Reviews

2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
1/10
I forced myself to not walk out...
11 November 2007
Warning: Spoilers
First...I am a dyed-in-the-wool liberal from the 60's and all that stands for; including being anti war; especially anti Iraq and GW. That said, this is one of the most self-consciously self-indulgent films I've seen in a long long time. What a disappointment! As a former TV correspondent, I thought Meryl Streep's interview with Cruise was laughable. (what was all her giggling about? And what television reporter does an interview without a camera!!!!) The college kid was a total smart-ass...Redford tried too hard not to come off wooden..and I didn't like Cruise's performance at all! The directing was contrived and confusing...and the war scenes were completely cheesy! The ending?...where the 2 soldiers forced themselves to stand up made me groan it was so corny...and then there was that questionable ending with the kid (about whom i didn't care one bit). I couldn't wait for it to be over. All that said, several audience members applauded!! Go figure. It made me think, alright...about why they couldn't make a smart anti war film that wasn't so talky, and preachy and so full of propaganda!
15 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
i was a reporter in boulder during the investigation; obviously i was very curious to see part 1.
29 June 2003
i agree with previous comments that there were too many characters in part #1. i reported on the investigation and although i knew nearly all the players, i had trouble keeping them straight while watching. i can tell you, that at least in part #1, the portrayals of the ramseys, commander eller, det. steve thomas and d.a. alex hunter were right on. so far, the tv movie is pretty even-handed.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed