53 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Final Exam (1981)
Fatal attempt
15 November 2003
This slasher came when the slasher genre enjoyed glory. Sadly, this flick didn't make a change, this is a good example of how producers in order to get some bucks squeeze a particular moment in the movie industry. Yeah back in 1981 the slasher genre smashed the box office so lots of these movies were released every month. 1981 was a decisive year in the genre as some of the best slasher movies were released. Take as an example Friday the 13th part 2 and Halloween 2.

"Final Exam" had a terrible direction, bad acting, and a boring script. Worst of all, this movie is no gory! This movie has it's moments. The director tried to create suspense whenever the killer was about to appear. The thing is that we don't have a clue of who the killer is, we don't get to know his reasons, and worst of all we never get to know who the killer is. Filled with stupid murders and boring situations, "Final Exams" fails on being remembered as a good slasher.

1/10
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A creepy slasher movie. Positive nostalgia.
10 November 2003
Warning: Spoilers
"The House On The Sorority Row" came in the right moment; the early 80's.

The "Friday the 13th" franchise commanded the slasher explosion by 1983.

Tons of slasher movies were released but only few are still in the memory of horror fans. "House On The Sorority Row" may be one of those films that are still remembered and recurred for some slasher fun.

The plot is somewhat inspired by Friday the 13th. The movie starts with Ms. Slater giving birth to a boy... Sadly, she has to abort due to some difficulties. Twenty years later (or more)Ms. Slater -now the owner and director of a sorority house for girls-is killed by the sorority girls. The girls killed her accidentally as they were planning a prank on her. These girls try to hide Ms. Slater's dead body outside the house. Unfortunately to them, the body disappears and suddenly these girls and their boyfriends start to disappear. One by one, these teens are brutally murdered inside and near the Sorority house. Katie Rose (one of the girls that had to do with the murder) finds 2 dead people and believes that Ms. Slater didn't die and now is doing the murders. Katie goes with the Doctor that 20 years witnessed Ms. Slater's abortion. To Katie's surprise, the Doctor confessed that the child didn't die and probably is living inside the house.

Katie and her boyfriend especulate that Ms. Slater's son watched her mother being killed and now is taking revenge. Katie realizes that her friends are still on the house and their lives are in risk. Could it be that Ms. Slater came from the grave and is taking revenge? Is it possible that Ms. Slater's son is alive? Katie and her boyfriend return to the house to solve the mystery and stop the killing spree. Witness one of the most shocking and terrorific endings in slasher cinema.

"House On The Sorority Row" delivers a great slasher experience as it's gory, suspenful, and very well directed. The acing and fun factor are interesting as you can imagine the outcome of the movie but you're never sure about it. The best thing about the movie is the creepy atmosphere. You can say the girls are terrorized while being inside the dark, big house.

This movie was the producer's first and last experiece in the industry. I think these people had a good potential in the genre. This movie is buried in the slasher cementery, just behind the precursor franchises of the genre.

4/10 Overall. On the slasher rating: 7/10
10 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Birds II: Land's End (1994 TV Movie)
This crap shouldn't be considered as a sequel...
30 October 2003
...to the 60's horror masterpiece. This is easily one of the worst horror movies of the past decade and that's something to say! The director Rick Rosenthal didn't have a clue of what's a horror movie or what'?! He did a good job in HALLOWEEN II but "Birds II" is a joke. The best thing about the movie is the scene where a couple is making-out and then the birds attack them... This movie has terrible special effects, a lame score, and worst of all a terrible selection of actors. Let's ban from our minds this movie.

1/10
0 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Don't get fooled by the creepy cover art of the box...
30 October 2003
"Death By Dialogue" is by no means a good slasher, in fact, it came out when the genre was going downhill.. Watch it just to have something to laugh about. I don't think someone can take this film seriously.

I won't even talk about the storyline as it's very BORING -not to say stupid-. The producers tried to make a bizarre sci-fi horror film but the result is a pooor slasher attempt. The highlight of the film is Ken Sagoes' major role in the film. I wonder why he didn't last long in the genre. The box features a demonic character surrounded by the 6 peak star... Definately a terrible film that didn't add something to the genre.

1/10
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Fear No Evil (1981)
A Diabolical attempt
29 October 2003
"Fear No Evil" is a great film about the anti Christ, the devil, and related stuff. The beginning of the movie is interesting and gives the chills. From that moment you can say that the film is filled with scary thematic and well crafted situations. The make-up could've been better but hey this is a b-movie from the early 80's so let's give it some credit.

The thematic of having Lucifer against the Archangels is outstanding as it's a thematic that hasn't been very discussed in movies. Now the best thing about this movie is Luficer's introduction in the modern world -the early 80's in that time-.

Overall, this movie is good for it's time and surely deserves a look. Luficer is menacing but this time his faith is set in Earth.

6/10
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Terrible piece of crap
11 October 2003
As I was searching for some old taped tv shows, I found this horrible piece of crap hidden in my vault. I don't remember why, or how did I get this trash but all I can say is that this is the worst spoof or comedy ever. Period. Don't ever waste your time on this horrible garbage. Forget about it, don't ever try to find it over the internet. I hate this film. It's even worse than "Saturday the 14th".

Jason Voorhees is spoofed by a lame actor, and the performance is nowhere funny. Heck, this film is not even stupid that it's funny. Forget about it, it's like it never existed.
4 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A perfect example of a great fantasy film
9 October 2003
After watching this movie on a Sunday morning I couldn't believe the fact that I enjoyed it. Recommended for all ages, really, this is how actual animated movies should be. The characters are well designed and the animation is pretty good for it's time. What I enjoyed the most was the music which I find amazing. Even the dark piano sounds fit perfect for the movie, specially the tense scenes with the king. There's this part where the king's wizard appears and you can say that the score just makes the scene great.

This movie has it all: a great story, well crafted characters, great score, and a high fun factor. The feeling of this movie is just amazing and that's what makes it so special. Watch it even if you don't enjoy this kind of movies, you'll be pleased.

8/10
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Good innocent cartoon
28 September 2003
This was a fun show. In the style of most of the 80's cartoons, Heathcliff is a fun 30 tv show. I remember watching it when I was 7 years old and when I think about it I smile because it was an innocent and sometimes tender cartoon. Yeah that's what some people same as my age used to watch, now what cartoons are popular? Cartoons that feature grizzly violence. Sad.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
I have no words...
28 September 2003
This film sucks. The storyline is quite good. Instead of watching this crap, watch THE SUPERNATURALS. Do not waste your time on this one. The worst thing about this video is the cinematography, and well I will not talk about the acting because it is worse.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A cheesy demon creation
28 September 2003
"Pumpkin Head II : Blood Wings" started with a good premise. The first 20 minutes are great as the horror feeling of the late 80's was present.

This is a good example of a film with a good start and a terrible ending.

The whole devil invocation is interesting and scary at some moments, but the way it's carried in the film simply lets down. The encounter with the old witch at the beginning is somewhat good, you can say it is creepy. The whole scene is the best part about this movie.

The devil Pumpkinhead looks very cheesy, the f/x - make up department ruined the scare factor creating this lousy character. Sad, the movie had a good potential. The gore factor is not present. If you are fan of the original movie, then give this one a chance. Only fans of this one should enjoy it because die hard horror fans won't.

2/10 After watching it, immediately boot it to the trash can!
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The franchise was in risk after this movie...
28 September 2003
Freddy Krueger is back in the sequel to the 80's horror masterpiece.

After the major box office succees of 1984's A NIGHTMARE ON ELM STREET, a sequel was visualized and that's when "Freddy's Revenge" got the green light. The chiling (somewhat cheesy) ending of the original film led to speculation about a possible return of the main characters, but only Robert Englund reprised his role as Freddy Krueger... and the rest is history.

Freddy's Revenge follows the original storyline, as Freddy Krueger is still on the hunt of the Springwood teens. Freddy centers his attention on Jesse, and his friends. This time unlike Freddy's past victim (Nancy), Jesse doesn't stand a chance to survive, but it's with his girlfriend that Jesse manages to survive and stop Kruegers reign of terror.

There are some good points about Freddy's Revenge. Englund's performance is convincing and he gained a place among the best villains of all time.

This movie was his consolidation. The party massacre is interesting, and it's one of the most infamous A Nightmare On Elm Street moments.

This movie could end with the ANOES franchise, but the original film paved the road for many sequels. Fans saved this film from being burned in hell. The acting is very bad, though the character development is good. You can say that the main characters were terrorized by Krueger. The ending is shocking and better than the original's one, it's a classic!. Personally, I think that the best moment in this movie is when Freddy during the party massacre opens widely his arms and says (I don't remember exactly the words...) "You're all my sons". That was a moment that most fans remember as Freddy Krueger proclaimed himself the king of nightmares.

Give this movie a try, surely it's one of the weakest in the series but deserves a chance. A Nightmare On Elm Street 3 : The Dream Warriors saved the franchise's prestige and consolidated Freddy Krueger among the 80's horror glory.

Jesse's girlfriend is hot , sorry I had to say that.

5/10
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Bad Moon (1996)
Awful Moon
27 August 2003
Warning: Spoilers
The first half hour of the movie is not that bad, I kinda enjoyed it. After the first hour, the movie turns terrible and boring. The acting is quite good, and that may be the best thing about this terrible werewolf movie. *Spoilers* The ending is as cheesy as possible, I mean how could the dog beat the hell out of the big bad hungry werewolf?! Beyond reason. I guess that the mom shooting at the werewolf would've worked as a better ending.

*End of spoilers* Watch BADMOON for some mindless entertainment, if y watch it do it at midnight or past it when your brain cells are about to get some rest so you'll forget about this one...

2/10 -After watching it, immediately boot it to the trash can!
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
M. Akkad should've let terror rest in peace!
27 August 2003
If "Halloween 5" was not enough, Dimension comes with "Halloween : The Curse Of Michael Myers". This film tries to explain something that doesn't needs any explanation : the origin of Michael Myers. Please! Myers was introduced in 1978 as the scariest maniac in slasher cinema. Sadly, as years pass Michael Myers' image is declining. He's not longer in the slasher respected killers list. He's very popular by now as 3 Halloween movies have been released in 8 years, with an upcoming sequel. In the original "Halloween" and in "Halloween II" he was scary and mean, by now in "Halloween Resurrection" he's just a cartoonish killer. Anyways...

"The Curse Of Michael Myers" is a mediocre horror film, and all this whole Thorn thing is stupid. Why would the producers relate the origins of Michael Myers with the occult and the devil? Beyond reason. This movie is filled with stupid explanations, situations, and crappy death scenes. The movie is pointless, that's why it was ignored in "Halloween H20" and "Halloween Resurrection". The plot was rejected by die hard Halloween fans, as it has nothing to do with the 1978's classic!

They should ended this franchise with part 2. Part 4 was a decent effort but didn't do as well as the previous films. Of course, not including part 3.

Donald Pleasence (as always) shines on this film, I guess that he's the best thing in this dying franchise. Paul Stephen Rudd delivers a believable and decent performance. The rest of the cast is awful. Myers never looked as weak, vulnerable, and dumb. Anyways, just watch this film if you are a big fan of the "Halloween" series. The plotline may attract many newcomers to the franchise or the genre in general. I can't believe it took 6 to release such a bad plot.

Watch it at your own risk!

2/10 -After watching it, immediately boot it to the trash can!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Massacre by a weirdo
27 August 2003
Warning: Spoilers
"Hide And Go Shriek" is by no means a good slasher film. In fact, it doesn't stands out of the pile of late 80's slashers. The film starts in a very creepy way... You have to watch it to believe it. After the suggestive beginning, we get to know the victims, I mean the main characters. These teens celebrate their graduation spending the night at a furniture store. They plan to get some drinks and of course! have pre marital irresponsible sex. Great fun!.

*SPOILERS* The security of the store is in charge of Fred, an ex con with intentions to start a new life. As the night avances, one by one this horny and dumb teens start to disappear one by one. These teens are killed by a lunatic maniac that after murdering them, uses their clothes to add more confusion.

Four of these teens discover their dead friends and by casuality find Fred, which leads them to suspect of him as being the murderer. Anyone wouldn't trust in Fred's looks! One of them physically beats Fred while the others tie him. Anyways at the end of the night these teens find themselves against Zack, the killer. Zack turns to be Fred's ex boyfriend, they met and started their twisted relationship while they were on jail. Fred took care of Zack in jail. Now Zack started a killing spree because he thought these teens would interpose between himself and his ... man.

Zack is a very disgusting character, just look at him he's as creepy as Michael Myers! Take my word. *END OF SPOILERS*

Watch "Hide And Go Shriek" for some fun. Bunky Jones is hot as hell by the way. This fim is filled with bad acting, bad f/x, and terrible acting. Just don't take the film seriously and you'll enjoy it.

2/10 -After watching it, immediately boot it to the trash can!
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Works as a tribute to the original
27 August 2003
Good sequel. Ok, John Carpenter's "Halloween" is light years ahead of "Halloween 4", but still this is an entertaining horror movie. As a tribute to the 10th anniversary of the release of the original Halloween, this film included Dr. Loomis and of course Michael Myers. Lauire Strode is still present as she left a daughter. It's supposed that Laurie died in a car crash, but that couldn't help her legacy from being in danger.

After being on a 10 year comma, Michael Myers manages to come back to life as he hears about Lauire's daughter. On his way to the maximum security jail, he kills 2 paramedics and starts his way back to Haddonfield (Where have I heard something similar?). It's Halloween night and Myers is on the loose, yeah that means fun for him but not for a town that prohibited the celebration after that horrible Halloween night in 1978.

Michael is back in Haddonfield and this time Rachel, Jamie, and of course badass Dr. Loomis are ready for him. Michael's intentions to kill Jamie end up in a massacre until the men from Haddonfield decide to take action by themselves. Could Michael defeat this time the old but wise Dr. Loomis? Could Michael survive the local cops attempt to kill him?

You have to watch Halloween 4 from it's shocking beginning, to the chilling and surprisingly shocking ending! Surely, you don't expect this film to end the way it does.

"Halloween 4" good points are it's good acting. Donald Pleasence and Danielle Harris deliver the best acting in the film. The rest of the cast is awful! Don't expect good acting here. Myers is still scary, probably less than he was in part 2, and he isn't even close as the scary killer he was from part 1. The settings are creepy, though the cinematography is terrible. In an attempt to make this film extremely dark, the cinematography is quite disturbing and not pleasant for the eye. You need to watch this film on DVD to really enjoy it. The gore factor is not present here, but that doesn't means the film is not violent. There is good tension towards the ending, and that helps to increase the fear factor. Do not think about the original "Halloween" while watching part 4, because you might get disappointed. Give it a try, even if you do not like this franchise.

This is where the series should've ended...

6/10 -Watchable, quite interesting
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Clownhouse (1989)
Scary memories
27 August 2003
"Clownhouse" is an instant favorite in everyone's slasher collection. The movie is scary for the simple fact that there are three killer clowns. This may not be scary for some veteran horror fans, but surely it is for those who watched it on their childhood. "Clownhouse" delivers some good scares, and a chasing scene a la "Friday the 13th". Effective slasher, filled with creepy settings, a scary score, and decent acting. The fear factor is present as the set is perfect for a chilling scary movie. Not much gore, but still this film worths your bucks. Watch for "Clownhouse" in the forgotten horror section in your video store.

4/10 -Mediocre fun!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Decent Troma effort
27 August 2003
Yes, "Monster In The Closet" is a guilty pleasure. Though it's not oriented for veteran horror fans, this film provides fun in a very silly way. It's a good dark comedy involving a very cheesy (Troma style) monster living in children's closets. The beginning is quite good and imaginative, and the ending is stuff for legend in cheesy horror cinema! Thousand cops against the monster is something that hasn't banished from my mind since the early 90's. Recommended for soft core horror fans. When I watched the Disney animated feature "Monsters Inc." I thought about this film, and I immediately saved it from my forgotten movie vault. Your average 80's film.

4/10 -Mediocre fun!
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Underrated slasher, don't pay attention to the title.
27 August 2003
Warning: Spoilers
Decent slasher? Depends on your cheese factor likes. Credited as an inspiration to the "Blair Witch Project", this movie tries to stand out of the slashers garbage of the early 80's. Actually, the direct inspiration for the Blair Witch mess, is the 1979's carnage "Cannibal Holocaust", by Ruggero Deodato. That's another topic.

*SPOILERS* Some students led by their professor start a trip to investigate about the truth about the Big Foot. They get testimony from people that claim to have past encounters with the blood thirsty monster. These explorers get deep in the woods and discover a terrorific fact about the Big Foot. They find a girl that was raped in the woods by a horrible monster and in consequence (?!) she had the monster's baby. Her father, a lunatic religious fanatic killed the baby. This woman (Wanda) reveals that she burned her father; after revealing such a horrendous fact, the Big Foot comes into the house and brutally murders these dumb students. The professor survives the attack, but he is marked for life as he suffered 3rd. degree burns in his face. The scars will always remind him about that horrendous day when he was attacked by the Big Foot. Ok that's about what happens in the movie, as the professor's story is told in slow and boring flashbacks. The movie gets quite interesting towards the ending. The expedition turned to be a horrible and bloody massacre in the woods. Something to forget, for sure.

*END OF SPOILERS* "Night Of The Demon" is very gory; in fact it's one of the goriest film of the 80's slasher glory. All the murders are extremely graphic, and are shown in slow motion. The film is disturbing, the grizzly deaths and the good make-up f/x used in the film are outstanding, and look good for an early 80's B-movie.

And yes the film is as cheesy as you can get, sometimes it's unintentionally funny. So no, there's no fear factor. Check out this movie, it has some good moments and the gore factor quenches your slasher thirst. I suggest you to watch the video version of the film, the t.v. version is heavily cut. I don't know if it's still available, I bought this hidden gem 5 years ago when my local video store was selling their old horror titles.

I recommend "Night Of The Demon" to all of you, slasher addicts! Watch it with very low expectations.

4/10 -Mediocre fun!
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Unfairly bashed.
25 August 2003
Warning: Spoilers
First, newcomer fans of the FRIDAY THE 13TH films have been very unfair with this 5th. installment. Die hard fans usually try to point the best moments of the movies (sometimes a hard task) and of course making emphasis on the worst things.

The good things about A NEW BEGINNING. Okay, the murders and the body count. Before JASON X this film had the highest body count. There's plenty of gore and some of the deaths were improved though the last 5 deaths were performed by the old machete. So A NEW BEGINNING succees in being a good slasher flick. Just take away the FRIDAY THE 13TH label and this would've worked. Another thing. Bringing back Tommy Jarvis was a clever decision. He's the favorite character of the fans (besides Jason) and he's still haunted by the remember of that horrible night when he killed Jason Voorhees for the 1st. time. Sadly, his character didn't have an evolution in this film. Another good thing, Tiffany Helm. Seriously, A NEW BEGINNING shouldn't be bashed if you watch it objectively.

Think about this, it's good that this film didn't feature Jason Voorhees doing the killings as the storyline and the situations weren't the best in the series. In JASON LIVES, Jason Voorhees gets a great and deserved return as the #1 maniac killer.

The bad things about A NEW BEGINNING. Where to start? First of all, the acting. This film has the worst acting in the series! The worst actors in the movie are Junior and his mother. Honorable mentions include Jake, Robin, and the guy who asks for a meal. Second, Tommy Jarvis' character is useless, and his storyline does not evolve during the film. Third (sorry if it took very long), Jason is not physically present on this film. Besides the opening dream sequence, Jason just appears in Tommy's hallucinations. Jason is present in the whole movie, at least the idea of him. The direction is terrible, the film is dull. It gets boring as there aren't any camera improvements.

And the worst thing about the film... ***SPOILERS*** As everyone knows, Roy Burns takes Jason's role in the killings. The ending. What the hell? Tommy murdered Pam? It's never explained.

Tommy escaped from the hospital? The opening sequence of JASON LIVES happens immediately after his escape? It's obvious that not, but if he murdered Pam then how could he escape and manage to return to the institution and meet Hawes? Too good he killed Roy Burns, because his character didn't do a single thing in the whole movie! And John Sheperd was awful. Too good Thom Matthews took the role of Tommy in JASON LIVES. If you want Jason then watch Friday 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, X, or FVSJ. Don't bash this film just because he isn't the killer. Other thing, it's clear that Roy started the killing spree because his son has murdered and he knew about Jason's legend. He killed the innocent people in the institution but he didn't avenge the death of his son. What if Vic did some of the killings? Nevermind...

***END OF SPOILERS*** Give a chance to A NEW BEGINNING, it's a decent slasher film. It ha some likeable characters as Tommy, Pam, Violet and Reggie. I felt sorry for Reggie, I mean his grandpa and his brother killed in the same night. Watch this film with low expectations, and you'll be kind of surprised at how this movie tried to be a decent addition to the series. Surely it's not the best but deserves a watch as it has to do with Jason Voorhees.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Uncomfortable title. Should've been just PART 4.
25 August 2003
Warning: Spoilers
THE FINAL CHAPTER. Back in the 80's I guess that everyone didn't believe about the title. A Friday movie for every year since 1980 (expect 1983) making millions... why would Paramount kill their golden cow?. THE FINAL CHAPTER is not the best addition in the series, even though it features a gory and creepy death for Jason. Oh man, Jason what are we gonna do with you?!

*SPOILERS** The characters are kind of likeable, but their development is just non existent. Rob was a potential character, he seemed tough and obsessed with Jason. BUT NO, he just let himself die without using his hands when Jason attacked him. Trish was a good lead, she was brave enough to fight with a weak and tired Jason. That's the next complaint. Ted White gives the worst performance of Jason in the series. This time, Jason looks scared, vulnerable, and weak. He is not half as brutal as he was in part 3, or scary and clever as in part 2. In THE FINAL CHAPTER, Jason just appears about 15 minutes in the entire movie! What? It was supposed to be his last film (where have I heard this? Mmm JGTH?). Jason is half the man he used to be in this film. THE GOOD STUFF. Tommy Jarvis is introduced as Jason's worst enemy. This character was featured in 3 Friday films. Sara! Wow she was pretty and hot at the same time. She seemed shy and cute, but she ends the night being a big seductress. Barbara Howard is very hot. Nevermind...

Jason's death is great, gore at it's best. Thanks Tom Savini.

Joseph Zito's direction is acceptable, though it's not as good as Miner's in part 2.

*SPOILERS* One a day after the Higgins Haven grizzly events, Jason's "dead" body is translated to Crystal Lake's morgue. There, he manages to escape and kills Nurse Morgan and Axel. You can imagine Jason's next route. You guess right! Camp Crystal Lake, Jason's favorite place. On his way to it he kills a female hitchhiker, and he watches and memorizes his next victims on a van.

His killing spree begins at night where he murders Paul and his girlfriend, Ms. Jarvis, Tina, Terri, Jimmy, Ted, Sara, Doug , Gordon the dog!, (I recovered my breath) and finally Rob. Just as quickly as you can imagine. The end ends with Trish and Tommy running for their lives.

Tommy finds newspapers about Jason in Rob's camping bag, and he dresses and cuts his hair as the 11 year old Jason that drowned in Crystal Lake. Jason is haunted by that day where he died and when he's about to get to Tommy, Trish takes off his mask with a machete revealing his horrible face. Jason (madly in anger) walks towards Trish, but Tommy takes the machete and stabs it on Jason's head. When Jason falls to the floor, the machete slices his head. Apparently, the machete passed through his temple, then his left eye, finally to his brain. Gory, yes. Satisfying, yes.

*END OF SPOILERS* This addition to the series is probably the least mentioned. Besides Jason's death, there's nothing good about this film. Jason is featured until the end, and the plot is just a mix of part 1, and 3. Tom Savini's make up saves this film from being the worst in the franchise. Anyways, it's a decent slasher film. Recommended for newcomer fans of the series. Die hard fans have to agree that this isn't by any means the best in the series. We all knew this wouldn't be the final chapter! The producers prepared us for the great JASON LIVES. THE FINAL CHAPTER just ended with Jason's humanity, leading to a brand new Jason.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Shakespeare a la Troma!
13 August 2003
I haven't seen many "Romeo and Juliet" movie adaptations, but surely this is the one I enjoyed the most. The 1996 version featuring DiCaprio and Claire Danes is a total mess compared to this one, it isn't half as entertaining as TROMA'S TROMEO AND JULIET. I can't find a word to describe this movie, but I think of these: twisted, sick, entertaining, mind blowing, aggressive, explosive.

The explitic sex scenes are well crafted, not disgusting as in other efforts (for a TROMA movie this is a surprise), and I guess that die hard Shakespeare fans deeply enjoy them as this is totally different POV of how Shakespeare would describe an explicit sex scene. I'm not sure if this movie should be labeled as an adaptation as it only follows the main idea, I mean the original dialogue is barely present. re genius! Addecuated for this times.

If you're bored by now after reading the original play 100 times, then watch TROMEO AND JULIET for a twisted (and I mean TWISTED) Shakespeare experience. Thanks again TROMA, you surely know how to entertain us.

8/10 Enjoyable watch, recommended.
9 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hidden Hills (2002–2003)
GREAT SHOW!!! Fun and smart, there aren't shows like this anymore.
6 August 2003
I don't understand some executives... If a show is creative, has some great dialogue, well crafted characters, and it's enjoyable they cancel it because it may not be very popular. Shame on them.

HIDDEN HILLS has to be the best sitcom NBC aired the last year. This show was mainly directed to young married couples, and I've read great comments by these couples about the show.

The situations are fun, and real life. The characters are great! The actors who play them know exactly how to mix comedy and look fresh, natural. The dialogue is superb, you get attached to every episode from the beginning. The potential of the show is big, this show deserved another chance! Damnit I hate when these people cancel great shows like this one.

HIGHLY RECOMMENDED, you won't regret watch this show with high expectations and you'll have a great time.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Night Screams (1987)
Likeable slasher
15 July 2003
NIGHT SCREAMS is underrated in the slasher genre. The premise works: Three escaped convicts head to a mansion where a teen party is taking place. These teens start to disappear one by one (ok they are brutally murdered). Later it's revealed that the escaped convicts had little responsability with the murders. Shocking!

The plot is a combination of the SLUMBER PARTY MASSACRE and the 1982's classic ALONE IN THE DARK. NIGHT SCREAMS deserves a chance, watch it with low expectations and you'll have a good time!

3/10 -Terrible but tries to stand out of the garbage

"Welcome to Fright Night!...for real"
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Violence, reflection of México D.F.
14 July 2003
When I saw this movie for the 1st. time I guess I was 7 or 8 years old, I couldn't watch it entirely because of it's high violence grade. A few years later, I could watch it completely. Actually I think it wasn't that violent as I remember but still...

RATAS THE VECINDAD may be extremely low budget, but it accomplishes it's goal: show the disturbing situation in the poorest homes in México. This movie is extremely violent, it's somewhat disturbing to watch the entire film without feeling uncomfortable. It's sad but it happens in some places, in some underground ghettos. Great performance by Gómez Cruz. RATAS DE VECINDAD has to be one of the most violent movies of the 80's Mexican cinema.

I'm not saying by any means that this movie is good overall, it's just a good example to show some disturbing situations in México D.F.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Santo Enredo (1995)
TRASH!
14 July 2003
This movie is a total mess. It's not funny, it's not sexy, it can't even be considered as a bad movie! It totally sucks.

I know, it was made for T.V. I'm sorry for Bruno Bichir who is a talented Mexican actor. And I wonder how much money they offered Diana Golden for appearing in this trash. By the way, she looks incredibly sensual. The other blonde woman was o.k. she was meant to be the visual attractive.

I know, I have the fault because I watched it. I'm responsible for watching this trash, I just wanted to point that Mexican cinema has some big flaws that SHOULD end. I think that modern Mexican cinema is going in the right direction, I guess that we haven't seen the best.

0/10 -Bury it! Be sure that it won't resurrect in the next 3 days.

"Welcome to Fright Night!...for real"
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

Recently Viewed