Reviews

22 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
The Showdown (1950)
3/10
The Showdown? Hope that was all it Showed
27 March 2010
Artistic Western? That one reviewer must have been hitting the Hoppy Juice a bit too often. I guess he thinks any Western that's not a clash over water rights is "artistic." This piece of junk was obvious from the start (Surprise? You thought the girl did it?)

Also "the cast was excellent , including Elliot?" He was stiffer than the oak tress in the background. I guess I can't take too much "Art" in my Westerns. Give me "Stagecoach" anytime.

The Showdown. Bill Elliot. Was old Elliot Wooden School of Acting Guru a regular Republic leading man? Why was Walter Brennan playing that type of character at that point in his career?
3 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Prehistoric Nonsense Corman Style
1 January 2010
It was made in two WEEKS, not two days as someone else's review stated. Please get the facts straight. Read Robert Vaughn's autobiography, he has some choice information about the background of the making of this movie.

Robert Vaughn recalled the filming of it. It took place entirely in Griffith Park in California and the animals involved refused to cooperate. Also, he was sent to the hospital twice. once when an animal bit him, and once when he fell off a log and stepped on broken glass. The glamor of show biz, it is intoxicating.

It was eventually released on a double-bill with the Michael Landon classic.....wait for it....."I Was a Teenage Werewolf."

Oh, Roger Corman, you've done it again!
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Great Western of revenge and setting things right
17 November 2009
How could one reviewer get it so wrong? It was not Sergio Leone who requested Henry Fonda to wear brown contact lenses, it was Henry Fonda who , when knowing he was going to play a ruthless villain, grew a full beard and bought brown lenses. Leone saw him and persuaded him to be clean-shaven and have "the beautiful, bright blue eyes of a killer." He wanted to shock the audience by having clean-cut Henry Fonda be a child killer.

It is one of the greatest movies of all time!!!

Harmonica (Charles Bronson): Did you bring a horse for me?

Killer (Jack Elam): No, it looks like we're one horse short.

Harmonica (shakes his head): You brought two too many.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
God's Gun (1976)
God's Gun?
1 November 2008
The strangest thing of all about this terrible western is that while it has the look feel and especially the SOUND (loud, overdone) of a spaghetti western, most of the talent involved in the top positions were not European, including the director. Also, the three male leads did not sound right. The lead Lee van Cleef, sounded like himself most of the time , but Jack Palance and Richard Boone were dubbed. This is especially clear with Richard Boone who has a very distinctive voice. If someone out there can tell me why you would dub a distinctive sounding American actor's voice into English, please tell me. I liked the plot twist of the twin brother but this is a bad movie. Enough said!
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Ghoul (1933)
Story of strange happenings in an old, very dark house with dark sets and characters with various reasons for being there. Early British talkie that creaks.
1 November 2008
Dumb. The story of how this film was saved from supposed extinction is much more interesting than the film itself. The direction is old hat. It resembles a stage play with the way all the actors stand in a line at 3/4 stance reciting their lines. Too talky. Hardwicke's makeup was all wrong for a film. It belonged in a theater. One should never be able to tell a person is wearing makeup (unless he is portraying a monster or creature that is otherworldly and therefore is not supposed to look realistic).

Just because it was a lost film doesn't mean it was a lost "treasure" and it certainly does not hold up today.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Boring!! It's like watching a master rib chef at work- low and slow
29 June 2008
I am still waiting for the movie to start! The lonely world of the master chef--The artist who can not tolerate incompetence or less than greatness from others must be doomed to live a lonely and self-absorbed life or else compromise her art until the right man/person comes along.

It's been done better and more exciting by many, many others. Looking at the beautiful Catherine Zeta-Jones and Mr. Eckhert ( with a morose child thrown in) is not enough.

Write a script that has some fun!!

New York never looked better and the kitchen help in the restaurant looked authentic, but we could get that on the Food Network.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Letters (1973 TV Movie)
The Letters. Postal Letters with great importance to the people involved get lost (delayed, actually) for a year. The news they DON'T bring changes people's lives forever.
9 March 2008
Warning: Spoilers
I remember this film. I only saw it once when it first came out and have heard neither hide nor hair about it since then. Yet, that vague memory has stayed with me up to the present day. When I saw the credit on Barbara Stanwyck's biog I clicked on it remembering the film from long ago. The first thing I said was "Henry Jones." He was the mailman. Sure enough, as I scrolled down the list there he was as the very last credited player Henry Jones....Postman.

What I remember best about this film was the mailman finally delivering the letter to an obviously happily married couple. The husband looks at the wife and says "Don't Open it." She tosses it in the trash and smiles. That little scene brought the whole theme of the film into sharp focus. Sometimes the moves you don't make are the smartest and most memorable actions of your life. Excellent film. Very well done.
13 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Buddy, Save This Movie
21 February 2008
I have never seen this film but have heard a lot about it. Just recently, I was reading an Abbott and Costello biography where it quoted Buddy Hackett as saying that he "replaced" Lou in the film when Lou got ill. (Was it another rheumatic fever attack?) I would like to know the origins of the casting and would like to see this film.

It is easy to see that Hugh O'Brian was essaying the Abbott role. But was he funny at one point?

Spike Jones in a movie that was tailored around him? Just zany enough to be a great idea! When Turner Classic Movies does show it at 3 in the morning I'll have the VCR set
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Odd Movie for The Odd Couple
12 February 2008
Getting the true odd couple together again was an inspired idea (I know, Walter Matthau and Jack Lemmonn did the movie first and Matthau and Art Carney were the very first Odd Couple in the original play). They were the best with the truest chemistry. It was and still is one of my favorite television shows of all time. It was hilarious! So, what happened to the reunion? It was dreadful. I know the actors were twenty years older but that didn't matter. The actors were fine. The script was lousy! It was juvenile and made little sense at times. For anyone to believe that a wife who supposedly loves her husband would ban him from his own daughter's wedding was too much of a stretch.

Jack and Tony were still good and the script did incorporate Jack's voice into the story quite well, but these two guys could have done much better. I have seen them both acting together on Broadway after this show was made in two separate plays (Three Men On A Horse and The Sunshine Boys). Both were well done although "Boys" was the better of the two. The point is, why couldn't they have had a stronger script?

Like others, it bothered me a lot that Al Molinaro did not play Murray. I know he retired by I still don't get why he wasn't there. He is still living and doing commercials, so why couldn't they get him to play Murray again? It was a small part in this movie. I wish someone had the answer to that. Also, I understand why Dick Van Patten was one of the poker players (He played the role when they reprised the play for the opening of Tony Randall's national Actor's Theater on Broadway, but what about John Fieldler. Why wasn't he Vinny? He remained active until his death in 2005.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Of Mice and Men (1981 TV Movie)
9/10
Two ranch hands looking for work and sticking together through thick and thin.
19 July 2007
This is the best version of my favorite novel. Robert Blake is amazing as George. The humanity and depth of feeling he exhibits for Lennie is evident but not overly done. Randy Quaid shows off his wonderful dramatic ability that first became apparent in the big time with "The Last Detail." Those folks who only remember him from the "Vacation" films are in for a surprise.

Greta film, great actors Just watch Whitman Mayo (better known as "Grady" from "Sanford and Son"), he is marvelous and he displays talents not often showcased in his career. Great film. Get a tape of if you can (I haven't seen one).
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Fiendish Plot of Fu Manchu turned into a fiendish way to end Sellers Career
19 June 2007
The only thing that baffles me is the insistence of most reviewers NOT to lambast this film as a poor and amateurish movie with no sense of continuity and an egotistical portrayal at the heart of the matter. The supporting performances are not even worth mentioning since no one (not even the great Sid Caesar) is given anything to do at all. Sellers did every bit and left not even a crumb for the others. A good, meaty scene between the great British comedian and a great American comedian from a bygone era would have been worth the price of admission. Alas, it was not to be. Caesar did nothing in this film. Why cast him? There was good casting in the female lead even and even she got little to do as well (as expected). Wonderful to see Helen Mirren though, anytime!!!

Why people insist on revisionist history now and try to paint this film as "an underrated gem" or other such nonsense is sad. When I saw it in the theaters upon its original release I was disappointed and I have not changed my opinion all this time later.
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Killer's Kiss (1955)
9/10
Grade A noir film . A good, clean guy, a girl who might not be trustworthy and an evil grasping, clutching mobster all collide for a top notch suspense thriller
3 June 2007
I saw this film about two weeks ago on AMC. It was in the morning so there was no tag by Bob Osborne when it ended and since I did not catch the very beginning, I did not see the credits. I saw the boxing match and it was BRUTAL. What a fighter goes through was never conveyed more clearly and more succinctly. I remember Frank Silvera from other films (and it was his name that I looked up to find here at IMD. The actors were unknown and the two leads were not that convincing but the story was riveting. I was prepared for an ending suitable to the type of dark film it had been up to that point. I really liked the ending that was revealed. I came here to read comments on this little known film and was totally surprised to learn that Stanley Kubrick directed it. He told a story in a lean, sparse way that was different from the way he told later films but his genius was showing here. Bravo to all connected with this little gem!
18 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Bud and Lou (1978 TV Movie)
2/10
A terrible recounting of one of the greatest comedy teams of all time. Bad Casting 101 is in full effect
18 April 2007
I first saw this as it was originally presented on TV in 1978. I have not seen it since because I hated it then. Lou Costello, one of the funniest comedians (although underrated) of all time and Bud Abbott, the greatest straight man ever are woefully misrepresented here. According to this, Costello was a monster and Abbott a weak man who knew nothing about anything, even comedy (The way "Who's On Forst?" is done makes it sound like an educational commercial for Mapquest instead of a comedy routine). While it's true that Costello had more push and was the business head of the duo, he was also a man of many sides, including a love for children, that this biopic prefers to erase. Buddy Hackett and Harvey Korman (both funny men in their own right)play the roles of two very interesting men as one-dimensional boobs who couldn't handle any aspect of show business. It's amazing that Buddy Hackett and Harvey Korman, who are comedy pros could come off so antiseptic and lifeless. It's as if they have no feel for comedy. As a matter of fact, Hackett derided the movie as terrible and he was embarrassed by what it represented for Lou Costello. When Lou's daughter wrote a book called "Lou's on First", Hackett wrote a foreword for the book essentially putting down the entire film as a colossal waste and terribly misleading.Instead of watching this film, read the many books of Abbott and Costello. You'll get a much better and more entertaining view of the two men that way!
14 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
American Masters: Vaudeville (1997)
Season 12, Episode 2
10/10
A great summary of a bygone era of entertainment that provided us with our most versatile and talented performers
28 March 2007
Just seeing the stars (Morey Ansterdam, Rose Marie, the Nicholas Brothers, BOBBY Short (not "Billy" as another contributor to this space wrote), the great Carl Ballantine, and many more provides the viewer with a living scrapbook and a real feeling for what it was like. After seeing this, I am sorry that vaudeville was dead when I grew up. Unfortunately, many of the performers from this show are now gone too. This is another reason why this oral history is so valuable to us now. It is a record of those days.

I remember vividly the great old variety shows I grew up with (Jack Benny, Jackie Gleason, Red Skelton, etc.). A great number of these people and their guests were products of the vaudeville era. It was niceto see many of them able to sing, dance and do comedy. You had to in order to survive. Vaudeville was a terrific training ground and this program shows us why.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Wagons East (1994)
Wagos East! A pathetic film about cowards turning back east after not making it out west.
27 February 2007
My favorite comedian John Candy went out of life on a terrible note. This film did nothing but MAR his brilliant career with a stinker at the end. He died while filming this pathetic Western spoof that is not funny nor is it a taste of any West that ever existed.

I still feel sad when I see him on TV and realize that there will be no more of that Candy warmth and Candy brilliance in this world. I just saw "Planes, Trains and Automobiles" tonight. This is a great film. Watch the way he interacts with Steve Martin. Touching and sidesplitingly funny at the same time. I can not think of one funny bit from Wagons East. He looked bloated on this picture and was ill-suited on a horse. Go, Candy go! But please don't ask anyone to remember you from this film.
9 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Very Good Movie
6 January 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Warning: This review contains spoilers!

I really liked this movie; in fact, I read the book many years ago and as much as I enjoyed the book, I liked this movie better. The movie is filled with hope and redemption, while the book is definitely darker. For example, the character of Walter Fane. In the book he remains emotionally stunted. He is unable to forgive Kitty for wronging him, and he is unable to forgive himself for having loved a woman who was so shallow. Despite his nobility in trying to stop the epidemic, he dies in despair. He sees Kitty change from a vain, shallow girl into a generous and courageous woman, but he simply cannot get past what she did to him. He is really a tragic figure.

The Walter in the movie is a completely different story. What a journey he makes! He changes from a repressed workaholic to a man who is truly ennobled not only by his unceasing efforts to halt the epidemic, but by forgiving his wife for her mistakes and loving her for who she was.

In the beginning of the movie, Walter loves Kitty, but he makes no effort to understand her. The pain he suffers when she betrays him with Charlie turns quickly into rage and vindictiveness. He brings her into the middle of the epidemic secretly hoping it will kill her. Instead she grows up. He sees this, and he realizes that her affair wasn't 100% her fault, he never made much effort to understand her, so no wonder she was lonely. While working tirelessly to stop the epidemic and end the suffering in the city, his love for Kitty is rekindled. When Kitty tells him that she honestly doesn't know if the child she is carrying is his or Charlie's, for a moment he looks terribly, terribly hurt. Then, with enormous generosity and love, he tells her it doesn't matter now and embraces her.

When dying, his last words to her were"Forgive me".(I guess for all the rage and hate and putting her in mortal danger) Kitty responds,"What have I got to forgive you for? Walter, I'm so sorry." They were able to come to a place of love, but sadly, their new life together was not to be. The last time we see Kitty, she is a kind and loving mother to her adorable son, who she has named Walter. She is a new person, generous, courageous, and kind. I guess it's a chick flick, but boy is it moving! Ed Norton and Naiomi Watts are terrific, and Diana Rigg is first rate as the Mother Superior of the convent in the plague ridden city. She doesn't wear a scrap of make up, her hair is hidden, and she wears a baggy habit. Her acting is amazing, and I really admire her fearlessness in letting herself look plain. China looks gorgeous and mysterious. The only reason I gave it a 9 out of 10 instead of a 10 out of 10 is because it was a little slow in the middle. But still, I highly recommend it.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
To the victor belongs the spoils! But who deserves the spoils? If a tree falls in a forest and no one hears it, did it really fall?
26 December 2006
"The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance" is a sparse, clean morality tale. The great vistas practically invented by John Ford are gone. There are no backdrops , no Monument Valleys, no Indians. In short, it is a western directed by John Ford that is NOT a John Ford Western! Go figure!

John Wayne plays the most difficult role here. He is a hero who pretends not to be a hero . A man who gives all the credit for a deed he has done to Ransom Stoddard, played by James Stewart. Tom Doniphon (John Wayne's character) hates Stoddard yet he does what he does because he knows it is best for his girl and the West, even if it tears him up inside and leaves him a forgotten man.

James Stewart is excellent as the traditional hero. He is Ransom Stoddard, a lawyer from the East who is determined to bring justice to the West without gunfire. The irony is that he only succeeds after gun play is attributed to him. He becomes a success for being good with a gun at a very important time even though he did not do what he was credited for. His victory is hollow and his success is without satisfaction.

Lee Marvin was super in this film as the baddest bad guy in the West. The rest of the supporting cast was top-notch. Go see this film. If you already have, see it again right now!! WHAT ARE YOU WAITING FOR???
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Columbo: Now You See Him (1976)
Season 5, Episode 5
10/10
The Great Santini tries to be great in another area besides magic. It works well until he meets The Great Columbo
5 October 2006
Warning: Spoilers
The best Columbo ever. The best villain ever. Jack Cassidy had logged the most appearances of any Columbo killer up to this point. He was to die in a horrible fire only a few months later. The suave, sophisticated Cassidy and the down to earth Falk play off each other magnificently.

Santini (Cassidy) never sweats , never gets nervous, never appears ruffled all throughout the episode. Even at the end when Columbo has him dead to rights and shows him the paper which contains the incriminating eveidence against him, Santini says" This one is burned!" He then burns it into thin air. Columbo says "Watch closely, sir. This is my best trick. He then pulls out copy after copy of the document and hands one back to Santini. "You can burn this one too if you like sir, there's plenty more where that came from!" A classic ending. The best Columbo!
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Columbo: A Friend in Deed (1974)
Season 3, Episode 8
One of the best Columbos ever. What twist this one has is that the killer is none other than the police commissioner himself. Columbo's boss! How can he catch his own boss?
5 October 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Richard Kiley is the second best Columbo murderer of all time. Too bad he was only in one episode (Jack Cassidy was #1 on my list). The writing of this one is tight and the characters are sharply drawn and performed. Old Peter Falk-John Cassavete-Ben Gazzara (who also directed this episode) friend Val Avery is superb in the small role of Artie Jessup. His interplay with Columbo about the fake jewels is priceless. The familiarity between the two actors is marvelous.

Peter Falk was once again in top form. His scenes with Richard Kiley play like a Broadway show. The final scene where Kiley is caught is priceless. "These are my socks, my underwear, my niece, my nephew, my brother-in-law..."
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A comedy? A Drama? It's a dog, But it's like car wreck. You can't take your eyes off it!
17 September 2006
I saw this film on a late, late show on television a long time ago (pre-cable, if you van believe that!) It was impossible to follow the plot. Was there one? The fun is in spotting the famous actors doing bits.

Groucho, Chico, Harpo. The best reason to watch any movie. Together, they would have been more of a hoot!

Irwin Allen loves these all-star studded set pieces but believe me, The Towering Inferno was "toweringly" better!

Most didn't make sense and most seem disjointed, but if it comes on late night again, I'll be there! Can't take my eyes off it!
12 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Movin' On (1974–1976)
This was a weekly series starring Claude Akins and Frank Converse about two good-hearted truckers getting into different adventures each week
9 September 2006
This was one of my favorite shows from the seventies. Claude Akins was a solid, strong actor. He always was and it was nice to see him get his own show. Anotyher attempt at his own show "The Misadventures of Sheriff Lobo" was dismal by comparison. Frank Converse proved he had good acting chops although he played the I don't want to be a star" attitude a bit much.

This was a good, if not great, show and one I have not seen since its original run. I'd like to see it again. It basically told about the adventures of two good-hearted truckers on the road.

Get it if you can!!
23 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Bad Apple (2004 TV Movie)
A good, funny, and unconventional movie
27 February 2004
I thought this was a terrific movie! It was very different from the standard Feds vs. Mobsters type movie. Chris Noth is terrific as a Fed who seems to lead with his heart and not his head, which isn't a good idea when you're undercover. The rest of the cast is equally excellent. Colm Meaney plays his exasperated, cranky partner, who has a dysfunctional(but still sort of loving) relationship with his spouse, the always great Mercedes Ruehl. Dagmara Domincnk (I think I spelled that wrong)plays the tough Jersey Girl love interest, and she's hysterical. I loved Robert Patrick as Tommy Bells, the psychotic mobster who chops people up for fun. He succeeds in not only being scary but also very funny. The kind of guy when you don't know if he's going to sit in a chair or bash it over somebody's head. Elliot Gould is hysterical as the bad tempered "Godfather" who wants to get to his condo in Florida more. I think what I liked so much about this movie was that no one really acts like you would expect them to. I think this movie was a funny, suspenseful treat.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed