Reviews

4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Showgirls (1995)
1/10
nearly unwatchable
14 June 2003
Warning: Spoilers
'showgirls' made entertainment weeklys list of top 50 cult movies, so my friends and i decided to make it a 'weekender.' in other words, we expected it to be bad, but watchably bad. (think 'the toxic avenger').

we were wrong. the acting, all of it, was wooden. elizabeth berkley has no sex appeal and moves as if she were made entirely of elbows. her ineptitude at the simulated sex scenes led one friend to state she 'must have been a virgin when she made this; theres no other excuse.'

even gina gershons performance, which has been touted as the only reason to watch this film, is subpar. her not-at-all passable texas accent is only surpassed in irritation factor by her constant use of the word 'darlin'.'

***POSSIBLE PLOT SPOILERS***





despite the horrid acting, the movie could have been saved if the story had been better. the 'shady past' card is played too early, with not enough payoff, and the 'i-found-myself' ending is completely unsatisfactory for the way the plot develops. the attempts at humor fail; the attempts at drama are funny. the only points i can give are for a few visually stunning dance/club sequences, but trust me, its more to do with lighting and less with 'dancing.'

this ones not even worth it for the kitsch factor. save 2 hours of your life and skip this one.
3 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
still fun -- even though im not in junior high anymore
10 October 2002
i dunno. theres just something about this movie.

yeh, in actuality, its probably dreck. its probably worthless and people probably wont remember its years and years from now when they start making out the lists of '90s movies that changed the sphere of moviemaking.

so what?

for me, this movie really does capture the feel of the mid-'90s. i was like these people once. i wore an outfit scarily like the one liv tyler sports (although without the hideous unders combo, im sure), i knew people like every one of the 'archetypes' from the movie and i really, really wanted to work in a record store. hasnt everybody? and doesnt everybody want there to be a cool record store like this in their town?

i guess for me it is a nostalgia thing, but i watched it (again) the other night with my boyfriend, and we both still laughed during the funny parts and cuddled during the sweet parts and, well, danced during the dance parts.

its just fun to look back on such a 'time-period' movie like that ... the clothes, the attitudes, the music even ... how good is it to hear the gin blossoms again, eh?

im sure many would disagree, but for someone who was right there when it was all happening, so to say, its a gentle reminder of the days before mtv committed suicide, before liv tyler started making 'real' movies, and when phrases like 'whats with Today, today?' could travel through a junior high faster than mono.
20 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
go back in time -- see the original
27 July 2002
'the time machine,' 1960s style, starring rod taylor and directed by the revered (amongst cult movie fans) george pal, was and still is one of the best sci-fi action/adventure films ive ever seen.

its 2002 reincarnation starring memento's guy pearce deserves to be disowned. directed by an h.g. wells' descendant (and first-time live action director) simon wells, the filming is choppy. i have only four words for mr. wells ... tight, middle and long (shots that is.) grueling action sequences of tight shot, bad cut, tight shot, rapid-fire, one after another leave one a bit motion-sick.

guy pearce, whom i expected much better from after his performance in 'memento,' acts with as much expression as a block of wood. the morlocks, while more technologically advanced in this incarnation, have lost their sinister vibe through the wonders of cgi. the monsters, now looking something like a cross between harry potter's voldemort and the green dog-demon creatures from 'ghostbusters,' are just not menacing.

add to all that a plot twist that simply doesnt make any sense and you've got 96 minutes of painful movie viewing. im glad i went with my first instinct and rented it, but sorry i didnt follow the advice of the video store guy to leave it on the shelf. dont bother. sometimes newer (i.e. more technology) is not always better.
8 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Nostalgia inducing -- even for people born in the '80s
4 July 2002
'Dazed and Confused' is one of those rare movies that's not 'feel-good,' but nevertheless makes you feel good. All the components (cast, setting, story, soundtrack) combine in this film to make for a unique, enjoyable, nostalgia-inducing experience, even for someone who wasn't alive in the '70s.

The characters are well-developed, mixing elements of 'good guy' and 'bad guy' in several character, with only two notable personas, Darla (Parker Posey) and O'Bannion (Ben Affleck) not leaving you wishing they were your friends.

All in all, this movie's a great way to spend a rainy afternoon, especially if you've got a couple of six-packs and a group of pals to share it with.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed