Reviews

23 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
10/10
Excellence par none. Should be seen by anyone who wants to witness cinema in all of it's glorious perfection.
20 July 2008
Warning: Spoilers
If ever a comic book movie were to get a best picture nomination come February it would be The Dark Knight. To say this is just a comic book movie would not only be a disservice to the film, but an insult for this is much more than that. It is in essence an unbelievable film.

So few films in any genre strive, and fewer still attain the kind of beauty that The Dark Knight captures in every facet possible. From the taught script by Christopher Nolan and his brother Jonathan Nolan(with an assist by David Goyer) the movie barrels at break-neck-speed and never truly lets up. It is also very intelligent; pursuing ideas on what it means to be a hero and how Batman through his disregard of the law is just a decision or two away from being The Joker. It also manages to be a social commentary relevant to our time. It brings up moral issues like public surveillance and whether or not the public when stretched to the brink by a madman, will sacrifice anyone or anything for their safety and in a sense destroy what separates them from the very thing that makes up a cornerstone of our society; courage, hope, and compassion.

Now onto the performances. It is without a doubt that Heath Ledger's performance elevates this movie in such a way that without him, it would have been good, but with him is a gold standard. The way The Joker walks, talks, darts his tongue and licks his lips. Even the way he manages to alter the pitch and tone from high to low in a second shows craft that few other actors could accomplish. He truly becomes this character instead of just reciting lines. Others do amazing jobs. Christian Bale is the reliable rock of the movie and gives both he and Batman more depth as his character and alter ego are tested in every way possible. Michael Cane and Morgan Freeman get more to do and both have some fine speeches when advising Batman. Maggie Gyllenhaal is an upgrade from Katie Holmes and shows more grit and humanity in her role.

The action is amazing. Best of all it's mostly done with real pyrotechnics and stunt work. This isn't a George Lucas movie with 99% of the screen done by computer generated effects. Christopher Nolan has really elevated his already amazing game to heights I would not have imagined.

Simply put, this movie deserves every accolade, every good word-of-mouth review, and all of the awards I hope it collects throughout the year, especially come February. Yes Heath deserves his award and not because of his passing. If he were alive now, he would be picking it up himself when the time comes.

At the end of the movie last night when I was walking out of the theater, someone in a crowd waiting to get into the next screening asked me if the movie was good. I looked at him seriously, then smiled and quoted Michael Cane's Alfred from the movie and said "You have no idea".
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Super . . . . for a reason
30 June 2006
Warning: Spoilers
The hype for Superman this year has been fairly large and expectations even larger after almost 20 years off of the big screen. With Bryan Singer at the helm, and his skills honed from doing the first two X-men movies, Superman has benefited from that knowledge and more. Over the past 5 years we have been bombarded with an assortment of superhero movies, most good and some not. The two that have shown the biggest influence on this movie are Spiderman, and X-men.

Superman has been gone for 5 years now searching the ruins of Krypton in a futile search for survivors. Now with a literal crash he is back on earth but things have changed. Lois has a child, and she is engaged. Crime, war, poverty, and general chaos now rule the world that is in true need of a hero. In a scene of breathtaking intensity he saves a botched plan to send a shuttle into space. Lois is on this plane and he meets her for the first time since he left. Lex Luthor is now out of of prison and his plan to both stop Superman, and rule the world is actually a very creative one.

The performances are good all around. Brandon Routh is good. He actually plays a tricky role here. When Christopher Reeves played the man of steel he did it with a wink to the camera. Here Routh plays him seriously, but must infuse him with a sense of vulnerability that makes him accessible to us. This is where Spiderman and X-men influence the movie. Vulnerable characters are the key especially to a man who is all powerful except to kryptonite.

Kevin Spacey is both wicked, and wickedly funny as Lex Luthor, Supermans old nemesis. Kate Bosworth also has a tricky role especially following in the footsteps of some of her famous predecessors of the role but she does a good job in showing both her anger at superman leaving her, and her love that still remains. It is also nice to see James Marsden get a more sizable role after 3 X-men movies where he went largely unnoticed.

If you want to see a movie that sits at the top tied with Spiderman, and X-men as the pinnacle of the superhero movies look no further. This one is how its done ladies and gentlemen. *****/*****
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
My So-Called Life (1994–1995)
10/10
A pure point of blinding brilliance in T.V. history, never to be forgotten
13 February 2006
With some hard thinking I remembered 1994-1995 when the show was on the air. I was 13-14 and being both young and a male I never gave the show much thought. Now ten years later I became increasingly intrigued having heard from various articles and people how wonderful the show was. So last week I bought the DVD and watched it.

To put it honestly I was completely enthralled. Never has a show that dealt with life whether teen, or any age been given so much realism and honesty. All the characters were three dimensional and true. The dialogue sparkled with truth and wit that most shows could only wish to capture for a second. I also saw where all the teen shows that try to be real and tackle issues found their influence. The imprint of this show can be found in Dawson's Creek, Gilmore Girls, The OC, and will probably be found for decades to come. At the moment I became hooked, I also became sad knowing full well that once the DVD was over I'd have no more to look forward too. Its just sad that when it premiered it was up against so much competition it could no thrive.

Shows like this leave a mark, the great ones always do. There are plenty of good shows but the great ones are always remembered for not only what they bring to a certain genre in television but to television itself. I only hope that ABC realizes for years to come what they truly let go was a masterpiece of the highest accord.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A great movie that deserves more recognition. A must see
19 December 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Ever meet a girl who is stunning in so many ways? She gets you and you get her but the problem is . . . well you can't be with her, whether its because she's already with someone, or she lives far away or in the case of this movie she's 13?

Well that my friends is the real problem in Beautiful Girls which is the story of a group of twenty somethings who all have relationship problems and try and figure them out over the course of 3 weeks before their high school reunion. The movie contains many established, and up-and-coming stars like Timothy Hutton, Matt Dillon, Uma Thurman, and Natalie Portman.

I liked the movie in so many ways because its was beautifully shot, and maybe even more beautifully written. While not a ground breaking film in its content( it owes much to the big chill) it is still a very well done movie with some fine thoughts about love, life, and what it means to really connect with someone.

Now back to the original thought I was having about not being able to be with someone because she's so young, well in this movie that would be Timothy Hutton's character Willie who comes home trying to figure out if he really wants to be with his nice attorney girlfriend of roughly a year. Thats when he meets the next door neighbor Marty. She's precocious, very intelligent, witty, cool, and even at the tender age of 13 you can see she's going to be one very gorgeous girl (Natalie Portman had one of her finest performances here might I add). They bond during their first talk together because Marty sees right into and through Willie who doesn't realize he's already smitten.

Yes I know this sounds disgusting. A 27 year old guy falling for a 13 year old? But no its tastefully done. Willie just see's something in her he can't help but like and through some very well conceived scenes admits to being jealous of a 13 year old kid on a bike who is flirting with Marty while he looks through the window at them. This my friends is the heart of the movie and while they devoted a good bit of time to it with such a large cast of characters my only knock on the movie is that they should have made it more center stage. The movie ends well and all seems good with good stories and excellent performances.

What i'd really like to see is a sequel with Willie now divorced and Marty now 23 and how they reconnect after 10 years and see if a romance is at all possible. NOw that would be a great movie. this one gets 10/10
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Love Actually (2003)
8/10
It should have concentrated on less stories
11 December 2005
Warning: Spoilers
I remember finally getting my hands on this movie the day it arrived at the rental store and popped it in my DVD player. My hands were shaking with anticipation, and by the end I was satisfied but not with all of it.

My only complaint was that it had too many story lines in it. If I could cut down the amount of couples whos story lines were interesting, the top three would have been, Juliet and Mark. I honestly felt bad for Mark who has always loved Juliet, but as a way of protecting himself never said anything and had to watch his best friend marry her.

The prime minister and Natalie. It was nice to see the prime minister portrayed as a guy who's just as lonely, and in love as the next guy.

And lastly Daniel who has just lost his wife and is grieving, and his step-son sam who is in love. Its a touching relationship where we see Daniel coming out of his pain and helping his son which in turn helps him to heal.

The movie isn't perfect, and if it concentrated on these stories instead of so many more it would have been better. Some of the others were good too but I think these 3 if they were given the detail, and time would have made a great movie.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A good movie, but a formulaic ending ruined it
28 October 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Being both a critic and a movie lover means you must be able to watch movies from any genre and have the possibility of liking them exist. That being said, Win a Date With Tad Hamilton is a pretty good movie though formulaic.

The strength of the movie lies in its casting and how the movie creates an old 1950's romantic feel to it. Rosalee played very well by Kate Bosworth is a young girl working at a Piggly Wiggly in W.Virginia. Her co-worker and boss is Pete who has longed for Rosalee for years but lacks the confidence to show her his real feelings. Rosalee's favorite actor is Tad Hamilton and one day both Rosalee and her friend enter a contest to Win a Date with said heartthrob. Tad has had some run-ins recently with the law and paparazzi that have hurt his perfect image and his agent suggest this as a contest to improve it.

Rosalee of course wins and off she goes to Hollywood for her perfect date which goes quite well if a little awkward at times. A few days after going back to her hometown Tad who saw something innocent, fresh, and sweet in Rosalee that he probably hasn't seen in a woman in a long time follows her. Soon he buys a home with the hopes of allowing his romance with Rosalee to become something a lot bigger. Pete of course just lurks in the background muttering, and being grumpy which doesn't gain any sympathy votes from me or much of the audience most likely. By this point you know whats going to happen which is the films biggest mistake.

Up until this point the film is quite good. Josh Du-Hamel who plays Tad does so perfectly, painting a portrait of an up and coming actor who has made some mistakes especially in his choice of women but now sees what a real good woman is. He is charming but not in a slimy way which probably would have been more effective for its ending. No instead Tad is earnest, and sweet in his sudden attraction to Rosalee, and their budding relationship and romance is also sweet, and honest. They have chemistry unlike Pete and her who's relationship is usually smart comments and not much else.

Unfortunately studios don't like taking chances which is their biggest mistake. If they really wanted to make this a good movie they would have changed the ending to end with Rosalee and Tad's romance having a chance. Istead its the usual Hollywood re-tread with Rosalee chasing after Pete after "aparently" realizing she loves him. Suffice the ending left me less than thrilled. I knew it was coming but was hoping I was wrong. Is the movie worth checking out??? Yes for everything but the ending.
12 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Ring Two (2005)
6/10
Ring one . . . good, but Ring Two . . . BAD!!!
28 October 2005
First I would like to say that I loved the first Ring movie and found its to be a very scary film that relied more on atmosphere and creepiness than gore and blood to provide chills, and scares.

When I heard that a second movie was in production I couldn't wait till It came out. I was there the opening day to see the movie and I had high expectations . . . that were not even closely met.

The biggest problem with The Ring Two is that they took out the creepiest thing about the first movie which was the video tape. They also took out Samara Morgan flashbacks of childhood which was also very creepy in the first movie. Replacing these elements with the grown up Samara trying to possess Aidan??? This child is not that important or great that she needs to go through him to get to our world, and I was very disappointed that this was the premise of the movie. I'm not sure precisely what the premise should have been but they could have come up with something else. They didn't have to follow the premise of the second Japanese movie which if i'm not mistaken wasn't as popular as the original over their either.

Sticking with he video premise they could have done plenty of creative things that would have made original enough to stand on its own. There were a few good scares like Somara skittering up the walls and stuff that made you cringe but for the most part I wasn't really scared much during the movie. I definitely didn't want this to be the review that I wrote for this movie but It is unfortunately.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The moment between childhood and adulthood . . . painful . . . beautiful . . . and perfect!
19 October 2005
Warning: Spoilers
That magical moment in life, that point between the beautiful innocence of childhood, and the confusing whirlwind that marks adulthood . . . this is what this movie is all about.

Danni (wonderfully played by Reese Witherspoon) is right at that moment in life when the movie starts. She swoons over Elvis, playing his records and wishfully thinking about love. Maureen her sister will soon be off to college, has no trouble with attracting boys, is beautiful, and seems to have it all figured out although she doesn't. She dates a local loser whos father is also after her, and just wishes she could find a decent boy and be swept off her feet. Danni like most young teenagers wishes she could be anyone else but herself because most teenagers think that who they are just isn't good enough. She wants to be Maureen but doesn't see that she is beautiful herself.

The moment adulthood begins to intrude itself upon her life is when she meets Court Foster for the first time. Court whos father has recently died has moved to their old farm to work it with his mother and two younger brothers. He has been thrust responsibility when he should be having fun. On one particular hot day he goes to the pond and jumps in only to find Danni skinny dipping. They yell and argue and Danni leaves. But they see each other a day later when Courts mother is invited to Danni's to visit old friends(Danni's Parents). Danni becomes attracted to Court, and Court to Danni. She is a tomboy and is spunky, has attitude and says whats on her mind.

Court is 17 and Danni 14 and he knows it but they continue to grow closer with their days at the pond between Court working the farm. By the time Court kisses her one day, Danni is smitten. Danni's father tells her to invite Court to the house and he does. but things are uncomfortable for Court on his "sort of date". The silence though is broken by his meeting with Maureen who has yet to see Court. One look between the two and its all over. The looks of pain and defeat on Danni's face are both beautiful in their trueness to life and painful at the same time. The rest of the movie I will not tell but the movie has more to it than a relationship between a boy and two sisters.

The greatness of the movie is in its depiction of lifes moments both beautiful and painful and the relationship between two sisters whose love is tested by both a boy that they love, and the pain they must endure both together and individually. Danni eventually marks her entrance into the world when she sees that the world is unfair, painful, and maybe even a little less hopeful than when the movie started. Few movies can truly capture the wonder of childhood and the pain of adulthood so perfectly. This movie has since the first time I watched it stuck in my mind. Its in the my Top 100 movie list and deservedly so. I only wish more movies like this were made, because if so . . . my faith in Hollywood would be a lot better.
15 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A Simple Plan (1998)
10/10
The Greatest movie about how even good people succumb to greed
8 June 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Most thriller movies are neither intelligent, or give their characters morals and moral boundaries that they are tempted to cross and good reasons for doing so. They simply let the story drive the plot instead of the characters and their choices, character arcs, and faults drive the plot line.

Its finally a joy to see a movie that does just that. A simple plan simply follows 4 people as their morals are tested, stretched, and eventually broken over the course of a month or so. 3 men find 4 million dollars in a wrecked plane on a reservation and decide to keep the money even though Hank Mitchell the sensible, moral, family guy in the film at first says no but agrees when the other two men (his brother and his friend) want to keep it. He takes it home where his wife also says no at first till she sees the money.

At first the plan seems simple enough which is to keep the money hidden and safe till the spring in case anyone comes looking for the money, and then if no one does then they split the money and hit the road. But alas the most simple things in life usually are the ones that run into the most problems. And this movie does just that except the problems are greed, mistrust, and loyalty, as each man is pitted against the other. Values also as time goes by eventually erode as each man see his future only in the money.

Hank becomes paranoid by greed and the constant lurking of the possibility of being caught. By the time the first half of the movie is over he has already killed someone. His wife helps him in plotting against the others in order to protect themselves, while the other two men are not quite smart enough to think of these things. There are some great scenes be each major character. Hank's wife Sarah gives a speech on how she doesn't want to check the coupons in the paper the rest of her life for every nights meal or when going out to eat they have to skip the dessert because they can't afford it. Hank's brother Jacob one of the other men is not quite so bright has two scenes that struck a cord as in one he comments on how their dad lost the farm because of Hank's college tuition and it shows how jealous Jacob is of his brother. In another Hank talks about how Jacob was once happy with a girl he dated in school only for Jacob to reveal that the girls best friends bet her $100 she wouldn't go steady with Jacob for a month. These are just a few of the scenes that give the screenplay which is very intelligent a lot of humanity.

The acting is top-notch as every actor throws themselves into their character till you only see their character on the screen. The plot is simple but its not the plot but the characters, their morals, reactions, and greed that make the movie so engrossing. Basically this movie is about how even he best people can succumb to the great life that they think money can provide and exactly how far people will go to get it and how even murder which normally would never enter their mind can be so easy and necessary to give them this life.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The third film darker, but better
4 June 2005
I'm a big fan of all of the harry potter films, but I have found this one to be the best of all. First off I would like to mention how much I admire Michael Gambons performance as Dumbledore. I think I admired it because he didn't try to duplicate the late Richard Harris's dead on creation of Dumbledore. He instead showed how he perceived Dumbledore to be and while it is not quite as perfect as Harris's it is his own.

The film was also much darker but I liked that. I feel like the films are getting darker because Harry is maturing while facing dangers that get darker as each book and films goes by. I also liked how the film wasn't a perfect carbon copy of the book, and that some liberties were taken.

I feel like the actors really know their characters now, and have grown in talent as well. You have to remember that for the three main leads these movies pretty much are their whole list of movies they have acted in. They are getting better with each film. In particular Emma Watson has made her character into the strongest of the three.

I see great things to come in future films and I eagerly anticipate Goblet of Fire coming towards the end of the year. As for this one I say darker is better(and yes there were light-hearted moments to lighten the mood)so keep it going.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Small True moments make this movie an instant classic
12 April 2005
Warning: Spoilers
When I think about it I realized one day that I never once questioned whether or not the events in "Before Sunrise" were truly as believable as they make it out to be. Then I also realized right after that I didn't care, and if any movie could make me believe in that kind of moment and love its this one.

What makes this movie so great are the small detailed true-to-life-moments that other movies don't even think to pay attention to which is their unfortunate downfall. One of my all time favorite images from the movie has to be in the bus when Jesse has to do everything he can from fully reaching out and touching a stray lock of Celine's hair. Another is in the elevator when each looks at one another and then looks away once eye contact is made. Or when they tentatively kiss for the first time which is touching.

Moments like these are often never seen because the common romantic movie overlooks them when if they were truly smart they would realize that the cornerstone of any great romantic movie should be moments like these. Chemistry too is something most of these movies never seem to really achieve, but which this movie does without trying.

The love in this movie is real. You never once question whether or not their love is real because your ready to believe it halfway through the movie even before they fully realize it. No grand gestures of love, or sickening melodramatic moments that make you roll your eyes and groan. The simplicity in this love is the truth of what love is. Fully accepting the person and really making a connection.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dawson's Creek (1998–2003)
One of the best shows that truly show what its like to be a teenager
19 March 2005
It wasn't until about a year ago that I started watching dawson's creek and I realized exactly how stupid I was when I was in high school, and making fun of the girls that were so obsessed with it.

Suffice to say Dawson's Creek was a landmark of a show in which to me all other teen shows about coming of age have tried to duplicate in some way or another. It was refreshing in every way possible. The intelligent, and witty dialogue, deep and well rounded characters, and character driven plots proved to be groundbreaking and yes controversial.

The show catapulted the actors to world wide fame. Each completely embodied their character. The plots had little to do with the events and more to do with the characters and how they dealt and verbalized their issues and problems. The way they did it made you realize exactly how they were feeling. Most shows were the opposite or with plots driving the show, or even worse shows where there was always a "moral" a the the end of each episode which meant that each episode was constructed around each moral. This show was simply about growing up and how hard it is to live each day about it.

The one thing I hope is that Dawson's Creek is remembered for more than just anchoring a fledgling network. I would like it to be remembered as one of the most important and influential shows (not just teen shows) in television history. Maybe thats too much to really hope for but no one can say that the teen shows your watching today haven't been directly influenced by this show.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The O.C. (2003–2007)
Great characters make a great show
7 October 2004
Have we seen this plot before? yes we have albeit not in a place this great looking and thats part of the charm of this fantastically addictive series. So many shows like this take place in a normal setting. This one defies the rules and showcases it in a very rich, very snobby like area full of interesting people.

There are several reasons why this show is great and successful

1. Seth Cohen is the most interesting character the show has to offer. Ya know it all started out with ryan who is the main character but after about 5 episodes it was clear who the real star is. No other character is as fleshed out and real as he is. and funny with his wisecracking demeanor. Seth has actually changed and become more real as the season went on. Most everyone else has stayed the same. Like ryan who hasn't showed any other kind of side or major insecurities, and he's still a hot head.

2. It doesn't try and shove morals down your throat. Just about every show in this vein out there tries to make every episode a "dont do this" episode, and its very refreshing. They present each episode as a day in their life and thats it.

3. Finally parents get their due. Seth's parents are not some stupid "john hughes" parents with little or no screen time and who's pets have bigger brains that they do. Instead they have a decent amount of screen time, fight, make up, and actually have a life that we see.

Is this show perfect . . . . no that would be unfair to say it is or expect it to be. Its fun, interesting, and is the most refreshing addition to the teen genre by far.
274 out of 333 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
More than just an action film
29 May 2004
I remember seeing this movie once quite a while back when I was younger but only in pieces. Finally I bought it and watched the whole thing. To my delight it wasn't just some action movie with a mindless plot, but a more heartfelt and genuine feel to it.

The odd couple/mismatched pair plots have been done about as often as the teen romance/comedy has been done, but not as well as this. Special care was taken to show that Mathilda (Natalie Portman) connects with, and trusts maybe the only person in her life so far. She then falls in love with him, which is easy to dismiss as puppy love, but for a girl as mature, and who has seen so much ill in her life I don't think so. The same goes for Leon who because of his profession, has not let anything emotional in his life besides his plant.

But Mathilda changes all of that. He finally finds I think another purpose to his life besides *cleaning* and you begin to see the affect it has on him, especially when he immediately goes to save her in the DEA headquarters without a care to his own welfare. Now that is love.

I've heard some audiences didn't like the sexual overtone between leon, and mathilda, but it didn't bother me. It exists and it does so to reflect the possibilities of life, and love. I think that this film is more of a character study than an action film. I like action but character study even more. If you truly want a film that is dark, humorous, and has real characters despite whether or not you like them as a whole, then go see this movie!!
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Girlfight (2000)
An Emotional and great performance by a very undderated actress
11 April 2004
I first saw Michelle Rodriguez in The Fast and The Furious, and was sad that her character wasnt given more to work with because it was a role that could have been a great addition to the film.

Just recently I saw her Girlfight which was the role that started and has so far highlighted her career. And to be honest I found it to be one of the best movies I have seen in the last couple years.

The movie is about a girl named Diana played by rodriguez who has alot of pent up anger about herself and her mother's death. So her life at school is spent mostly by getting into fights, but that all changes when she visits her brother at a local boxing facility.

Soon its her and not her brother being the one trained, and through boxing she finds a way to release her anger, and find something to concentrate on. One of the things I found that I loved about the movie was that at the end not all of her problems were taken care of, just some of them. And her dreams are not realized but just taken a step further which is all she really wants.

But most of all it was Michelle's performance that made this movie the experience it is. Her character is REAL, and people aspiring to be actresses should watch her movie for pointers. She imbues her with the rage, and the full range of emotions that she shows through every scene. So watch it and love it 10/10
20 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Beautiful movie not about anti-semitism
26 February 2004
For months all I have heard about this movie is anti-semitism, anti-semitism, anti- semitism, and frankly I was just as anxious to see the movie as anyone else. The thing is that after watching this movie I felt that anti-semitism wasnt what the movie portrayed in any way. Pilate I think was portrayed as a man agonizing over a decision rather than the cold hearted man he has been known to be. As for the other jews, and priests. . . Yes some of them did call for the death of jesus, but many, many jews called for the life of jesus as well. I agree with the critic Roger Ebert who said that the jewish high priests, and other leaders that DID call for the death of jesus were only afraid of him because they threatened their estabilishment and because he was seen as a rebel those flocked to. Jews did not just kill Jesus, in fact all people killed Jesus and so all are accounted for not just one race.

I think too many people are going into this movie with pre-concieved notions of what this movie is going to offer, and any jewish people might look for any single thing in the movie that can and will validate their pre-conceived notions. I went into this movie with a clear mind because I wanted to see what this movie meant to ME not what this movie meant to my religous affiliation.

Now after clearing that up I will now praise the movie for what I saw in it.

I think this is one of the bloodiest movies in the history of cinema, and while I did flinch many many many times, I think it was in many ways a good thing. All of that

blood,pain, and suffering was meant to show you exactly how much Jesus went through for us. I have watched several different films depicting the death of jesus and all of that violence was softened greatly. I think many will hate this because yes it is making you see what he went through will great detail for us to show his love.

This is definately not a movie you watch every sunday after church but is probably something you see two or three times and probably wont watch again for a while. The movie did have a couple flaws though. One was that I dont think it had enough flashbacks of jesus's life, and the other is that it didnt show enough of the miracles of jesus as well though I understand why it didnt because it was concentrating so heavily on his death. I find this movie to be one of the greatest religous of all time for its chances that it took. 10/10
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Say Anything (1989)
10/10
THE guide to all future romantic teen movies
14 January 2004
As we watch movies we search for the ones that we can truly identify with, whether its with certain characters or situations. With Say Anything I was able to identify with everything in the movie characters and all.

The plot for Say Anything is fairly standard, but its the details and nuances that make the movie one of the greatest of all time. The script has such a freshness, and honesty that its impossible to brush it aside as a "typical romantic teen comedy". Instead it gives you truly believable characters going through very believable situations. Some of the most important points of the movie were some of the most honest and overlooked parts. Like when Loyd and Diane make love for the very first time(for each of them as well) loyd begins shaking and though he tries to deny he is, and then says its because he is happy that you see one of the reasons the movie is so great. The break-up seen in the middle of the movie is so heart breaking that you almost want to reach out to loyd to try and help him and all of this movie and all are done with a script I wish most teen movies would have. Its intelligent, funny, honest, and precisely written with all the characters being three-demensional even down to bits parts. And the famous scene where loyd stands in front of his car and holds up his boom box with "your eyes" blasting out of it is one of the most memorable and great scenes of any movie. . . ever.

John Cusak who is one of the most underrated actors of all time plays Loyd Dobbler with such delicacy that you would not be surprised if he was just playing himself. Ione Skye is perfectly convincing as a girl who is as intelligent as she is beautiful(and she is very much both) who doesnt realize how beautiful she really is. The honesty with which both of these actors played and poured themselves into the roles are admirable. And if you really want to find out some more about this movie listen to the commentary by cusak, skye, and cameron crowe and you will find even more depth than you ever thought to this movie. It gets a 10/10, ****, and is most definately in my top 10 of all time.
9 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
BEHOLD!!!! I HAVE SEEN THE RETURN OF THE KING.
11 December 2003
Well I must say this movie is above anything I could have imagined no matter how high my expectations were. Managing to see a special screening of the most anticipated movie of the year, I realized about 20 min. in that I was in for the time of my life with this most exceptional movie. I just cant give enough praise to Peter Jackson for not making this another matrix revolutions. Which could have happened, but thanks to the dedication of so many people instead I truly see it as the best movie so far this year just ahead of The Last Samurai. What do both movies have in common with each other? Both are epics, both have unbelievable set designs, and both have excellent quality acting, but what makes rings even better is the sometimes happy, sometimes sad, and sometimes gut retchingly awful moments that truly bring tears to your eyes as various people die that you have become so close with during the last couple movies. If this movie does'nt win best picture, and best director along with at least 5 more awards i'll be extremely disappointed. This I believe is the movie that gives hollywood hope for the future!
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
not just a chick flick but a great movie as well
15 July 2003
To put into words how beautiful this movie is would be almost impossible but i'll try. I watched this movie several years ago and just the other night and both times I was amazed at how touching the story is. Yes I am a guy but one who realizes that a movie doesnt necessarily have to be violent to be good. This movie has what action movies dont have . . . heart. The story of a horse and a girl who's injuries cause them pain because the other's injuries cause them pain. Their souls and love for each other intertwine which is what gives this movie heart. Kudos to Scarlett Johanson who should have been nominated for an oscar. She makes this movie believable by wearing her characters pain on her sleeve. You feel for her and wince everytime she falls or cries. The love story is more of just a subplot. The soul of the movie is the horse and the girl. This movie deserves a definate 10!!!!
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
good but not great
1 June 2003
Warning: Spoilers
SPOILER 9 years after legends of the fall was released I have finally at the age of 21 found the time and a copy to see just how good it is. Well I liked this movie alot but at the same time I have issues with it. The story centers on tristan who is the middle child of the movie and how everyone he touches or is close to him dies. I was surprised when isabella died. I did not see that coming largely because the movie looked as though it was going to end happily but it didnt of course. The major problem with the movie is that it kept going and going and going.

And everyone in this movie seemed to die. Isabella, susannah(played by the gorgeous julia ormond) both beautiful are killed and I would be lying if I said it didnt pull at the strings of my heart. That I think is the greatest advantage of this movie. Its ability to tug at your heart as you cheer for tristan. You sit in disbelief as he leaves susannah and goes away for years, and then feel happy as he marries the girl who always loved him as a child(Isabella), and then you almost want to cry when not one but both die. Part of you loves the movie and hates it at the same time
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Little Women (1994)
magic made because of the great cast
28 May 2003
I remember I first watched this movie with my mother when it came out on video. Of course at the age of 13 I was unimpressed and uninterested, but now having watched this classic several times I can now take full appreciation of its beauty in all angles and measures. This movie could have been pathetic and sappy,

but instead it draws from the book beautifully the characters and attitudes that made the book one of the greatest of all time. But I think the real magic is not in the script but in the cast. Sarandon(marmy), claire danes(beth), and eric

stoltz(john brooke) do an admirable job here, but I believe the true stars that make this a classic are first winona ryder(jo) who here plays her character

unlike any I have ever seen her play. She plays it with such passion and

fierceness. Kirsten dunst(amy) is wonderfully sweet. A little girl longing to fall in love and she does it with a grace and ability not very often seen in movies.

Christian Bale(Laurie) does almost as great a job as winona ryder as his

character is one searching for purpose in life and love as well. A life full of lessons is what he has but his rich upbringing and longing for Jo blinds him till its taken away from him and the veil is dropped for him to see what he has to learn. And of course Gabriel Byre(friedrich) also does a great job and has a great chemistry with ryder that is unmistakable. His soft hearted character plays well to jo's fierceness and the movie is better for it. This movie without this cast would have been terrible but with it became one of the better adapted movies

from a novel in maybe forever. The magic of it lives on through these actors and children who never heard of it will hear of the name Little Women and maybe

just maybe will be compelled to read the book after seeing the movie.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
X2 (2003)
10/10
X2 stands on its own
3 May 2003
Going into X2 I had some doubts that it would be a good sequel. Now dont get me wrong I have faith in Bryan Singer but with most sequels not being up to par I didnt know what to expect. I came away though with an even greater respect for both the director and the cast members. The storyline was well thought out with little things happening to keep it going, and the special effects are of course phenomenal. Wolverine played by hugh jackman is of course the most popular of all the characters. The reason is because he is deeply flawed in character which makes him the most human out of everyone in the movie. Nightcrawler is also an exceptionally interesting character as well. The movie did exceed my expectations well. Although I doubt this will ever happen I guess the only thing I really want to see in the sequel is finally seeing wolverine get the girl. .. . cause he deserves it
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Amélie (2001)
10/10
a movie who's magic grabs and doesnt let go
21 April 2003
I saw amelie as of a few days ago. It has been a long time coming. There has always been something that has stopped me from seeing it. So I finally got a copy of it and as I watched it I became enthralled by the beauty, simplicity, and magic of the main character and the story itself. You root for the character almost from the beginning of the story as you see her terrible childhood, and see her loneliness only increase with time. And instead of thinking of herself she thinks of others in an attempt to fill the void in her life. But it does not last for long and she begins to see that her life isnt all that she wants it to be. And her attraction to Nino is quite apparent. And you see that he is very much like her. . . a dreamer. Audrey Tautou is absolutely magnificent in her role. She exudes this sort of kindness and thrill for life but with a loneliness keeping her life from being perfect. And the rest of the movie is filled with characters seemingly pulled right off the street and into the movie. . . not shells of characters with no depth like in most movie. This movie is definately a 10 and rightly deserves it.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed