I have read the book "the Picture of Dorian Gray" twice and have watched more than two adaptations of Dorian Gray before I come across this one. This latest version is utterly bullshit. I was about to laugh out when I read one review entitled "does Oscar Wilde justice". Does the reviewer read any Oscar Wilde at all? Is it possible, that one of the most celebrated authors of the Victorian era(which is characterized by its comparative prudishness) would compose a book of lust and eroticism?In Wilde's original Dorian Gray, he focused on the mental and internal progresses and controversies of various characters; and especially regarding Dorian Gray, Wilde wrote nothing whatsoever manifestly related to sexuality.
This version of Dorian Gray, on the contrary,emphasized on a variety of corporeal adventures experienced by the protagonist. I would fairly say this movie is more adult-video like than the notorious Japanese adult video. Why wouldn't the producers of this version entitle it "our interpretation of Dorian Gray as the Victorian Casanova?"Dorian Gray is not a sexy flirt. He is rather naive, and truthful. I remember reading an account of his relationship with a theater actress. The description is rather moving, and quite "spiritual" to an extent, meaning that there's no discussions on the corporeal side of their relationship. Yet in the movie, as far as I can see, the producers put a huge effort to emphasize the physical aspects of Dorian Gray's various relationships. Is it allowed to stain Oscar Wilde's classic so outrageously???? To judge fairly, the movie might be a good movie if those people don't call it "Dorian Gray." Call it whatever they like, but NOT DORIAN GRAY. DORIAN GRAY IS NOT PROMISCUOUS; HE'S NO DON JUAN I ASSURE EVERYONE.
This version of Dorian Gray, on the contrary,emphasized on a variety of corporeal adventures experienced by the protagonist. I would fairly say this movie is more adult-video like than the notorious Japanese adult video. Why wouldn't the producers of this version entitle it "our interpretation of Dorian Gray as the Victorian Casanova?"Dorian Gray is not a sexy flirt. He is rather naive, and truthful. I remember reading an account of his relationship with a theater actress. The description is rather moving, and quite "spiritual" to an extent, meaning that there's no discussions on the corporeal side of their relationship. Yet in the movie, as far as I can see, the producers put a huge effort to emphasize the physical aspects of Dorian Gray's various relationships. Is it allowed to stain Oscar Wilde's classic so outrageously???? To judge fairly, the movie might be a good movie if those people don't call it "Dorian Gray." Call it whatever they like, but NOT DORIAN GRAY. DORIAN GRAY IS NOT PROMISCUOUS; HE'S NO DON JUAN I ASSURE EVERYONE.
Tell Your Friends