Reviews

13 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
1/10
Farcical
2 January 2024
Well, if only this could be as great as the book... The Yursky film proved that there can be a proper adaptation of this novel. In fact, it was very watchable. But this dud is overly long and plain boring. Also, there are too many actors who can't act. Menshikov, being a decent actor, is an exception, but even he overacts more often than not. It doesn't seem like he wants to be in this movie. The others, though, are much, much worse. And the director is most at fault, as she turned this yarn into an unfunny attempt at farce. I don't know who is so patient that he can sit through all these episodes. I definitely wasn't.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A County Girl and a City Girl
7 August 2021
I didn't expect much, but, all in all, it is not a bad film. Very strong performance by both leads portraying a city girl and a country girl as lifelong friends, and the storyline is rather moving. The writing at times is a suspect, as it often gets overly ridiculous. The man obsessed with hens, etc., etc. The depiction of country life is bordering caricature. With a better writer, this could be a seriously good film. But even what we've got in the end is very watchable and engaging.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Silliness Prevails
25 February 2020
This combination of fantasy, musical, extravaganza and silliness doesn't really work. It could be a brilliant satire, a "The Good Soldier Svejk"-like grotesque; it could be something similar to Milos Forman's "The Firemen's Ball", but, unfortunately, it isn't. The basic premise had the potential; the idea of turning guns into clarinets and vice versa was a good one. However, the directors were too obsessed with playing it safe in Communist Czechoslovakia and making the viewers "have a good time". In the end, silliness prevails, and the film doesn't live up to its cult status.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Excellent but a bit of a downer
16 November 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Audie Murphy makes his last appearance on screen as Jesse James, and an excellent Jesse James he is (I wish he had more screen time here!) But the film is much more than just an Audie Murphy vehicle. Victor Jory's portrayal of the infamous sadistic judge Roy Bean is hard to forget. It is good to see Anne Randall in her pre-"Westworld" days. The little-known Richard Lapp is convincing as a farm boy and a bounty hunter wannabe Cass Bunning, and so is Bob Random as a neurotic wannabe bandit Billy Pimple who tries to establish himself as a bandit and as a gunfighter. Good actors' work throughout the film!

Made on a low budget and only lasting 67 minutes, the film nevertheless provides food for thought. It makes you think about trying to use your fighting skills despite having no previous experience - and then your whole life slips out of your sweaty hands like a couple of pistols. You may be lucky once or twice, but not the third time. You want "fun" and you go into town with your wife that you saved from a whorehouse, even though you could take her straight to your ranch. As a result, you end up dead, and your wife ends up in the same whorehouse you saved her from. As I said, it is a bit of a downer but still an excellent western. Well done, Mr. Budd Boetticher!
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Decent Film Noir
4 November 2017
I heard about this adaptation of the novel by James Hadley Chase made in the late 60s but only came across the DVD very recently - and it was a German DVD, with both English and German-language versions. Overall, it is a decent film noir, with very good actors in it, even though we don't see them very often in English-language films. Lang Jeffries is excellent as a man consumed by greed; the Chilean actor Daniel Emilfork also very convincing as a creepy policeman, and the Italian Gianni Rizzio (who I remember from his cameo performance in "The Name of the Rose") as the underworld kingpin. Francesca Tu is OK as the leading man's girlfriend. So what can I say about the film today, exactly 50 years since its release? It is very watchable, and deserves to be seen. I hope it will be restored for the next edition, as it looks rather bleak on DVD. So if you like film noir and have a chance to watch this particular one, do.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Unwatchable
18 May 2016
This one is really made in bad taste. What exactly is it? A musical? A silly science fiction piece? A fairy tale for the adults? The only thing, they get bored after just few minutes of watching. The actors grossly overdo it, and the whole thing tumbles down into farce. Could have been so much better! Terry Gilliam's "The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus" gives a good example of how this kind of film should be done properly. As for this one, it provokes no emotions and creates no ideas. Weirdness reigns supreme, and it is not a good kind of weirdness... I've seen quite a few excellent Romanian films but this isn't one of them. My verdict: a complete waste of time...
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Za spichkami (1980)
1/10
Unfunny and Agonising to Watch
25 October 2015
A farcical comedy with a few very good actors which is supposed to be funny; the only thing, it is not. Made in Russia in 1980, it was announced as a Russian-Finnish co-production, although all the leads and supporting actors are Russian. Is it authentic? I visited both countries, and my opinion is, the Russian actors in this film don't look like Finns and don't behave like them. Such Russian stars as Leonov, Nevinnyy and Vitsin are wasted, and silliness creeps in from the very start and then builds up and clogs up everything. The director, Gayday, made quite a number of really witty situation comedies. Unfortunately, this is not one of them. Try 'Twelve Chairs' or 'Kidnapping, Caucasian Style', instead.
3 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Westwind (2011)
7/10
Love vs. Indoctrination
8 February 2015
In 1988, two inseparable twin sisters from DDR, Isabel and Doreen, travel outside the country for the first time. They go to the sports camp on the bank of Lake Balaton in the socialist Hungary, then a part of the Soviet block. The sisters accept a lift from two young men from Hamburg in Western Germany, and get castigated by their supervisor for communicating with "the enemy". One of the sisters gets romantically involved with one of the men. Will she abscond with him or will she stay?

Director Robert Thalheim did a great job making the film very watchable and creating tension towards the end of the film. The two actresses portraying the two sisters, Friederike Becht (who appeared in "The Reader") and Luise Heyer in her first role, were terrific. I also liked Hans-Uwe Bauer as the supervisor; his take on this character is very believable.

All in all, this is a great little film about the divided nation, or, if you prefer, about "the German - German problem", as the Germans themselves like to call it. Whichever countries the Soviets laid their hands on, they spread there the ideology of hate indoctrinating children with the views that all the westerners are their enemies. And this is not very different from the state ideology of Putin's Russia that brings chaos and destruction to the neighbouring countries.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A Tribute to Ken Annakin's "Across the Bridge"
20 June 2012
It is one of the best films I've seen this year, which proves that low- budget films can be as good as lavish Hollywood ones. Of course, it is an homage to Ken Annakin's "Across the Bridge" (1957), which, in its turn, was an adaptation of Graham Greene's short story. It also has a banker who commits embezzlement and flees to Mexico, even though the banker in the newer film is a much more likable person - at least, Aidan Quinn makes him that. Both bankers achieve redemption in the end, but in very different ways, and this is where all the similarities end. Aidan Quinn, Mario Van Peebles and Andy Garcia are very good matches for their roles; actually, the whole actors' ensemble is impressive. Somebody described this flick as an action movie; in fact, it is not, even though tension builds up towards the end. Another reviewer doubted that the FBI budge could make such a profound impression on Mexican police and mercenaries; my take on it is, it surely can, especially if you don't forget that the events take place very close to the US border. Overall, it is a very good film, and I was pleasantly surprised with its quality (which includes camera work). It comes highly recommended.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Seventh degree stupid
11 April 2012
I am a big fan of Polish cinema, so I decided to watch this flick on DVD (luckily enough, it was subtitled). I couldn't be more disappointed. Clichéd characters, a cheesy love story, all those not-so-funny jokes... And, what is worse, the actors turned it into a complete farce. The only thing that seemed OK was the camera work. As for the writing, it was shockingly bad. They made much better films in the past. If you want to watch a good Polish comedy, find a copy of Sexmission, a great science-fiction comedy directed by Machulski (I liked it much better than his famous Vabank). Don't waste your time on this dross!
1 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Pop (2009)
1/10
Straightforward religious propaganda
14 October 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Watched this film on a Russian DVD, which had just been released. Frankly, it came as a huge disappointment. Every time the director wants to make a point he uses a cliché. Makovetsky as a priest is laughable, and the whole film resembles a kind of parody because of that. I bet the director didn't want that to happen! Usatova as the priest's wife is brilliant, as she almost always is, but she can't save the film which is nothing short of a piece of straightforward religious propaganda. Enough to say that the film was made by the Orthodox Church film company. By the way, the prototype of the priest (who bore the same surname) didn't stay put when the Russians came but fled with the retreating Nazi troops. So much for the truth of life... The only positive Jew in the film is the converted Jewish girl. Well, what can we expect of an adaptation of a novel by an ultra-nationalist Russian writer - and, generally, of a film made by a church film company? Gazprom that subsidized the making of the drivel could have found a much better way of investing their money.
6 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
what a flop!
19 July 2009
It is arguably the most boring film I've ever seen in my life. Boring and pretentious. European cinema at its worst: no plot, no nothing. I wonder how the director started filming having such an empty script. The stilted monologue of the Portuguese woman who explains things to her daughter makes you feel uncomfortable, simply because you know most of the things, and don't really want to know the rest. The whole first part of the film sounds like a bad documentary from an educational channel: we could have read a guide-book, instead. If you want to watch a good film with an educational background, find a copy of Sophie's World: this is a great film. In the second half, Catherine Deneuve, Irene Papas and Stefania Sandrelly excel in a small talk, and so does John Malkovitch; they wouldn't stop for ages. You begin to anticipate some kind of deus ex machina, and here it duly comes in the form of a bomb. The Talking Picture isn't even bad, it is awful. Avoid!
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dogma (1999)
1/10
What a flop!
8 April 2009
I must admit to being quite surprised that some people think this film funny. In fact, this is probably one of the worst films I've ever seen: stupid, pretentious and containing some meaningless pseudo religious rubbish. There were wonderful films in this genre (religious comedy) - "Life of Brian" would be a good example - but this movie isn't one of them. It has some good actors in it - notably Matt Damon, Ben Affleck, Jason Lee, Linda Fiorentino, Salma Hayek, Alan Rickman - but they were unable to save the film. If you don't want to waste a couple of hours of your precious time, avoid this boring stuff! It won't offend you but it will make you yawn...
7 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed