OK, so this is actually not a sequel, but a remake of the first Fright night from 1985. But the twist this time is that the vampire Jerry is a she, Gerry. I wont go into detail about the story since i bet everybody with the slightest interest already knows about Charlie, Amy , Peter Vincent and Evil Ed. So, is it as horrid as people say? Well, yes and no. For once, Evil Ed is much closer to Geoffreys portrayal in the original. Charley is okayish, Amy too. But Vincent comes of as pretty humorless and boring, which is a shame, since both Roddy McDowall and David Tennant made the character pretty cool. Wish they could have gone with a British actor. The movie itself is at least not boring. And the vampire is OK. NOW...to the best part! The effects! Remember those horrible cgi effects in the remake? Even the blood was cgi for Christs sake! Here practical effects is used with a minimum of cgi. Crosses rammed into eyeballs, throat slashings...etc..everything looks great! The only bad thing is actually the demise of Gerry.. Which is a let down.. A combination of these effects, this versions Ed, Farells Jerry, Tennants Vincent and Brad Feidels music from the original would had make the perfect remake. And please, next time You will remake this, have Jerry have his ghoulish day guard! Well, its much more fun then to stare at a concrete wall for 90 minutes. But cant top the original, although its a bit better the the remake when it comes to effects. Sorry for my bad spelling, I'm Swedish and i wrote this on my ipad early in the morning..
4 out of 6 found this helpful.
Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Tell Your Friends