Reviews

46 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Predictable 90s part-animated film that has not stood the test of time
8 June 2008
The main argument that I have against this film is that it seems to try, and subsequently fails, to be Disneyesque. As a result, it does not come across as an original or innovative idea. However, this is definitely not the only thing wrong with this disappointing feel-good extravaganza.

First of all, there are some definite cast issues: Macaulay Culkin is quite unbearably irritating as the cowardly Richard Tyler, a role that, in my opinion, would have benefited a lot from a more comic portrayal that would have made the audience relate to him more easily. Another annoying feature is Whoopi Goldberg as Tyler's animated literary companion, Fantasy. She is the wise-cracking character that you find very often in animated feature films, like the Genie from "Aladdin" (portrayed engagingly by Robin Williams), except that Goldberg, for all her talent, does not really have the extreme pathos that Williams had, and that the role requires. Patrick Stewart, the man with one of the greatest voices to ever grace the big screen, is somewhat wasted as the obligatory coward-who-thinks-he's-so-brave, Adventure, and although Frank Welker's Horror (the hunchbook) is amiable, the character still comes across as boringly formulaic, like the film. The cast's only real saving grace is the live-action Christopher Lloyd as Mr Dewey the librarian, not to mention the latter's animated alter-ego, the Pagemaster. As he so often is, Lloyd is brilliantly over the top. Otherwise, the only other interesting vocal contribution is that of Leonard Nimoy as Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde, although his appearance is limited to a small cameo.

Furthermore, the animation, for a modern day viewer, is not impressive enough to distract the audience from the dull plot, and neither is the dialogue, which falls flat (especially with Culkin's unenthusiastic delivery) and the gags are mostly grindingly facetious and unfunny ("Would you like to crawl into a corner with a good book?"). There is also a song in the middle of the film, "Whatever You Imagine", written by Barry Mann, James Horner and Cynthia Weil, and performed by Wendy Moten. The song seems to be an attempt at capturing the Disney feel of incorporating Pop songs into the story-line. However, whether you like Disney's songs or not, you have to admire their talent for incorporating them into the plot, as can be seen in "The Lion King" (a film of which I, personally, am not tremendously fond) with Elton John and Tim Rices' Oscar-winning "Can You Feel the Love Tonight", not to mention the other songs that they wrote for that film, all of which fit seamlessly into the plot. In "The Pagemaster", no such cohesion between plot and music is achieved even minimally.

However, although this film is mostly disappointing, not all is lost. The story, for all its flaws, wastes no time in getting started, and there is a certain nostalgia surrounding the film for the endless stream of, mostly mediocre, but still harmless, cartoons of the 90s, when computer-generated animation was yet to be exploited. The film does make a respectable attempt at being educational on the literary world, but some of the references are too fleeting (more Sherlock Holmes would not have gone amiss) while others were given too much emphasis, especially the "Treasure Island" segment, although Long John Silver is quite endearingly modeled on Robert Newton's classic portrayal of the character from the 1950 motion picture. Pixote Hunt, Maurice Hunt and Joe Johnston handle the direction skillfully, and, had the script and the story been polished up, this film just might have been passable. Having said that, I can't deny that, when I first saw the film, as a young boy, around ten odd years ago, I was sufficiently entertained, so it is definitely a good, innocent film to plant your children in front of if it's on television, but definitely not worth buying.
9 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Bizarre and somewhat dated, but still worth watching once
17 September 2005
I saw this film recently and didn't find it particularly entertaining. It is very dated in my opinion, and in many instances, it isn't funny at all. So why have I given it a respectable six? Well, there are many details about this film which keep it interesting to the viewer, even if he doesn't find the film funny. First and foremost there is the cast which includes uncountable guest stars from both Britain (John Cleese, Clive Dunn, John Le Mesurier, Richard Attenborough and Spike Milligan just to give you an idea) and America (Yul Brynner, Christopher Lee and Roman Polanski) and spotting them is great fun. The two main actors, Peter Sellers and Ringo Starr, play their roles very well too. There is also the occasional funny moment (for example, the bird-hunting scene) and also it must be said that with its theme of greed, the film makes a valid point: some people will go to immeasurable lengths to get money. Quite fun, but I assure you that I will certainly not watch it again. Maybe you have to be into the sixties...
1 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Sideways (2004)
10/10
Depressing and truly watchable
4 March 2005
"I feel so insignificant I can't even kill myself" says the depressed Miles, played to perfection by Paul Giamatti. This excellent film has every ingredient which the (in my opinion) highly overrated "Lost In Translation" lacked. Like in the equally great film by the same director Alexander Payne, "About Schmidt", we feel the relentless pain that the principle character is subjected to. In "Sideways", we feel Miles' miserable feeling of general uselessness as he attempts in vain to get a book published. Yet this film is very funny in all of its insane depression, which is what makes it so watchable and enjoyable. An excellent cast makes the film even more fantastic, with Thomas Haden Church perfect in the roll of the playboy Jack, Virginia Madsen very suitable in the roll of the wine fanatic beloved of Miles, and also Sandra Oh is good as Jack's girlfriend. Credit has to be given too to Marylouise Burke who is great in the role of Miles' ecstatic mother. Moving, funny and to a certain extent pretty true, "Sideways" is a rare example of truly excellent film-making. Not to be missed.
1 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
As good as any Western could possibly get
28 January 2005
Little did John Sturges know when he made "The Magnificent Seven", that he had made a classic. Eli Wallach is great as the villain, but it is the Magnificent Seven who steal the show here. Yul Brynner is the tough Chris Adams, Steve McQueen is on top form as Vin, in his own unique sophisticated style, Charles Bronson is very good as Bernardo O'Reilly, the man who the children take an enormous shine to, Robert Vaughn, Brad Dexter and James Coburn all keep the film zooming along wonderfully, and the late Horst Buchholz is good too as the ambitious Chico. Everything that a western should have can be found in this film: a good cast, fantastic and exciting fight scenes and great scenery. A great game to play with your friends is to see if they can name all of the Magnificent Seven. This film is also recommendable for its marvelous score by Elmer Bernstein. Well worth seeing, especially if you like westerns. 8/10
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One of the best Marx Brothers films
14 January 2005
It starts off fantastically, with the four brothers playing stowaways on a ship who are hiding in barrels and singing "Sweet Adeleide". Harpo is fantastic as he goofs in his own unique silent way, and there is a hilarious scene involving him and a Punch And Judy show. Chico is as usual on top form as the Italian who has sent for his grandfather's beard by "hair mail". And Groucho gives his classic wisecracks. Zeppo has more to do in this film than he did in other films and he isn't too bad considering that he didn't want to be in the films but had to due to his contract. Two historically funny Marx Brothers scenes in this film are one where they each in turn pretend to be Maurice Chevalier, and one where Chico and Harpo are cutting a man's mustache ("That sides-a-too short"). You must see this film; it's the Marx Brothers at their best. 10/10
19 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
An enjoyable spy spoof from the great comic duo
20 November 2004
I love Morecambe and Wise so I enjoyed this film. They are on top form as bumbling British agents who are trying to stop the bad guys who are "on their side" from doing their bad deeds. There are some really funny scenes and some great lines ("waiter there's a dead man in this soup") and a reasonable cast. Yet though this film is very much enjoyable, it is not as good as their next film "That Riviera Touch", because it begins to get a bit unfunny at times. Nevertheless it's worth watching just for the fantastic opera scene at the end of the film which recalls Danny Kaye's equally hilarious opera performance at the end of his film "Wonder Man". It is also interesting to see how young Morecambe and Wise were when they made the film. Enjoy! 8/10
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A little-known classic
22 October 2004
I saw this fabulous tear-jerker purely by accident but I don't regret it one bit. In my opinion it's one of the best romantic war films ever made. This is mainly because the fabulous director Douglas Sirk doesn't allow it to become a soppy schmaltz. Also, the film is incredibly moving, especially in a scene at the beginning where a young man, unable to live with the guilt of having shot a woman, shoots himself. John Gavin is good as Ernst Graeber and his beloved is adequately played by Liselotte Pulver, but the most outstanding performance, I think, is by Charles Régnier as Joseph. If more war films were made like this then they would be much, much more watchable. The credit sequence at the beginning of the film is also very well done. Why don't more people know this masterpiece? Enjoy! (and don't forget the Kleenex) 10/10
37 out of 46 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Truly, truly great
22 October 2004
I saw this film for the first time quite a while ago, and ever since it remains one of my favorite films. Everything is perfect about it, from Saul Bass's expertly designed credit sequence to the spectacular ending which always has me on the edge of my seat. It is, without a doubt, one of the best spy films ever made along with "The Thirty-Nine Steps". This film has the best possible cast that it could have had. Cary Grant is excellent as Roger and James Mason is a great villain. Martin Landau is equally good as Mason's sleazy assistant. There are some wonderful lines too ("I am not going to let them all down by getting myself slightly killed"). The bi-plane scene is just classic and it is filmed fantastically. What more is there to say? "North by Northwest" is a true classic from a great director; you've done it again Alfie. Enjoy! 10/10
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A bizarre yet interesting account of Jolson's life
9 October 2004
Hardly any of this film is true; for one thing they missed out a couple of wives, and, like most biographical films of back then it is highly over-romanticised. Larry Parks was a strange choice for the part, since he was not very famous, and he doesn't really look like Jolson. Yet this film manages to stay relatively interesting for two hours, with some great music from the master performer, who appears himself briefly, in a long-shot down an isle singing "Swannee" (though it's quite obvious because Al Jolson was much smaller than Parks). Most biographical films were helped by guest appearances by stars playing themselves, but this film has none, and you can hardly say that it has an all star cast. But if you can't enjoy the story, then just sit back and listen to the stream of Jolson hits nicely mimed by Parks. Enjoy it! 7/10
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Bad Acting, but what do you expect?
8 October 2004
The Dorsey Brothers were great musicians, and I admire their work greatly, but they weren't actors. They could carry off reasonable performances in cameo roles in films, like Tommy Dorsey did in the film "a star is born" but other than that, they were not worthy of a main role.

However, I am not here to dump this film; it has some fantastic music in it, including a great jam session with Art Tatum. We are treated to a fabulous amount of Dorsey hits like Tommy Dorsey's soulful rendition of "I'm Getting Sentimental over you" and Jimmy Dorsey's swingey rendition of "Tangerine".

Also, there are some enjoyable cameo appearances (apart from Tatum) that include the famous bandleader Paul Whiteman and the singer Bob Eberle.

The worst thing about this film is a romantic relationship that occurs between the DB band's pianist and the singer. This relationship has virtually nothing to do with the film, and amounts to an unbearable schmaltz.

"The fabulous Dorseys" isn't a bad film but you probably have to be a massive fan of the talented brothers to truly like this film. Enjoy the music! 7/10
15 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
OK but nothing special
6 October 2004
I like Robert Walker, he is always nice to watch, and Ava Gardner is great as the sexy Venus of this film. Yet the film strains continuously to be funny but doesn't quite make it a lot of the time, meaning that the film starts to get boring after a while. I am not a massive fan of Dick Haymes which didn't help my opinion of the film get any better. Yet nevertheless this film manages somehow to be reasonably entertaining, with occasional funny gags (like the police in the park pulling snoggers apart to find Robert Walker) and the thing which I liked most about this film was the inclusion of the famous song "Speak Low (When You Speak Love)", a truly lovely melody. Even Dick Haymes gives a reasonable performance of it (oh alright, Dick Haymes wasn't that bad). "That Touch of Venus" will give reasonable entertainment when it doesn't lapse into soppy schmaltz. Enjoy it! 7/10
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
This film is as funny as it is educational
25 September 2004
I don't like Shakespeare particularly yet this film appealed to me very much. The reason for this is partly because I am a very big fan of Vincent Price, but also because of how clever the film is. It incorporates all the famous Shakespearean death scenes into it from the likes of "Julius Caesar", "King Lear" and "Titus". There is also a fantastic cast that includes a host of stars like Arthur Lowe, Eric Sykes, Diana Rigg, Ian Hendry, Harry Andrews, Coral Browne (Mrs. Vincent Price), Robert Coote, Jack Hawkins, Robert Morley and Dennis Price. The only lament that I could make of this film is that it, on occasion, gets very gory (especially in the "Merchant of Venice" scene). Otherwise, this film is very funny, and is well worth watching for Vincent Price's (intentional) hammy acting. Enjoy! 9/10
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
I, Robot (2004)
8/10
Will Smith carries this highly enjoyable film with ease
18 September 2004
I have always had a lot of appreciation for Will Smith. He demonstrated good comic talent in the TV sitcom "The Fresh Prince of Belair" and in the film "Men in Black" but also showed that he knew how to act in films such as "The Legend of Bagger Vance" and "Ali". In "I, Robot" Smith gives a performance that is not only kick-ass and cynically funny but also somewhat moving as his character Del Spooner recounts how he had desperately tried to avoid the death of a girl in an accident he had had some time before. The special effects are as good as they get these days, and there is also a great cast that includes James Cromwell as Dr. Alfred Lanning, the dead scientist who died of a presumed suicide. Enjoy it! 8/10
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Not a bad film
18 September 2004
I used to love this film a lot, but with time I have grown less fond of it. Still I regard it as a pretty good film, for a number of reasons.

First, it is very well made, and artistically shot with some highly memorable scenes, such as the one where Will Smith first appears out of the dark.

Second, it is very well directed, by Robert Redford.

Third and finally it has a smashing cast, with Will Smith and Matt Damon carrying it beautifully. Surprisingly, Charlize Theron, who I don't tend to like very much in general, is very good as Damon's love interest. Another surprising thing about this film is that the kid, J. Michael Moncrief, is fantastic in his part as young Hardy Greaves (kid actors, with the exceptions of Rupert Grint and Haley Joel Osment, tend to have very poor acting skills. Yes Daniel Radcliffe, I'm thinking of you). Also, look out for Jack Lemmon's (for some reason uncredited) role as the old Hardy Greaves (it was one of his final roles).

"The Legend of Bagger Vance" is a good watch, but it does get a bit monotonous after a while. Still, if you love golf, you're bound to enjoy it. I give a respectable 8/10.
34 out of 56 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A very funny film from that master of comedy Rowan Atkinson
17 September 2004
It's obvious that this film was tailor-made for Rowan Atkinson; if it didn't have him in it, it would have been a pile of rubbish. We've all seen bumbling secret agents before, but none quite like Johnny English who, again thanks to Rowan Atkinson, is a completely original character. There are tons of memorable gags and slapstick sequences to keep most people happy, and some good lines too ("I think you over-estimate your sexual potency Mr. English" "I think that is more than is physically possible"). If you do not like Rowan Atkinson's comedy in general then you probably won't enjoy this film, but fans of Atkinson's various TV series like "Blackadder" and "Mr Bean" are certain to roll about laughing. Highly enjoyable! 10/10
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
X-Men (2000)
8/10
Great fun
17 September 2004
Mutants with all sorts of powers like lasers that come out of their eyes and claws that come out of their hands are set loose in this fantastic comic book adaptation. I would normally yawn at this type of film but I actually really enjoyed it. It must have been because I liked the characters; in some films the characters just can't be related to, so it's difficult to enjoy the film. X-men has a fantastic cast too, with Hugh Jackman as a fine Wolverine and Patrick Stewart as a fine Professor X. Halle Berry is adequate as Storm and Ian McKellen is a sufficiently malicious Magneto. It is also worth seeing this film for its climatic action scenes and appealing special effects (look out for Mystique's transformation powers too). All in all I think that Bryan Singer has done a very good job, and has made a very watchable film. Enjoy! 8/10
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Charming
12 September 2004
A nice little film really, which is very enjoyable. The thing that I enjoyed most about this film was its cameos from the likes of Bugs Bunny, Daffy Duck, Porky Pig, Woody Woodpecker, Droopy and a never ending list. It is always great to hear Mel Blank. Bob Hoskins is on top form too as the hapless detective and Stubby "Sit Down You're Rockin' the Boat" Kaye makes an enjoyable appearance. The only negative comment that I could make of this film is that I am not a great fan of the character Roger Rabbit. But a great performance is made by Christopher Lloyd as an effective, and somewhat frightening on occasion, villain. "Who Framed Roger Rabbit" certainly isn't the best animated film of all time but it is still very much worth seeing. Enjoy! 8/10
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Silent Movie (1976)
10/10
Fantastic
12 September 2004
This film is Mel Brooks at his best. The thing in my opinion that makes this film so great is the fact that it is completely original. In those days people were in love with big colorful modern films, so it must have come as a pretty big shock to discover that suddenly somebody had made an old-fashioned silent film. There are so many things about this film that will make you just crack your teeth laughing, but most of the funniest of them are thanks to the comic genius of the actor Marty Feldman. Also in this film are some fantastic cameos by all sorts of stars. This is certainly one of Mel Brooks' best films, and should be put next to his many other great films like "The Producers" and "Spaceballs". Enjoy! 10/10
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Carnegie Hall (1947)
7/10
One hell of a weird film
12 September 2004
I saw this film recently and couldn't quite get the point of it. In a two hour film made up almost entirely of music, a very weird and decidedly irrelevant plot can be found. But I'm not here to bin this film, some of the music is very engaging especially Arthur Rubinstein's energetic virtuoso piano playing, and it is interesting to see some classical music maestros perform. I recorded this film because I had heard that the fantastic trumpeter Harry James and his orchestra were in it, but what this review failed to mention was the fact that you have to wait a good two hours before James comes on, only to appear for about three minutes (which are, despite the long wait, quite good). No, "Carnegie Hall" is not a bad film, but you probably have to be well into the type of music played in it to truly enjoy watching this film. 7/10
5 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Enjoyable detective spiel
7 September 2004
This film is quite strange, because for once we actually see Sherlock Holmes, the most intelligent detective in literary history (played fantastically, as always, by Basil Rathbone) making a mistake that leads to a precious pearl being stolen. Other than this detail, this film is pretty good, and it is always nice to see the lovable Nigel Bruce as Sherlock's occasionally bumbling but forever faithful sidekick Doctor Watson. What made this film get such a high rating from me though, was the fantastic performance by Rondo Hatton as the creeper, a more sinister foe than Holmes and Watson have ever faced in my opinion. Hatton has a very sad life story, having been deformed during the First World War due to gas. This meant of course that he was always cast as the deformed murderer, but he did what he did well. Enjoy! 8/10
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Great stuff from Eric and Ernie
6 September 2004
Maybe you have to be a Morecambe and Wise fan like me, but I loved this film so much. The comic duo find themselves in the midst of a jewel theft and a beautiful woman, Claudette. One of the most entertaining scenes in this film is when Morecambe accidentally wins a massive amount of money at a casino. Gags are plenty in this film, but occasionally, when Morecambe and Wise aren't on the screen, it gets ever so slightly over-serious. But this is just one tinsey handicap of a very funny film. If you get bored with Morecambe and Wise (not very likely) then you can enjoy the beautiful French Riviera scenery (the film was actually filmed there). Enjoy! 9/10
18 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not worth seeing
23 July 2004
The thing about the original "Around the World in 80 Days that made it so enjoyable was the fact that you could spot tons famous actors in cameos. But this this bleak remake has little to recommend apart from Jackie Chan's amazing martial arts moves. Arnold Schwarzannegar (how the hell do you spell it?) plays a prince in Turkey and is just plain embarassing, and I like him as an actor. John Cleese appears for little more time in this film than he did in the first Harry Potter film, and Macy Gray also makes a bizarre cameo appearance as a sleeping French woman. She must have wanted more after "Spider man". Steve Coogan is no David Niven, and he just doesn't have enough charm to keep this film going. But Cecile DeParis is the worst of all. The only good thing in this film apart from Jackie Chan is Rob Schneider as a tramp. You might like it but I think it's pretty mediocre. 6/10
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Shrek 2 (2004)
7/10
Better than the first one
9 July 2004
I was not very impressed by the first "Shrek" film and was expecting the same sort of sentiments for the second film. But when I saw it (only yesterday as a matter of fact), I was pleasantly surprised to find it was better. As usual, Eddie Murphy is great as Donkey, but the show is completely stolen by Puss in Boots who is brought alive by the voice of Antonio Banderas. John Cleese, Julie Andrews, Rupert Everett and Jenniffer Saunders are among the new cast. There are some great gags and some wonderful spoofs of a number of films, one of the best spoofs being one of "Mission Impossible". But this film is no masterpiece; it suffers a bit from the same problems as "Shrek (1)": after a while it gets boring watching the two ogres farting and burping continuously. Still, it is worth seeing, even just for Puss in Boots. Enjoy. 7/10
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Shrek (2001)
6/10
Overrated but not too bad
9 July 2004
I really don't think much of this over-popular computerised film. It is vulgar and unfunny most of the time. But there are enough gags here to keep this film going at a steady and mildly enjoyable pace. Also, Eddie Murphey is in top form as Donkey, Mike Myers provides a passable Scottish accent for Shrek, and Cameron Diaz suits her part too. But if you are looking for good computer animation films then turn to Pixar. A thing which makes me dislike this film more is the fact that at the oscar ceremony a couple of years ago, it beat Pixar's "Monsters, inc." for the oscar for best animated film. "Shrek" isn't awful, but I get a bit bored after a while of watching a grumpy ogre farting and burping his way into the hearts of audiences around the world. 6/10
7 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Freaks (1932)
10/10
A strange yet fascinating masterpiece
9 July 2004
I saw this film just recently and immediately fell in love with it. The idea behind the film of: "offend one freak and you offend them all is disturbing and it is this statement which is the back-bone of the story. One of the best shots in cinema history comes near the end when the revenge-seeking freaks close in on the stabbed strong-man Hercules. Another scenes to look out for is the famous wedding scene in which Cleopatra has her outburst ("Freaks!" she yells in their stunned faces). But the real shock of this film comes right at the end where Cleopatra's fate is revealed to us. This film was way ahead of its time when it was made back in 1932, seeing how it still manages to disturb us today. A truly unique horror film that is a must-see to all you film buffs and horror fans. Enjoy! 10/10
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

Recently Viewed