Reviews

4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Never had a chance
29 July 2004
Okay, it wasn't as funny as "Designing Women" but this was a funny show. It had an excellent cast... had it been given more of a chance, it may actually have been better than the show it spun off from. Suzanne Sugarbaker was back and was better than ever! The rest of the characters were pretty much darker versions of the characters on "DW". Teri Garr was a recovering alcoholic and journalist... with a sarcasm similar to Mary Jo. Malone was a wide-eyed innocent divorced Charlene with two children who idolized the Menendez Brothers. Natalie was Suzanne's adviser... she exuded the class and sophistication of Julia but was a Conservative... and had an affair with a married Congressman who was now in jail.
18 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Great Performances: Jesus Christ Superstar (2000)
Season 29, Episode 11
Holy, Holy, Holy
1 March 2004
I rented this prepared NOT to like it. Afterall, I'd seen the 1973 film so many times and loved it. How could they improve upon it? Well, they did. The staging and the acting were so much better here. "Simon and the Zealots" was always a part of the original film I'd fast forward through since it didnt seem to move the story at all... seemed like a pointless dance number. Well, here, it finally has a meaning! The relationship between Christ and Judas is fleshed out more (though I really must say this Judas is vocally not as good as the one in the '73 version). The otehr scene that is way better than the original is the trial scene... I mean, it actually is quite grizzly and violent for a musical (though I preferred the 1973 Pilate to this one). The only thing that's missing is the great locations used for the first film. But, for the most part, this is the superior version. A must-see!
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Gothic (1986)
Almost liked it
2 February 2004
The opening where Shelley and his party arrive at Lord Byron's was excellent... the music, the photography, the misty locations... everything was perfect. Seemed to be the set-up fpr a great movie. The perfect flick to stick in the VCR every Halloween.

The ending was also very well done... seemed like the end of a really great creepy movie. The perfect movie to stick in the VCR every Halloween.

Unfortunately, the rest of it was a mess. Ken Russell did what he does best. He went way over-the-top. About fifteen minutes into the film, he was dangerously close to crossing the line. So, he crossed it. It was too much! Overblown, overdone. Then, it seemed maybe it would get good again... nope. Then, it got even more overblown and overdone.

But, it's Ken Russell. I do believe there's a good director in there somewhere. This movie indicates that. Too bad there's no one there to edit his work or help him focus more
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Brilliant
15 December 2003
Okay, I never saw the play nor read it. So I don't know how the film compares to the source material. Overall, I thought it was brilliant (though a few scenese seemed merely to be there to shock and upset members of the Christian right----though there's a part of me that definitely loves that!) A wonderful movie with an important message (well, several important messages). A movie that teaches the importance of moving on and forgiving... of choosing to live because no matter how bad things get, there is always hope. Faith can be a good thing. And, love is something each and every one of us needs... it's where the hope, the faith, and the ability to forgive and be human come from.

The acting is amazing. The sets, lighting, cinematography, and everything are top notch. Wonderful, wonderful film!
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed