Reviews

16 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Playmates (1941)
7/10
Enjoyed it!
16 July 2012
I have to agree with akroyal's review above, and say that I really enjoyed this movie and laughed out loud many times! Although I did know that Barrymore was a great and respected actor when I watched the movie, I wasn't all that familiar with his life story, so his scenes didn't have a pathos or pain for me. I didn't feel pity for him: I believe he was having fun with a silly, over-the-top role, and was giving it his all.

I'm not a fan of Kay Kyser, and find him rather silly, but he was okay in this movie. Can't say the same for the members of his band, though, whose dopey dialogue and antics got tiresome fast.

I am a big fan of Patsy Kelly, and she gets lots to do here, which adds to the merriment.

All in all, a really fun comedy!
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Will Rogers' tiresome putdowns
10 January 2011
This was the first Will Rogers' movie I'd seen, and I really came to dislike him in it. His constant, increasingly unfunny putdowns during the rehearsal in his home started to irritate me quite quickly, and coupled with his controlling behaviour of his wife I thought he came across as an annoying and unpleasant character. I know Rogers' is a movie icon, so I'll give him the benefit of the doubt that his other characters are not as unlikeable as this one.

Rogers aside, the rest of the movie is a gem! The disastrous play, overacting amateur actors, Billie Burke's larger than life take-off of Mae West, the pompous director, and the backstage disasters all make it very funny, especially if you've ever been involved with community theatre.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Actress (1953)
7/10
Long winded and short on action
8 March 2010
I knew nothing about this movie when I began watching it, just that it was a biography of the actress Ruth Gordon, who I had seen in a couple of movies. Therefore, I was expecting a full biography, from childhood to middle-age, and was puzzled and bored after a while when things just didn't progress. It turns out that the time frame of the movie takes place during a couple of months, when Ruth finishes high school and goes off to New York to become an actress. So we see scene after scene of Ruth, her friends and her mother talking about her ambitions and how they need to hide them from her father, who wants Ruth to have a steady job as a phys-ed teacher.

The fact that this movie was adapted from a play becomes evident as key scenes (which would require additional actors and sets) are never shown, such as Ruth meeting the actress who inspired her backstage, and her audition with a famous director. Including these scenes would have livened up the movie considerably.

Also, Jean Simmons was just too beautiful to play Ruth Gordon. And she kept going on about how short she was, which although true for the real Ruth is not the case with Jean! However, I enjoyed Spencer Tracy's performance immensely, though, as Ruth's grumpy father. As others have said, his description of his childhood at the dinner table is riveting.
0 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Enjoyable but inaccurate?
12 February 2010
I thought this movie started out with a bang, with rousing ragtime numbers, but then drifted into dull ballads and slower music. I kept on wondering what happened to the peppy ragtime! And surely the songs played after the boys returned from WWI were not from the 1920s? Didn't sound like it.

The story got a bit dull after the promising beginning, but the stars Powers, Faye, Ameche, and Haley were all entertaining in their ways and great to look at.

Also, I was distracted by the inappropriate costumes, which again started out correct for the turn of the century, but for some mysterious reason became 1930s fashion after WWI. The skirts were too short, the jackets had shoulder pads and nipped in waists, and the women's hairstyles and hats were totally wrong for the 1920s. I kept wondering how many years had passed!

All in all, a good movie, but could have been better in some ways.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Too much singing, not enough plot
12 November 2009
Unlike much of the other posters here, I really didn't enjoy the many musical numbers in this movie, and thought more acting and plot was needed. The first number on the train went on waaaaaay too long, I thought it would never end! I think I clocked it at around 8 minutes of silly, uninspiring singing. I would have liked to have seen some classroom scenes, a football game, or anything that positioned the action in a college. The sets were spectacular art-deco architecture and interior decorating, making me wonder if the movie had actually first been envisioned as a sophisticated Manhattann penthouse romp.

Not a terrible movie, but nothing much happens in my opinion.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
17 going on 30
24 August 2009
Warning: Spoilers
I agree with the other reviewers about this movie being lovely to look at, and Rex Harrison and Kay Kendall are indeed very funny, but I was astounded at what the 17 year old Sandra Dee got up to! Drinking sherry (sherry?! was that the usual cafe drink for teenagers then?) like she'd been doing it all her life, staying out until 5 in the morning, smoking, and at the end of it all deciding to marry a guy she'd only seen a couple of times! And ridiculously, her father (Harrison) is totally nonchallant about it all.

I know that in a lot of these old movies people got married after only knowing each other a couple of days or weeks, but a 17 year old? It beggars belief, and became annoying. What was the point of making the daughter a teenager if everone was going to behave as if she was 30?

A somewhat funny movie, but Sandra Dee is obnoxious rather than endearing, in my opinion
5 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Cluny Brown (1946)
3/10
Boring: Cluny should have remained a plumber
21 January 2009
I thought this movie started out well: funny and unusual, with the main character of a female plumber in London. I was anticipating lots of funny situations as Cluny plied her trade around the city. But Cluny is quickly moved into the boring typical role of housemaid in a stuffy English manor, and nothing much of interest happens after that. Within days she becomes engaged to the local chemist (I found it unbelievable that such a beautiful woman would settle for the unattractive, dull chemist as a suitor: surely men from miles around (of every class!) would have been beating a path to Cluny's door!).

Good performances from Jennifer Jones (although her British accent wasn't very strong) and Charles Boyer, however.
10 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Very enjoyable movie
2 December 2008
I really enjoyed this movie, and I'm not a classical music fan. The story of the tough street kid discovering classical music and changing his ways was great to watch, without being sentimental or too unbelievable, although some details had me scratching my head (Frankie and his dog can live in the basement of the school without any of the students or teachers discovering him? Where did he eat? Bathe? Did he ever get a change of clothes? What did he feed his dog? The owner of the school didn't think it was important to notify the police about finding a missing boy, but let him live in the basement indefinitely? :-) ). But we can let such unrealistic details slide and just enjoy the touching, fun, and slightly suspenseful (for me, anyway) story and wonderfully talented children.

I loved the scene with the mothers standing shoulder to shoulder on the steps barring the policemen from entering the school: I doubt they would get away with that nowadays. And I liked the nice touch about the boy Frankie stole from turning the tables on him (although that never really went anywhere), and Frankie's friends helping him out in the end.

All in all, a great movie for everyone!
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Confusing, bizarre beginning puts you off
11 August 2008
Warning: Spoilers
As the other reviewer says, the bizarre and confusing beginning to this film almost put me off sticking with it: I couldn't figure out what was going on when the narrator talked both to the modern girl passing by in Budapest and the older woman who used to be his neighbor, and action in the story was stopped while he pointed out details in Nazi costume, etc. This merging of the past and present, and actors playing themselves playing an historical character (!) added nothing to the film except confusion.

Once this nonsense is over, however, things proceed in a regular fashion as the narrator's mother is arrested while walking the street, herded onto a train bound for Auschwitz, and then successfully confronts the Nazi commander and is allowed to return home.

Now I love Pauline Collins, and she is a fine actress, but I felt she was miscast here, maybe she is just too much of an English icon for me to believe her as a Jewish Hungarian. And sorry, but what "courage" did she exhibit? She meekly went along with the other deportees even though she had a "Red Cross Exemption", didn't offer the thirsty girl one of the plums in her purse (that bugged me!), and only spoke to the Nazi officer because her neighbor dragged her bodily across the floor and shoved her out the door in front of him. If the neighbor hadn't done that she would have got on the train with the others without a word. And why didn't she mention the girl who had been captured by mistake? She returned home seemingly without a thought for those left behind. I realize that we are viewing the film with hindsight as to what fate awaited the deportees, which Elsa didn't have and that as far as she was aware the others were just being sent off to another country, and perhaps in the book there is some mention of her feelings about the others she left behind, but in the film she comes across as meek, somewhat selfish, and driven more by naiveté than courage when confronting the officer.

This film left me with the thought "Is that it?"
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Depressing and anti-climatic
5 August 2008
Warning: Spoilers
I watched this movie last night, as it was a "classic" I had put off seeing for many years. I always had the idea it was a comedy, but after and hour and a half I was getting beaten down by the continuous disasters and disappointments incurred on the characters: illness, bankruptcy, infidelity, blackmail, loss of a career, it just went on and on. Yes, there were comic moments, and I agree that Marie Dressler was marvelous in both her comic and dramatic scenes, but by the time Barrymore was preparing to kill himself I could stand no more. And when we finally get to the dinner, which the entire first half of the movie seemed to be setting up for, nothing happens! (including the dinner itself)! After spending so much time laying out and intertwining the stories of these characters, they only actually meet each other for 10 minutes at the end of the movie, during which nothing really happens. I expected them to all sit down to dinner, during which the sparks would fly and all the problems would come to a head, instead everything is pretty much resolved in individual scenes before they even arrive for the dinner.

A disappointing and depressing movie, with just a few great moments.
2 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Harem Girl (1952)
8/10
I Love Lucy in Arabia!
28 July 2008
I had taped this movie off of TCM, and was really enjoying it when my tape ran out halfway through! But the part that I saw was very funny, thanks to the actress playing Susie, who I'd never seen before. I started watching assuming this was going to be a typical corny 1950s Arabian adventure movie, but when Susie started cracking wise with her man-hungry and self-depreciating comments it was a delightful surprise! It was like an episode of "I Love Lucy" in Arabia, as Susie was chased by the villains, danced hilariously with the harem girls, and hid in giant vases and under beds, while helping the princess and her loyal supporters reclaim the throne.

I hope I'll be able to see the entire movie sometime, and others by this hilarious actress!
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
I love Jack Carson, but....
22 July 2008
I love Jack Carson in any movie I've seen him in, but I'm afraid I found this one boring, and fast-forwarded through most of it. I enjoyed the beginning, when Jack was treating the kids to ice-cream and joining in the Captain Marvel fan club, but once it got to the murder mystery it went downhill and became a mess of slapstick aimed at little children. But even kids couldn't sit through the too-long chase scenes. It needed a more clever zaniness, and I kept thinking how much better it would have been with Bob Hope and his self-depreciating humor in the lead, making clever quips.

Kudos, however, to the actress playing Jack's girlfriend, who gets dunked, dragged, and knocked down incessantly and yet manages to keep one step ahead of the villains! I really felt for her when she was trying to get Jack off the rope he was swinging on, and she got dragged back and forth until she fell onto the dusty ground!
6 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Bad songs
4 April 2008
Warning: Spoilers
I can't say I enjoyed this movie. I fast-forwarded through all of the songs as I found them dull, uninspired, and repetitive. Not Loesser's best, and no way near as good as those in Guys and Dolls. I found Robert Morse interesting to watch, although I kept hoping right up to the end that he would somehow get his comeuppance and be knocked back down to window washer! Although his tricks were fascinating, he was rather obnoxious and unpleasant in how he used people and didn't care who he crushed on his way to the top (yes, I know it is satire, but he still was irritating!).

I did find that things picked up near the end, but the ending itself didn't make sense to me. Why was it suddenly forgotten that Ponty had caused 6 offices to be wrecked and the company to lose money? Why did Michelle Lee suddenly forget that she was disgusted with Ponty for stealing Bud's idea and become his fiancée again? The art direction and colours were fabulous though, and I really enjoyed the sets and those enormous offices!
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Fun family movie
1 April 2008
Warning: Spoilers
I really enjoyed this movie, and laughed aloud several times. The father was for the most part lovable, in spite of his stubbornness and temper, and the 3 daughters were lovely, as was the Scottish policeman! I just couldn't understand the father's prejudice against the Scotsman as a suitor of his daughter: I mean, he had a good job, was kind and helpful, and steady. I guess it can only be explained by his stubbornness and the belief that the Scotsman in some way was responsible for his forced retirement. But this attitude seemed to be carried to a too harsh extreme when he disowned his daughter after she married the Scot, although he came round in the end.

There were a couple of bothersome things for me: I found both of the policemen helping themselves to the Italian vendor's fruit without paying to be out-of-character. I really couldn't believe that the upright Scotsman would basically steal like that. And the general disappointment and grandfather's anger when the grandchild was announced to be a girl was again a bit hard to take in this day and age.

But the election scenes were a real hoot, especially when the father is trying to dissuade people from voting for him! And Alan Hale Sr. is as always extremely watchable.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Extras (2005–2007)
8/10
HIilarious, but a bit predictable
27 March 2008
While this is a great, hilarious, unique show, I find it too predictable that the guest stars are simply made to behave in the opposite manner to their public and screen image: Kate Winslet is crude, Daniel Radcliffe is conceited and horny, Ross Kemp is a coward, Ian McKellan has no clue about the acting process, and so on. Lazy writing on Gervais' part, I think. And you really have to know your British actors and show biz personalities to get the in jokes: many will be lost on American audiences who won't recognize the guest stars.

And while I love the scenes with "Barry" and Darren, I find it a guilty pleasure to see Shaun Williamson humiliating himself so much.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Judy in black-face!
21 February 2008
Warning: Spoilers
I agree with most of the other comments: dull songs and a somewhat boring movie. I loved Fanny Brice as the Russian maid though: after watching her first scene I wondered "Who is that?" and looked it up. I had only heard of her through the movie "Funny Girl" (which I didn't like and couldn't sit through). The Baby Snooks number was awful, a total embarrassment: imagine a 46 year old woman dressed up like a toddler and speaking baby-talk! I'm surprised no one else has mentioned the jaw-dropping scene where Judy appears in black-face, her hair sticking up in cornrows all over her head, and sings a bouncy down-South number with all the usual racist stereotypical mannerisms of the time. Quite startling to see!
7 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed