Reviews

6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Samson versus Goliath
28 April 2014
Warning: Spoilers
I think most viewers miss the uniqueness of this film. Yes, it's a quintessential Adam Sandler comedy, and that is certainly not everyone's cup of tea. At the same time, Zohan is a marvelous parody about the life of Samson. Instead of dealing with the ancient Judge of the Israelites directly, the film modernizes Samson as Zohan, a virile Massad super soldier. Zohan is portrayed as an imperfect yet extraordinary soldier who can perform amazing physical feats. His Palestinian nemesis, Fatoush, is not unlike Goliath the Philistine.

Zohan sports long hair, but the issue of hair is not as simple as keeping it uncut. Instead, Zohan dreams of a peaceful life in which he can work as a hairdresser. Let me give the writers a high five: Too funny!! Zonhan falls for Dalia, a modern Palenstinian version of Delilah. Just think about The Book of Judges, Chapters 13 to 15, as you watch the film and chuckle the evening away.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
An under-rated Generation X film
1 January 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Career Opportunities is a film worth a watch for a few key reasons. One reason is because the film is one of the last major projects of the great John Hughes. I wanted to take time out to watch this film recently because I never saw it when it was released back in 1991. I do not think I was ever aware of the film back then. As I watched the film, I asked myself why John Hughes chose to write and produce it. I think John wanted movie goers to explore the question, "How would his teenage characters, from films like "Pretty in Pink," "Sixteen Candles," "Ferris Bueller's Day Off," and "The Breakfast Club" feel about their lives and their prospects for their future after their high school years are behind them?"

The Jim Dodge character is like many memorable characters created by John Hughes: A handsome, witty, fast-talking, and extroverted charlatan. Unlike The popular and successful Ferris Bueller character, Jim Dodge doesn't fool most of the people in his life. People see through his charlatan antics and regard him as a disingenuous liar. Jim Dodge is also from a modest working class family. The Jim Dodge character is as engaging as the Ferris Bueller character, but he is not as funny or as entertaining to watch because his charlatan behavior is unsuccessful. Jim Dodge was not cool in high school, he doesn't have any friends his age, and he doesn't have a gorgeous girlfriend like the Sloane Peterson character from "Ferris Bueller's Day Off." I think Hughes wrote the Jim Dodge character to represent the slacker stereotype of Generation X. The Jim Dodge character is in his early 20s, he lives at home, he has few job prospects, and he lacks tangible goals other than a general wish to be credible and successful.

The Josie McClellan character is strong-willed female lead who is similar to a lot of other John Hughes characters. Josie is an effortlessly beautiful young woman with a bad attitude. She believes her ideal high school experience means that her best days are behind her. She and Jim Dodge share a tremendous uncertainty about their futures, and they are both loners. Despite Josie's beauty and wealth, she feels as alone as Jim Dodge and she is also a slacker without clear goals. Jim and Josie find each other and bond within strange circumstances in "Career Opportunities." I think the film is really about how these two characters connect as fellow struggling Gen-Xers.

I think this movie failed to be a big hit because Hughes offers no clear answers for the Jim and Josie characters other than the idea that falling in love offers hope for both of their futures. The laughs are not frequent enough in the film and the music sequences are too numerous. The title of the film is also misleading. Regardless, this film is definitely worth a watch if you were born between 1966 and 1974.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Vikingdom (2013)
3/10
Innovative Writing, Poor Execution
23 December 2013
This film will always be judged on it's flawed execution: Bad costumes, bad acting, bed special effects, etc. This movie had an extremely small budget, and sometimes you truly get what you pay for. All of this being acknowledged, the screen play written by James Coyne offers one of the most interesting fictional explorations of Norse mythology I ever experienced. Coyne addresses the question, "How did the Gods and Goddesses of Asgard react when the peoples of Scandinavia convert to Christianity?" Coyne concludes that the Gods would become vengeful and furious with humanity for abandoning them. I'll look forward to following Coyne's career.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Odd and memorable with a touch of brimstone and a dash of treacle
17 December 2013
I have a theory about why Sting and Trudie made this move: I think they became involved with the film for sentimental reasons. As far as I know, Sting and Trudie fell deeply in love during the time in which Sting made the movie, "Brimstone and Treacle." There are significant differences between that film and "Gentlemen Don't Eat Poets," but there are a few striking similarities. In both films, Sting portrays a sexy, mysterious, and sinister character who becomes involved with an unsuspecting family. Both characters take on a role of servitude only to wreak havoc on the respective families for personal gain. The two characters also torment a child of the respective families. I think these character elements attracted Sting and Trudie to this project, and I suspect the film reminds both of them about an extraordinarily passionate part of their personal past together.

There are plenty of reasons to enjoy this film beyond any interest viewers may have for Sting as a celebrity. The acting is actually quite good, and the performance of Alan Bates is memorable. The costumes, the set, the score, and the photography are all excellent. Where the film falls short is the lack of an enjoyable story. There are really no likable "good guys." Instead, there are just victims and "bad guys." At the same time, the viewing experience is more weird than dark. I think viewers are most likely going to ask the question, "What did it mean?" I cannot answer that question, but I would like to point out that this film is the last significant film role performed by Sting.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A New Low for Hauer
12 December 2013
I am a loyal fan of Rutger Hauer as an actor, and the ups and downs of his career have often challenged my loyalty. "Hobo with a Shotgun" represents a new low in Rutger's career. A prolific and daring actor, Rutger has experienced dark moments before. Rutger made egregious movies like "Hard to Remember" when he was young, but he really demonstrated substantial talent in later films like "Blade Runner," "The Hitcher," "Ladyhawke," "Escape from Sobibor," "Fatherland," and others. Everyone experiences weak moments within their career, and I thought Rutger had truly hit rock bottom in 1997 when he participated in the film, "Bleeders." I was wrong. "Hobo" reaches the depths of depravity within Rutger's career that can only be described as a new low. Rutger has been so prolific as a movie actor that it is hard for me to believe he did "Hobo" simply out of desperate need for a pay check. I don't know what he was thinking when he signed on for this travesty. Sometimes a movie is so bad that it is good. In the case of "Hobo," bad is just bad: Very bad indeed.
1 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Skyfall (2012)
Extraordinary yet flawed project
23 February 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Like all James Bond films, Skyfall provides great music, great acting, great international settings, and great action sequences. After so many of these films, it is a challenge for any writer to come up with something new. In Skyfall, I think the greatest aspect of the writing is the way in which the writers deal with the issue of age. M is old. Bond is middle-aged, and a new generation of the British Secret Service has risen to management and field positions. The issue of age was dealt with in earlier films like Thunderball and Never Say Never, but not to the same extent. In Skyfall, Bond is almost killed at the outset, and he looks beaten and exhausted through the rest of the film. There is a beautiful woman in Skyfall, but the 45 year old Bond character is no longer the aggressive stud we knew in earlier films. He also is full of physical and mental imperfections. In short, the writers let Bond become a middle-aged human being. Skyfall is different than all other Bond films because it is more of a survival story about two aging characters in a dangerous and unforgiving world.

This should be the last Bond film, but there is too much money to be made from additional sequels. Without any explanation, Bond is "reborn" with the death of M and once again fully capable of being the great spy.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed