Change Your Image
pitt-penguin
Reviews
God Is Not Dead (2013)
Is this what Christians think of atheists?
As a Christian myself, I found this movie a complete embarrassment. The portrayal of atheists as all having some sort of psychological problem makes everything else irrelevant. There aren't any arguments here, just a decent boy who believes in God being hounded by an idiot professor. Josh (the boy), is never able to make a cogent argument on the points, but you feel so sorry for him, he wins on likability.
There are several lives followed, but the main lives concern a freshman named Josh Wheaton and an arrogant philosophy professor named Prof. Radisson.
Radisson forces everyone in the class to sign a piece of paper stating that "God is Dead" so that the class can "move-on" to the important aspects of philosophy. Of course everyone signs but Josh. He can't sign the sheet in good conscience and thus is asked to prove that God is not dead over the next three lectures. He is belittled by Radisson publicly and often throughout the entire movie.
Josh's life is intertwined with an attractive blonde girlfriend named Kara. She also believes in God, but wants Josh to either drop the philosophy class or to just sign the paper so he can focus on her and the rest of his difficult college schedule. Kara, who at first appears to be a supportive and lovely girlfriend, proves to be self-centered. She demands that Josh drop the class, or drop her. She childishly demands his full attention, arguing that either the relationship comes first or Prof. Radisson—it is Josh's choice. Josh argues that God comes first. Of course she promptly dumps Josh.
So it is clear now that Josh is up against the world. Even his mother coaches him to take things easy by dropping the class to focus on his other studies this first semester. But Josh is a stand up person. He does not shy away from a challenge. He visits a church where a reverend 'Dave' provides some Bible verses to make Josh feel guilty about not taking on the challenge.
Radisson has a girlfriend too. She is a beautiful young former student named Mina. She believes in God, but is so psychologically weak she latches onto Radisson for security, and thus suppresses her belief in God. Radisson regularly bully's and belittles her in private and public. It is clear that Radisson is merely tolerated by his colleagues—no one likes him.
Josh's first lecture focuses on the creation of the universe. Specifically how the universe was, for thousands of years, believed by scientists to be always in existence. But then evidence of a "big bang" was found. Physicist Stephen Weinberg (atheist) and Belgian astronomer George LeMaitre (theist) seem to agree on the beginnings of the universe. LeMaitre says the big bang is consistent with how the Bible portrays creation of the universe when God says ""let there be light." It is unclear how any of this proves, or disproves, God is dead or not dead.
After Josh is done, Radisson belittles Josh again, saying that Stephen Hawking says something else. Radisson makes sure that the class knows that Stephen Hawking is the greatest physicist to ever live, and that unschooled Josh is arguing with the greatest physicist who ever lived.
Hawking is mischaracterized and then used as a defense against divine creation. But the argument does not really matter. What matters is that Hawking makes the argument, thus it must be right. Radisson is clearly a numb-skull philosophy professor using an appeal to authority. Actually, that is all anyone does in this movie.
After the lecture Radisson roughly corners Josh attempting to intimidate him. Radisson's exchange with Josh is very arrogant and mean—as if by a ruffian on the streets of New York.
Josh's second lecture takes on Hawking's mischaracterized statement. Josh finds mathematician and philosopher John Lennox to refute Stephen Hawking. Again, this argument is a mischaracterization, but it does not matter. Josh takes this as a refutation. What matters most is that Lennox and Hawking disagree, and Lennox is no dummy. Professor Dummy, I mean Radisson, then asks Josh arrogantly, if he is arguing with professor Hawking. Of course Josh now responds with a no. He isn't, but Professor Lennox of Mathematics and Philosophy IS! Also, Josh finds Hawking making the following statement "Philosophy is dead." This is gem for Josh. Now he can force Radisson to choose either to dump Hawking all together, or to accept that philosophy is dead.
And so it goes on...
There are other characters in the film too. A Muslim raised girl named Ayisha who gets beat up by her demanding Muslim father. An atheist young woman reporter Amy Ryan facing cancer. Marc Shelly, an arrogant businessman who is dating Amy Ryan, but conveniently dumps her in her time of need. Reverend Jude, who seems to be the only non-wavering Christian. Martin Yip, an atheistic Chinese American who is impressed with Josh and thus wants to believe in God. And Willie Robertson, a caricature of Duck Dynasty's Phil Robertson.
Jobs (2013)
Kutcher is so wrong for this movie
Whoever thought the Kutcher could play Steve Jobs needs their head examined! He makes the movie so difficult to watch (where was the director for God's sake!).
But the problems don't end there. Jobs' life is only partially portrayed, so if you only know about Jobs being at Apple--that is still pretty much all you know about him. Engineers are portrayed, as they typically are in "Hollywood" films--nerdy enough to be uncool.
Where is the story??!! Most people will be lost, there is not much continuity, and you are left at the end wondering why you came to the movie. You didn't learn anything new about Jobs, you are not sure what the point was, and yet you spent two painful hours trying to get something out of this film.
It's a shame this movie was so awful.
Life of Pi (2012)
Seinfeld's "English Patient"
If you ever saw the episode of Seinfeld where Elaine can't stand the movie "The English Patient" yet everyone else does--but cannot explain why--this fits "Life of Pi" exactly.
I suppose I am so anti-mystic that this would be inevitable. There are no lessons here for life, nor any enjoyment of watching someone else battle the world. The movie starts out as if it is going to chronicle a "man against the world" story. But it progressively becomes untenable to hold on to that idea as weirder and weirder things happen. It became so mystical I could barely stand to watch it. And of ALL THINGS dumb, 10 minutes of the camera focusing on someone talking about what you just saw right in the middle of the movie! BORING!!! You watch a movie to tantalize your eyes--this does not. My kids were asking when this would EVER end.
Undaunted: The Forgotten Giants of the Allegheny Observatory (2012)
Really cool background stories to aviation, spectroscopy, and astrophysics
This is a fantastic documentary (more like a collection of stories)! The production quality and the music make what could be a very dry subject enjoyable. But then the story telling and wealth of information packed into this movie make it one of the best documentaries I have ever seen. It is really unlike most documentaries--crossing into the boundary between movie and documentary. What keeps it from being a movie is the lack of heavy personal drama, but this was never intended to be a movie so it is not a fault at all.
You learn about two men, Samuel Pierpont Langley, and John Alfred Brashear, and their work at the Allegheny Observatory. What is fascinating is all of the interesting science that occurred from these two men--individually, collectively, and even away from the observatory.
You learn about how spectroscopy birthed astrophysics--and I mean you really learn about it, not just hear it mentioned. Great use of Neil deGrasse Tyson here. My wife turned to me and said "I never understood red shift until I saw this movie." Doppler effect is also well done, as is the Michelson-Morley experiment--which required Brashear's advanced optics. And there is a lot more.
I don't want to give too much away, but this is a great documentary.
It's better than the 400 years of the telescope, if you have ever seen that one.
Whoever rated this only 1 star is crazy.