Reviews

2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
10/10
A heartwarming escape from gloomy times
5 December 2022
This series lit up lockdown evenings and remains a happy bit of escapism we could all do with.

The detractors in other reviews either think Mrs Hall is too young, love the 1970s series so much they can't bear a remake, or complain it contains things not in the books. Including: 'It's not as though it was originally fiction.' Er, yes, it was! Loosely based on the author's life, but not an autobiography. And (unlike, for eg, the dreadful Peter Rabbit movie), there's nothing jarringly out of character or tone to the books.

It's natural that if you love a series, a remake is likely to seem 'wrong'. But I wonder if anyone minded much back in the '70s when the original Helen suddenly changed into a completely different person (actress)?

Robert Hardy's Siegfried had two settings: loud, and contrary. The real man he was based upon was apparently far more eccentric. Samuel West's Siegfried has more depth - we know why he reacts as he does to various situations, he's not two-dimensional.

The 2020s series does flesh out all the key characters: why they behave as they do.

The old episode I saw recently didn't show Mrs Hall at all, but is it so bad to develop a minor character, whose original role was presumably to serve meals and do the housework? As a fictional character, does she have to be drab and late-middle-aged and confined to the kitchen?

One odd gripe I spotted was that one episode featured a cricket match. Should no series set in England or Wales feature cricket, because some overseas audiences wouldn't 'get it'?! Few people outside the USA play baseball, American football, or basketball, but that doesn't bother their film or TV programme makers!

Also funny are the complaints that the actors today don't actually put their hands inside cows! That may have been acceptable in the past, but the 2020s series don't 'do' anything to animals that would distress them in any way.

I like that the 2020s series don't have too many miserable storylines. But perhaps some viewers wish to see sick animals and distraught owners, or farmers losing precious stock? Lighten up and enjoy a series where nothing dreadful happens and all problems are sorted by the end credits.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
No Offence (I) (2015–2018)
8/10
It's a comedy, guys
9 May 2015
Just to strike some balance against the review titled 'total trash'. (Written by someone in the US two days before the UK show premiered in the UK??)

It's not 'shocktainment.' I have no idea which scene that's supposed to relate to, if any. The only body you see is on a mortuary slab: just the face, rest beneath a sheet. There is a mildly gross X-ray image in the background, relating to an, er, unusual car crash. You might not like the humour, but it is included AS humour.

If he/she means the 'splat' moment at the start, it only lasts a second and you don't see anything, really. It's no worse than any of the deaths in Midsomer Murders, and no one compares those to torture TV.

It's a black comedy. And if some of the humour seems, as another reviewer says, to 'belong in the playground,' well, the clue is in the title of the series. People say 'no offence' when they are about to say something awful. It's meant to be outrageous in places.

It parodies the standard police drama, while still being one. Turns a few clichés on their heads. And adds some realism: a heroine jumping in a city river to save someone probably does need antibiotics more than a medal afterwards.

Can't wait to see where it goes from here.
128 out of 134 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed