Reviews

6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
1/10
"I Know" you can't make it through this in one sitting!
23 January 2022
Warning: Spoilers
This has long been one of my least favorite movies of all time. I was lured in by Netflix's promise of a philosophical kung fu film, and found neither philosophy nor kung fu. Thirteen years later, I decided to give it a second chance. Was it really as bad as I remember? Definitely.

What makes this worse than any other direct-to-video martial arts claptrap? You can see Gary Daniels' aggressively wooden acting in scores of direct-to-video flicks. In most of them, he does more fighting than talking. In this movie, he does precious little fighting. When he talks, he does it in an accent strange enough to render "I know" into a four-syllable phrase.

For about sixty percent of the run time we wallow in the suffering of Paradise Valley, a town of no importance whatsoever. We get to see scene after scene after scene of Lord Shin's doughy professional wrestlers brutalizing innocent villagers. The villagers expect the hero to come and save them, but he is too busy doing nothing. He wanders around aimlessly, trying to escape his destiny, with the exact same expression on his face.

The fight scenes are generally confined to the last third of the movie. Kenshiro finally gets off his ass when he sees thugs carrying a picture of his girlfriend. He's too noble to fight for the lives of villagers. But, if you try to bang his girl, he's out for blood! The most exciting scene in the film features an army of thugs lining up to get kicked by Kenshiro. However, the director's not content to let you just enjoy the action. Instead, he keeps cutting away to meanie bad guys mumbling about rape or progress or some other nonsense.

Parts of this movie are schlock enough to laugh at. However, the drawn out sequences with Bat and Lynn and Paradise Valley are a bear to sit through. If you're going to watch it, skip everything but the fight scenes.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
BloodRayne (2005)
2/10
A freakshow of bad acting!
23 June 2021
Uwe Boll has made some of the worst video game adaptations ever. Most of his movies are effortless, cynical, nihilistic cash-grabs. Although you could argue the same applies to Bloodrayne, it has become one of my all-time favorite bad movies.

How is Bloodrayne any different from House of the Dead? How come I can't stomach that film, but want to watch this one over and over again? The answer is in the acting. Bloodrayne has a number of famous actors. Does this mean the acting is good? No. But it's not bad either. It's terrible! The performances of all the actors turn Bloodrayne into a true trainwreck of a film: it's so terrible you can't avert your eyes.

Oscar winner Ben Kingsley speaks in an eloquent, Shakespearian monotone. I've never seen such a bizarre performance, before or since. Michael Madsen convincingly portrays a man slowly dying of boredom. Michelle Rodriguez's British accent is so bad that even she is pissed about it. Kristanna Loken, veteran of Mortal Kombat Conquest, exhausts all of her acting chops on moaning. Billy Zane delivers some of the hammiest snooty acting I've ever seen, and I love it. Meat Loaf is truly a horror to behold, in every possible way.

The rest of the movie is firmly within SyFy Channel Original movie territory. The CGI and practical effects are terrible despite the Hollywood budget. The costumes could easily have been stolen from the closets of trendy cosplayers of the early 2000s. Romania affords one or two interesting film locations, but most of this looks like a TV set.

I highly recommend Bloodrayne to fans of movies like the Room. If you see it, it will be very hard to forget!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Iron Warrior (1987)
2/10
In the ancient world, there were only twenty people on the entire planet.
11 August 2011
Warning: Spoilers
This is the third out of four Ator films, and the sequel to MST3K's Cave Dwellers. This is probably the best shot but least entertaining film in the series. It was directed by someone other than Joe D'Amato who tried to take the subject matter seriously and make a dark, brooding Ator film. However, Ator and seriousness do not get along well at all.

All Ator films are horrible. However, the other three are so horrible that they become funny because of their plagiarized plots, cliché characters, toy quality props, and outrageous dialogue. This movie has hardly any of these. It seems like there is nothing to this movie except for Ator and a Princess running around on a beach and getting into sword fights with the same group of extras over and over again.

There is almost no plot to this movie: Ator has to defeat an evil witch by finding the "Golden Chest of the Ages". The movie's ending is not satisfying and does not resolve any elements of the plot; it's more like the movie just stopped when they ran out of budget. There is also little dialog; although the lines that are present are among the worst in the entire Ator Series. The evil witch character gets more dialogue and screen time than Ator, and she really gets annoying after a while. Much of the movie's running time is taken up with scenes where the witch takes the form of almost every other character in the movie just to trick Ator and make him flabbergasted.

The best part about this movie is the filming locations and the cinematography. It was filmed on scrub deserts and ancient ruins on the islands of Malta and Gozo, including some of the oldest stone structures made by humans. In fact, the buildings in which Ator cavorts about are far more interesting than anything that happens to him in this movie. You might get some enjoyment out of the scenic backdrop if you turn off the sound to avoid the terrible music and witch cackling.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Splatter Beach (2007 Video)
1/10
Hopefully, this is the Polonias' last comedy
15 June 2011
Warning: Spoilers
This is one of John Polonia's last movies and possibly one of his worst. Although it's not completely boring like Razorteeth or The House that Screamed, the sheer amount of forced comedy in this one makes it hard to put up with at times. It has nothing to do with Splatter Farm, which is probably a better film. This is supposed to be a comedic tribute to the beach monster movies of the 1960s. However, comedy is the thing that the Polonia brothers do the worst.

This film has the standard Polonia plot of " a man in a homemade monster suit shows up in Pennsylvania and kills a few people whom the directors know". However, because this is a comedy, expect the characters to talk about homosexuality, sexual acts, farting, lesbianism, Hercules movies, homosexuality, and farting Hercules before they die. The comedic height of the film is when a character chooses to become a lesbian. We're seriously supposed to laugh at this.

Most of the rest of the film consists of padding. Dave Fife walks back and forth along a beach and has to put up with the obnoxiously unfunny and uninteresting characters of Brice Kennedy and his girlfriend while being accused of homosexuality by Ken Van Sant. Harder to sit through, however, are the drawn out sequences featuring poorly edited teenage girls dancing to a garage band playing an extremely repetitive song. Don't watch this movie unless you are determined to see the entire filmography of John Polonia or Dave Fife. Despite this, the bonus film on the disc, Hallucinations, is the best Polonia Brothers film I have ever seen. It was made when the two were teenagers and still gave a crap.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
How to Slay a Vampire (1993 Video)
1/10
Could this be the worst thing ever filmed?
3 August 2010
To say that this is a bad movie would be an understatement. Because it's from the Polonia Brothers you can assume that it has no budget and is poorly shot and edited. What you need to know is that this is extremely, stunningly unwatchable. I venture to say that I know of no film that has been shot with less effort than this one. It is supposed to be a comedy but it never, ever succeeds at being funny. Apparently that takes an amount of thought or effort that the Polonia brothers were not willing to spend on this film. It may be cliché to say that watching a film is torture, but I'll go ahead and say that for this film.

The plot is supposed to be about two brothers trying to find ways to kill a vampire that they found in their mother's basement (because the entire film is filmed in and around a single house). However, they can only stretch that out for about 15 minutes. The rest of the running time consists of blatantly obvious time wasting and filler. The majority of the running time is taken up by such stupid pointless scenes as fifteen second shots of people sleeping and a guy urinating. I am not kidding when I say that a full one eighth of this film consists of an unending scene of the vampire making out with a blow up doll.

This film is only funny if you think that references to private parts, homosexuality, and sexual objects are funny. The film's knee slapping premise is that the vampire is actually gay. Ha Ha Ha! He farts a lot also, and never speaks: instead he only makes "Blah Blah Blah" noises. There are also many attempts at "breaking the fourth wall" that are never creative or funny. This film is supposed to be zany and comedic but it is executed with so little effort that it ends up being an insult to the viewer's intelligence and a criminal waste of time. I would be surprised if any other people than I and the Polonia Brothers were masochistic enough to sit through this entire film.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Holy Crap! This is a bad movie!
1 August 2010
I saw the first ever screening of this movie at the Fright Night Film Festival in Louisville, KY. Even though the director was there in the room sitting not too far from me I could not help snickering and groaning. I could not believe how bad this movie was considering the hype surrounding it on the convention website.

First of all, it is very difficult to tell what is happening in this film because the soundtrack booms triumphantly at all moments during this film, even when people are standing around talking. Apparently Albert Pyun has no idea how to make the soundtrack compliment what is happening in the film. Since the actors mumble in monotones it is very hard to hear them; indeed at first I didn't even think this film was in English. Secondly there is the acting. Apparently in the Kingdom of Abelard, it is illegal for women to show emotion or even change their facial expressions. Men, however, are forbidden to show emotional subtlety and must overact at all times. Ralph Moller, star of the live action Conan TV show, is unbelievably the best actor in the film.

The cinematography is somewhat competent, except that the film is divided arbitrarily into "tales" with weird chapter title screens that are cut into scenes abruptly which only serve to make the editing look unbelievably amateurish. Also, the computer generated special effects are unbelievably bad; they look like something straight out of a 1990s cartoon or perhaps amateur CGI art from around 1998; I could not help but laugh at this.

It is a 75 minute film, and I walked out of the theater after about 40 minutes because the plot had gone nowhere. This is the first time I ever walked out on a movie simply because it was bad. Keep that in mind if you are considering seeing this.
29 out of 98 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed