Reviews

3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
WALL·E (2008)
10/10
Rediscovering our Humanity: A Wall-E Review
28 June 2008
Warning: Spoilers
We live in a consumerist era. As any visit to a metropolitan area will prove, there is the unfaltering marriage of burgeoning commerce to a burgeoning population. Retail giants now provide services that would take more than a handful of independent stores to supply and this umbrella is continually widening. But how far can this consumerism go before it consumes us? This is where Wall-E begins, setting up the most scathing, yet perhaps most accurate futurist take on consumerism's affect on society in any animated film I've seen to date. In fact, I can't recall any film in the last several years that has taken this approach so seriously. Andrew Stanton once again throws us straight into a darkly themed film, but once again there are serious points to be had. At the outset of the film, we are introduced to a world where the skyscrapers that once housed the internal workings of business are dwarfed and surrounded by skyscrapers built of that very business' refuse. WALL-E spends his days continuously collecting and compacting the mountains of garbage that fill the streets of the city and adding it the trash skyscrapers, piece by piece. We learn very early on that this is the last functional bot of its kind, and perhaps, the only living machine on the planet. But there is something special about this surviving Wall-E; this robot performs its programmed tasks, but it has also become a curious being, collecting and organizing interesting items seen day by day. Wall-E is, essentially, the last bit of humanity left on Earth, since every other human being is either dead or living aboard the space cruise liner, the Axiom.

But things change once EVE arrives on Earth. In true fashion with his curious nature, the sight of EVE is enthralling to Wall-E. Here is something new from humanity, not just the garbage and trinkets left behind for Wall-E to sift through and compact. What begins here is the most innocent yet basic of love stories I have seen or read in many years. There is a purity to Wall-E's almost hypnotic and naive interest in EVE. I don't mean this in any religious terms, but rather in the vein that neither robot has prior knowledge of love or adoration, apart from Wall-E's surviving betamax tape of Hello Dolly! as his primary source of inspiration. Everything else is rooted in simple curiosity, but it is amazing how far just that can develop one's character.

Wall-E interacts with everything he finds in a very primal manner (the source of that curiosity), slowly learning about the things he finds by essentially playing with them until something happens. EVE is the dedicated but markedly emotional counterpart to Wall-E's primal self. She performs her tasks at the expense of taking notice of Wall-E. By the time she finally catches on to Wall-E's affection, the programmed side of herself sets off their exciting journey into space.

Once things set into full-swing, this film does not let go of you. EVE and Wall-E are quite a dynamic duo, although not the romantic pair envisioned in Wall-E's mind for most of the film. I won't go into any further analysis here, lest I spoil the fun for anyone wishing to go see it. But I must say that the fact that we see two robots, two human creations, act as the primary humanizing force is entirely effective and what makes me love this film so much. The overall message of the film emerges from the dark outset and even darker conclusion... The ending credits are a must-view for anyone who sees the film. There is a very emotional sequence of progressions that twice put me to tears for its poignancy and in light of the beginning of the film. The way this movie ends is the same way it begins: at the core it's all about WALL-E and the things we recognize in him as inherently human: his funny personality, his compulsion toward the good, his child-like curiosity and naivety, his sense of loneliness that he tries (and fails) at anesthetizing with psychological comforts and companion place-holders.

On other notes, the soundtrack is Newman's definitive work in cinema. I didn't think I would say this anytime post Finding Nemo, but it really is true. EVERY bit of music supports the film's imagery and tone while also helping shape it note by note. There is not a wasted note in this film.

Also, the visual imagery is utterly beautiful and affecting. Skyscrapers of compacted garbage, the collections in Wall-E's trailer, the outer heavens, the POV's of EVE and Wall-E... All are fantastic. The cinematography is also top-notch. They might have used the back to foreground focus a bit much, but just the fact that they had Roger Deakins consult on their almost perfected simulation cinematography as well as Stanton's directorial 'mindprint' of the film speaks volumes for the studio. It is all found and spoken for in the final print.

The thing about this movie is that is able to speak so much without much dialogue. Stanton has obviously learned a great deal in how to use the visual image as powerfully as possible.

Verdict: Pixar gets another 10/10. They make films that speak to me in ways no other animation studio ever pulls off. The message may always be positive, but that doesn't mean the trials of Pixar characters are ever just plain and simple affairs. Stanton produced something very very special and endearing here. While the paint may be of a love story and two curious robots, he has captured nothing short of the core of our positive human nature in two inanimate objects. This is a meaningful and important film. How far can we let our lives be simplified before our own creations become more human than ourselves?
39 out of 57 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Cars (2006)
9/10
Fantastic! A seventh Pixar gem!
11 June 2006
Who cares about negative hype? Who cares about presumption? Who cares about others ridiculing the concept?

None of that matters once you've actually seen Cars!

Cars is very well done, in its spectacular (and well researched) details of Mid-Western and South-Western scenery, the cars themselves, the lighting and reflection/refraction that will make you say "wow" times over throughout, the opening sequence, etc., but also in its excellent Lasseter-style characterizations, story arcs, and interactions. This movie really has it all, despite the fact that humans do not exist in its universe. You really stop caring (if you even did going into it) that they are all cars after only a few minutes...And seeing the movie twice is a very high recommendation. Kids may not enjoy this movie as much as say, the original Toy Story audience that I am a part of (16-19 or so), to see it twice in a row, but it takes two or three viewings to get all of what Lasseter is doing and to truly marvel at how well done the animation is. Plus, it's enjoyable each time through!

On a personal note, I have to say that I am sick of people trying to constantly rank each new Pixar film based upon those before it. It's great that Pixar has a "bar", and I think that each movie they have released meets it, but arguing over the newest features as 'inferior' is a fool's argument. We pretty much know that Pixar productions are the best, and they are the undisputed masters of animation...(and please remember that, despite the movie being released now, the final rendering was down over a year ago, with many of the designs, animations, and effects being done in separate groups over four years of rendering production. They are already able to, and usually rendering another movie, at a graphical level above that of their films in current release...)

Anyways, I recommend this movie for about 7 or 8 year olds and up....Smaller children have a problem with this movie (I've seen it four times, and each time, younger children don't follow it too well) but it is still very family friendly. The storyline is great, the effects are fantastic, and the direction of John Lasseter makes this an extremely enjoyable ride!
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Serenity (2005)
9/10
This is how we should define 'a good movie'
30 September 2005
I just got back from the theatre, and am still thinking about the movie. The future plots, the histories, the fate of this person or that person....the whole universe is entrancing. I think somebody commented about the awe evoked whenever Star Wars first came out on screen. I wasn't alive back then, but have had such feelings when watching and reading the Lord of the Rings and the Silmarillion or the Star Wars trilogies.

There was a pilot show called "Firefly" on the Sci-Fi network a year or two ago, and I only was able to see the first episode. I didn't get to see any of the following episodes, but was hooked on the idea. I hadn't given it any thought or recognition until just yesterday whenever I found at that THIS movie was the same universe and ship and crew from that one episode of a show that got cancelled. The universe simply surrounds viewers of this movie, and takes you in without giving the slightest hint of being overblown or trite.

Simply put, this is really a "new" Star Wars, in that it all is very unique, believable (as in it all works within itself) (well, the first trilogy was believable), and full of history. The "Used Universe" isn't a banal concept, it has just been misused over the years. And now we get to experience good film-making just as we did for the original Star Wars trilogy or the Lord of the Rings (book and films). This has everything that we could want from a movie: humor, intriguing and engaging plots, rounded, human characters, fine acting, engaging music, action, conflict, and again, great characters.

If the elf is Tolkien's greatest creation, then one of the creatures of this universe is Whedon's foulest. I won't go into detail. You have to go see this movie for yourself!

Suspense and plot arcs are very well handled, and the action is very tight and fitting. The actors and their characters play out very nicely, and you get to know pretty much everyone in this movie. It's a sign of good writing when we make our winces or grunts or sobs.

I don't think many people will be disappointed with this. It's a well-rounded and engaging film, and feeds off of its own interesting intricacies, much like Star Wars and Lord of the Rings before it.

This is how we should define "a good movie."
6 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed