Reviews

4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
An Old Fashioned Christmas (2010 TV Movie)
3/10
The dramatic equivalent of a Hallmark card
12 December 2010
I only watched this because Mommy made me. I'm thinking the cider with the cyanide would have been preferable. Ho ho ho!

Christmas movies are rarely either profound or intellectually stimulating. The point is to make the audience glow with Christmas cheer. Still, even the least demanding viewer requires something more than bad acting and a plot that presents itself in its entirety within the first 15 minutes. Oh yes, and something having to do with Christmas besides the time of year in which the story happens to be set. An old-fashioned Christmas seems to consist of scheming with and against friends and family between exchanges of insults. Then, you can hang some holly, sing some carols, eat, drink, and be merry--if you can find the time.

If you've ever read a Jane Austen novel or seen one of the movie adaptations, pick one. Then, move it to Ireland. Then, set it at Christmas. Then, make the heroine American. Then, remove any semblance of wit or charm. Then, skip this movie.
6 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
CSI: Miami (2002–2012)
2/10
Huh?
24 March 2007
Since when do CSI technicians have medical degrees? Since when do people from the medical examiner's office investigate crime suspects and make arrests? Since when is acting and writing this bad deserving of high ratings?

The original, Las Vegas-based CSI, while still implausible, at least has had a decent cast and writing. This overheated, pseudo-cool "spin-off" makes me wonder if the the term "hot, steaming mess" has become a compliment in TV Land. Surely viewers out there are yearning for something that doesn't insult their intelligence as badly as this show.

Then again, American Idol is the top-rated show on television. Never mind.
41 out of 48 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Taxi (I) (2004)
4/10
What was Queen Latifah thinking?
9 April 2005
OK, "Bringing Down the House" was pretty thin, but at least there was a certain comedic chemistry between Queen Latifah and Steve Martin. In this one, Jimmy Fallon brings absolutely nothing to the party. I've long wondered who was hitting the pipe when they hired him for "Saturday Night Live". Now, I have to wonder who was dropping acid when they cast him in this movie. Something with a plot this weak definitely needs strong leads to carry it off, and while the Queen does her best, she gets almost no help from anyone else. The one thing they should have done to at least keep things interesting was to show Henry Simmons in much less clothing. At least they had the supermodels strutting their stuff once in a while. If you haven't seen this one, don't even bother.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Where's Storm when you need her?
10 January 2005
Warning: Spoilers
How could something that cost $125 million to make be this cheesy? It's unreasonable to demand a thought-provoking plot from what is essentially a special-effects movie. Still, if you're going to dispense with plausibility, intelligent dialog, and characters of any depth; then it seems reasonable to expect the effects to be stunning. This movie simply takes bits and pieces that have been seen before in other places (_Deep Impact_, _Twister_, and Discovery Channel documentaries, to name a few) and stitches them together into a cautionary tale that would be more aptly called "The Environment for Dummies". The characters, whose vellum thinness is inadequately offset with bathetic earnestness between screaming set pieces, are so cookie-cutter that the actors could all have phoned in their parts and let the computer graphics department draw them in. (Then again, with this budget, are we sure they didn't?) As far as the "action" goes, about thirty minutes into the movie, it became completely unnecessary to watch the rest. Not a single gasp of surprise or clutch of pearls awaited.

As far as the principals: it would be easy to lambaste them, but why bother? Laurence Olivier couldn't have turned in a creditable performance with this unfortunate script and a director who obviously ought to stick with commercials for cold and allergy medication or adaptations of Jack London novels (reference scenes in New York City). It must be terribly hard to act one's best in a vehicle with a complete lack of subtlety, nuance, or development.

It must be said, though, that the film does offer two huge consolations: that when the going gets tough, strangers will band together to survive in supremely adverse circumstances; and that when the planet's environment eventually turns against us, Hollywood will be one of the first things to go.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed