Reviews

146 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Persuasion (1995 TV Movie)
9/10
Jane Austen's world perfectly brought to life
19 April 2024
A real pleasure to watch and by far superior to the later version with Sally Hawkins. (Sally Hawkins was fine but the whole later production looks like a cartoon version compared with this elaborate rendering of Jane Austen's world.) Amanda Root as Anne Elliot is perfect as the underestimated and unloved daughter of a spendthrift snob of a father and a stepmother right out of Grimm's fairy tales. (Not to speak of being henpecked by her hyper nervous younger married sister.) They filmmakers also managed to make Amanda Root look rather unattractive at the beginning and one wonders how any man could have been so much in love with her as the still lamented Frederick Wenthworth, whom she sent away on the heavy influence of her family, because he was a nobody with no regular income at the time. Years have past when we comes back into her neighbourhood, apparently haunting her serenity and feeling her more wrong then ever before. Cairán Hinds is equally good as the former lover Wenthworth, still hurt and trying hard to ignore Anne and seemingly having a good time without her. Once Wentworth pops up every now and then we notice that Anne begins to look more pretty, even the presence of the man she thinks she has lost forever make her look so much better.

The beauty of this version is not only grounded on the excellent cast but also in the magnificent eye for details, and, although only running a mere 100 minutes, gives the viewer the appropriate feeling of time passing by very slowly (don't get me wrong, I don't speak of the pace inside the story), but time that painfully slows down when being with people you despise or you feel dispised by. I always cherished this book by Jane Austen very much and I'm so glad that finally I found this film that really does it justice!
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Great story, well done!
9 April 2024
Josef Hader has returned to the director's chair after his first film as a director, "Die wilde Maus", was a great success with critics and audiences. Now he has raised the bar considerably. This time he has taken the subject of his film much more seriously, even if the typical raunchy dialogue can still be heard here. Nevertheless, the core story tells of policewoman Andrea, who wants to divorce her husband and then move from the provinces to the state capital to pursue more interesting police work. But then a stupid accident happens and Andrea's entire life is thrown into turmoil. Along the way, the film uses clear, calm images to show us the simplicity and loneliness of life in an insignificant place somewhere in the countryside.

Birgit Minichmayr as Andrea, who has been the most sought-after Austrian actress in the German-speaking world for some time now, carries the film with incredible presence, and that's a good thing, because the story offers hardly any external tension. Everything happens in the moment and her restrained performance gives the viewer just enough insight to understand her next steps. However, she is supported in the supporting roles by an impressive array of acting greats in some very small but fine roles. Thomas Stipsits in particular, who, like Hader, comes from the cabaret scene and is enjoying increasing success in film, puts on a great performance in the role of the drunken husband of a young man.

Josef Hader appears here as the second main character in the plot, although he primarily acts as a catalyst for the developing story. His character has all the typical Hader characteristics: a loner squared with a penchant for self-dismantling. Despite the occasional situation comedy that arises from this, it is ultimately this honesty towards himself that will ultimately save Andrea from her inner shell.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Marlowe (2022)
2/10
This is not Marlowe
3 April 2024
As my wife notes, it does say something when I don't watch a film to the end. "Marlowe" is just a waste of time. Not only is it not based on any original story be Raymond Chandler, it is not well invented either. Liam Neeson is way too old for the role and what is worse, he just doesn't get the character right. He appears to be angry about something most of the time, but we don't know why. What is even worse is, the subtle humor that makes the real Marlowe so likable, is missing.

I should mention that I'm a great Chandler fan and therefore maybe too critical. But, for example, watch Robert Mitchum in "Farewell, my Lovely", though Mitchum was too old as well, he got the right feeling for the role and we are on his side.

In the past, quite a number of very different actors tried the Marlowe character, from Humphrey Bogart to James Garner and they all found a way to get us interested in the character's well being. With Neeson's Marlowe I didn't find anything that is worth watching and after a boring half an hour I stopped the film.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Maybe I Do (2023)
6/10
Disappointing
2 April 2024
Considering the fact that all actors who play the parents in this film have been way over 70 at the time of shooting, they would be better suited to play the grandparents. Diane Keaton and Susan Sarandon would have been 50+ when giving birth. Which gives me the idea that this screenplay with earmarked actors had a long shelf-life until finally green-lighted.

Anyway, the whole story has an ancient feel, switched partners and all that was quite popular in the past. The French probably have done dozens of this kind of film. Nothing new has been added to a forseeable story, it is a feel good movie that should have been done 20 years ago.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Die Nacht der Nächte (1995 TV Movie)
9/10
Excellent
2 April 2024
An astonishingly well-made comedy in a genre that is clearly dominated by Hollywood, an escape from a routine life into an adventure that takes the character to her limits, but ultimately also back to life. Senta Berger plays with great conviction a wife and mother on the verge of old age who is taken for granted by her family, not loved and growing old. On her 50th birthday, she flees from a party forced upon her into Vienna at night and begins a journey into the underworld, from which she only emerges with great effort and skill.

In addition to the very successful production, the strong star line-up for a television production is particularly striking; well-known and up-and-coming Austrian actors, even in the smallest roles, add to the appeal. Also unusual is the really fast-paced car chase, which is also a trademark of U. S. cinema. The whole story is of course somewhat reminiscent of "Into the Night" and "Eyes Wide Shut", but in this case the pace and humor prevail.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Endeavour (2012–2023)
9/10
Excellently developed
12 February 2024
Russell Lewis, the mastermind behind the "Endeavour" success, was certainly the best choice since he had one experience with the original "Inspector Morse" and helped to get the followup "Lewis" on his way. His five early screenplays for "Lewis" helped develop the partnership between Lewis and Hathaway.

By the way: Am I the only one who sees the relationship between DS Hathaway and DC/DS Endeavour? Both are very clever, well educated, studied in Oxford and originally trained to take a different occupation before joining the police, loner, awkward opposite women, and like riddles. And both are very respected by their superior.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Just plain stupid
12 February 2024
"Romancing the stone" was certainly nowhere near any best Comedy List but it is an entertaining film that keeps you watching, silly as it is. "Jewel of the Nile" unfortunately is not in this category. In fact, it belongs to the category Wish I never watched it. Or, as in my case, Stop watching it before you get mad.

The Indiana Jones films imitated the old B-movies storyline with an A-budget. The two films with Michael Douglas try the same thing, alas, with a smaller budget and much weaker scripts. The Jewel film is just plain stupid and not funny enough to overlook it. No wonder Kathleen Turner tried to get out of her contract, she was forced to play unless she would have been sued by the studio.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Very bad script
3 January 2024
"Midsomer Murders" has never been known for tight and logic plots but this episode really kicks the bottom out of the barrel. When I start to think of the many holes in the story, especially once you "know who did it" you only ask yourself WHY, but I begin to feel like counting the holes in an Emmentaler cheese. I don't want to get into details otherwise I would have to mark this as spoiler which the whole thing is not worth the effort.

I have to say that I really like the series and so far have not complained on IMDB about other episodes, but this...

As a fan of MM one had to endure the outcome of the True-May affair which resulted in the squeezing of people of color into every episode, fitting or not. That they have been completely absent before was definitely wrong and unrealistic for everyone who ever visited England. But this quota filling which takes place now is just as well ridiculous.

The turnover from Tom to John was easier than expected and Neil Dudgeon has been well chosen, and so is his wife, Fiona Dolman, and it is good that she got a proper job. Joyce, the housewife from the original Barnaby, had to be in each episode and the way to involve her in the stories became more and more stupid.

The change of assistants is another subject and not everybody is likable to everyone. But at least there should be some chemistry between them and Barnaby. Unfortunately, Nick Hendrix is by far the weakest sidekick to Barnaby. I cannot imagine that they could not find anyone more suitable for the role. On the other hand, the addition of Fleur Perkins, played by Annette Badland, is a highlight and whenever she comes up is a good moment in the show.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Yannick (2023)
5/10
Disappointing
3 November 2023
Someone applauds and everyone follows, is drawn into it. This seems to be the case with this film, in the story but also the film itself. Though only 1 hour and 7 minutes long it still manages to be testing your patience. The synopsis of the film presented it in a much better light. Maybe I should have stood up and left, but, like the audience in the film, I was hoping for a satisfying finale act.

In vain! I didn't find the film more entertaining than the play that gets interrupted by Yannick. I don't see the point in this film, where a weak boulevard play is interrupted by someone who roots for an even inferior play. The film makes fun of Yannick, the actors of the play and also the audience in turn. But to see a fool being foolish and being laughed at till he turns the table on the others who now begin to look foolish, including the audience, is no great art either and not really better than the play it mocks.

Of course, you could argue that the story should be looked at as a political statement: a fool, critizising other fools in view of a foolish audience, but honestly, others have done that much better.
16 out of 47 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Screwed up
29 October 2023
It's actually a pity, the initial idea is quite appealing and the title and the advertising strategy have aroused great expectations. However, the film gets lost in a long series of quotes, stylistic devices and plot patterns, which were borrowed or copied from the works of famous directors. Thus, despite many mysteries and twists, the story becomes more and more predictable, and thus more disappointing. Unfortunately, the film completely lacks its own cinematic language, which would be necessary to remember the film as an independent work. As it is, however, it remains only as a thoroughly successful homage to Aldrich, Polanski, Lynch, Hitchcock, Truffaut, and, and, ... in memory.

The film is most convincing in its image composition, the black and white photography is beautiful, followed by the excellent actors. What the film would certainly have scored with is almost not used at all: quantum mechanics is only briefly mentioned, and the main character's groundbreaking theory is never explained, although it seems to be the key to the story. Instead, the emphasis is entirely on confusing the emotions, leaving many interesting possibilities for interpretation. The story never builds up to the great mystery that the title implies and becomes more and more annoying and shallow towards the end. What remains is a visually splendidly made film that is strangely conservative in the end.
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Silly stuff
21 June 2023
If someone had to judge Paul Newman's career prospect and future acting abilities, he would not have great expectations. The film is silly and the acting is generally weak to bad. Joan Collins steals all the scenes she is in and this might tell you something, my friend. Newman, in this film, acts as if acting is something he is trying out for the first time. His wife Joanne Woodward is a bit better but suffers from an ugly wig and bad directing. Jack Carson has to overact almost every scene and it is hard to believe that Newman and he just had great moments in "Cat on a hot tin roof."

Of course, the script is a mess. It is a typical film of a director who was well known for comedy but who had the best part of his live behind him and no feel for modern film making or modern themes. Leo McCarey never was an innovator and at this point in his career he was working like in the 20ies and 30ies.

Every actor has a cardboard character and therefore you don't really care for any of them. The story is so silly that at any point you would expect the keystone cops just passing through (and stealing that scene too). When ever the movie reached a moment when the screenwriter seemed not to know how to handle, we get a fade to black. This film is full of such fade to black moments and by the time you become grateful for them because you fear what nonsense might have been thrown at you instead! They should have put a big fade to black over the whole film.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Still worth watching
6 May 2023
This was the first book by Ray Bradbury which I read, more than 40 years ago, and I immediately fell in love with it and the author. Since then, I read everything by Ray Bradbury I could get a hold on, first in German, and later in English. You can imagine in how dear a memory I hold the first book, it still is one of my favourite, not only by the author, but by many other books I read since then.

I saw the film version of the book maybe 20 years later, and I found it quite a mixed bag, sad of course, and still something sparkles... Where should I begin? You know the back story from IMDB, so I concentrate on my personal impressions.

The actors: Jonathan Price is perfect. He was the best choice of the cast, period. Jason Robards is very good, and since Bradbury loved him, I will not challenge it. Pam Grier is great, wish she would be more present though. The boys are definitely the weak spot, both of them. But the blond one especially, he looks too much like out of a children's program. And strangely, both boys look younger then 12 years, which makes them even more unconvincing.

The look: The film changes between almost horror and corny autumn scenes. The beginning is great and you can't wait for the story to unfold, but when the Indian summer scenes come on, you have to whine, and they don't get any better, just worse. And when the village gets into view you can bet this is not real, the colours are too much and the sky looks like matte painting.

The story: I would not say that most of the original story has been changed, but many of the stronger moments appear to be shortened, or watered down. The great exception is the scene in the library, there you can feel the strength of the book. But the ending is a little weak, and the special effects look cheap and added in after the film flopped at the previews.

The film is not at all bad, I just wish it would be much better!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good drama, but missed opportunities!
3 November 2022
A film with Tilda Swinton is always worth watching and so is this one! Though I have to say that I expected a little bit more after I read about the film at the Viennale (Vienna International Film Festival). What irritated me were the tags ghost story, supernatural, spooky and so on. Not that I expected a real horror movie, far from it. But not such a lame attempt of a ghost story.

The film starts out with a scene of a foggy country street and a lonely taxi coming along, quite evocative of old Hammer films of the sixties or early seventies. The main setting in an old country mansion turned hotel was a good choice. As was the rather unfriendly receptionist/waitress/housekeeper who raises a lot of questions in the mind of the viewer and is a highlight of the film. The mother and daughter conflict is very subtly done and evolves beautifully the longer they stay at the hotel, and the absence of other guests is quite unsettling.

But, being in a lonely hotel would make even completely relaxed people jumpy and here we have someone who is in a very difficult stage of her life and we could expect much more unusual things for her to hear or see other than what we get here. Tilda Swinton does her best to make us fell uncomfortable, but with this script there is not much to do. A little fog, some creaky trees and a shot of the moon, my, this is what you get in every other episode of Midsomer Murders, I am sorry to say! That is not upsetting or disturbing anymore, in fact it is a cliché and more of a parody. Besides, we all have seen films of people in empty hotels before and therefore you have to bring some new ideas to this setting.

When the film ended I was disappointed, there would have been chances to lead the viewer around but they are missed. I have guessed from the beginning what is reveiled at the end and that did not satisfy me either, I hoped that some twist eluded me, but no.
28 out of 56 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Pacifiction (2022)
7/10
A sloooow burner
28 October 2022
Taking place on Tahiti, "Pacifiction" takes a long time to set the story in motion, though director Albert Serra gives us some images to think about. The images are beautiful and the camera dwells on many sets far too long. When I finally got to the end of the film I was tired and regretted that I could not feel as I should.

Well, here is the story: The High Commissioner of the Republic of France, De Roller, has little power but tries to keep peace on the island, when some native representatives inform him of a rumor, that nuclear testing is returning to the region.

Of course, everyone is upset by this idea, though no one seems to know anything in particular. But as De Roller starts to investigate, he finds a number of strange things going on, a group of sailors plus their captain, a Portuguese visitor who's passport has been stolen, foreign shady characters are popping up, a submarine has been sighted and so on.

The more De Roller pokes around, the less he can make any sense out of it but he begins to believe that there is truth in the rumor. In between he manages to coach a local dance group for their performance at his favorite night club, where he also chats with Shanna, a transsexual. Shanna has high hopes to become the secretary of the Commissioner, and De Roller certainly gives him reason to think so by taking him along on some of his visits. This relationship does not seem to be sexual, but the film gives no explanation to what it is that draws De Roller to Shanna.

I don't want to go into more details, but the film is certainly too long, I would say by an hour! Running 2:45 right now, there is no reason not to cut it down, some sidelines don't really advance the story. But despite the length, we hardly see any Tahitians who are not wearing costumes and perform for tourists. Which I don't think is close to reality.
25 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Family Dinner (I) (2022)
7/10
Tame countryside horror
25 October 2022
The film was advertised as a domestic horror film and the mood and the location was very well met. In terms of action, the whole film takes place on a farm in the countryside (Lower Austria), the actors are all very convincing and were well chosen. Pia Hierzegger is of course fantastic as the aunt, very believable.

The label horror film is too strong for me, although it certainly fits into the genre, but measured against today's usual horror films, the film is already rather harmless, more psychological thriller. Also, the film offers little surprising.

The story: overweight teenager Simi visits aunt Claudia, a nutrition expert, in the countryside (with hopes to be helped with dieting), with (newly married) uncle Stefan and cousin Fillip (from the first marriage of the aunt). Simi feels uncomfortable from the beginning, the cousin a creep, the aunt strict, the uncle too nice?

I felt they got inspired by films like "Get Out," "The Wicker Man," as well as some Hammer films from the sixties. Without giving more away, you definitely guess what the whole thing is leading up to in the course of the film. That's what I meant by unsurprising. I was missing a twist that would change your view of the story and question your perception, so to speak, but that twist doesn't come. Conclusion: well done, but not top notch.
18 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Listener (I) (2022)
8/10
Your full attention is needed
24 October 2022
Warning: Spoilers
"The Listener" is a very very quiet film. The story of a woman who works as a telephone counsellor naturally holds the material for various psychological thrillers. But that's not the case here, even though one or the other caller certainly carries the potential for dangerous encounters. Beth, her working name, is very unagitated and sensitive with her customers, tends to block personal questions and even hangs up when the conversation suddenly starts to drift towards phone sex. But even the average caller demands all of Beth's attention, a fact that we learn in the course of the film is what Beth likes most about this job. In general, despite her detached attitude towards personal issues, we slowly learn more and more of her story as well.

Director Steve Buscemi, in front of the camera more specialized in gangster roles or losers, shows himself here from a completely different side, takes himself as a director very back and leaves his great actress of Beth, Tessa Thompson, all the space she needs. The camera glides unobtrusively with her through the rooms, while the voices of the callers more or less get to her and demand a lot from her. More and more she feels lured out of her reserve in the course of the evening and her protective wall crumbles visibly.

Tessa Thompson, who is also one of the producers of the film, is in full control of her role and that is what keeps the viewer tuning in. Her acting leaves enough questions unanswered to make this so uncharacteristically American film worth our attention until the last minute.

The film is done in rich warm tones, we feel comfortable here with Beth, the camera doesn't leave the house until the very end. We experience a night with Beth on the phone, all callers remain voices, except for her only her dog is present. The camera keeps finding new positions to hold our attention in this very limited setting. Despite this simple situation, the film never gets boring, each caller is exciting because, like Beth, we have no idea what his/her motive is for calling. Nevertheless, there is a great sense of release at the end when Beth finally walks her dog at the end of her shift and we can take a breath with her and look at the city in the morning haze.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Falcon Lake (2022)
9/10
A haunting experience
23 October 2022
I fully agree with the excellent reviews of the film by Blue-Grotto and comcockbot (the later obviously sat in the same screening as I), and their discription of the story is better than I would be able to deliver. So I will focus on the way the film appeared to me.

Nowadays hardly anyone uses the old academy standard aspect ratio of 1:1.33 anymore and I was a bit sceptic if this stands for an amateuric attempt or fake docu a la Blair Witch Project.

Far from it! The film consists of very controlled settings from the first to the last scene, there is nothing in it that doesn't advance the story or the mood of the film. At the same time it still manages to give you the feeling of an relaxed and slightly boring vacation time for a teenager. Minimal camera movements and long takes with no movement, always a tic longes as we are used to, gives you some uncomfortable moments and you don't know what to do with them, is there something more scary coming or is it just a joke to offset us? The film shifts between the trivial and harmless talks of the grownups and the more daring themes that the two protagonists discuss. The ghost story does appear to come and go. Again, is it just a joke of has it a deeper meaning? Find out for yourself.

Despite the fact the the scenes around the lake have not been technically enhanced, the lake looks not exciting but not mysterious either, the nature is beautiful as it is. The boy and the girl are both great actors and you always believe them in their struggles. The ending has been mentioned as to short to digest, yes, that is true, a bit more time would have been great. But all in all a beautiful film, very well planned and executed, congratulations!
13 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Avengers: A Chorus of Frogs (1963)
Season 2, Episode 24
6/10
Fake settings
7 September 2022
This episode asks for an enormous amount of fantasy. The story itself is rather trite, but a little exotic scenery would have helped since the story evolves around a yacht in the Mediterranean sea and deep sea diving is a major part. Well, can you imagine? Because, you never see the yacht, although almost all scenes take place on the "yacht" (100% studio setting), we see interiors (which never move and which could at least have reminded us to be on a ship), we don't even see water although deep sea diving is an important part of the plot!

Sadly, it is the last episode with Venus Smith, who seems to really enjoy herself and appears as if she were constantly amused by all this fake settings! I will miss her!
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Avengers: The Little Wonders (1964)
Season 3, Episode 16
7/10
Some first-rate ideas
7 September 2022
An episode with some first-rate ideas, a criminal organization that behaves like religious leaders, traveling in the guise of clergymen, but even among themselves are calling each other reverend, bishop and the like. The head of the organization is very sick and is looking for his successor. Elements of the procedure sound like choosing a new pope. Steed steps in under cover (Johnny the Horse) to find out what they are up to. The scenes with the other hoodlums are very entertaining. Lois Maxwell is remarkable as a machine-gun swinging nurse and Mrs. Gale shows bit of judo and gets her only kiss from Steed. A sidetrack with a puppets repair shop fits very well in this over-the-top story. Of course, as usual, we hear more than we see. Watching these early episodes is sometimes like reading a book: you need your imagination a lot.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Sommernachtsmord (2016 TV Movie)
3/10
What a mess!
7 September 2022
This TV movie is part of the "LandKrimi" series, which as the name suggests, deals with crime on the countryside of Austria. The individual entries in the series are not connected to each other and (with a few exceptions) present one-time police teams in one of the nine Austrian provinces at work. The average quality is pretty good, I have seen about 15 episodes of the over 30 episodes and there are more in production.

Unfortunately, this is the by far worst episode I have seen. The screenplay is by Felix Mitterer, a well known dramatist, director and actor, who often shows his fellow Tyrolleans in a very critical light. This time though, he seems to have gone far over the top, trying to mix too much together and using an uncharacteristic amount of stereotypes when presenting countrymen and women of his homeland. The characters reminded me of woodcuts, no greys, just black and white. Katharina Strasser, had a very unbelievable role a a police officer who played it very tough but behaved very silly. Throughout the film she receives threatening and insulting messages on her phone which she more or less ignores and never really get explained. At one point I could not take the whole story serious, it was getting more and more ridiculous. A waste of time and talents!
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Avengers (1961–1969)
9/10
Strictly about the pre-Peel era
4 September 2022
I wrote about a few Emma Peel episodes, not only because those are the ones I grew up with, a mere boy at the time, but those were the only ones we got to see in Austria.

Some years ago the Venus Smith and Cathy Gale episodes have been dubbed and aired on ARTE. This was an amazing experience in many ways. First of all, the videotaped series looked odd and very old, slightly distorted images and actors waiting for their cue made it hard to believe that this was such a hit in the UK. And then there are two very different women, one very naive but lovely and relaxed, the other a professional, tough and modern. Steed does not wear his bowler yet, or only occasionally, and the stories often take place outside of Great Britain.

The humour and the odd stories are already there, although not that outrageous as in later seasons. But what strikes me the most was the incredible economy with which those early episodes manages to get away with! In "A Chorus of Frogs" almost the entire episode takes place on a yacht, though we never see the yacht from the outside, we don't see water from the ship's view, of course no underwater scenes, though the story evolves around deep sea diving! And no one tries to shake the boat to give us an idea of motion or being on board of a ship! Incredible!

In an other episode, which I think takes place at the Riviera, Steed sits at the "beach" in the sand, leaning against a wall (sic), we never see the sea, all we see are people in beach wear passing in front of the camera, and, at one point, a girl passing a ball waits too long before she starts to threw it... One can almost see the studio lamps trying hard to give us a sun feeling.

And so on, every episode is concealing things too expensive to show. This has changed with the start of the Emma Peel era, all takes place in the UK, so no one had to travel far for outdoor shooting.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Avengers (1998)
3/10
Terrible
2 September 2022
One look at Ralph Fiennes and Uma Thurman and you knew this cannot work. Why? Because, this whole series, at least from the moment Ian Henry left the show, was one long tongue in cheek affair which lived by the way Patrick Macnee and his various leading ladies played the part. Not only is Macnee British to the core, he is also a guy you can hardly see in very serious roles or heavy drama. There is always a kind of sparkle in his eyes that made him the perfect cast for The Avengers. Fiennes is a great actor but completely without any natural comic appeal. Carrying a bowler hat and an umbrella is by far not enough to make a good Steed. The same applies to Thurman. Thurman had not enough sex appeal for Emma Peel and she is giving the part an edge that does not fit. It might have been a bad idea in the first place, to think someone can bring this perfect pair back to life. I'm trying to think who would have been a better cast. Colin Firth and Emma Thomson come to mind. So, without reflecting on the actual story, in my opinion this was bound to sink.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Good idea but bad execution
31 August 2022
Revisiting films last Seen in childhood or adolescence can become a very painful experience. It so happened to me when viewing "Assassination Bureau." My memory told me that this was a lovely film with a great cast, most importantly for me, Diana Ring, since I grew up with "The Avengers." Alas, the story was not so bad, but the execution suffered from the permeant use of rear projection when ever there was a continental Europe setting. Unfortunately the film consists mostly of central Europe settings and often very badly investigated sets. The scenes supposed to be in a Viennese Inn looked more like a place on the Rhine than anything near the Danube. The actors tried their best but the special effects department ruined most of the fun like the zeppelin ride at the end. Money seemed to have been spent mostly for the actors and little was left for other things.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A waste of good actors/actresses
19 August 2022
Warning: Spoilers
The reason I recorded the film when it played on an early afternoon weekday, was the plethora of famous names involved. Halfway through the film my wife complained feeling embarrassed about the way the women have been portrayed, with the exception of Jessica Biel, who was the only one who took her role serious and delivered the best acting in this film. All other females swooned the moment Gerald Butler came into sight and never stopped no matter how he treated them. They must have stepped out of a screenwriters wet dream.

The children are almost a relief, as they play what they are. Of course, you also get the usual unbelievable "grown-up talks" of them once in a while, In German this kind of statements by kids is called "altklug," don't know if "precocious" describes it as well. One thing Hollywood very seldom gets right is convincing kids talk.

Gerald Butler is completely unconvincing as a has-been soccer ace still in love with his ex-wife but bedding every hot mother he meets through his coaching a soccer kids team. Beside the Biel character, everyone acts as still going to high school, including Dennis Quaid, whose role lies completely undefined between harmless jerk and sinister maniac, we never learn where his money comes from or what he really wants from Butler. The same goes for the whole film, the characters are mostly cardboard-thin, but still we get the heartbroken Butler, and it takes Jessica Biel all she has got as an actress to make us believe that she will take him back after all.

I just read from another reviewer that he did not want them to get together again and I completely agree with him, me too! My wife and I hoped so much that Jessica Biel's character will be strong enough to keep her distance, but no, the screenplay asked for a happy end, which we considered an unhappy end!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Liebling Kreuzberg (1986–1998)
10/10
A piece of very entertaining history
11 August 2022
Manfred Krug in the role of his life! "Liebling Kreuzberg" was one of the best German series ever made. Robert Liebling, the main character is a cunning, if rather work-shy lawyer, who tries to throw many of his cases to his law firm partner Arnold in order to have more time to be lazy or to follow the pleasure with one of his girlfriends.

But through his large circle of acquaintances and also word of mouth, he keeps taking on very tricky cases. Rarely does it involve murder or manslaughter, but rather smaller, but all the more realistic offenses or disputes, in which he strikes the right tone with great skill and flair and also knows how to hold his own in court. Not infrequently, his and his colleague's clients are not completely innocent and not always sympathetic.

Actually, in each episode, despite the short running time of only 45 minutes, you always get at least 2 cases exactly told, sometimes even more. Because his colleague Arnold also has his difficult cases, which are described and solved just as meticulously as those of the head of the firm, Liebling.

In between, there are minor dramas in the family environment now and then, because as tough as he can be in court, he finds it hard to escape the charm of his annoying daughter and her constant need for money. Liebling's girlfriends also repeatedly take center stage in the narrative, although some are present for extended periods of time. Then, of course, there are his law firm employees Paula and Senta, who keep him and Arnold up to date with facts and appointments.

In the course of the individual episodes, many familiar faces and also voices (a lot of dubbing work for films and series is done in Berlin) appear. Some of them also have recurring roles.

You learn a lot with the series about the law in Germany (and in Berlin in particular) before the fall of the Wall.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

Recently Viewed