Reviews

24 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Rio Grande (1950)
Oh, by the way, there's an Indian raid...
17 May 2024
Warning: Spoilers
...although that's not the most interesting part of the movie. The family dynamics between Wayne. O'Hara, and Jarman dominate the movie, each vying for the affections of the two others all the way through. The scenes between Wayne and O'Hara speak for themselves; I especially like the scenes where Wayne tries to reconnect with Jarman, whom military duty has kept him from for eighteen years. Jarman, Ben Johnson, and Dobie Carey are also a delight as three troopers who eventually thwart the Indian raid while providing any comedy that Victor McLaughlin misses. I love the scene where Wayne sneaks a look at a beaten and bruised Jarman, who has lost a "soldier's fight", and smiles knowing his son has stood up for himself and for his commanding officer. The songs are provided by the Sons of th Pioneers, featuring Ken Curtis, who also has a line or two in other scenes. It way not have the stars and grandeur of Fort Apache or the color of She Wore a Yellow Ribbon, but this is my favorite of the Ford Cavalry Trilogy.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Tollinger/Nelly Backstory is the Most Interesting.
17 May 2024
Warning: Spoilers
Mitchum hires on as a town tamer to rid Sheridan of a land grabbing rancher. But why is he there in the first place? He's tracked his ex-wife to town to find our about his estranged daughter whom he hasn't seen in three years, after Jan Sterling, fed up with his gunplay, takes her to Ohio to stay with her parents. Mitchum will stay on, not because he's been hired, but because Sterling refuses to tell him about the daughter. When he finds out she died during a cold winter, he becomes the viscous character he always had the potential to be, and sets the rest of the picture in motion. For me, this is the interesting part of the story, not the gunplay, although Mitchum mows down both Claude Akins and Leo Gordon. It looks to me like a Mitchum film noir in the dust.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Caney Isn't Miscast - Dracula Is
11 April 2024
Warning: Spoilers
Son of Dracula is an intelligent mystery in which the vampire plays a relatively minor role. Lon Chaney isn't on screen for very long because his character isn't really needed; the film is an occult mystery that could have been just as well served by using a witch, minor demon, or other satanic figure. A young woman wants her fiancée to join her in eternal life and attempts to double cross the vampire after the process is complete. The use of Dracula (or whoever he is) reduces the need for background explanation other than the minute or two Kay gives Frank in his jail cell. Chaney is given some trite dialog and wisely doesn't attempt an accent. In fact, although the film is set somewhere in the American southeast, no one has any accent at all. The real star is the set decorator, as the swampy land around Dark Oaks rises and falls, and looks genuinely muddy and dank. Special effects are simple but effective, especially the use of mist for the vampires' method of travel. A very good film, unfairly overlooked by UMU enthusiasts.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Plane Nuts (1933)
3/10
Two Movies in One - And the One You Watch it for Isn't Very Good
21 March 2024
Even Stooges fans will have a hard time recognizing their heroes in this two-for-one picture. Ted Healey tries mightily to deliver a song before a closed curtain while the Stooges constantly interrupt. Although Moe takes charge of his team, Larry Fine actually has more lines and more gags, which are lessened by the absence of their familiar sound effects. Two big musical production numbers highlight the movie as a reminder this is an MGM production. It's interesting for movie historians and Stooges buffs, but overall it's a big disappointment and you won't want to sit through a second viewing.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Hal Roach vs MGM
2 December 2023
In 1937, Our Gang, then working for Hal Roach, made a short called "The Pigskin Palooka" which used a similar Alfalfa-as-Footbal-Star theme. But the differences between that film and this, an MGM production, are night and day. This film makes Alfalfa a genuine star, using a broken romance to bring him to his senses and win the day and the girl. The earlier film had Alfalfa as the braggart who has never played being forced into the "big game" with a rival team. That film is more in keeping with the Alfalfa personality we all know, and is frankly much funnier. This one could have starred Jack Okie and Ann Southern and been the same picture.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
I Prepared Myself for a Turkey...
24 August 2023
...but was very pleasantly surprised by this light comedy. I was only passingly familiar with Evalyn Knapp, but she is wonderfully authentic as a gentle but take charge wife and secretary who would do any modern feminist proud. Reginald Barlow is equally good as the rough "capitalist" who gives his playboy son, John Wayne in a suit, too many of the wrong kind of chances until Knapp sets him straight. Wayne gives some glimpses of the comedic ability he demonstrated later in his career. The pre code "scandalous" party sequences fall completely flat, but the performances make the mild plot twists enjoyable. Fine movie for a rainy Sunday afternoon.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An Adult for Kids
4 May 2023
I may be the only kid in America in the 1950's who didn't watch Captain Kangaroo, because he was on at the same time as Sandy Becker, and I wouldn't miss Sandy for anything. Marvin Mouse was my introduction to classical piano music. I didn't know what sauerkraut was, but I knew Geba Geba owned a factory that made it. Bosco was the number one chocolate syrup, but I used Cocoa Marsh because that's what Sandy advertised ( mom wouldn't buy Giroux Grenadine Syrup). I saw my first snake courtesy of Massepequa Zoo and Kiddie Park. I can still hum "That Happy Feeling". And of course, the classic Looney Tunes and Merrie Melodies. Sandy was never over the top, didn't wear outrageous makeup and spoke to kids as real people, not as cartoons. He was an adult for kids. God Bless Sandy Becker.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Love Fever (1931)
Thelma Shines, but Where is Everyone Else?
14 February 2023
Despite being an entry in "The Boyfriends" series, Thelma Todd unsurprisingly carries what little of this picture there is. The minuscule plot has Thelma rehearsing her death scene for a play, and being interrupted by Alabam, Mickey, and Dave, who have just been dumped by their girlfriends. For all the gag men available on the Hal Roach lot, this picture has no gags; Dave gets to do some tumbling, and Mickey falls on the floor, but that's about it. There are also an incredible number of needless closeups of everyone mugging because there's nothing else to do. Thelma is wonderful, as expected, and one wishes the end scene with Edgar Kennedy had been longer, but overall nothing really happens in this picture. Strictly for nostalgia buffs (like me).
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The Importance of Models
12 June 2022
Everyone who comments on this movie wants to criticize Jim Danforth's animated monsters as jerky and inferior to Harryhausen's. Maybe Raphael wasn't Michelangelo either, but he was pretty good. I see the problem not with the animation, but with the models themselves. Harryhausen was involved in every aspect of their design and construction and had them built to his specifications. Danforth had to rely on Project Unlimited, with at the time was heavily involved in TV production, including many children's shows. As a result, the monsters here all look like Puppettoons or Gumby creations, and no amount of snarling and grimacing can give them any menace. I never got the feeling Cormoran would kill anyone, although Sinbad's Cyclops terrified me. Harryhausen's models are vital to the overall superiority of his animation.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
A One Story Foundation
21 October 2021
Stan Laurel once called his and Oliver Hardy's early features, "a three story house on a one story foundation". Here, Godsen and Correll, masters of the fifteen minute radio program, attempt to stretch their sketches into a feature film. Because of their success with the early Marx Brothers, Harry Ruby and Bert Kalmar were brought in to write the dialog, but their experience was also in short bursts of business, so there's little continuity in the "plot". Even though they created the characters of Amos and Andy, Godsen and Correll aren't as funny on screen as they were on radio, and not as effective as Spencer Williams and Tim Moore as the Kingfish, on TV. This may be a good movie for nostalgia buffs and film students, but it isn't especially funny.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
They're Still Wild Animals
29 January 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Must have been made by people who are all heart and no mind. Martin Milner actually tries to make the case that a recently fed carnivore is no danger to the public until he gets hungry again, then says he has trained riflemen with tranquilizer guns who can render all the escaped animals harmless. Milner and Andy Devine give it a good try, and the underlying idea is heartwarming, but escaped wild animals are still highly dangerous, making the events ridiculous. Skip this and go hug your puppy.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Law & Order: Switch (1995)
Season 5, Episode 22
Unusual Plot, Excellent Performances
14 January 2021
I'm a big fan of the series and this is one of my favorite episodes for several reasons. First are the performances, especially by Francie Swift as a disturbed woman diagnosed with multiple personality disorder. She, and the personalities, are believable without being over the top. Second, because of the lead guest's diagnosis, there is no "bad guy" as in most murder cases. Last, and to me maybe the most important, the producer has the courage to allow the "gut instincts" of the stars to be dead wrong almost all the way through. I find it satisfying when the stars are as flawed as the rest of us; even McCoy's usual sanctimony is held in check. If this one is replayed tomorrow, I'll watch it again.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Slight But Still Funny
7 December 2020
Made before Laurel and Hardy became a solid team with the characteristics we know and love, Putting Pants on Phillip is a one-trick pony, but the Boys play it for all, maybe more, than it's worth. Shirt chasing Laurel must be taken out of his own skirt, or properly his kilt, to fit into American society. Of course, Laurel resists, and Hardy is adamant, and along the way we get our share of lantern grins, camera looks, cries, and maybe the first time Oliver Hardy meets the six foot puddle. There's a great reaction shot after Laurel inadvertently loses his drawers before walking over an air grate; a quick cut shows the women in the crowd fainting at the sight of the pants-less Laurel. After his inseam measurement is taken, a half disrobed and completely disheveled Laurel appears, as broken as any Griffith heroine.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Good Cast With Nothing to Do.
15 September 2020
How can a movie with Charley Chase, Thelma Todd, Anita Garvin, and Dell Henderson, plus a sletzer bottle climax, be such a dud? Even a top notch cast needs some good gags, and there almost none here. The plot is fine, and one wonders if it had been intended as a dialog comedy instead of a slapstick. The post office and Niagara Falls gags just don't work, and there are too many cutaways of Chase's camera looks. Eddie Dunn probably has the best scenes as the butler who takes too many drinks of the bootleg cocktails he isn't supposed to be making. However, any scene with Todd, Garvin, and Dolores Brinkman in wet, tight dresses deserves applause.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Big Business (1929)
9/10
A Brief View of Two Neglected "Characters"
15 June 2020
There's really nothing one can add to the performances of Laurel, Hardy, Finlayson and Tiny Sanford that hasn't already been said. So here's a word on two forgotten characters in the movie. First is the Model A Ford, which should have received co-star billing. The mechanical equivalent of Stan and Ollie, the Model A is slightly defferent from other cars, a little out of touch, but still able to participate fully in whatever schemes they have. You must feel sorry for the Model A at the end, having given its life for The Boys; even the crowd seems horrified at its demise. Which brings me to the second character, the crowd that forms person by spectator, aghast at the action, but too fascinated to intervene. They shuttle back and forth from the street to Fin's yard, an autonomous collective, gasping and crying along with Fin, TIny, and the Boys at the end of the war. The picture wouldn't have been the same without either of them.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Laughs Without Comedians
21 October 2019
This picture is the prime example of how MGM ruined some of the greatest comedians in film. It had the best writers, best directors, best cinematographers, and they mistakenly thought dropping comedians like the Marx Brothers and, most lamentably, Keaton, into their studio films and expected superior results. They forgot, or refused to acknowlegde, that there was such a a thing as a Keaton comedy, or Laurel and Hardy routines. Look at the cast list here; how many real comedians are there? Very few. We get comic bits from mostly straight actors who had the chance to say or do something funny in an MGM movie. Are there laughs? Sure, and if you're looking for comedy you can find it here. If you're looking for a Big Parade of Comedians, you'd better go elsewhere.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Skip Everything but the Dinosaurs
8 September 2019
I saw this when it first came out, and like all college students, whooped and hollered through the whole thing. I've seen it several times since then, and have come to realize the non-Harryhausen elements are generally awful. A prize bull could have been substituted for Gwangi without making a difference in the story, which tried to be so much a standard western that the fantasy elements are minimized. I could never warm up to the Franciscus character, even when he did a "face turn", Gila Golan is unnecessary, and although Richard Carlson tries hard, he can't out-act everyone alone. Some of Harryhausen's best Dynamation effects are here (color changes notwithstanding), Gwangi is lively enough, and the final scene is extremely well done, but it's hard to sit through the rest when you know what's coming up.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Where Are Stan and Ollie?
23 June 2019
The great silent and early sound comedians were all "personality" comedians. No on could devise gags for Keaton and Lloyd as well as the comedians themselves because they knew their characters and knew what was believable for them. Likewise, no one could devise gags for Laurel and Hardy as well as Stan Laurel. Unfortunately, MGM thought their best writers and directors could produce winning films for anybody, regardless of their characters. Here's the problem with this picture; the characters of Stan and Ollie aren't needed. Jack Haley and Tom Ewell could have starred in this movie with equal succcess because there are so few Laurel and Hardy moments in it. Even the "tit for tat" gag with Edgar Kennedy is slow and tiring, without the zest and fun of similar battles with Finlayson and Charlie Hall. In the end. this is an MGM picture with Laurel and Hardy, and not what fans of "Sons of the Desert" and "Blockheads" look forward to.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
No Magic
14 December 2018
It's an almost thankless task to remake a beloved classic, and the entire production tries mightily. The actors, production, photography, etc. are all very good. Unfortunately, the pure magic of the original isn't here. This is a movie; the original was an emotional event. There's no Macy's, so the reality of the times is missing; they "updated" the characters' names to Dorey and Bryan (Doris and Fred are too 1940's), and as good as he is, Richard Attenborough doesn't twinkle like Edmund Gwenn. This is a good picture if you haven't seen the first one.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Forget Stan and Ollie - Peanuts and Anita Carry the Picture
11 December 2018
Anyone who says Laurel and Hardy were intended for the parts played by Kennedy and Erwin has never seen this picture. Ed and Stu do very little other than drive around looking for a place to park; the majority of the comedy is handled by Peanuts Byron with some support from Anita Garvin, especially in the first reel. Her attempts at getting ice cream cones. continually thwarted by bratty Spec O'Donnell, provide the highlight of the movie. A good "tit for tat" sequence at the end may reinforce the L&H theory, but remember this is a Roach product, with Roach gag men. All else aside, this is a very funny picture available on YouTube and worth your twenty minutes.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Plenty of laughs from Patsy and Thelma
20 October 2018
One of the better Kelly-Todd entries, this one had no plot at all, just a series of gags dominated by Patsy Kelly. Thelma has little to do but be somewhat annoying, but Jimmy Parrott's direction and the above average gags make this a winner. A good running gag leaves Patsy with nowhere to put her clothes because Thelma's crowd every closet and drawer, to the point of crawling out when they're opened. Charlie Hall and Arthur Houseman get in in the fun, too, and LeRoy Shields' wonderful background themes run throughout the short.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A comedy with Keaton, but not a Keaton comedy
4 August 2017
I have great respect for the early movie comedians like Keaton, Chaplin, Laurel and others who created a character and developed situations and gags that fit the character's personality. They all had great autonomy within their own smaller companies, but found free reign disappear when they moved to the majors. "Sidewalks" is an MGM comedy with Buster Keaton; it's not a Buster Keaton comedy. It isn't bad, but other, even lesser comedians could have done as well because the "Buster" character doesn't appear here. Although some of the dialog is good and Keaton delivers it well, there's too much; he has an inner city gym for physical gags, but there's too little. The big studios never understood that comedians like Keaton, and later Laurel and Hardy, were their own writers, directors, and gag men. "Sidewalks" has much to recommend it, including some good support, but if you're looking for "Buster", or even "Elmer", look elsewhere.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Not Stan and Ollie - Peanuts and Anita
28 March 2013
I realize this very funny picture was produced by Hal Roach and starred a comedy team, but I don't see how anyone can believe that Kennedy and Erwin played roles intended for Laurel and Hardy. The two men do little more than drive around the block for more than half the picture while Peanuts Byron gets all the gags. If anything, Stan and Ollie would have played the girls' parts and would have been more of a team than Peanuts and Anita were. The ice cream routines with Spec O'Donnell are highlights, as is the final "reciprocal destruction" scene, but it's unfair to compare this delightful short with a true Laurel and Hardy picture. Forget The Boys, watch The Girls; they're funny, too.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Swiss Miss (1938)
7/10
Better than it gets credit for
22 October 2010
I think this picture gets bashed undeservedly. By 1938 Hal Roach was branching out into other movie genres, and he liked adding music to comedy and comedy to adventure. Laurel and Hardy had been successful in "The Devil's Brother" and "Babes in Toyland", and this film was not a stretch from those. He added good sets, a better than usual supporting cast, and popular music to this picture. Stan, for his part, created gags that were unusual for the team, such as the St. Bernard scene, the piano-bridge scene, and the organ scene. Both men were in the 40's; Stan had been ill and Oliver was really adding weight, and they were less than believable doing banana peel slide routines any more. They all tried mightily to produce a pleasant hybrid movie, but because it wasn't traditional L&H picture they got resentment instead. The light was visible at the end of the tunnel for Stan and Ollie by this time, and they attempted a direction change they hoped would retain their place as major stars.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed