monique Parent, she can actually act.

Fantastic film. If any couple watches this and doesn't like it, then I believe they would be hard pressed finding a title that they would both like. This is a must see.
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Objective Analysis
17 February 2004
Wow, reading these reviews I only see two points of view: Love and Loathed. Well, there could have been more balanced reviews, but my attention span is just too short.

I rated this film 4/10. Some elements work, but most fall flat. I will start with the positives.

This film has a great supporting cast with too many moments to mention. The jokes of breaking the fourth wall hit every time. The theme song "Rock the Cradle of Love" is fantastic (great bridge). The koala bear and the sorority house cannot be beat. And the "My Hair" moment at Capitol Records busts me up!

However, all is not well for this film, and most of it falls squarely at Dice's feet. His character is just not that sympathetic. Even after living through events resembling a depressing country song, his character is barely sympathetic enough to keep the story together. His "rock and roll" sequence at the recording studio is laughable. The Diceman just can't sing.

I loved the film when it was new, but when I saw it again recently, I was shocked at how bad it was. However, the film picks up when he finds the koala. Following that up with the sorority house gave a one-two punch that put the film back on track. It's a shame those set-pieces didn't come earlier in the film.

On a side note, I was a kid when this film came out. I remember the "Rock the Cradle of Love" video. When I saw it recently, I was shocked at how young that girl looks! She didn't look that young before. All a part of getting older I suppose.

Back to the film. It has some smutty elements in it, so if you're a Holy Roller, avoid this film. Otherwise, I recommend giving the film a chance. Just remember that "class" is not readily apparent.
8 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Tango & Cash (1989)
9/10
This film is NOT F.U.B.A.R.
17 February 2004
Warning: Spoilers
This film is not F.U.B.A.R. However, it did teach me what that term means. It's not often that a film this cheesy, this good can enter your heart. "Tango & Cash" isn't just a movie. It's an institution.

The common mistake many people make when they view this film is that they judge it in a conventional way. Bad move. Why? Because when you judge it in a conventional way, you get a seemingly bad film. For example, one-dimensional characters, cookie-cutter plot, one-liners every minute, etc.

However, this film rises above the conventions of film making. Sly and Kurt have a good chemistry, and that more than carries the film. However, this film has the added benefit of cheese.

Why are cheesy films looked down upon? Sure, in real life criminal masterminds can't lease/buy a former military base. Of course they never have a mechanized infantry. Surely even if they did, two men with a fully armed SUV wouldn't be able to conquer such a criminal empire.

I suppose I should have labeled that a spoiler, but is it? Is there any doubt how a movie like this is going to end? No, and that's the beauty of it.

If you like cheese, you will LOVE this film. If you don't like cheese, then you should probably watch your copy of "Titanic" for the 100th time.
16 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Model Solution (2002 Video)
10/10
For the genre, a great film.
12 March 2003
I said, "FOR THE GENRE, a great film." This is the type of film you'll only see on Skinemax late at night. For "softcore erotica" you see some bumping and grinding. It never crosses the line, but it comes as close as it possibly can. Very close. Oh, so very close.

Do people watch these films for the plot? Oh well, it involves a guy who owns a modeling agency. He gets into trouble and could lose his business and . . . oh, never mind. The main plot is so simple you can figure it out. However, they actually go for a subplot! I must say the subplot is romantic, involving the guy's best friend and the assistant. Yet, it too is quite predictable, but let's focus on the big picture: no one cares about the plot in movies like these. What do people care about?

There are eight scenes of interest. Six male-to-female scenes, one female-to-female scene, and one female-alone-in-the-shower scene. Two actors and eight actresses grace these scenes. That's a 1:4 ratio! This might "put the brakes on" for watching this kind of film with your lady, but I think the romantic subplot may be enough to compensate for this (in her eyes).

I said this was a great film. Why? It has a good-looking cast, and despite a predictable plot, it is entertaining enough for any mainstream Hollywood movie. I would compare this film to "Castle Erotica" aka "Castle Eros" within the genre. If you liked that film, you should like this one, and vice versa.
14 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Watch out for the Horny Devil!
24 February 2003
Production values for softcore erotica have increased in recent years. This movie shows it. The plot is about a reporter who dives into the realm of computer personal ads as part of an assignment. She goes from one sexual adventure to another as she listens to the sexual adventures of others. However, after the recent breakup from her boyfriend and a string of meaningless flings, she feels emotionally empty. Can she find true love?

Anyway, people typically don't watch films like these for plots, but I will say the plot is good. The romantic ending is there which is a big bonus. You can watch it without feeling too dirty.

The scenes themselves are geared towards couples. Nine of ten scenes are straight male-to-female scenes. One is a female-to-female scene. There are six males and seven females that grace these scenes. They look good for the most part. Most of the women look natural.

All in all, a good film. Not the best for this genre, but still good.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Staying on Top (2001 Video)
8/10
"La Conte," get it?
24 February 2003
"Staying On Top" is another film of the soft-core erotica genre. I liked this film, although I have seen better. The acting was generally good considering the genre.

Not many people care about the plots of films like this one, but here it is. A new, young advertising executive, Katherine Phillips, is put in charge of a new account. However her supervisor, Cindy La Conte, takes the account away from her. Ms. La Conte wants the account all to herself. Ms. Phillips quits her job from the frustration, but there's a problem. The new account specifically wanted her to do the work, not Ms. La Conte. If the head of the firm finds out that Katherine Phillips quit her job, Cindy La Conte will be out of a job. If things weren't bad enough for Katherine, she finds out that her boyfriend has been cheating on her. Can Katherine Phillips survive Ms. La Conte's schemes while dealing with the emotional turmoil of her love life? Better yet, can she succeed with her dreams?

Ah, who cares? With a gag character name like "La Conte" for the evil female villain, this film is clearly as deep as a baby pool. However, it's not supposed to be deep. This is a film that couples can watch if they're feeling up to "stimulating" entertainment.

Now here's the deal. Six scenes are straight male-to-female scenes, one scene is a one-female-shower scene, and another scene is a one-female massaging-two-other-females then-getting-it-on-with-the-third-female scene. There are three male actors and six female actresses that grace these scenes. Some don't look that good, but most do. Holly Sampson is always great, and Sasha Rochelle was great too.

It's good. If this sort of thing is your bag, check it out.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Castle Eros (2002)
10/10
A Great Film for Couples!
29 January 2003
Warning: Spoilers
I must say I rather enjoyed this film. For the sake of a common point of reference, I will outline the plot later in this review. This film is a good late-night cable film. It is explicit when compared to R-Rated films (MPAA Rating System) but not graphic when compared to hardcore pornography. It is a good balance, and perfect for couples who want to spice up their viewing habits, but don't want to feel "dirty" afterwards. In total, there are 10 sex scenes. Seven scenes are straight one-male-to-one-female scenes. One scene is a female-to-female scene. One scene is a one-male-to-two-females-with-one-female-watching scene. Then, there is one

two-males-to-two-females-where-the-two-males-have-nothing-to-do-with-each-ot her-but-the-two-females-do-have-something-to-do-with-each-other scene. Whew, I think I burned out the hyphen key! Now on to the plot summary. SPOILERS AHEAD!!!

Gabriella and Julia are two American tourists visiting Italy. Gabriella is very liberal and drives conservative Julia nuts. Things get worse when Gabriella's late night fling turns out to be a thief. With no money and no belongings Julia and Gabriella are stranded far from home. Their pride prevents them from calling home for help.

While walking the country roads of Italy, the pair come across an employee of a local castle. He takes them to the castle where the two cousins meet Isabel, the keeper of the castle. She tells a tale of the castle's origins. A prince built it for his true love. However, his family prevented the two from marrying, and fate took his life not long after. After hearing the report of her true love's demise, she dies of a broken heart. Ironically, she looks like Isabel. After her death, the castle went to the woman's sister and has been passed down to relatives through the years.

Upon finishing this tale, Isabel offers Gabriella and Julia jobs at the castle which now caters to a select group seeking romantic adventures. The two cousins accept.

During their tenure at the castle, Gabriella develops an interest in the employee that originally brought them there. This interest is peaked because he is very cool to her advances, something she has not before experienced. In the meantime, conservative Julia keeps running into the same guest over and over. Despite his bumbling approaches he charms her, but Julia is too insecure to go any farther.

The one day, Julia walks into one of the rooms. It was seemingly empty, but then a couple is in the bed making love. She sneaks out of the room but maintains a vigil. When Gabriella arrives on scene, the couple vanishes as mysteriously as they appeared.

The answer to this encounter is solved when Julia comes across a miniature castle with dolls, each of whom is representing a guest, in Isabel's room. When dolls are paired up with one another and placed in the miniature castle, the guests that are represented are magically transported to a realm where they experience a sexual encounter. However in reality, they don't go anywhere, but it sure doesn't seem like that to them.

Gabriella soon learns of this magic. She wants to really use it to give the guests a good time while Julia advocates restraint. Julia sees the magic as too powerful and chooses instead to study its origin. She discovers that the woman with whom the prince had fallen in love with was a Gypsy with magical powers. However, Gabriella is getting impatient because she really wants to play with the dolls.

Things really get heated when Isabel leaves the castle for business. "When the cat's away the mice will play," and Gabriella certainly plays with this power. However, her actions often have unintended results.

I don't want to ruin the ending. Let's just say Isabel is not who she seems to be and neither are Gabriella and Julia. Gabriella must deal with the consequences to her actions, and Julia must deal with her insecurities.

All in all, a great film. The audio on the DVD is a bit loud when compared to my other DVDs, but that it easily solved by turning the volume down. If you like this genre, buy this movie. You won't be disappointed.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Progeny (1998)
8/10
Jillian McWhirter is the best actress ever! (A bold statement, I know.)
21 January 2003
First, let me review the movie. This movie creeps me out, and I don't even believe in aliens! However, the movie has its flaws.

There are three acts to this movie. Act One is perfect. It sets up the movie, and really builds up the creep factor. I must say the score is great! Everything is set up and it's set up perfectly.

Act Two begins when Jillian, playing Sherry Burton, goes to the shrink. They hypnotize her, and she recalls the abduction. Act Two ruins the film when the aliens show up. "Screaming Mad George" did the effects for the aliens. I must say they did a good job, except with their depiction of the "Gray" aliens. No offense, but the Grays looked like inflatable door prizes.

On a side note, I liked how they treated hypnosis in Acts One and Two. If you paid attention, you would notice that the husband and wife had two different memories. In the husband's version of events, the blue light zaps them and his wife says, "Somebody's here," or something like it. It makes sense. The husband is concerned for his wife. "Someone" may hurt her. That's his issue. However in her version of events, she says, "Help me!" She does not say "Somebody's here." This also makes sense. The aliens are after her. Wanting her husband to help and save her is her issue. Now back to the film.

Act Three turns the film into a gore fest. It begins with a "strange" ultrasound procedure. It's a typical gore fest, but it does have a surprise ending. I won't ruin it because it's actually an interesting development.

The DVD and commentaries takes itself too seriously, but if you think Wilford Brimley saying "Horsesh**" is funny, you might want to check it out in the cast interviews section. Now on to my praise of Jillian McWhirter.

I could only hope Jillian will read this. I had never seen her before, but wow, what a performance! Let me tell the rest of you this. First of all, this is supposed to be a serious film. The details I will now describe may sound campy and fun, like "Humanoids From The Deep" (1980), but it really isn't. Got that? Okay.

Jillian is hot, naturally good-looking. She is naked for a lot of the film, a good thing. Unfortunately, she is usually being assaulted, terrorized, and raped, a very bad thing. However, she must act in a lot of this film naked. She gets points for overcoming that. She has to act happy, sad, horny, afraid, and physically hurt all in the span of a few moments. The turnaround of emotion is astounding! She has to cheer for joy when she learns she's pregnant. She has to scream in terror when the aliens take out her guts. She has to act very angry when her husband suggests that the baby isn't his. She has to act like she's in denial, saying nothing is wrong with her baby, when her husband says otherwise. A denial, I should note, that is really forced upon her by the aliens controlling her. I am talking Oscar-caliber performance here!

Then there is the rape scene. It's disturbing, but since it's just some rubber alien, it's not too bad. In this scene, the alien is not a "Gray" alien, so I will describe it. The alien has tentacles, and it's kind of like a table. Jillian is on the table-like part, restrained by the tentacles. By her head is the alien's head. The alien's head is long, and it flips down so that its head is now above Jillian's legs. Then, the alien's hey-nanu-nanu comes out of his forehead. It's forehead! Sounds pretty campy, right? Well, Jillian plays it straight, and she pulls it off! She has to act like an alien with its hey-nanu-nanu coming from its forehead is raping her, and she pulls it off! It's a very intense scene, but that's not what makes it. You see, this scene is done in a flashback. What makes the scene is Jillian's performance recalling these events. She is just lying in a hospital bed under hypnosis recalling the alien abduction, but her acting here is more intense than the actual rape scene! How many actors can pull off a performance in a scene that describes a rape that is more intense than the scene with the rape? Not many! However, Jillian does it.

I could go on and on. Jillian, if you ever read this, I want you to know that I, (name withheld) alias of MegamanX-1, believe you are the best actress ever. You are the best actress ever! I could only hope you read this and take it with you always.

As for everyone else, "Progeny" (1999) is an Okay to Good film. I would recommend it.
8 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Alien Seed (1989 Video)
2/10
This film went in the wrong direction.
11 October 2002
Warning: Spoilers
I was disappointed with this film mainly because I was expecting a different movie. To credit the film, this was an "X-File"' like plot before there was an "X-Files" show. However, the movie was as cheesy as it could be without taking place in Wisconsin.

This movie just took itself way too seriously. There was a lot of violence and action but little nudity and no sex, despite the theme of impregnation. The nudity is brief, only in the few strip club scenes, which implies more nudity and sex to follow when the scene first pops up, no pun intended, but alas, it's a tease. This is where Lisa Jordan, played by Heidi Paine, works. She's not a stripper, so we never see her naked. Instead, she is a waitress who needs a paying job while she's working on her thesis. That's right, writing a thesis for graduate work in academia is what she's doing; it makes perfect sense, right? Heidi is hot though. After all, strip clubs don't hire ugly women as waitresses . . . or so I'm told. She spends the whole movie answering the question, "Who really needs a bra anyway?" I know I don't!

There was another character that "aroused" interest. She was this assistant to a New Age reverend who happened to be wearing a leather mini-skirt, but the writers drop the character! Where did she go? You don't drop hot characters when your movie sucks, at least not before they get naked.

The director went with a surreal vision that doesn't work; the beginning is all over the map, making little sense. The story also has many parallels with the original "Terminator," like our heroes hiding out, how the movie ends, etc. Apologies for the "spoiler" there, but believe me, you can't spoil this crappy movie. Perhaps this direction would have worked if the production values weren't so low, but I doubt it.

The special effects looked like animation from a personal computer, a 1989 personal computer. The background 1980s synthesizer music was overdone, and the dialog was horrible. There is a part where some guy named "Officer Davis" comes forward with testimony that is way too specific. It makes little sense because everyone else who has come forward has been killed, so why did he testify? The answer is "exposition" of course. With that said, maybe some mystical force was at work, and the character became self-aware that he was in this flop, so he suicide-by-cops himself into a dirt nap to escape the script? Now that would be an interesting story, relative to this film's story anyway.

The editing was also atrocious. There is a particular car chase that goes from an exterior shot of the cars in a field, to an interior shot of one of the drivers. When you look over her shoulder, you can see that she's in the city. The shot goes back to the exterior view, and they're back in the field! There was also a scene where a writer was typing on a typewriter. Would you like to guess whether or not the typing sounds matched his keystrokes? If you said that they didn't match, you win a gold star.

Of course the actors were overly melodramatic, but I must give Erik Estrada some credit. He gave it his all. Ponch pulls no punches, earning his paycheck.

The stunts were also laughable. For example, there was a hit-and-run involving a pedestrian: the car stops, the pedestrian hops on the hood, and the car speeds away. Also, empty cardboard boxes stop a moving car involved in a chase, spinning the car out. I laughed my ass off again when they showed a motorcycle wreck in slow motion. In my view, that motorcycle could not have been going faster than 5 mph. They must have skipped insuring this film or something.

However, I will give the filmmakers credit for their use of squibs in the gun shot scenes. There were two really cool gunshot wounds, one in some lady's forehead and one in some guy's back that blasted through his stomach. The forehead shot elicited a genuine Keanu "Whoa!" from me.

In summary, this film is cheesy. I like cheesy films, but this one went the wrong way. It went the serious, violent way. The film should have gone the comedic, sexy, or even pervy way. The film is supposed to be about alien impregnation, so have fun with that! Instead, the aliens are barely in the picture, and they impregnate the ladies by zapping something through their bellybutton. I don't know about you, but if I'm traveling thousands of light-years to impregnate hot Earth women, I'm going to do it the fun way.

This film wasn't going to win Academy Awards; the only genre that would have worked for this film was the B-rated soft-core erotica genre. I could only imagine what the genius Alain Siritzky could have done with this project.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Maximum Exposure (2000–2002)
Dude, this show rocks!
20 August 2002
Rarely in the course of human events can people view the tragedies that plague our fellow man and laugh our asses off at the same time. "Maximum Exposure" provides just that.

We have all seen those reality TV shows where the narrators describes the video (like we couldn't figure it out ourselves) and, in the cases of so-called comedy reality shows, the narrator makes really bad commentary in a futile attempt at a joke, such as "America's Funniest Home Videos." Max-X is not like those shows.

There is a narrator, in a sense. I view the narrator as a surfer dude who got a hold of some kick-ass videos and is now showing them to his best buds. Every week there is a theme, such as PainFest, Recipe for Disaster, and Wild in the Streets.

One specific example of a clip is this: A Greenpeace zodiac boat is trying to board a Russian ship that has been illegally clearing trees for lumber. One of the activists, a woman, manages to get on board. However, the Russian sailors throw her overboard. The surfer dude narrator states,

"Dude, you know there's something wrong when Russian sailors throw a perfectly good woman away!"

Max-X is the only reality show worth watching, period.
15 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Grand Theft Auto III (2001 Video Game)
9/10
Not for the Kids
28 May 2002
This game has to be the best programmed game in video game history. On the other hand, this game is so violent and evil, for lack of a better word, that this game should not be played by children.

Now, I like the game. I play it often. When I have a bad day, it's nice to play GTAIII and take out my frustrations on the unsuspecting citizens of Liberty City.

This game is fun if you already have a developed sense of right and wrong. For some younger gamers, this game would completely warp their minds.

If you're a parent, please keep this game out of your kids reach. If you're mature enough to handle the subject matter, then rock on. This game is quite an experience.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Citizen Kane of Cheesy, 1980s, Teen Sci-Fi
21 May 2002
Warning: Spoilers
I was five-years-old when this movie first came to HBO. I haven't seen it in a while, but I still have a good impression of it. If you like cheesy sci-fi films, you'll like this one.

<SPOILER ALERT> The premise of the movie is fantastic. A UFO crashes decades ago. What does the military do with it? They put it in a junkyard where high-schoolers have access to the strange craft's engine.

Now Michael tries to pass off the alien time-warp engine as his own science project. Now, I've studied to be a teacher, and there's no way on The Good Lord's earth that ANY teacher would believe this was a student's own project.

My favorite part was when they were trying to outrun the electric tendrils of the gizmo. Now let's see, electricity runs at THE SPEED OF LIGHT!!! According to Einstein, NOTHING but energy can go as fast as light. Yet, THEY OUTRUN THE TENDRILS! I don't care how good your car is, it can't run that fast! This is so cheesy, you have to love it.

I would have to say that Dennis Hopper, the teacher, and Fisher Stevens, the best-friend Vince, give Academy Award winning performances, if the Academy had a sense of humor. The best line belongs to Stevens. As Vince is having his mug shot taken, the cop asks him why he's wearing sunglasses at night (How '80s is that?). He replies, "When you're cool, the sun shines on you 24 hours a day." Great delivery.

If you like cheesy films, you must, MUST, see this one.
8 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Gets Better Every Time I See It.
17 May 2002
Please forgive the length of this first paragraph, but it is needed to explain my opinion of this film. I never saw this film in the theater; it looked a little silly to me. One day a few months later it came on pay-per-view. Due to a technical glitch the cable company unscrambled the pay-per-view channels all day long. It also happened to be raining and generally miserable out, so my buddies and I decided to watch this movie. We had three pay-per-view channels, and one of the channels showed a single movie all day long. Guess which movie it was.

The first time we watched it, we thought it was goofy, even stupid, and didn't really care for it. However like many teens, we mindlessly watched it again . . . and again . . . and again. We watched this film all day. "Why?" you ask; because it truly gets better every time you watch it.

I think the reason is because this is a stupid film, and when you first watch it, you're too smart for it. Eventually though the IQ points seep out of your head, and you're able to fully enjoy this great movie.

The bottom line: Watch this film at least 5 times, not necessarily back-to-back but it helps. It will grow on you. Even if you don't like Farley, watch this film for Chris Rock. Rock's performance is perfect, despite being too small of a role. Farley's performance is perfect as the bumbling but good-hearted "Great White Ninja." Even the chicken's performance is perfect. If you find the concept of a fat, white ninja involved in an Asian gang war mildly provocative, check your brain at the door and enjoy.
50 out of 60 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed