Reviews

3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Noah's Ark (1999)
Noahs Ark , (Jon Voight)
16 April 2012
Chromium 5 review says it all. What was the writer thinking, I suspect he was on something illegal ! Modern songs and phrase's in a period set thousands of years ago. Not to speak of the Director and Producer.

Studio heads must have been on vacation for this to slip passed them. The actors must be at the stage in their career's when the pay cheque means more than their good name and reputation. utter garbage, this certainly was a figment of somebody's imagination. When I think of Voight's abilities such as the Odessa File, Midnight Cowboy, Mission Impossible etc. I shake my head. the movie should carry a Comedy sticker at the very least. Remember to avoid this movie at all costs.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Ten Commandments (2005–2006)
9/10
Different version.
11 April 2006
Warning: Spoilers
This is not a modern repeat of the 1956 version, nor should it be. I thought that this was not so much a story of the different events in the journey,which were in fact accurate,other versions do that job. The Bible describes Moses as a man "slow of speech" (possibly a stutter or stammer) who would naturally be an introverted character. This story is a study of the man, and his agonizing self searching as a leader,while searching and discovering his spirituality and discovering God. We of course are looking back to these events,with all the knowledge of the whole Bible and how history has borne these things out,with prophesies fulfilled, he was looking forward with no experience behind him,he was actually making the history.Not as spectacular as De Mille, but an equally good movie. Lots of new faces to me, turning in good performances.
6 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Paratrooper (1953)
disappointing.
22 May 2005
At the time this film was made (1953) many of the men who took part in ww2 wearing the RED BERET were still around and expecting to see a movie depicting what they had accomplished, and the opening text pays tribute to them somewhat, the film then goes on to a disappointing plot about an American leading man Alan Ladd,whose sole purpose seems to be to sell the movie in the U.S. The action depicting the raid on the Bruneval radar installation is o.k. but the later action which I think is supposed to be the fight in Tunisia gives a very seedy type of appearance,amateur,and certainly unconvincing acting and generally cheap looking sets, possibly a gravel-pit somewhere,(I guess most of the budget was spent on the leading star's salary) although the training scenes were very accurate. It was shot at R.A.F. Abingdon,near Oxford, the Parachute Training School at that time, the Guardroom at the rear gate can be recognized, where they are issued with their Red Berets.Considering all the hard fighting that this regiment actually did in fact do in so many places this had the potential to be a great movie. What was required was a good plot,a good script and less of a romantic storyline and some tight direction, sadly this did not happen and no serious attempt at a movie was made about the heroic actions of the Airborne Forces until "A Bridge Too Far". Other movies like The Cruel Sea, Twelve O'Clock High, Bridge on the River Kwai, King Rat and Das Boot etc.depict the sacrifices made by these men accurately I think, the men who wore the Red Beret must have left this screening very disappointed,I certainly did. Worth having a copy in your collection as I have, if only to think of what might have been.
11 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed