5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
The Hangover becomes Mission Impossible
6 September 2013
Not so long ago in the year 2009, The Hangover exploded onto the scene and was praised as one of the funniest films of the decade, with its witty cast and the hilarious "re-tracing our footsteps to find out what we did" routine running as the main plot. The Hangover Part II simply changed nothing at all, and offered nothing new with the attitude of "if it ain't broke, don't fix it." What will please fan's the most with The Hangover Part III, is that is does not follow the same formula that the first two did. However, a lot of fan's will be headed into disappointment when they realize that this third instalment decides to take a completely different change in direction than that of its predecessors. And by completely, I mean very much drastically.

The story follows the Wolf Pack yet again as they try to help Alan (Zach Galifianakis) get back on track due to him being off his meds, and soon enough they get thrown into a Mission Impossible-esque mission to save their friend Doug (Justin Bartha, who yet again takes a miss on all the excitement) from Marshall (John Goodman), an angry gangster who wants' the Wolf Pack to find Chow (Ken Jeong, who has a much larger screen time in this instalment) and return to him to them with 21 million dollars in gold bricks that he stole. If not, Doug gets the offing.

A major plot point is the development of Alan. His friends Phil and Stu (Bradley Cooper and Ed Helms) are mature and grown men who have happily settled down, but he is still very much stuck as a spoilt rotten teenager within a man's body, and his life is going nowhere. Throughout the adventure, it really is a tale about Alan and watching him grow into the man he should have become years ago. Fans of The Hangover owe it to themselves to watch it, whatever their final opinion of it may be.

Whereas The Hangover Part III doesn't match the quality of its first part, it definitely doesn't deserve all the negativity it has been getting. The film does a good job of balancing the well known Hangover humour with the Mission Impossible-esque set pieces, and all the recurring stars do well reprising their roles. One of the biggest changes that The Hangover Part III entails is that there is no actual drinking/hangover sequence. There's also no wedding or no missing person (or a pot smoking monkey). Instead, it plays it much straighter and it knows what it wants to set out to do, which is to stray far away from the formula of the first two chapters. And by doing so, it makes the finale to The Hangover Trilogy one to remember.

My Verdict: The Hangover Part III is a fitting end to the trilogy, but despite its changes in directions fans will be divided, resulting in a love or hate for this final chapter.
42 out of 53 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
What starts as funny soon becomes tedious.
6 September 2013
Warning: Spoilers
The concept was simple enough. All the big A list comedy stars group together and go to a huge party in the house (or fortress) of James Franco, just before the apocalypse erupts. All playing themselves, Seth Rogen, James Franco, Jonah Hill, Jay Baruchel, Danny McBride, and Craig Robinson, survive the first stage of the end of the world and seclude themselves safely within the walls of Franco's house, and from that moment on the movie goes from one mistake to the next, which just makes you wonder:

Have these guys run out of comedic ideas?

When you look at the credits given in This Is The End, you really would expect more from these guys. Seth Rogen, hilarious in Knocked Up, Green Hornet and Paul. Jonah Hill in 21 Jump Street and Super Bad ( a minor plus in the film is seeing the Super Bad trio reunited), Craig Robinson in Hot Tub Time Machine (although he is one of the funniest of the cast) and James Franco has done enough to show his acting talents in the past. The problem with This Is The End is that it all feels like they're just re-treading old material, whether it be masturbation gags, male genitalia jokes and pornography references, and, of course, "funny" clips involving dope smoking. (It wasn't funny in Pineapple Express, and it isn't here either).

It all just seems so forced and more like a private joke between the cast members, and as the film "progresses" the jokes become all the more stale. I really went into This Is The End with high expectations, and I sat there hoping to find it more amusing, but the truth of it all is I just got really, really bored. Throughout the decapitated heads, jizzed up magazines, cannibalism, and a mildly funny parody of The Exorcist, the film reaches it's much awaited ending, and we are given the cringe worthy sight of giant devil testicles as the it comes to Earth to claim the last survivors. And then, when the last scene finally ends, the cinema falls quiet and the credits roll.

And it's a real shame. These guys have shown in the past that they can be funny, and whilst this film does deliver the occasional few laughs, they are short lived and then forgotten. Although, on a more positive note, whoever came up with the idea of a douche bag Michael Cera (as seen in the trailers) on cocaine that nobody likes was probably the funniest aspect to film amongst it's stupidity. So props to that guy.

My Verdict: An overlong, boring journey following Hollywood's best in the midst of the apocalypse with few highlights. If anything, it's just disappointing.
8 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Having You (2013)
7/10
Look out, Jack...
5 September 2013
After nine years, Jack (Andrew Buchan), proposes to his infertile girlfriend Camille (Romola Garai), whilst working in a seemingly poor job fixing old arcade machines with best (and possibly only) friend and boss Paul (Steven Cree), with his chess loving father Peter (Philip Davies) pressuring him to get a real job in order to fully support her. Complications, however, begin to arrive when Anna (Anna Friel) an old one night stand from years back, turns up at his doorstep with her seven year old son Phoenix (Issac Andrews) claiming that he just may be the father.

The most admirable thing about Having You is the character development and the writer's ability to keep them grounded and realistic, so that we care about them enough and grow invested in them. It's a tale of human nature and responsibility, and we follow Jack on his journey of coming to terms with the mistakes he has made and facing them like a true adult, responsibly and maturely; not to mention dealing with a shut down and difficult relationship with his father, the growing struggles of keeping his family a secret from the completely clueless Camille, and old habits rearing their ugly heads back into the picture as Jack struggles with the troubling hand he has been dealt.

A real plus in the matter is Steven Cree's witty and often hilarious portrayal of the easy-going boss (who acts more like a teenager trapped in a man's body), who really gives the film that comic relief in the occasional moments in which he shares screen time.

Towards the last half hour, the film takes a dramatic change in direction that does its job exceptionally well by building up the emotions and tension before delivering a powerful and heartbreaking finale that really hits the audience hard. Unfortunately, it is such a film that will go without any real recognition, and this is a real shame due to it's impressive quality and well crafted storytelling.

My Verdict: Emotional, character driven and grounded, Having You is one of those rare gems that sticks with you long after it's over.
39 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Scary Movie V (2013)
1/10
Are we funny yet?
5 September 2013
One cannot really expect much from Scary Movie 5, the weakest and most tedious of the so called "comedy" franchise so far. Starring Ashley Tisdale and Charlie Sheen (who is only present within the first painful five minutes in a non funny sketch with Lindsay Lohan) the film spoofs big hitters such as Mama, Evil Dead and mostly Paranormal Activity, as well as non horror films Inception and Rise of the Planet of the Apes, which believe you me, comes across as an even more boring watch than the actual horror spoofs. The film drags from one loose plot line to the next, and literally rams down unfunny toilet humor gags down our throats in the hope that we find them the least bit humorous or clever. Scary Movie 5 possess no humor whatsoever, and let's be honest, does it really come as a shock?

The not so painful truth is behind this movie is, every gag resolves into a heavy sigh and the rolling of eyes. The thing is with Scary Movie 5 is that it is rated as 15 like its predecessors, but the truth of it all is that the film really is aimed at anyone under the age of 5. The funniest part about Scary Movie 5 is that the target audience is not even old enough to watch it, and by the time they are, the film will be forgotten. I wouldn't even give it that long.

My Verdict: A mindless bore that really doesn't improve on any of its previous instalments, and makes you sincerely wish that the Scary Movie franchise will just go away forever.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Conjuring (2013)
8/10
Look what you made me do...
5 September 2013
Warning: Spoilers
James Wan, director of such films as Insidious, Saw, Dead Silence and the upcoming Insidious Chapter 2, has made quite a name for himself after reaching critical success in his frightful horror flicks, which have been praised by both critics and movie-goers alike. Based on a true (and most terrifying) case of demonologists Ed and Lorraine Warren (Patrick Wilson and Vera Farmiga) , The Conjuring display's Wan's talent in the genre, as well as scarring us with a fear of what lies within our wardrobes.

The main thing to grasp with The Conjuring is that if you're a horror fan, you have seen most of this before. You've seen door's move on their own, you've heard eerie creeping noises in the same old, run down house, and you've most likely seen some form of exorcism one way or the other from countless movies out there (although you've probably cleared the bad memories from tiresome exorcism film The Devil Inside). Despite the horror traits/clichés that do appear more than every so often in The Conjuring, the film remains to be highly shocking and succeeds in scaring it's audience.

Opening with an unnerving scene revolving around an old Warren case featuring a haunting china doll, the story soon moves onto Rodger and Carolyn Perron (Ron Livingston and Lili Taylor) and their four daughters, Andrea, Nancy, Christine and Cindy (Hayley McFarland, Joey King, Mackenzie Foy and Kyla Deaver) who move into their new but slightly run down house in the countryside. It doesn't take long until the boarded up basement is discovered and the paranormal stuff begins to occur, and at this point you begin to wonder if this film is offering nothing more than a rehash of the most well known horror traits. Well, you're right, only The Conjuring works these traits so well it makes them feel like whole new scares, and they never intend on slowing down. It builds and builds from one scare to the next as well as making time to develop the characters so that we care about them (the biggest example being the romance and passion in the paranormal with Ed and Lorraine), which is something horror films seem to be lacking lately. The Conjuring does what it sets out to do and raises the bar to all future upcoming horror movies, and, with previously mentioned Insidious Chapter 2 on the way, one can only imagine what it is that James Wan has in store next.

My Verdict: A suspenseful, highly well crafted horror story based on the most kept hidden paranormal case file keeps up the scares and proves to be a real treat for anyone looking for a good fright.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed