Reviews

15 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
King Kong (2005)
10/10
1933 Comes to Life
15 December 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I finally got to see the 2005 version of King Kong. I had no intentions of seeing it. Mainly because of that fiasco that came out in 1977 and of course my loyalty to the original Willis O'Brien version. But, it was on one night and I decided to watch, all the time ready to hate it and rip it to shreds. But for 3 hours I sat glued to the screen and saw something I had never expected to see. I used to know a lot about how they made movies, all the tricks and miniatures and blue screen, etc. After this I just threw up my hands. There were some major plot changes but it didn't take away from the movie at all. If for no other reason you didn't want to see this film the dinosaur scenes alone were worth the price of admission. Absolutely incredible. In the original Kong battles one T-rex. In this he battles three very lively creatures. The recreation of New York City in 1933 was also astounding, especially the Times Square scene at the end. There were lines taken from the original movie and some "in jokes" and names like Fay (Fay Wray, star of the original film). Naomi Watts was amazing as Ann Darrow. Adrien Brody was good and Jack Black as Carl Denham - well, I think this was his best performance ever. In 1933 they wanted to use some giant spiders to attack the men as they fell off the log into the ravine below but production costs forced them to eliminate that scene. In this film there is every kind of insect imaginable. It gave me the creeps! This was truly an action film, a love story, a great adventure from beginning to end and I endorse it as one of the finest films to come along in years.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Three Strikes You're Dead
12 September 2006
I love this series. The first was good because it was so different. The second had the best road wreck I have ever seen bar none. I'm still in awe of the entire, carefully planned scene. One of the most incredible and realistic crash scenes ever filmed. I just watched Part 3 on PPV and was delighted. We all know the plot, what happens and why, but it's always interesting to see how the writers are going to come up for new ways for Death to claim its victims. The opening scene reminded me a bit of (the remake of) The House on Haunted Hill so we were off to a good start. I loved the ending on this 3rd installment as well. It leaves an opening for a sequel and if not, it was a satisfying end. You can use your imagination to figure it out. If not for Glen Morgan and James Wong there would be no good movies to watch! These guys are great, with writing, directing, producing, whatever they do. They compliment each other wonderfully and I enjoy their work tremendously. When Space: Above and Beyond was on a wrote a fan letter and sent it to the studio. Imagine my surprise and delight when one time I received a hand written letter from Glen, and another time another hand written letter with a cast picture enclosed! I will treasure them always. The gore in this movie was there but went by so quickly you didn't have time to dwell on it. For me, I was more afraid of that d**n roller coaster! Those things scare the yell out of me! No way I would ever get on one, and after seeing this movie it only adds to my terror and fear of them. Want some good fun and lots of action? Then by all means see this film. Thanks Glen and James.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
D.E.B.S. (2004)
1/10
d.u.d.s.
6 July 2006
I can't spoil this film by giving away the plot. There is none. This was the most inept film to come along in a while, and there are plenty to choose from. Not a movie for young girls, no role models here, only 4 young ladies with guns, violence, lesbians, smoking, inane dialog and so bad it must be seen to be believed. You can not connect with any of these ladies and one has to wonder how a film so bad could ever get made! On second thought, don't see it. You'd be wasting your time and money. Maybe if it pops up on cable or satellite take a look, if you can stand it. Of all the projects that are shelved each year in Hollywood why something like this was given the green light is beyond me. There are plenty of good stories waiting to be told, many good directors waiting for their chance. Even Roger Corman couldn't make a film this bad with a 3 day shooting schedule and $25,000 - or less.
4 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Christine (1983)
8/10
Glen or Glenda?
30 June 2006
OK, so you're asking yourself why am I talking about an Ed Wood movie like Glen or Glenda? in association with a movie like Christine? What's that got to do with it? Well, everything. Stephen King is a master of subtle commentary and with one word he sums up this entire book: Christine. Did anyone stop and wonder why he called the car Christine? I did. Why not Peggy Sue or Mary Lou or some other sappy name from the 1950s? Well, it was obvious. To me at least. Maybe I'm way off base. No one can actually know what's going on in his mind, nor would we want to I suspect. But Steve and I are the same age, we were both old enough in the 50s to appreciate the fantastic cars that were produced during the latter part of that decade as well as the world wide scandal that rocked moral minded people everywhere. Maybe we didn't understand it, but the news was rammed down our throats day and night by the media and we knew something was not quite right here. Christine Jorgenson had become a woman thanks to a sex change operation. What? How could this be? This man went beyond "God's laws" and changed his sex. So Ed Wood, bless him, conned his way into directing Glen or Glenda? which was supposed to cover this story, but instead he used it as a showcase for himself, to tell people he liked to wear woman's under panties and dress in pink sweaters. He often directed his films wearing a wig and dress but in now way tried to be a woman. He was just eccentric and loved woman's clothes. So what's the connection between that and Christine Jorgenson? Simple: change. The timing was perfect. The assembly line at the Chrysler plant producing the 1958 Plymouth Fury, one of the sharpest cars ever to leave Detroit and one of my personal favorites. The 50s were a time or change and unrest. The cold war, sexual freedom, the bomb, beatniks, outlandish cars - such as the '59 Caddy with tail find 10" lower than the roof! Why name a car Christine? Simple answer again: change. The possessed car could change right in front of our eyes, repair itself, renew itself, and each time the miles on the speedometer would go backwards. From 99,000 miles it suddenly reached 88,000 miles. This was a car lover's dream come true! Well, I won't give away any plot details and it's far different from the book. Like there's no dead guy in the back seat speaking to the new owner. They saved that for Pet Semetery. But if you like classic cars this is the film for you! The Fury also destroys a Camaro which I was also fond of. After seeing the movie I asked myself, wouldn't this be a great car to own? It goes out by itself, gets rid of people you don't like, returns home and repairs itself! An insurance man's dream for sure. No costly repair bills to pay out. Great movie, watching the transformation of the wrecked car and it's nerdy owner is worth the price. At the end I don't know if I felt more sorry for Arnie or the car.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Thriller (1960–1962)
10/10
Prepare to be Scared To Death!
26 June 2006
Warning: Spoilers
When Thriller first came on TV I didn't pay much attention to it. Naturally I watched it because I heard that Boris Karloff would be the host and assumed these would be one hour mini movies of horror. Nothing could be farther from the truth! They were mystery shows, told in segments with Boris telling us a bit about the show before each episode began. Thriller was doomed from the start. It seemed it didn't know which direction to follow and each show was in no way related to the previous one; ranging from mystery to comedy. I soon grew tired of this and went back to Alfred Hitchcock Presents. Then came that fateful night. I decided to give it another try. After airing something like 14 episodes I tuned in to one titled The Cheaters. It started out grimly enough with a hanging and Boris, with that wonderful voice, assuring us that this would be a Thriller. Well, by the final episode when Harry Townes dons the special eyeglasses and looks into the mirror, what he sees sent me into total goosebump shock! I had nightmares for a week. It's all I could talk about at school. For a 12 year old boy this was the scariest thing I had ever seen. So I watched again the following week. This time it was an episode called The Hungry Glass with William Shatner. A creepy old house with images appearing in the windows, a really horrific ending, but still not as scary as last week. OK, I said to myself, this isn't so bad. Sure enough the next few episodes went back to murder and suspense and I again lost interest. But along comes Well of Doom which was a mystery in disguise. They tried to trick a wealthy man with magic and a giant hulk of a man to gain possession of his estate. At the end we discover all the horrors had been staged and the man ended up scaring his tormentors half to death! Directors on this show ranged from Ida Lupino to John Brahm, one of the finest TV and movie directors of all time. The rest of the season went back and forth between horror and mystery and again I stopped watching. But I did catch the last show of the season and I'm glad I did. Called "The Grim Reaper" it starred William Shatner. His wealthy aunt had purchased a painting of the grim reaper, a really horrid thing, and when Shatner comes for a visit he tells a tale of murder and intrigue and terror. Those who owned the painting all met violent deaths. As he tells his story to his aunt and guests he stops, looks at the painting, touches it, then turns toward his audience extending his hand. There's blood on his fingertips! At the end, his aunt dies and no one is left in the house except the secretary. Shatner explains the whole thing was a gag to scare the old lady and get her fortune. The secretary locks him in the room with the painting and goes for help. I shall never forget what happens next as long as I live. Alone in the room he taunts the painting, wallowing in his victory. But when he turns to see what made a noise he sees the character in the painting is gone! He looks around. There is no music, only deadly silence as the look on his face says it all. He is so terrified he can't even scream; no sound comes out. What does he see? Finally the police arrive and break down the door. The inspector and his partner find Shatner dead on the floor. Then someone says, "Oh my God. Look at the painting!" The camera slowly zooms in and we see blood dripping from the scythe. I thought that since I was so young yeah, that's why it scared me. I bought this episode on videotape and played it again. Knowing the plot, knowing what would happen, and being 58 years old, I still got chills at the end! Karloff himself appeared in several episodes, and to fans there's a top 20 list of the best shows. They include the ones I just mentioned of course plus The Incredible Doctor Markesan, A Wig for Miss Devore, Waxworks and more. Sadly the show went off the air that second year but it left it's mark on TV history. Stephen King was influenced by it, as was I. The one episode that scared both of us was Pigeons From Hell. He was inspired to write several stories watching this and I won a short story contest at that time. I also didn't sleep for weeks after seeing it. It was scarier than any horror movie of the time, and most of today! In fact, this episode would not even be allowed on TV today. The censors would not allow it. Critics hated it, fans were confused, so much behind the scenes bickering finally killed off Thriller. Yet Hitchcock was so envious of the show he expanded his own show to one hour, a terrible mistake. While his little stories worked well in the half hour format, the one hour shows did not. If you have never seen this classic horror fest by all means do so. It's black and white which adds to its air of suspense and terror. Sit back and prepare to see something you will never see on TV again!
16 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A Rude Awakening
26 June 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I saw 2001 back in 1968 at a theater in Philadelphia, shown as intended: in Cinerama. To see this movie any other way is like watching House of Wax without the 3D glasses. Still, in 70mm widescreen theaters it is still a visual feast. I can sum up this movie in one sentence: The greatest sci fi film ever made. No need to go into detail, by now just about everyone has seen this movie in one form or another. But it holds one giant disappointment for me. I so looked forward to the year 2001 after seeing this film. I had high hopes for the future and thought for sure we'd have a base on the moon. Instead 2001 turned out to be one of the darkest days in American history. And for that I was sadly disturbed. Hard to believe also that it's nearly 40 years since its release. I keep track of how many times I see a movie. If it's really good I count to 100 and stop counting after that. I have now exceeded 300 times, maybe more, and never grow tired of watching this epic. While Citizen Kane has to be the number one mundane movie of all time, 2001 is the number one sci fi film. Forry Ackerman hated it which doesn't make a bit of sense since he is the foremost fan of science fiction. The late great magazine Castle of Frankenstein couldn't lavish enough praise on it. It won an Oscar for visual effects, innovative at the time using computers in a way that was never done before. The beginning is enough to grab your attention, when the ape-man tosses the bone into the air and in a flash we're transported 4 million years into the future, into outer space. That scene will never been duplicated. Then the discovery of a monolith buried on the moon. The team sent to investigate says "It was purposely buried." The deafening transmission that came from the monolith aimed at the planet Jupiter and the amazing trip thru time and space as the lone astronaut enters the black rectangular box. In 2010 his last transmission was played back: "My God! It's full of stars!" Indeed. The ending still gives me chills and yes, it was open to the viewer's own interpretation. For me, seeing the birth of stars, the wonders of the universe, creation in space then Bowman seeing himself grow old and eventually die. His last act, to point at the black monolith as if to say "I understand". He died and is transformed into the Star Child. From there you can decide whatever you wish. It's all symbolic after all, a way of telling us the Earth needs a rebirth, a reawakening, a fresh start. The sequel 2010 explained this briefly at the end, when the Earth now had two suns and another monolith appears on one of Jupiter's moons. It's a continuous cycle taking us from ape to man and beyond, to the beginning of a new life cycle and hopefully a better understanding of our universe and ourselves. What more could you want from a movie??!!
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Infection (2004)
This Is NOT General Hospital
25 June 2006
Warning: Spoilers
For me hospitals are creepy places anyhow, no matter how brightly lit or decorated. This Japanese import takes that phobia a step further. This hospital is isolated, off the beaten path, and staffed by (seemingly) inept doctors and nurses, but worst of all, it's dimly lit, dark and foreboding. Nothing I like better than a good scare tale and this movie delivers. Not a Godzilla type film with laughs and so-so f/x, just an old fashioned haunted house story set in a hospital. It's creepy, sometimes sickening, eerie, has a few good scares, an ending that makes you think and I guess it can be called psychological horror. As one of the doctors explains, "This is not a virus that is airborne. It is spread thru the subconscious. In your dreams." It starts with a burn victim who dies. The hapless man is burned over 70% of his body but when a nurse injects him with the wrong serum the patient dies. Then the doctors and nurses try to cover it up. Big mistake, for shortly after this bizarre things begin to happen. Bodies dissolve into a mass of green liquid. Internal organs are dissolved. The :"infection" spreads from nurse to nurse, doctor to doctor, until the film reaches a satisfying climax, only to hit you with one last shock. Excellent movie. I can't say enough good things about it. A must see for any horror fan.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Morticia Would've Loved It
24 June 2006
I saw the George Pal production of The Wonderful World of the Brothers Grimm and it was an excellent movie. Filmed in Cinerama, the sensation of the time, it was shown on a huge screen with stereo sound and was quite a fascinating picture. Packed with music, fantasy, dancing, stop motion animation and more it was one of MGM's epic productions to use the new process. But like 3D before it, Cinerama did not last mainly because of the cost and complications in filming and a lack of suitable theaters. So now we have The Brothers Grimm, a retelling of the infamous duo and their world of fantasy. I remember seeing an episode of The Addmas Family on TV and Morticia was shocked because the stories (by Grimm) were too awful for her children to read. Not because of stuffing witches into ovens or killing giants. No, just the opposite. She was dumbfounded that with a name like Grimm how could they write such terrible things? Well, I think she would've liked this movie. I wanted to hate it. I really did. But as it unfolded it was soon obvious that this was not your same old, worn out telling of children's stories. Yes, the took the original tales and changed them quite a bit but it made for a convincing story with real-life situations. Directed by Monty Python graduate Terry Gilliam you never know what to expect from his demented mind. And the audience is never disappointed. This film delivered on all levels but one. I liked the production values, the look and feel of the film; you felt like you were there in the early 1800s to see how people lived. In real life, of course, the Brothers were not con artists. On the contrary, they were prolific writers. Each wrote many volumes alone and together they published several volumes of various works. They were an interesting duo and if this movie had any basis in fact whatsoever I'm sure they would have behaved exactly as we saw them. Excellent film. Maybe not an award winner but worth the price of a DVD for an enjoyable evening. Unless you don't like frogs.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
House of Wax (2005)
House of Whacks
24 June 2006
Youngsters get whacked one by one in this remake of the 1953 classic. I didn't see it in the movies but I did order it when it came on PPV. I switched channels after 5 minutes of unbearable agony. I could not bear to watch any more. I am a great fan of "bad movies" and anyone who has read my articles in a number of sci fi and horror magazines knows this. In 1953 I saw House of Wax in 3D and I had nightmares for weeks. It was truly scary with Vincent Price delivering one of his finest performances. In the renovated new version there isn't one character you can be sympathetic to. By the end I was hoping they would ALL fall into the hot wax, including the writer and director. I did finally see the entire movie, a little at a time, for that's all I could stand. Eventually I saw it all and once was enough. I never want to see this film again. It was so bad I won't even compare it to Women of the Lost Mesa or Plan 9 From Outer Space for they were Award Winners compared to this tripe! Don't waste your time.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
William Castle Would Be Proud
24 June 2006
I saw the original 13 Ghosts when I was 12 years old and it scared me half to death. They gave you a viewer so when the ghosts appeared on screen you looked thru one color and could see them, but if you looked thru the other color you couldn't see them. Now that I see that movie again I wonder what I was scared of. But I loved all of William Castle's movies. He was the master of gimmicks and chills in his day. Now comes a new version of the old story, packed with gore and shocks galore in living color. No glasses or special optical device handed out at the theater this time. The film hits you with a punch to the senses in the opening scenes before settling down to a poor man struggling to make ends meet after the tragic death of his wife. He later learns that his dear wife's "ghost" has been captured by his eccentric uncle and is kept in a special cage in the basement. While vastly different from the original, this film can stand on its own. It is a complete retelling of the story with great action, special fx, acting and a few laughs thrown in as well as some references to the original. If you are just looking for some mindless supernatural fun and maybe even a moral (love is stronger than evil) this film is for you.
45 out of 69 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Poor Stanley
24 June 2006
I loved Stanley Kubrick pictures. Each was different than the one before and each had that undeniable Kubrick touch. He was a photographer and worked for Life magazine and others before turning to directing. A-I was to be his next project. Sadly, he died and the world lost of the greats. So Spielberg took over. If I were Steven I would remove my name from the credits and slap an "Alan Smithee" on there as quickly as possible. In case you don't know, Alan Smithee is the name directors use when they withdraw their own name from a film because after careful consideration they no longer want to be associated with it. David Lynch did this with Dune, another epic flop. But A-I goes beyond flop. I could not find a suitable word to describe this movie suffice to say it was so bad it wasn't released, it escaped! Awful, boring, stupid, one of the worst movies ever made. Even the worst of Roger Corman's $20,000 quickies was better than this. Don't waste your time or your eyesight. A-I, I imagine, stands for Absolutely Inept.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
It's 1939 - or Is It?
23 June 2006
Sky Captain and the world of Tomorrow is the kind of film I've been waiting for! Pure sci fi, in my opinion, where mechanical robots weighing many tons can fly and The Hindenburg can dock at the Empire State Building (this was actually discussed during the planning and building of the historic landmark). Many people think this film was set in some dark future while others think it was pure fantasy. In reality, for anyone who has ever read a comic book, this was set in 1939. Despite it's many errors (not the right camera, not the right plane, etc) you have to suspend all belief and let your mind go to the fantasy world of science fiction, the way it used to be. They're showing The Wizard of Oz at a theater. So is it 1939 or some distant future retrospective as some have claimed? It's winter as snow is falling on New York City, yet there is something odd about the skyline. To me this film contained all the elements of a good sci fi movie: some from Wizard of Oz, some from Things To Come, even some from King Kong. I especially liked the sound effects from the robots. Does anyone remember the Martian war machines in War of the Worlds? The cars were especially nice, vintage 1930s yet not a single one could be identified. And Bazooka chewing gum? Don't see much of that these days. The special effects were awesome and the not-quite-color look of the movie gave it extra oomph if you will. It looked old. This film could've been made in 1939, had they the technology. All in all it was a fun ride, an adventure around the globe, impossible situations, machines and even a rocket ship. Most people forget these days that there was a time that scientists believed if a rocket would leave Earth and punch a hole in the atmosphere it would start a chain reaction and incinerate the Earth! With time running out, literally at the last second, Sky Captain stops that from happening. For those of us who enjoy Ray Bradbury stories and H.G.Wells, then this is the film for you, where the impossible is not only possible, it seems logical. One of the finest sci fi movies ever made. Also, when they're showing pictures of giant machines from all around the world, if you look carefully you'll see Godzilla in Tokyo. Great shot!
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Grudge (2004)
10/10
One of the Scariest Films Ever
23 June 2006
I have The Grudge on DVD and watched it again this morning with surround sound and a widescreen TV. It scared me just as much as the first time I ever saw. Unrelenting in its content and editing, they show you a quick glimpse of something with musical sounds added for extra scare value. I spoke with a young man who is half Japanese and he tells me that yes, this belief is common and true in Japan. They believe that when a person dies a violent death the essence of the crime remains and builds until anyone who becomes involved in any way, shape or form is affected by it. I've seen many films over the years but none can compare to the horror in this. What made it more terrifying is that it took place in Tokyo, Japan, a most unlikely place for a haunted house movie. There were no silly gimmicks, no laugh breaks to ease the tension, just horror upon horror building to a chilling climax. I suggest if you've never seen this movie, by all means do so. Today. Or preferably, tonight!
6 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Haunting (1963)
10/10
Haunted by The Haunting
10 March 2005
I was only 15 when I saw this movie. It was on a double bill with The Birds. In those days you can see two movies, a newsreel, coming attractions and a cartoon. I don't know if it was the b&w photography, the music, or just the horrid look of the thing but I had nightmares for weeks. Never saw a ghost or monster but it was that unseen "something's out there" that got to me. The scene where the door "breathes" and the final scenes where poor Eleanor sees the good doctor's wife thru the trap door in the ceiling. Took 10 years off my life. I have a very good friend named Jim Maloney. He was actually my high school English teacher. He told me he saw this movie and it "scared the bejesus" out of him. "I should know better" he said. But it was that kind of film. Eerie, shadowy, expressionistic. Reminded me of the old German cinema in many ways, ie: Cabinet of Dr. Caligari and Nosferatu. Even today, under proper conditions, this film can evoke a chill or two.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Legendary King Arthur and his men search the land fir Camelot.
9 June 2004
When I first saw this movie I hated it. I didn't ubderstabd it. I didn't care for the TV shows. I thought it was our silliness. One night at 2AM my cousin and I watched it on TV and we laughed ourselves silly. Maybe we were drunk, tired, whatever. From then on it was Python madness. We watched all the TV shows, watched Holy Grail over and over and when it came out on video we wore it out. We memorized the words and really freak people out in chat rooms when they don't know what we're talking about. "It's only a flesh wound!" "What are you going to do, bite me?" "Oh please, can't I have a little peril?" "No, it's too perilous". "How do you know he's a king?" "He hasn't got s**t all over him". "Bring out your dead". The writing, directing, special effects with no budget (Terry Gilliam says "it's only a model" all incredible. And the taunting Frenchmen. This is a true classic made by geniuses and why it didn't make the top 100 funniest movies ever I'll never know (either did It's A Mad Mad Mad Mad World and several others. I give it an big A+!!!
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed