As a user of IMDb for the past 7 years, I'm going to assume from this point forward that nearly every film is going to be rated at least 1 whole star too high. Because, in my opinion, there is no way in hell that PA3 is a 6.5 star movie. As people are likely to see the rating before anything else, I want put this up front: at best, PA3 is a 5.8, and that's being generous. I think 5.6 is probably more accurate. I hope that the slew of IMDb members who slap 6 and 7 stars on virtually everything they see will one day learn to dole out the stars a little more sparingly and with more thought. I believe that once a film has broken into the 6+ star rating it should (for the most part) lack glaring errors. PA3 contains too many obvious flubs to enter 6-star territory.
The most unforgivable error is the wife's refusal to watch the video footage. It wouldn't have changed much. I mean, even if she had watched it they probably would have ended up at her mother's house any way. At least there would have been some satisfaction there for the viewer.
The other problem is that the formula used in the movie becomes tedious at times. Only so much can be done while you're waiting for a camera on an oscillating fan stand to show you the next half of the room. It's boring and makes the action feel compartmentalized, as if it's happening because of the cameras and not in spite of them.
Now, I don't mean to say that the whole movie is boring - just some of the elements. There are some pretty strong parts. The comedy works well. Some said it detracted from the film, but I disagree. I think that being able to juxtapose the characters while smiling with images of them experiencing terror both endears the character to the viewer and enhances the horror. However, there are times when the characters don't seem to be acting like they're really going through what they are. This makes the story lose some its credibility.
The friend of the husband is a very effective character, and the scene with him and the older daughter playing Bloody Mary is the most effective scene in the movie - the acting during that part is just intense and enjoyable. What blows it for him though, is his inexplicably hasty departure from the house following that episode. It just seems like, knowing that character a little bit, he might have handled it in a slightly different way. More could have been done with that part of it.
One of the main problems, which leads to why so much of the story seems half-baked and unfinished, is that the scares take precedent over coherent story presentation. So much time is burned during all of the set-ups for the scares that it feels like content has been omitted. And the lengthy set-ups are part of what starts to make the movie feel like it has been hollowed out in some respects.
I would watch this movie again. So that's how we get into the 5-star zone. I know that I will be frustrated again though, and that's going to keep me from ever branding a 6+ on this one. Some decent acting and some creepy scenes that will stick with you make this one worth a watch.
The most unforgivable error is the wife's refusal to watch the video footage. It wouldn't have changed much. I mean, even if she had watched it they probably would have ended up at her mother's house any way. At least there would have been some satisfaction there for the viewer.
The other problem is that the formula used in the movie becomes tedious at times. Only so much can be done while you're waiting for a camera on an oscillating fan stand to show you the next half of the room. It's boring and makes the action feel compartmentalized, as if it's happening because of the cameras and not in spite of them.
Now, I don't mean to say that the whole movie is boring - just some of the elements. There are some pretty strong parts. The comedy works well. Some said it detracted from the film, but I disagree. I think that being able to juxtapose the characters while smiling with images of them experiencing terror both endears the character to the viewer and enhances the horror. However, there are times when the characters don't seem to be acting like they're really going through what they are. This makes the story lose some its credibility.
The friend of the husband is a very effective character, and the scene with him and the older daughter playing Bloody Mary is the most effective scene in the movie - the acting during that part is just intense and enjoyable. What blows it for him though, is his inexplicably hasty departure from the house following that episode. It just seems like, knowing that character a little bit, he might have handled it in a slightly different way. More could have been done with that part of it.
One of the main problems, which leads to why so much of the story seems half-baked and unfinished, is that the scares take precedent over coherent story presentation. So much time is burned during all of the set-ups for the scares that it feels like content has been omitted. And the lengthy set-ups are part of what starts to make the movie feel like it has been hollowed out in some respects.
I would watch this movie again. So that's how we get into the 5-star zone. I know that I will be frustrated again though, and that's going to keep me from ever branding a 6+ on this one. Some decent acting and some creepy scenes that will stick with you make this one worth a watch.
Tell Your Friends