Reviews

2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Return to Sender (I) (2015)
3/10
3 films for the price of one!
31 May 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Unfortunately, all three of them are bad.

This film is a mess. It starts out with a woman being raped, then turns into an attempt at a character study, then ends up a cheesy revenge flick. It's all over the place and never segues any of the different threads in a way that make it watchable.

It's a shame to see Pike and Nolte in this, they're way above it. To be fair to them, they both do as well as they can with the material, but it would have been better suited as a movie of the week.

Don't waste your time with this one. It sounds interesting, and you think maybe the synopsis is short in case it gives too much away. It's not. It's short because it's that or an essay explaining that this film isn't about anything because it has no idea what its doing.
21 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hemlock Grove (2013–2015)
5/10
Has potential, but seems confused.
15 July 2014
To me, Hemlock Grove is like a gorgeous dress that doesn't quite fit. You'll wear it anyway because you love the idea of it so much, but you'll always be aware that it just doesn't look as great as it could.

The premise and the script scream for camp and witty - a la Buffy or True Blood - but the direction tries to make it gritty and serious like it's The Sopranos. The problem is that the story lines are just too ridiculous for such a somber tone.

Joss Whedon found the perfect solution to this in the Buffyverse - he made it tongue-in-cheek so that the silly stuff could just be silly and still work, and when things got serious, we really cared. I feel like the director(s) of Hemlock Grove could learn a lesson from that way of making a supernatural/fantasy drama. Or, if they wanted to go the dark gritty road, I wish they'd done it like the much missed Carnivale and focused much more on character development, keeping the supernatural elements teasingly in the background.

That's not to say this isn't enjoyable because it is. It just keeps frustratingly missing the mark in its attempts to be far more earnest than the premise warrants.

Some of the acting comes across as pretty bad, but I'm not sure if that's the actor's faults so much as it's very difficult for them to deliver their lines in the tone the director wants.

I'd hoped the criticism the first season got would be taken on board for the second season, but aside from Famke Jannsen getting rid of the ridiculous accent, that doesn't seem to have been the case.

This could have been the next big thing in supernatural shows. It's got the cool creepy town like Vampire Diaries but without all the Dawson's Creek stuff that goes on in Mystic Falls. It's got some familiar and well loved supernatural entities, and some we've never seen before. Landon Liboiron is great in his role as the gypsy Peter and Joel de la Fuente gives a good performance in an original take on the mad scientist trope.

I just wish they'd either stick with the scripts they're writing but camp it up in tone, or stick with the dark and gritty tone but change the scripts to suit that.
52 out of 73 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed