Reviews

2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
The Room (2003)
3/10
Cult Phenomenon?
6 May 2013
Warning: Spoilers
This film was so awful it was almost good. Besides the use of both HD and SD cameras to shoot this feature length film, the director casts himself as the lead actor and displays no acting chops. With lines like "Your tearing me apart" and his constant introduction of every character and of himself in every scene you can tell that this was a first time screen writer.

The only credit I will give this film is the fact that it was made, and it has somehow become a cult Phenomenon so Congrats to the director but please do not make a 2nd one of these films.

If you are into really bad films and are looking to complete your trek into the cult world of film makers then this is a must see, otherwise steer clear.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Awful Film and a Waste of time
6 May 2013
I had high hopes for this film since it was given to me by a friend and recommended as a must watch, but the video quality, acting and poor directing of this film was to much for me to handle. Now granted I did not watch till the end but after 40 min of mind numbing torture I had to turn this film off.

In the age of digital cinema one would expect the use of a high quality camera to shoot, but the grainy unfocused shots lead me to believe this was shot on a lower level camera and not one befitting a feature film. Now I am not sure who is responsible for the directing but by the fact that Co-Director Randy Kent is not attached to the 2nd attempt at a franchise I would guess it was the other director.

I would say pass on this film as well as the unwise attempt at a 2nd in the series which looks like as of this review is currently in production. However if you believe that "The Room" is the greatest movie ever shot then this is in fact a must see for you.
14 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed