Reviews

14 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Skyscraper (2018)
6/10
Not terrible...but holy plot holes...
20 October 2018
I won't ruin the ending...but my goodness...the sheer number of plot holes that creep up in this flick are hard to ignore.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Goon (2011)
4/10
An Insult To The Game Of Hockey...
10 October 2012
Warning: Spoilers
I didn't give this movie a 0 because there are some redeeming aspects to it, a few cool moves here and there you see on the ice. But Hockey isn't about the goonery, hasn't been for a long time. Even in the minor levels you don't see anything near the bench clearing brawls you see in every other "Game" portrayed in this movie. A player getting his ankle stepped on by a skate? the ankle would be amputated. A player getting hit in the face with the puck, only to get smashed there a dozen more times while in the crease and no whistle? please.

I guess if you don't care about hockey, and stuff you might find this amusing, but as a hockey fan, a hockey player, and a person who feels the game of hockey is disrespected by the mainstream media far too much, this movie flat out insults me at times. Maybe I'm taking it too literally, but I just can't get over the way that hockey players are portrayed in this film. It's insulting.
1 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
April Showers (2009)
5/10
Over-hyped, underdelivered.
24 June 2009
Warning: Spoilers
This is one of those films where the trailer gets your expectations way too high for the actual film. When watching the trailer you are expecting just the most epic, heart wrenching masterpiece about a school shooting. Instead the movie is really about a supposed tragic love story that is tragic because of a school shooting. It's almost like the shooting, and the reactions of some of the traumatized kids are afterthoughts to this "love lost" story. Which wouldn't necessarily be a bad thing if you cared for the characters at all. But the 2 main characters, April, and her love interest, whose name I am forgetting right now and who really needs a haircut in the worst way, just aren't likable. You don't really CARE that April is killed in the movie. You don't really care that the greasy hippie is in pain. What I seemed to care more about was the kid whose life was being turned upside down because he happened to be friends with the killer...except that the director spent far too little time on this, significantly more interesting aspect of the film, and instead tried to fulfill the cliché "pretty people in suffering" aspect that you come to expect from movies nowadays. I expected a lot from this movie, and I gave it a 5 mainly because of a really great trailer that gets you very interested in the watching the film, however the film itself is something I wouldn't really recommend watching unless you're an avid movie watcher who enjoys watching everything you can get your hands on.
15 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Bad...Really Bad....
20 July 2007
Warning: Spoilers
I've seen hundreds, possibly thousands of movies. I sat through the abomination that was Tomb Raider 2. I watched the blindness producing Torque all the way through. But this.....this was just unwatchable.

I love action/martial arts movies...who doesn't? But this is just awful. First it starts off with some exciting action, then degrades into a truly spectacular piece of crap, with a giant, a wizard, and a monkey man.

Yes, I'm being serious.

Once we met the wizard, I turned it off. No action in the world was good enough to make me keep watching.

This movie had some truly awful acting, even for Thai movies this was bad. The action? boring, with one or 2 memorable scenes which I already saw on the trailer. The hero? only uses his knees. watching him kick the crap out of people the same exact way for 20 minutes gets boring...fast.

Special effects? My god, they were bad...i mean we had the hero riding a rocket like a surfboard....Christ almighty can you believe that crap?! I feel stupider just having watched this movie, I urge you to save some brain cells and skip it. Watch Ong Bak, watch Tom Yum Goong, heck watch em twice, just don't watch this movie.

-Inferno
5 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Charmed (1998–2006)
1/10
Horrible. Quite possibly the worst show to ever air for more than 3 seasons.
29 August 2006
Warning: Spoilers
So lets get one thing straight, I've watched the first 7 years, many episodes more than once. Why? simple, I'm a 26 year old guy, and I like to look at the bosoms. Thats it. I'm a HUGE HUGE HUGE Buffy the Vampire Slayer fan, but not because of the plethora of attractive women that appear on that show. No, because of the writing, depth, and emotional resonance. Charmed will always be known as a Buffy clone w/o any of the good writing, acting, story lines, depth, and as i mentioned, emotional resonance.

let me sum up the first 7 years, since i haven't seen the 8th one yet (but ill watch it just so i know how the story finished)

I hate being a witch I love being a witch I hate being a witch I love being a witch I hate being a witch I love being a witch "maybe this is an innocent we just cant save" i love you *insert overly attractive male stars name here*, but i cant be with you because I'm a witch. i love Cole, i hate Cole, i love Cole, i hate Cole

the insipid writing is only topped by the blatant exploitation of Alyssa Milano, Shannen Doherty, holly Marie combs, and rose McGowan's sexy bodies. The show was never really good, i mean, it had SOME moments, brief ones, in episodes where things seem to have been written actually well, but is just lost when the inane writing truly shows its colors.

the show, unlike buff, blatantly exposes the hot women to scenarios, and situations to use their vast sex appeal to drawn an audience. have Alyssa milano as a half naked mermaid, a half naked mummy chick, a fully naked lady Godiva, naughty nymphs anyone? the show knows what it has, and it shamelessly exploits it. Think about it, if you've ever watched Buffy, can you name one episode where the show deliberately set itself up to be a sex grabber? every time something sexual happened it was usually within the scope of the show, and important to not only the story line of the episode, but of the greater arc. NEVER can that be said for Charmed.

This show is truly a pillar for which all unambitious, poorly written shows should strive for. if you can cast VERY hot women, put them in situations mentioned before, you can be on the air for 8 years, and have an actual core fan base who collectively have the intellectual level of a turnip. Now I'm not a hypocrite, seeing as how i mentioned I've watched 7 years of it, and will watch the 8th. I'm honest to myself, i watch it because Alyssa Milano is simply a goddess to be worshiped. But those of you who actually think you're watching good television, shame on you.

allow me to take an excerpt from encyclopedia Dramatica (google it) on the show. *note, i didn't write this:

"Since all Hollywood producers are unoriginal hacks with a single brain cell among them, BTVS was ripped off by Aaron Spelling who stole Buffy's premise and plots to make the series Charmed. He claimed he actually stole the idea from a movie by the same title but no one buys that bull****. Spelling put his creative signature on the show by costuming the lead characters as trailer trash whores and, to ensure verisimilitude, by casting actual trailer trash whores in the roles.

The clone has particular appeal for young women who wish to fight the forces of evil with their supernatural powers while wearing halter tops, stiletto heels, and glitter eyeshadow. The Charmed Ones official web site has announced their budget has been cut for the next season, meaning the stars will wear no clothing at all and will substitute old copies of "Bewitched" episodes for new scripts. This is expected to increase entertainment quality and viewer ship enormously. "

Retrieved from "http://encyclopediadramatica.com/index.php/Buffy_the_Vampire_Slayer"

obviously a joking account of the show, but surprisingly spot on.

I wouldn't suggest ANYONE to watch this show, because it makes ME seem like a bumbling moron for even suggesting it.
64 out of 141 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Serenity (2005)
10/10
EXCELLENT! one of the years best no doubt
1 October 2005
Warning: Spoilers
where to begin, well since i want to keep this spoiler free, lets do a quick non spoilery review of what you get when you watch this movie. you get some of the prototypical joss whedon humor, and by that i mean stuff that makes you just burst our laughing making the theatre look at you (hey, i laugh loud OK!) it also has EXTREMELY unexpected moments, and no major character is free from being killed off (typical joss!).

it is also brilliantly written, a great story, and some interesting plot twists with some major ties to the TV show yet an entity all on its own. i loved it, i will see it again, i will buy the DVD. i just hope everyone at least sees it once in theatre, because it really is a great movie, and joss whedon is one of the most under-appreciated men in Hollywood. the guy is a genius and gets no credit. i hope this film makes oodles of cash because i want to see a sequel! or even better, a Buffy movie that HE writes and directs!
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Waterboy (1998)
10/10
Captain Insano Shows No Mercy!
23 September 2005
Warning: Spoilers
how anyone could not like this movie is beyond me. Not only does it have a pretty darn good acting core with Fariuza Balk (sp?) Adam Sandler, Kathy Bates, and the great Henry Winkler, it also has a lovable story, and some insane football hits.

a hilarious comedic action flick is what i would call it, just a different kind of action flick :) anyway, i really don't have to say the story outline, as I'm sure 99% of the people reading this have already seen it, so all i am going to say is, that i think this is a great movie, i think everyone should see it, and i think you should see it with an open mind. you are NOT going to get a flick like the shawshank redemption, but you will get a flick that will make you say, you know what, that last 90 minutes of my life was pretty darn good :) watch it, you'll like it, trust me :)
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Simply Terrible
25 June 2005
generally speaking when i watch a movie, i am almost never tempted to turn the movie off, in this case, i was. Tomb Raider 2: The Cradle Of Life was a putrid piece of film-making, it has only 1 single redeeming factor, Angelina is hot, and shes in full sex-appeal mode in this flick, other than that, i can not think of a single thing i enjoyed, it was THAT bad. i usually don't need much, i mean, i enjoyed bride of chucky, i even thought cat-woman was a bit under-appreciated, however this is just terrible. she punches a shark in the face? i mean, come on...give me a break. even taking into account that shes a buff, B/A chica, to punch one of the few creatures to survive the extinction of the dinosaurs and knock it into submission, with 1, count em 1 punch, is ludicrous!

things go from bad to worse as she picks up a terribly predictable bad guy turned good who is along for his freedom...haven't i seen this before? uhh, yeah, in like a zillion movies, the jackal, just to name one off the top of my head. the character wouldn't be so bad if you could understand a thing he said, but i was forced on many occasions to actually rewind a terrible movie just to hear what this guy said.

The amazing thing to me, is that this movie was actually made. i mean, lets all be honest, it was the exact same story in tomb raider 1, which was also a pitiful excuse for a film, however i assumed that if they got enough money to do this movie, based on the first flick, that they must have gotten a great script, so i gave it a shot...let me save you the time and effort....skip it, its not even worth the 2 hours of your life thats wasted. watch weekend at bernies for the 389025832098th time, but avoid this one at all costs!
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Rollerball (2002)
6/10
its not that bad..
25 June 2005
if you want a flick that will give you something to kill a few hours, check this out.

Its not all that bad, and is worth a rental, don't listen to everyone here, take my word for it :)

apparently i need a full 10 lines of text, so here goes.

There is a nude scene with miss stamos, so that alone should make it worthwhile to the guys out there.

there is some pretty brutal action, with plenty of blood.

the movie tries to do something different than the cookie cutter crap we see nowadays.

go see it!
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Batman Begins (2005)
10/10
Stop reading this now
20 June 2005
I'm being serious....why are you reading this? go out, get into your car, drive to the nearest theater, and wait in line for the next showing of batman, i don't care if its 4am, u go now, and wait for the first showing.

That is how good this movie is. Best movie this year, better than star wars episode 3 (and i LOVED EPISODE 3!!!) best super hero movie of all time, best...wait a second...are you STILL READING THIS?!!!? didn't i tell you to go wait in line!!! :-) with that said, this movie is great because it humanizes a "super human" you connect with bruce Wayne (mr. bale) on a deep level, you feel his pain, you feel he has truly suffered, and can not go on living the way he lives without going out and becoming batman, i mean, you can actually believe somebody would be insane enough to jump off of buildings, and dress up like a bat...thats how engaging this flick is. and never once do you actually believe you are looking at something that couldn't happen. this movie is done in a very "real" way, it uses real technology, it takes not suspension of disbelief to watch this movie, all you have to do is be a little hip to technology.

Simply stated, this movie is magnificent.

I hope they make a sequel, if they do, I'm lining up TODAY! :) NOW GO SEE IT!
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
House M.D. (2004–2012)
Absolutely BRILLIANT
19 February 2005
there are few show that can combine genres effectively, House however combines humor and drama seamlessly, this is one of the most brilliant shows ever created, and we are only midway through season one.

remember the episode of friends with the sarcastic guy on the airplane making fun of Rachel? to be honest i always thought that guy should have his own show because hes just so damn funny....well looks like i got my wish, and man o man is it a whopper! the acting is superb and the stories are excellent, a little reminiscent of the dead zone season 1, without the large swooping arcs, just episode by episode, but nonetheless, BRILLIANT everyone needs to watch this show so that the idiots at fox don't cancel it!
16 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Cube (1997)
6/10
Terrible, Terrible, TERRIBLE acting, but cool story.....
29 January 2005
Warning: Spoilers
When you watch this movie, if you are somehow capable of ignoring some truly godawful acting, you will enjoy it. it is pretty gory, and has some cool stuff that happens, but the acting is just horrible.

there are MANY plot holes, and the fact that the good guy turns into a villain so darn fast leaves me gagging but still, it is worth seeing. 6.5/10 holloway and quintin are terrible actors, whoever they are. be prepared for it, and you should be OK.

I would suggest also that you pay attention to the major plot holes of the moving cube that is nice enough not to make you feel like you are moving until you know that you are actually moving, and the cubes rattle like crazy, how handy is that!
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Village (2004)
9/10
brilliant
26 December 2004
i think the thing i had going for me when watching this movie is how many people said the movie was terrible. so i went in with a slightly pessimistic outlook for the movie, and was more than surprised. this is NOT like any of m. nights other movies. this is not the scare you, or shock you flicks he has done before. this is about making you think, and making you see whats around you. i pretty much had figured out the semi twist in the movie pretty early. all the signs are there, just look for them, and listen. it was very well written, and on par as far as grabbing films as he has done before.

i do understand however why people did not enjoy this movie. the problem is with the advertising. they advertise the heck outta this movie as something to scare you, and make your heart stop. and it just doesn't do that. don't blame the film, blame the marketers on that one.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Torque (2004)
1/10
YUCK
18 April 2004
blech, cough, wheeze, ahh-choo

this movie left me with a terrible taste in my mouth, a ridiculous piece of GARBAGE advertised like it was the best thing.....save yourself from an hour and 40 mins of garbage.

TERRIBLE special effects, the worst CGI crap i have ever seen, especially the last uber bike scene, made me want to throw up, it looked like something done with claymation....i was expecting Gumby and his pals to come welcome me.

when the flick starts, you may seem dumbfounded...lots of unexplained fights, terrible acting, and really, really hot chicks prancing around for no reason (though, thats not a bad thing, i just would like to KNOW why they are prancing around)...dont worry..it gets WORSE from there...

im too aggravated to comment on this for much longer, but let me say, there is one redeeming factor to this movie. Mcpherson, or whatever his name is, the FBI dude is pretty hilarious, all my buddies got a kick outta him.

to conclude, dont waste your money watching this movie...you are better off seeing the fast and the furious for the 129th time, or even 2 fast 2 furious for the 20th time (i actually prefer 2 fast, but hey, thats just me)
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed