Reviews

4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Promising but lacking depth
7 December 2006
This documentary had so much to offer. Unfortunately, it didn't push forward and deliver what it could have. Hip hop heads will leave this film knowing a few more names or stories about underground hip hop but the history lesson ends there.

Documentaries, for the most part, are made to expose a niche. To show others its esoteric quality. While Freestyle: The Art of Rhyme begins to scratch at the surface, it barely leaves a mark. The history of hip hop and its origins in the Bronx are passed over as though everyone in the audience were a hip hop connaisseur. The other aspects of hip hop (graffiti, break dancing and DJing) are mentioned in passing as though it had no correlation to Freestyling.

The Art of Rhyme is simply a fan's video of favourite MCs and friends freestyling and battling in the streets. The psychology of freestyle rhyme, of battles and its roots (some historians date it back to the days of slavery) are muted by the redundant scenes of freestyle artists rhyming for the camera, hoping for exposure.

While showing actual freestyling is essential for the film, too much of it just dilutes the artistic and historically-significant aspect of Hip Hop. Most importantly, its lack of depth confirms what narrow-minded critics have said for years about Hip Hop music and its generation.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A Tale About the Fragile Balance of Wanting and Needing...
30 August 2005
I watched "Ricordati di me" and it felt like a polite conversation that avoids self criticism and only accepts one's personal dreams and ambitions. A conversation that accomplishes nothing since the subconscious is too scared to embark on the dreams because there is no safety net.

'Remember Me, My Love,' as it is known in North America, is a great film that reveals the superficial mask of the family unit. It is the story of a family and its progressive loss of balance between the self and the public sphere of conventional happiness. This film begins beautifully with the personal woes of the family members and the audience can sense the inevitable tipping of the cauldron.

The crossroads for most of the characters is based upon their personal potential and their own self-interests versus the ones created by their environments. For Carlo Ristuccia (played wonderfully by Fabrizio Bentivoglio), Giulia (another great performance by Laura Morante) and Alessia (played by the very talented Monica Belucci) the question at hand is based upon their waning existence. They all seem to feel lost and monotone while they struggle to feel the youthful sensation of bliss and love. The opening sequence is perfectly written and shot to portray the Ristuccias one dimensional life. The screenplay, subtle in its work, progressively displays the inevitable choices to be made by the members of the Ristuccia family.

However, as the characters embark on their selfish adventures, they digress from their intentions and they seem to blindly be repeating their mistakes. Giulia attempts to reconcile her acting career yet fails to see the theme of the play as a reflection of her own state. Carlo, failing to write the last chapter of his novel, never completes his work because he is afraid to risk and lose. He, along with the rest of his family, tries to balance between the want and the need. A problem that is never realized - even in the end.

"Remember Me, My Love" is a film that could have benefited from some slight editing, especially concerning Valentina's storyline, yet the end product leaves you feeling like the characters - a false sense of hope but a bigger sense of loss. This film strikes a reminiscent chord for its audience because it deals with loss - the loss of dreams, the loss of love - and its battle with throwing in the towel. None of the characters experience true happiness however they've convinced themselves at times. The first and final shot sum up the film beautifully as it questions the choices made by each of the man characters. It's all a facade, so enjoy the show.
13 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Closer (I) (2004)
10/10
Great Study of Relationships and Truth
22 August 2005
Warning: Spoilers
I saw Closer in a theater with my girlfriend. We did not know what to expect. Within five minutes, I realized this was a mistake. Not because the film was bad, but because the film reveals a great truth about trust within relationships. As soon as my girlfriend and I made it past the exit doors of the cinema, I could systematically count down her next words: 5...4...3...2...1 "Have you ever cheated on me?" Mike Nichols and Patrick Marber show you the selfishness of love...and for some it can be a hard pill to swallow. Most critics of the film state that they do not relate to the story or these anti-hero characters. I would argue that selfishness and deceit are part of this culture and that we are finally beginning to admit it. Other works have dealt with the subject recently (Sideways, Television Commercials that portray infidelity, Eyes Wide Shut) and it is the hardest emotion to battle: The thought of the person you love being emotionally and physically attached to someone else. The four main characters do not have to justify their actions since their deceit is not rational. We do not learn why Dan leaves Ruth for Alice nor do we learn why Larry and Anna reconcile. Why not? Think about previous relationships and the others around you. Have they based their relationship decisions on one single act (such as other Hollywood films would argue) ? No, reasons for our actions are selfish, awkward, spontaneous and/or sometimes, repressed. Closer is a true study of 'civilization' and its collective unconscious.

Besides the deep subject matter lies the no-nonsense approach of Patrick Marber's writing. The audience is spared the simpleness of subtitles stating the progress of time. In fact, Nichols and Marber seem to purposely let the story progress without interruptions. The end result is a raw display of emotions and a quick-witted situation for all four characters. Subject matter and form collide as the characters are drawn together within the same circle of deceit and self-interest.

Clive Owen and Natalie Portman give performances of a lifetime and Nichols gives everyone another reason to love him as a great Director. The soundtrack also provides a great emotion for the film that flows through you like a dream and a nightmare simultaneously.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Full Frontal (2002)
6/10
A Search for the Reality .... And A Plot
17 August 2005
I heard Full Frontal was great. However, I also heard horrible accounts. The only solution left was to view it myself.

I wasn't quite sure what to expect and the film leaves you feeling ... well, nothing in particular. Full Frontal's effect (if there is a desired effect) was lost upon me.

However, the film can be viewed as an interesting search for truth or the reality of Hollywood. The lines between the cosmetic and authenticity, as in real life, are blurred. Even when you (as a moviegoer and fan) think you know a character, actor, person, screenwriter Coleman Hough reveals the rose-colored lens. Through the intertextual narrative of the film, one can view the absurdity of our celebrity-obsessed culture. Some may interpret the film's stylistic features as condescending or pretentious - which is a valid argument. However, I think the intended effect was to be a self-reflective caricature. Some of the film's features such as the name game and the roles played by Julia Roberts and Brad Pitt reflect the self-parody of the film. Furthermore, the ending, along with the Underwood/Roberts subplot, reveal the nature of Hough's parody. It just seems to have gotten lost in its direction.

Nicky Katt and Catherine Keener give great performances as always. David Hyde Pierce is desperately trying to stop audiences from exclaiming, "Hey, that's the guy from Frasier" but to no avail. Pierce's delivery and mannerisms are too reminiscent of Niles for the audience to consider him as Carl. And Mary McCormack does a great supporting role, unfortunately, the bare bones story leaves the audience awaiting something that is not coming.

Overall, this is a film worth viewing. Maybe twice...if you can stomach its lack of direction.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed