Reviews

16 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Good Relationship Dynamics
25 April 2003
I initially rented this movie, because I confused it with Macon County Line (which I have never seen but heard was good). So I came into this movie without any prior knowledge to plotlines or previous recommendations or criticisms. I was pleasantly surprised. I have just finished watching it about ten minutes ago. Although the audience is supposed to be oooohed and aaaaahed by the car chases, I was mostly impressed with the relational dynamics between the three leads. The movie takes two long-time buddies and throws a crazy girl into the mix.

Characters: Bo (Nick Nolte)-Bo is a bit hot-tempered and obviously not the brains of the group. He is the "driver" of the movie's centerpiece, a flashy yellow Chevy. He is loyal, almost to a fault and determined.

Harley (Don Johnson)-Harley seems to be the brainier of the two. He does tend to look out for Bo a bit. He's the "mechanic" of the car.

Janelle (Robin Mattson)-Janelle was a waitress, who suddenly latches onto the two boys, romantically with Bo. She's quite crazy and will do anything.

Plot: Harley has finally put his greatest touch to the yellow Chevy, Bo's and Harley's pride and joy. They are on their way to California to enter the National race, having fun and flings on the side. Along the way, Janelle jumps onto the bandwagon, despite Harley's misgivings. She begins to form a bond with Bo, while Harley is out testing the car. During the test drive, Harley gets into a drag race and wins. The loser claims that Harley cheated, and so the two get into a fight over the $100. In a major sub-plot, the gang gets into trouble with Sergeant Whittaker, who becomes obsessed with their capture.

As I said earlier, I greatly admired how the relationship worked between Harley, Bo, and Janelle. The plot was almost used solely to create the dynamic. Bo feels he must choose between racing (and hence Harley) and Janelle. Harley quietly resents Janelle and rationalizes her craziness is dangerous. Janelle feels the intruder, yet is still a member of their little bunch.

I will point out that this movie is good, but not great. It's good for a one-time viewing.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A Good Sequel, but
30 January 2003
I really enjoyed watching Part II, but I would not say it was as good or better than Part I. In Part I, there is the story of the descent of Michael into the "family business". Part II is more like a good mafia story without much more. Only at the end, does Michael see the consequences of his choices but is so deeply trapped that he no longer cares. I liked the ending of the first story, leaving us only to imagine Michael's future. I was also much more confused by the Hyman conspiracy plot. On the plus side, I appreciated the flashbacks much more. It was a great insight into the man that was to become Don Corleone. I wonder how great the movie would have been if they merely expanded on that storyline.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Pulp Fiction (1994)
8/10
And the point was
15 January 2003
I picked this movie up from the video store and watched it last night. I mostly got it hearing that it was a great, one of the best movies of the nineties. I have to say I was let down. Yes, it was a very intriguing piece of fluff (considering it was about violence). I mostly found it very funny at times, the way these mean gangsters act like regular people. For example, Vincent and Jules are calmly discussing the level of intimacy a foot massage implies right before they go inside an apartment with guns to teach some twenty-somethings a lesson. However, when all is said and done I felt as if there should have some point to the movie. The only characters who evoked any sympathy were minor characters. I will confess I totally loved "The Bonnie Situation" sequence, but it was way too short in comparison with some of the rest of the movie. I wish the whole movie was that light-hearted or had expanded the story out for two hours. On the other hand, I was almost bored during the story about Vincent taking Mia to the restaurant. Overall, it was a good movie, but the quality changes throughout.
6 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Moulin Rouge! (2001)
7/10
Splashy, but Unorginal Plot
9 January 2003
I have to say probably the best thing about this movie was the orginal arrangement and splicing of well-known songs. Sure the songs themselves are not orginal, but I really enjoy the creative use of them. Both soundtracks are a joy to listen to, except many of the songs are the orginal cut and not how they were played in the movie. Onto the problems. This is an out and out rip-off of Camille. Both stories are set in Paris at about the same era. Both Satine and Marguerite are women who use their bodies to get what they want. This later backfires when they actually fall in love with the wrong men. Both men come from poorer backgrounds but are armed with high ideals. There are also men in both stories using their money to buy the affections of Satine or Marguerite. To complete the case for plagerism, both women have consumption which plays a major role in their decisions.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Proof of Life (2000)
8/10
Intelligent Action Film
18 December 2002
This is a great, intelligent action film. While the beginning seems to drag as the premise is set-up, it picks up later to keep the viewer hooked. However, the movie falls short when it looks into the emotions of the characters. The film may have been much better had it developed the emotional side more or completely cut it out, creating a strict action genre.

Our story has Peter and Alice Bowman (David Morse and Meg Ryan). Peter is an engineer who has traveled to exotic places around the globe in pursuit of his dreams to help others create a better life. Throughout his travels, he has brought his "hippie" wife along and they are happy in a rich, fulfilling, globetrotting life. Their current project is to build a dam in Tecala (a thinly disguised Columbia) to stop the regular flooding, but Alice is feeling world weary. She wants to go home and start a family with Peter. She is equally unhappy about the fact that the money for dam project is coming from an oil company, that wants to get goodwill with the gov't to build a pipeline.

The story takes off when Peter is caught in an ambush along with many other people on a major roadway by a guerrilla group. We soon learn that the group, once communist, is now only interested in the cashflow. The incoming cashflow comes from foreigner ransoms and cocaine. The oil pipeline threatens their cocaine operations, so when the group learns of Peter's affiliation with oil company he is not set free but kept for ransom.

Enter Terry Thorne (Russell Crowe). He is an extremely professional negotiator, dealing with foreign hostage situations by terrorist groups. Alice is immediately comforted by his apparent understanding and knowledge of these situations.

So the movie progresses along two story lines. 1. We see Peter's experience as a hostage. 2. We see Terry and Alice working on the other end to free Peter. Both story lines are clearly and intelligently written. Peter's character is fleshed out much more, as a kind, sensitive man, very much in love with his wife. We also see Terry's ironically successful attempts at negotiating.

What works: The intelligent story line of the negotiating process, based on the true stories of kidnappings in South America. Also Peter's life as a hostage is an intriguing dual story line to deal with. This story would have worked very well had Peter not been seen at all throughout the experience, but Peter would have remained one-dimensional and not given any richness to the story.

What didn't work: The emotions. Terry's backstory seemed all fluff and no substance. The movie may have been better if Terry had no story prior to entering the picture in regards to his family. Also, I almost had trouble seeing any romantic feeling between Terry and Alice. I only saw a true respect for each other in the on-going crisis. I think the film should have either 1. Pushed the attraction of Terry and Alice much more. or 2. Completely cleared it. I felt like going half-half did not succeed. Another problem I had with the story was Terry himself. I was quite impressed with Terry's negotiating skills and brains. Later, he dons camo and becomes super-soldier. He seemed to be too super-heroish and almost became unreal.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Love Story (1970)
9/10
Few Movies Make Me Cry
16 December 2002
Few movies make me cry, but this one did. Twice. Even though we all know what is going to happen, since Oliver (Ryan O'Neal) tells us in his wonderfully moving first line, "What do you say about a girl who died?", it sneaks up on you. The success of "Love Story" relies heavily on the acting of Oliver and Jenny (Ali McGraw) and the chemistry they had together. It could have bombed, but everything clicked. Also look out for a very young Tommy Lee Jones in a small role as one of Oliver's Harvard friends. It is curious to note his appearance, since he was a Harvard alum and roommate with Al Gore. (Al Gore claimed that he and Tipper were the inspiration for the story.) The touch and feel of the movie feels like Harvard and college. It is obvious that the writer, Erich Segal, attended Harvard as well.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Two Road Escapees
2 December 2002
Bob Hope and Dorothy Lamour team up for this spoof on private eyes movies, particularly Sam Spade. Hope plays a baby photographer who dreams about being a real private eye, like his friend. One day he is mistaken for being his friend, which Hope chooses not to correct, by Lamour's mysterious lady in distress character. Soon Hope finds himself running from Lon Chaney and Peter Lorre, at their spookiest best.

This was the first movie I ever saw with Bob Hope, and I didn't even realize that Hope and Lamour were famous for the Road movies they did with Bing Crosby. However, this movie is consistently funny throughout. Hope fit the character perfectly. Keep an eye out for Crosby's cameo.
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Don't Take It Seriously
2 December 2002
The Road to Morocco is the best of Crosby/Hope road movies, in my humble opinion. Yes, the plot is paper thin, but the comedy and self-deprecating humor is there. Much of the comedy is slapstick, but this is a movie that's not afraid to say "It's just a movie, don't take it seriously." In the first song, Crosby and Hope allude to it being just another road movie. Naturally they'll meet Dorothy Lamour, and they have nothing to fear, because Paramount will protect them. This is not a movie to have a serious, philosophical discussion about. This is a movie to pop into the VCR on a Saturday night and forget about your worries.
24 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
K-PAX (2001)
9/10
My Theory (Almost Completely Spoilers)
28 November 2002
Warning: Spoilers
This is a movie that will leave you thinking, is he or isn't he? While many people have complained about the ambiguous ending, it gives room for the audience to think and interpret it from the signs. This is my interpretation and theory, and I believe it is very sound.

First, here is the plot. One day, Prot (Kevin Spacey) suddenly appears in the midst of a busy train station. After attempting to help a woman from muggers, he is arrested and sent to Bellevue, and later transferred to Dr. Mark Powell's (Jeff Bridges) hospital. Prot freely talks about how he came from the planet K-Pax and is here to do a report on Earth. Naturally, he is classified as a looney and is locked up in a low security level ward. He befriends the other patients and quickly convinces them of his story. In fact, he tells them he can take one person back with him. Soon Dr. Powell is beginning to question Prot's insanity and as the plot progresses, it is harder and harder to prove Prot wrong.

In the end, Dr. Powell learns that Prot is Robert Porter, a smart man who worked in a slaughter house in New Mexico, when his wife and daughter were murdered. Prot claims that he plans to leave for K-Pax at a precise time on the fifth anniversary of the murders. The time comes and goes, and Powell finds Prot or Robert in a catatonic state. One of the patients is missing and is never found again.

On to my theory: Prot is not crazy. Prot is from the planet K-Pax. Robert Porter is a friend of Prot's. On one of Prot's previous visits to Earth, Robert was a child, learning about the constellations from his father. Prot and Robert became best friends. After the death of his family, and Robert slaying the murderer, Robert decides to commit suicide. Prot is on K-Pax at the time, but he rushes back (in multiples of light speed) to stop Robert. So Prot takes over the thinking of Robert, taking over his body so to speak. Awhile later, Prot (still inhabiting Robert's body) comes to New York and is locked up. When he leaves for K-Pax on July 27, he takes Bess with him, but he must leave Robert's body behind. Hence, we now have the catatonic Robert.

Explanations or clues:

PROT'S KNOWLEDGE OF THE PLANETS AROUND LIBRA: As Prot says, any child knows about their own system. Only a few people on Earth had an inkling about the system, and Prot added to their knowledge. Robert Porter, while smart and knows his constellations, was no astro-physicist.

DR POWELL FEELS CHOSEN BY PROT: It's true. Prot could've left the institute at any time, but chose not too. Prot's last words to Dr. Powell are, "Now that you've found Robert. Take care of him." Prot was probably staying there to ensure a place for Robert when he left.

SUPER-HUMAN ABILITIES: It was a proven fact that Prot had a significantly higher sensitivity to sunlight and could even see UV rays. Prot provides his usual K-Pax reason, but there was no Earthly reason given. It was also mentioned that Prot was given extremely high doses of medicine with no effect.

HELPING THE PATIENTS: Throughout the movie, you see Prot helping the other patients (or the patients discussing Prot's suggestions) to a better sane world. While the psychologist balk at Prot's help, Dr. Powell talks at the end of the movie about the new lives the patients are leading.

THE SPRINKLER SCENE: The sprinkler is associated with Porter's home in New Mexico (which is ironically where Roswell is). Does Porter associate the sprinkler with the death of his family? Is her trying to protect Powell's daughter from that horrible fate? I have a different point of view. It is assumed that Porter had committed suicide in a river. Indeed, Prot (under hypnosis) is greatly concerned about Robert. I believe that Prot associates the danger with the water, not the sprinkler. He is trying to protect the girl from watery death, like he did Robert.

HYPNOSIS: Dr. Powell feels that under hypnosis he can uncover Prot's true identity, but while Prot gives plenty of information, he never gives up his Prot persona and claimed homeland of K-Pax.

THE SECURITY CAMERA: Why would the camera just give out for no apparent reason?

MYSTERIOUS DISAPPEARANCES: First, Prot disappeared for a few days to his trip up north. Funny, the patients are not at all alarmed. Indeed, they try to reassure the doctor. Sometimes I think they understand better than the staff. Naturally, the most telling disappearance is of Bess, the winner of the essay contest. Not only does she disappear at the approximate same time, but the only remaining clue is her winning essay.

This is only my humble theory. You can conclude what you want. You can take Dr. Powell's theory, that Prot was merely a persona taken up by Robert Porter to mentally defend himself from reality, but that would be giving up too many plot holes.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Instant Classic (Possible Spoilers)
12 November 2002
Warning: Spoilers
This is a wonderful film that is an instant classic and pure genius. It is a rare feat to turn the holocaust into a comedy and not lessen the horror. This is not another just another holocaust movie to help us remember. Shindler's List is the defining movie for its genre, but rather this movie takes for granted that you already know about the holocaust from school, movies, or elsewhere. For example, what else would give you that pit in your stomach feeling when you see Guido's uncle sent to a different line after the train ride. This is not exactly a film about the holocaust per se, but it is a film about a triumph over the holocaust. Yes, Guido dies, but Giosue survives. Guido's sacrifice was a triumph. It is a rare mixture of happiness and tragedy, all in the correct amounts. It is a film that will leave you speechless, save to say "Life is beautiful."
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Snake Eyes (1998)
Bland Thriller
16 October 2002
As a fan of Nicholas Cage (even in his more action packed films), I was excited to see this. When the credits began to roll, I couldn't help feeling disappointed. The pace was too fast and jumpy. The events happened so fast that it was unbelievable. I do believe this film would have benefitted from much more character development, especially with Rick (Nicholas Cage) and Kevin (Gary Sinise). The motivations behind each of them would have made the movie feel better. Also a better background of their friendship would have added more depth. I had a lot of trouble watching the earlier flamboyant and loud Rick turn into a serious police officer with a good head.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Chicken Run (2000)
9/10
A Stroke of Genius
16 October 2002
On the surface, this is a simple children's movie. It has a wonderful theme. Never give up hope on your dreams. You have your typical chicken jokes and some action. Now look under the surface. This movie is a very clever homage to the World War II escape movies. I strongly recommend watching Stalag 17 and The Great Escape before viewing this movie. The jokes and sight gags coming from those two movies are too numerous to count and will keep you laughing throughout. Near the end, it even tips its hat to the original Star Trek. Between Chicken Run and Shrek, Dreamworks has certainly come up with some children's movies that will appeal to adults on entirely new level.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
In & Out (1997)
7/10
Good Set-up, but then a let down
16 October 2002
Warning: Spoilers
***SPOILERS*** ***SPOILERS*** I loved the set-up and consistently laughed throughout the entire movie. The acting was great, with my favorite part being Howard's (Kevin Kline) attempts to be a "manly man". The fiance and parents did a great job as a supporting cast. Spoiler Warning: The acting of his conservative family's acceptance and attempts to be polite were heartwarming and believable. My only problem with the end was the fact that Howard was actually gay. The movie is set-up as a "be who you want to be", but the movie actually does the opposite. Howard's logic behind his "discovery" is the fact that he loves Barbra Streisand's movies and enjoys dancing to music. His mannerisms and tastes appear to be gay, and it isn't until it is pointed out to him that he realizes it. Rather than setting Howard free, it pigeon holes him. Oh, he likes to dance to music, than he must be gay. His confession at the marriage felt like a bending down to society's wishes. In the end, the movie becomes a gay rights movie, which was not the original course. It almost becomes bland with the rest. I believe the movie would had been ultimately better had Howard been straight. It would have been truer to the message.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
More than your summer blockbuster
16 October 2002
Independence Day is often classified with the usual summer blockbuster rubbish, but it does rise above it to better quality. It plays upon some good themes, more than action. It examines the true meanings of relationships we have with other people. There is a drunken father who has lost the respect of his children, mostly his oldest son. There is the ambitious wife who leaves her husband to maintain the growth of her career. True, some stereotypes lurk about, but the film is all about putting aside petty differences and concentrating on what is truly important. Oh, and shooting aliens.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Still Above Average
25 July 2002
I'm a little disappointed to always seeing bad reviews for this movie. Yes, it's not Julia Roberts best movie, but it's still above average compared to other movies. Although, I must say I was particularly impressed with John Cusack. He completely embodied his role as Eddie. All in all, this film is loaded with charm and laughs.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Titanic (1997)
7/10
Good, but Overrated
25 July 2002
Yes, I was a teenage girl when Titanic came out, but I had trouble seeing what all the fuss was about. It was good, well-acted movie, but beyond all the glitter it's nothing more than perhaps above average. (Winning Best Picture was highway robbery.) Yes, I recommend seeing it. However, it's not the greatest movie of all time.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed