Reviews

15 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Quiz Lady (2023)
5/10
Here for Awkwafina
6 December 2023
For some reason I can watch almost anything starring Awkwafina. While this movie was generally ok and has some heart to the overall story--much of the intended humor fell flat for me. There were times when the comedic moments portrayed by the co-lead actresses felt embarrassingly bad. Not their fault as they seem to be giving their all, especially Sandra Oh, but the screenplay itself fails them. Nice supporting role by Tony Hale (Buster, Arrested Development) and RIP to surprise guest cameo.

Well made, for what I'm assuming was made on a shoestring budget.

One of the rare movies I score at 2.5/5, but still liked overall.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Possibly best Godzilla movie ever!
4 December 2023
I guess you could call me a G-fan. And if you too are a G-fan, then you too must watch this movie.

Of the 38 Godzilla films out there (Japanese + US), I've seen 36, but I own them all and have for a while now. Most G-fans know Shin Godzilla (2016) was a high point for the TOHO Godzilla films. We really wanted to see a sequel come off of that reboot for the franchise. Well TOHO had other ideas and decided to make Minus One instead.

This film plus Godzilla x Kong: The New Empire sort of makes up the 70th anniversary of the Godzilla franchise. Along with the Apple TV+ MonsterVerse series.

This movie had a significantly smaller budget than you're used to, not only for a Godzilla movie, but for movies in general. $15 million is difficult to fathom in modern times. And for the most part, the movie looks very competent. Shin Godzilla (2016) had set the standard for Japanese Godzilla film effects, but Minus One bests it.

This film also has a much smaller scope than you're used to for a Godzilla film, but for me was a good point. Arguably when of the best human stories ever for a G-entry. This also go well with a miniscule budget, and this time you actually care for the protagonists.

At 2 hours 10 minutes, this exceeds the typical kaiju sweet spot of 90 minutes to 1 hour 45 minutes. There were some quiet/dialog scenes that dragged a little for me and for the first 2 thirds most events were fairly predictable. What I was NOT expecting were developments that came in the third act, which I will not spoil.

The score utilizing the iconic OG Godzilla theme is off the chain. Most of the movie is not booming loud, but scenes featuring the original theme blew me away sonically and then some.

As a nice chaser, if you are also a G-fan of the Legendary Pictures MonsterVerse movie, I would also recommend the Apple TV+ Monarch: Legacy of Monsters series.

My quickie review on this movie and more can be found on our movie review podcast: Prognosis Negative, wherever you listen to podcasts.
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Creator (2023)
8/10
If Sci-fi is your thing, check this out
14 November 2023
Initially the marketing campaign alone almost got me in the door. Time passed and I was content to wait for streaming options. But my podcast editor Caleb nudged me to give it a theatrical go. (Wish I had been able to see it in IMAX, but that was a small window, pun unintended.)

I was immediately reminded of that special year of sci-fi revival 2009. If you've been a fan of the notable sci-fi films since then, THE CREATOR should be right in your wheelhouse. Although an original story, there is a feel like this is a live-action adaptation of an existing anime, in the best possible sense.

Gareth Edwards has few features to his name, but he continues to flex here as a notable genre director. The CGI easily surpasses the recent trend of cheap unrealistic superhero and lazy action flick effects. The Hans Zimmer score isn't his most notable work, but the overall soundscape including atmospheric foley and a select diegetic song inclusion are perfection.

Also timely is the prerequisite sci-fi allegory. While production began years ago there are no less than two very topical current issues to be explored.
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Marvels (2023)
6/10
I was not intending to see this movie at the theater
13 November 2023
Warning: Spoilers
In fact, it was going to be the first MCU I intentionally skipped. (In fairness, I never saw Iron Man 1 & The Incredible Hulk in theaters as I wasn't very interested in more superheroes at the time.) But I recently re-watched the entire MCU from Iron Man through Black Widow. I also finished of Secret Invasion (terribly boring) and am halfway through Loki season 2 which is interesting like season 1. So even though I wasn't thrilled with another Captain Marvel movie I still have this nagging feeling to want to still stay in the know with MCU happenings.

This movie isn't bad, but it isn't great either. With our 3 primary protagonists, Rambeau is just a zero burger for me. I'm just not interested in her, her backstory, or any other aspect of the character. Now Iman Vellani as Ms. Marvel, I actually do like her and a lot of it has to do with the actress herself. When I was watching the Ms. Marvel Disney+ series, I kinda hated the first episode or two, just didn't feel like I was the target demo (which is fine). But by the time I finished the entire season, the character Kamala has a very endearing quality. Brie Larson's character has been softened a bit from her previous MCU appearances, which is a good thing, but it has also left her feeling a little underdeveloped and milquetoast.

If you have not watched WandaVision and Ms. Marvel you will be very lacking in some character backstories and background. If you haven't watched Loki series some key terminology may be lost on you as well.

The score was serviceable, but also forgettable. Some of the bass sound FX sounded great in the particular auditorium I was in. Some people really appreciate the many 'cat' gags, but I'm not one of them. There was a strange 'melodic' scene, but I'm guessing Marvel execs got a little scared including it and therefore didn't fully commit. It gives it an odd undercooked or trimmed down feeling.

Whenever I see an MCU film that takes place in space, I can't help, but compare it to the Guardians of the Galaxy trilogy that did MCU space right, and to a lesser degree Thor: Ragnarok. All other MCU space adventures I've seen aside from those feels severely lacking in creativity and execution. The Marvels falls into the latter category for me.

There were a couple of nice surprises at the end of the movie, but it feels weird having them tacked on to a film that feels middling in the grand MCU saga. If anyone knows me, then you know I was delighted to see the face of a certain unexpected actress.

Another empty bag of an MCU villain. Wow, I knew the actress who portrayed her looked familiar. She previously appeared in a British show I used to watch called Fresh Meat. No shade on the actress herself, she's great, just not given much to work with here.

There is some 'humor' peppered in here and there, but it also has a sense of Marvel not totally wanting to commit. There's nothing cringe, but also nothing I found very funny or entertaining either. Overall this one felt like a decent made for Disney+ streaming movie. See this in theaters if you are a) a die-hard MCU completionist, a massive fan of MCU Captain Marvel, of fan of Ms. Marvel series. If this isn't you, probably best to wait for this on stream.

Also, I did not see the estimated $220 mil budget on screen.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
I had no idea what to expect from this
14 October 2023
...did not even know what it was about. That said, very illuminating. As we have been going through all the Best Picture nominees from 2005 on our podcast (The Best Picture Podcast), I can't help, but associate all their political themes with current events. This film was no different. Centering on a CBS news program and real life commentator Edward Murrow, this movie dramatizes when the host took on Senator McCarthy during the mid-1950s.

I knew virtually nothing about this clash and the downfall of the Senator prior to seeing this so I found it all very interesting and a good starting point to conduct further research.

The movie has a proto-Mad Men (series) feel to it. Very well shot and acted all around. My biggest shock was when end credits rolled and I saw the director was George Clooney.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Crash (I) (2004)
5/10
Not for me
10 October 2023
I understand how this movie could be liked by a select group of viewers, but I am not one of them. This movie kind of exists in its own universe which is not the one we live in. This is a world were most individuals appear to be aggressively racist or prejudiced, but in a cartoon racist kind of way. The movie also felt like a student film with a budget of 6 million dollars. Stellar casting (some amounting to near cameos), but how this was nominated for Best Picture?? But I remember it being very popular at time of release. A movie that is similar to this in structure, but much, much better is Contagion.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Very, very, interesting
6 October 2023
This is a non-canonical side adventure taking place in the East Blue prior to Sanji joining the true. Very old school (90s) looking anime movie art style which I enjoyed for nostalgia reasons. The slapstick here, especially involving Usopp seemed funnier here than typical One Piece anime eps during opening East Blue arc.

The reason I gave this a bonus 1/2 star is because while most of the story feels typical filler'ish, I really found the reveal at the end to be quite a surprisingly powerful/meaningful message.

Currently on anime 339/2078. This is my second OP film and looking forward to watching all the OP movies and specials!! 😜👍
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Capote (2005)
8/10
Pretty sure I saw this a long time ago. I recalled essentially nothing.
23 September 2023
Pretty sure I saw this a long time ago. I recalled essentially nothing.

This is the type of film I generally would not seek out of my own accord. That said, I was gripped almost immediately. Never knew anything of Truman Capote prior to seeing the film the first time, but he is an imminently fascinating character based upon depiction in the movie and of course his notoriety and accolades.

The True Crime genre has never been my thing, but every once in a while something catches my intention. Netflix series Mindhunter comes to mind and movie Once Upon a Time in Hollywood.

This is one of those movies that just sucks me into it world, atmosphere, and mood, not dissimilar to There Will Be Blood and The Assassination of Jesse James.

How much of himself did Capote truly see in the accused Perry? I would surely like to know.

While driving home I decided to listen to the film's soundtrack. If you found this movie interesting, as I did, I'd highly recommend checking the OST out. It intersperses some of the all too brief score elements of the film with excerpts of In Cold Blood read my the real Capote himself.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Finally, I have seen my first One Piece movie
21 September 2023
Due to falling in love with the Netflix One Piece live-action, in less than two weeks I have re-watched the live-action several times and restarted the anime from the beginning, currently on episode 100. Still waiting on my Malaysian copy of the complete OP movies and OVAs. Until then, I got far enough in the anime that I could watch this movie.

If you've watched the entire live-action series or seen the anime past the Arlong Park arc, this movie is a quick recap of the origins of our original five Straw Hat Pirates. Produced to celebrate 20 years of the manga, it's nice to see updated animation of the series opening. While it's mostly an upgrade, there are backgrounds that have a bit of a rudimentary style at times that feels lazy or generic. Not a bad thing, but I can also spot moments that the live-action drew upon specifically from this version. (The infamous Nami Straw Hat scene wasn't executed as well here as anime or live-action.)

The dub voice actors sound largely the same to what I'm used to in pre-season 5 anime, albeit a little older. Usopp, may be different as he sounds more African American here.

It was one, but I'm very much looking forward to the more famous OP movies!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
I was not expecting this... disappointment
17 September 2023
I recently watched the original Mothra (1961). I don't know why I was assuming this version would be some kind of updated remake. Well it is not. Rebirth is very much aimed at the family/youth audience. If anything, it reminds me in tone of All Monsters Attack (1969), already one of my least favorite Godzilla movies of all time. I really can't stand the children (or boy) in this.

On the plus side, the visuals and SFX are decent for the era considering the budget. I don't really have an issue with this aspect. Reminds me of the 90s theatrical Might Morphin Power Rangers movies. And the effects are reminiscent of Masters of the Universe (live-action) and Willow, but better. Not better than the original Honey I Shrunk the Kids though.

Also nice that the original fairy twins Mothra song remains intact with little alteration. I guess I'm giving the film a bonus half star for the song and SFX.

One last criticism. While I'm never expecting Shakespeare level writing for any Godzilla/Kaiju film, the plot here is paper thin and could be sketched out on a cocktail napkin. More of a long effects reel or proof of concept than anything else. Now I have a fear of the sequels, but could they possibly be worse than this opening entry??
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Bizarre piece of Sexploitation film
12 September 2023
I picked this up during Vinegar Syndrome's recent Labor Day sale. To be fair to me it was only a $5 double feature DVD release. I was drawn to it because of title other film on billing, A CLOCKWORK BLUE.

I hardly know what to say about this. It begins with a narrator, akin to classic Twilight Zone. Was this part of a series (or proposed that never materialized) of Sexploitation films? 🤔

While I have a fairly open mind to this genre, this is not one of the greatest in my opinion. The whimsical carnival-esque is obnoxious. This movie appears to have quite the reputation perhaps for it's rarity in availability. This movie plays like an early 70s Pornographic film minus the hardcore bits. Also features notable Porn and Sexploitation actress Rene Blond.

Fun Fact: The 1980s VHS release is considered "one of the world's rarest" video releases.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Judging it for what it is
12 September 2023
Vinegar Syndrome had a great overstock sale during the recent Labor Day weekend. If you don't know who they are, definitely check out their website.

This was one of several items I picked up during that sale. Mostly based upon the intriguing bluray slipcase art. (The movie and it's double-feature counterpart on the disk, HONEYMOON OF TERROR, are both available streaming on Tubi at the moment.) The bluray and streaming versions have very good remastered picture quality, all things considered.

There's not too much to the plot here. One blonde female nudist (Sally Parfait) convinces her room mate to give the practice a try and go with her to Camp Sunshine for the weekend. The blonde female's day job is as a tech involved in lab animal testing. She has an accident in the lab and the doctor irresponsibly disposes the waste in a river. Somehow it makes it's way down to the Camp Sunshine simpleton groundskeeper. Antics ensure.

The part of the title "How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Nature" refers to a bit involving some paramilitary responders who are more akin to Classic Doctor Who's Unit. While this is supposed to allude to Kubrick's 'Dr. Strangelove', it's more similar to Kubrick's first experimental film 'Fear and Desire'. When they incorporated stock WW2 soldier footage, LOL. The movie tends to linger and dodder a bit with wistfully edited long takes, especially during Camp Sunshine frolicking nude scenes. Reminds me ab it of 'The Running Jumping & Standing Still Film', an early Oscar nominated short film by 'A Hard Day's Night' and 'Superman II' director Richard Lester. Funny enough RJ&SSF was co-directed by Peter Sellers for another Strangelove connection.

If you can handle a basic 60s Sexploitation film, you can handle this. Otherwise steer clear.

Sidenote: The brunette room mate who played a model in the movie (Deborah Spray) was 60s girl-next-door hot.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Better than I thought
9 September 2023
Warning: Spoilers
This is one of the rare films I've labeled as DNF, which means I started it once, but 'Did Not Finish' (This and Astro Boy). I had weird reasons for not liking this movie when I attempted to watch it during the mid to late Aughts. Weird when I try to think back to it now. In short, it had something to do with both of the wives seeming so desirable as mates.

My initial thought was, "This reminds me of The Last Picture Show (1971)." And then I see Randy Quaid playing Mr. Aguirre--how fitting. At first I was confused as to why they had to conceal their making camp near the flock, but I get it now upon further review.

The initial hook-up, I suppose is plausible enough. The wives were brilliantly cast (Michelle Williams & Anne Hathaway) and both men were reasonably good to their wives.

A general issue I had was that the time period generally didn't always look authentic. Especially during the 60s. Sure the vehicles look right and the ladies' fashions in later years, but it's probably down to cowboys' attire. Again, especially during the 60s in the movie. Because this story takes place over the course of 20 years, I don't think the leads were aged up appropriately either. Only in their latest scenes do you notice the additional aging make-up around the eyes. Heath Ledger (Ennis) naturally looks more age-appropriate, but when they meet up in the late 70s, Jake Gyllenhaal (Jack) looks especially baby-faced. Would've been a nice touch to add a little gut to one or both of them to.

A couple more inconsequential time period mistakes were one of the Chilean Sheepherder's is wearing a Carhartt brand jacked, but it has the modern logo that didn't debut until 1970. There is a family dinner on Thanksgiving day in which the Packers are playing (maybe?) the Giants. First of all, both teams would never play each other during old school Thanksgiving Day games (must feature Cowboys or Lions until 2006). Also, the Packers never played played on T-giving Day during the 1970s. {I realize this was a very slim-budget movie.}

There were more notable actors cast in side roles. David Harbour (Stranger Things - Hopper) as the Texas ranch owner and Anna Faris as his wife. And a highly unappreciated actress Linda Cardellini as Ennis's later girlfriend. Let's not forget a youthful looking Kate Mara playing Ennis's eldest daughter Jr. Who is a cute as a button.

If I were to give any of the performers an acting award it would be Ledger. I'm not sure about his accent, but aside from that his character feels the most real and complex. Gyllenhaal was fine, but many actors could've done as adequate a job--plus he has more profound acting in other films.

Like The Best Picture Show, this movie feels very 'slice-of-life' that I know not all find appealing--I happen to. Not until the closing credits did I realize Larry McMurtry co-wrote the screen play (and one an Oscar for it) so bonus points for that.

I found it interesting that the stories original writer who also co-wrote the screenplay, Annie Proulx, has said that since the film she has been inundated by gay men who have sent her their versions of fan-fic meant to either alter or extend the story past it's ending. They invariably feature the revelation Jack isn't really dead, Ennis finds another gay boyfriend for life, or their children grow up and marry. All of these sent in with the intent of "fixing" the author's original story.

All in all I liked the movie more than I would've expected, but I think it was barely Oscar nominee worthy.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Trust (1990)
8/10
My second foray into the works of Hal Hartley
7 September 2023
My second foray into the works of Hal Hartley. I was not disappointed. This was like a shorthand version of A Song of Ice and Fire in that from the very start you just know our leads are destined to meet and fall in love. In my review I mentioned Hal Hartley's indie 80s/90s style reminded me of Linklater and George Sluizer. This time I was reminded of director Whit Stillman--though not as much wit (pun unintended).

Adrienne Shelly once again shines playing young heroine Maria. Her love interest Matthey is played by "that guy" (Martin Donovan) I always recognize, but can't quite figure out from where.

2 films in and Hal Hartley's movies are so low-key they can lull the audience into a false sense of plot security--meaning you are unprepared for and don't see the major plot twists or story turns coming. The Mother's (Merritt Nelson) plan to trick Matthew was diabolical. Matthew is never able to fully explain the situation to Maria. I wonder if she intrinsically knows the truth or doesn't care. The end reminded me of ending of Baby Driver.

Chekhov's grenade was a nice plot device.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
First time and hooked on Director
7 September 2023
Big fan of the Criterion Channel (streaming) and this month they released a new collection based upon the works of director Hal Hartley, whom I'd never heard of before.

There's an overall tone with this movie which is a little Michael Lynchey (without the weirdness), but even more like an American version of Hong Kong director Wong Kar-Wai's style. Not in terms of WKW famous cinematography, but in other aspects of tone and story. Like WKW, there is subversive quality of this film that is hard to pin down where the movie doesn't come off as immediately good. You just have to sit there and marinate in the work and it sort of starts to wash over you. And while I generally fall for 80s movie, I also really like 80s movies that don't necessarily feel like or contain all the tropes of 80s movies--of which this is one.

This film has a very 90s indie feel generally (NOT mumblecore). I'm thinking of Linklater's earliest works and for some reason George Sluizer's The Vanishing (1989). The scene between Josh (Robert John Burke) and Jane (Omgosh that was Edie Falco!?) that goes:

Jane: '"That girl is crazy." Josh: "I know, but I like her." etc.

...was understatedly hilarious.

Audry and Pearl (Julia McNeal--resembles Gillian Jacobs) are super pretty, but edge goes to Audry (Adrienne Shelly, RIP--tragic 2006 death--read her wiki).

Maybe because I have Woody Allen on-the-mind currently, just as a general plot, I could see this situation coming from the pen of Allen (not the prose/dialog style).

My only real critique was that The dad character (Chris Cooke) was easily swayed in multiple directions (but perhaps that's simply his character trait) and there was a lot of situational/plot convenience during act 3. Some of the time jumps seem a little too abrupt (pacing and cutting-wise) and like script training wheels as well.

But overall I really enjoyed the movie and am looking forward to diving into the filmography of Hal Hartley.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed