Brilliant Film. Yet a Travesty. How to explain?
The acting, cinematography, directing are superb...standout. Viola Davis is scorching as the General of the Agojie. Formidable. Battle scarred. Weary. Resilient. Lashana Lynch is a standout. Sheila Atim is a standout. Thuso Mbedu as the new recruit nearly runs away with the damn film.
The physical training the women did paid off. The fight choreographer did a first rate job. They are believable as warriors, at a disadvantage in close combat with men due to having less strength, but making up for it in speed an agility, and using long range weapons.
So, what did I have a problem with? Well, the Dahomey are the heroes here, portrayed as reluctant slave traders. Actually, they were very enthusiastic at it, their 300 year old kingdom flourished because of it, and when the Brits started trying to end it, their King begged to continue.
The film is so inaccurate on this, its like portraying the SS as heroes, reluctant to do what they did during WWII. It also avoided showing the mass decapitations the Dahomey practised, executing hundreds of captives in rituals. The dialogue was clunky at times.
Really, it would have been better if they had done something like Apocalypto, which showed the splendour and brutality of Mayan civilization.
So mixed feelings. But I disagree with those who wanted a boycott of the film. I'd encourage people to go see it. It deserves to be seen.
The acting, cinematography, directing are superb...standout. Viola Davis is scorching as the General of the Agojie. Formidable. Battle scarred. Weary. Resilient. Lashana Lynch is a standout. Sheila Atim is a standout. Thuso Mbedu as the new recruit nearly runs away with the damn film.
The physical training the women did paid off. The fight choreographer did a first rate job. They are believable as warriors, at a disadvantage in close combat with men due to having less strength, but making up for it in speed an agility, and using long range weapons.
So, what did I have a problem with? Well, the Dahomey are the heroes here, portrayed as reluctant slave traders. Actually, they were very enthusiastic at it, their 300 year old kingdom flourished because of it, and when the Brits started trying to end it, their King begged to continue.
The film is so inaccurate on this, its like portraying the SS as heroes, reluctant to do what they did during WWII. It also avoided showing the mass decapitations the Dahomey practised, executing hundreds of captives in rituals. The dialogue was clunky at times.
Really, it would have been better if they had done something like Apocalypto, which showed the splendour and brutality of Mayan civilization.
So mixed feelings. But I disagree with those who wanted a boycott of the film. I'd encourage people to go see it. It deserves to be seen.
Tell Your Friends