Reviews

28 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
10/10
A rare contender for the best film of all time
3 May 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Not so long ago, I was involved in a debate to decide what the best film of all time was. Not necessarily my favourite or the most re-watchable, but just the best film. Somehow, after a drink, a few arguments and a lot of contemplation, I singled out The Silence of the Lambs. The question remains though... was I actually onto something?

The Silence of the Lambs follows agent-in-training Clarice Starling (Jodie Foster) who is desperate to apprehend the serial killer Buffalo Bill (Ted Levine). To try and help her gain insight into the mind of a psychopath, the aspiring agent must consult the genius, yet sinisterly manipulative psychiatrist turned cannibal, Doctor Hannibal Lector (Anthony Hopkins). From the very first scene, Silence of the Lambs' genius is obvious. During the opening credits, with eerie music displaced on top, the camera follows Clarice, with almost stalker-like intent, as she completes a training course in an initially empty forest. This immediately founds a cruel feeling of fear, dread and unease that continues to build throughout the film... though there are noticeable spikes during any visits to the film's most infamous character.

Hannibal Lector - "A census taker once tried to test me. I ate his liver with some fava beans and a nice chianti."

The Silence of the Lambs is one of three films in history to win the big 5 awards at the Oscars (best picture, actress, actor, screenplay and director) and the reason for those wins is thanks in large part to every and any scene involving Clarice's interaction with the eponymous Hannibal Lector. Imagine, Heat's diner talk, The Dark Knight's interrogation, or The Godfather's meetings. This is the level Silence of the Lamb's interviews are at. With closeups of both characters faces capturing their psychological chess game in exquisite detail, both actors are at the top of their games and refuse to provide respite for their entranced audience. Jodie Foster perfectly encapsulates the intelligent, ambitious yet emotionally delicate Starling who along with Anthony Hopkin's now iconic portrayal of the psychopathic Lector create a pairing so iconic that their interactions have been parodied to no end (references range from The Batman to Stranger Things to even Tom and Jerry).

Hannibal Lector - "And what did you see, Clarice? What did you see?"

Clarice Starling - "Lambs. The lambs were screaming."

Commonly touted alongside Sigourney Weaver's Ellen Ripley as one of the all-time-best movie heroines, Jodie Foster's Clarice Starling is an icon. Whilst this is largely down to the captivating performance at the heart of the film, another crucial reason is how the director (Jonathon Demme) frames our protagonist. Throughout the film, the camera will occasionally position itself in Clarice's point of view. This means that whoever Clarice is talking to (serial killer or otherwise) will often stare directly down the lens and thus directly at the audience. This allows viewers to become a pseudo-psychologist themselves and deduce the intentions and thoughts of multiple characters in Clarice's periphery. Furthermore, this technique also forces audiences to identify with Clarice, as she navigates a case that, due to her age, gender and position, involves all eyes being on her.

Jack Crawford - "Starling, when I told that sheriff we shouldn't talk in front of a woman, that really burned you didn't it? It was just smoke, Starling. I had to get rid of him."

Clarice Starling - "It matters, Mr Crawford. Cops look at you to see how to act. It matters."

Thankfully, to match the astounding performances at the heart of the film, The Silence of the Lambs bolsters a captivating, quick-paced and unbearably suspenseful story spread across a 2-hour runtime. By using the conversations with Hannibal almost like beginnings of a chapter, the film signposts where the story is heading, without giving any of its delicious twists away. This feat is even more impressive as Lector himself is only on screen for 24 minutes and 52 seconds, yet the pacing is so exquisite that his absence is never truly felt. Furthermore, the hunt for Buffalo Bill serves to keep both the audience and Clarice on their toes. By drip-feeding revelations surrounding Bill's psyche and own particular brand of horror, a sense of trepidation, tension and terror is expertly raised throughout the film. This then reaches a crescendo where, after a clever misdirect, Clarice finally confronts Bill in what has to be one of the most suspenseful battles ever put to screen. Does anybody breathe when the lights turn out?

Clarice Starling - "He won't come after me."

Ardelia Mapp - "Oh really?"

Clarice Starling - "He won't. I can't explain it... He - he would consider it rude."

With a haunting score, powerful performances and exquisite pacing, The Silence of the Lambs personifies everything a psychological thriller should be. It is thematically rich, touching on overt and covert sexism, childhood trauma and the philosophy behind serial killers all while brimming with endlessly quotable dialogue, a lightning-fast pace and iconic characters. Honestly, I doubt many could argue with The Silence of the Lambs' status as both a classic for its genre as well as the medium of film as a whole. However, although not everyone may agree with it being the best film of all time, after a rewatch, I'd willingly fight anyone who claims it isn't close.
14 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Actually translated to film better than I initially thought!
26 February 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Many thoughts here so this might be a bit incoherent.

Firstly, Andy Serkis is a great villain, though when his whole plan is unveiled at the end it does get a bit boring, but he sells the role brilliantly

As a Londoner, I loved seeing my city on the big screen and that sequence in Picadilly Circus is breathtaking and definitely the highlight of the film

Hahaha I love how even in a frozen wasteland Luther refuses to wear anything other than his coat and tie to keep warm!! That's dedication I admire!

Surprisingly nice cinematography at times, very awkward special effects at other times.

Shenk survived!!

Idris Elba lit the screen up even in the most tedious of scenes

Whole community of wanna-be serial killers is a very tired idea done very weakly here which is a shame....but

Hahaha yaaaassss, if Idris Elba can't be James Bond, then John Luther definitely can be!!!
26 out of 57 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Black Swan (2010)
9/10
The price of perfection.
9 October 2022
Warning: Spoilers
"There are no two words in the English language more harmful than 'good job'"- J K Simmons as Fletcher in the 2014 film Whiplash giving sentiments that would have been shared by his Black Swan counterpart, Thomas Leroy (Vincent Cassel). Yet to further the comparison that Whiplash is a jazz-based repeat of 2010s Black Swan would be a disservice to both cinematic masterpieces. Both take the theme of "the drive for perfectionism" and run very different courses. Whiplash looks to focus on the bond between a student and their teacher, whilst Black Swan dives down a more introspective route: the relationship between each and every version of yourself.

Natalie Portman stars as the quiet yet committed ballerina Nina who is selected for the lead role in a dramatic, new performance of Swan Lake. Although perfect for the delicate and innocent White Swan, few, including artistic director Leroy, believe she can embody the sensual and beguiling alter-ego, the Black Swan. As Nina struggles to embrace her well-hidden darker side, she is constantly challenged by her over-bearing mother (Barbera Hershey) as well as being threatened by the rivalry from new ballerina Lily (Mila Kunis).

Nina Sayers - "I just want to be perfect"

It is no secret that this is the role that won Portman her Oscar. What a performance! She effortlessly embodies the physicality of a ballerina as well as portraying a character so initially dainty that you feel she could shatter into a thousand pieces at a moments notice. This comes across in her performance alone, regardless if you consider the training completed or the weight she lost for the role. Furthermore, when Nina's darker side comes to the fore, Portman seamlessly navigates every part of Nina's disintegrating psyche. This results in an extremely impressive feat that very early into the film, you stop seeing "Natalie Portman as a ballerina", you just see Nina. And what a character to behold.

Alongside an awe-inspiring performance and some very subtle, yet ingenious uses of special effects, Black Swan's secret weapon comes with its sound design. This is a horror film. A psychological horror, but a horror film nonetheless and the sound design knows it. Whether it is the sound of joints and muscles moving or merely the adjusting of pointe shoes, the sound effects are raised above the ongoing soundtrack and dialogue causing underlying dread for the most mundane of actions.

Thematically, Black Swan is an exceptionally rich film. With the world of ballet as its anchor, the film navigates multiple themes including that of the duality of the societal view of women, the transition from girlhood to womanhood and the effects of abuse and harassment as well as many more. However, the drive for perfection permeates throughout Black Swan, and I would argue that it achieves that lofty claim in the form of its third act. Just wow. Masterfully building on the tension and plot threads laid throughout the film, the third act becomes a crescendo of music, dance and horrifying revelations. Like an astounding episode of TV that has been seasons in the making, the third act is so jaw-droppingly fantastic that as soon as the credits rolled I rewatched the final 30 minutes just to experience it all again. Phenomenal! "I felt it, it was perfect".
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Batman (2022)
9/10
What's dark... and bold... and beautiful all over?
5 March 2022
On the 23rd of August 2020, the first trailer for The Batman dropped. Nevermind that the director, Matt Reeves (Cloverfield), said only 25% of the film had been shot, it featured a scene with Robert Pattinson (Good Time) as The Batman single-handedly demolishing a gang member and declaring that he was vengeance. I did not need to see another single piece of marketing from then on. I was sold. But did the finished product live up to the hype of that trailer from a year and a half ago? Or has the marketing department been taking lessons from 2016's Suicide Squad?

With only the Spider-man and James Bond franchise to rival it, Batman has had more iterations than almost any other cinematic character. We have had Adam West's camp crusader, Michael Keaton's gothic nightmare, Christian Bale's grounded soldier and Ben Affleck's tortured veteran. However, none of them, nor most of the animated efforts, have ever truly utilised Batman's moniker as "the world's greatest detective". Something Matt Reeves clearly looked to rectify. The Batman finds our titular vigilante in his second year of crime fighting as he comes face to face with Paul Dano's Riddler, Colin Farrell's Penguin and Zoë Kravitz's Catwoman in a crime epic that threatens to change the face of Batman, Bruce Wayne and Gotham forever.

Despite my excitement from the beatdown in the initial trailer, I was pleased to discover The Batman is less of an action film, and more a Fincher-esque psychological crime thriller. Therefore, like with many Fincher films, the most intense scenes in The Batman don't come from a grand display of martial arts and gun fire, but instead they come from two characters merely having a conversation. Thus, paired with a booming score and gorgeous cinematography, the film never fails to captivate. Although some will cite the lack of action as a segway to criticise the film's pacing, for me, Reeves' use of long, drawn-out tension building makes the inevitable action-based catharsis that much more gratifying. Plus, when the action does kick in, it is truly a crowd-pleasing spectacle, with a batmobile chase being the highlight.

Whilst I was thrilled with Robert Pattinson's casting as the caped crusader, a lot of criticism, due primarily to his involvement in the Twilight saga, was thrown at him with many feeling he could not bring the necessary weight and presence needed for the role. However, if you have seen any of Pattinson's filmography that doesn't involve sparkly vampires, you will know that all of those worries are unfounded. His Batman is a tortured, brooding and an occasionally immature hero. He is young, inexperienced and more prone to shouting and violence than any previous iteration (even Affleck's). This places him perfectly in probably the grimmest Gotham ever put to screen where he is not the only player with the belief that "fear is a tool".

Alongside our hero, Colin Farrell disappears into the role of Penguin, Jeffrey Wright as Gordan gives a wonderfully subdued performance and Paul Dano is a twistedly sinister Riddler. However, the movie has a secret weapon. Move over Michelle Pfieffer, there is a new Catwoman in town. Matching Pattinson in embodying their role is Zoë Kravitz who perfectly captures the capable, smart and secretly deadly nature of Selina Kyle, even embracing some of the quirkier aspects of the character (so many cats). Thus, as the story develops and as she becomes an emotional, moral and physical foil for Batman, Kravitz is able to expertly carve out her own wonderful interpretation for this icon of comics.

I could rave about The Batman for so much longer, and maybe one day I will. In the same way that Spider-man is for others, Batman is my hero. He is the one I grew up watching and he is the one I wanted to be when I was older. So, sorry not sorry if this review is a little biased. But from Michael Giacchino's amazing score which I keep humming to myself, to the cinematography which puts it in contention for the best-looking comic book film ever, to the casting and characterisations, it all just works for me. Criticisms do exist such as its length and a particularly frustrating and lazy cameo, but these are minute. Ultimately, I truly hope The Batman is successful because the potential for Reeves' world is far more exciting to me than anything the DCEU or the MCU is offering right now.

(As for the obligatory "but how does it compare to The Dark Knight?" question, there is not much point attempting to answer it. They are too far apart. Same characters yes, but wildly different interpretations. It would be like asking which is better, cats or dogs? Yes, they both have four legs, fur and are cute, but ultimately it's just a matter of opinion)
1 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Nine Days (2020)
8/10
What and why is life?
20 December 2021
Nine Days - A film so niche that my local cinema didn't even show trailers before.

Winston Duke (Us) plays a man called Will, his job is to interview souls before they are born and decide whether they are suitable to have a chance to be born and live, however due to an event he witnesses, he becomes jaded and his philosophies are challenged by his friend Kyo and the candidates he is interviewing.

There's a bit more to the story which I obviously won't detail, but I feel you can tell the themes the film will explore.

The questions the film asks are interesting, however this is more of a why film, instead of how. Like if you go into the film wondering how Will is where he is or does what he does, you will be disappointed.

The film is abstract and very much show not tell, but still does have a complete, clear and compelling narrative.

Watch if you want to see very popular actors such as Winston Duke, Benedict Wong, Zazie Beetz and Bill Skarsgård give more nuanced and heartfelt performances.

This film is shot, scored and performed wonderfully, however, those scenes aren't the ones that stay with you. Instead it is the scenes that unite all these aspects to portray different but ultimately human experiences that leave a lasting impression. But overall your enjoyment will depend on your own personal philosophies, moralities and beliefs.

For better or worse, I enjoyed it!
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Aquaman (2018)
7/10
One of my guilty pleasures
10 June 2021
Warning: Spoilers
You may be cool, but you will never be Jason Momoa holding a gold trident, riding a kraken (voiced by Mary Poppins), surrounded by an army of man-sized piranhas, charging at his half brother, also holding a silver trident, riding a Tylosaurus, surrounded by an army of sharks, all while a war between giant crabs and giant seahorses rages below, with Willem Dafoe watching cool.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Cruella (2021)
7/10
Surprising amount to like in this cash-grab
5 June 2021
Was not going to bother with this one, however a combination of having not been to the cinema for over a year and Craig Gillespie (director of the brilliant I, Tonya) being at the helm was enough for me to go and see Cruella (with a 25% discount).

Despite knowing and despising Disney's desire to take every single piece of popular culture and mould it into a corporatized, disembodied husk of a film compared to the source material, I was curious to see how they were going to handle Cruella as (although having only seen 101 dalmatians once when I was 3), I distinctly remember her main goal being the murder of over one hundred puppies! Not exactly hero material. But of course, like Maleficent before her, the Disney execs got in a room, sat down, thought about it for a bit until someone in the back shouted, "MAKE HER LIKE HARLEY QUINN!".

So what we end up getting is another case where if this was an original film, not worried about setting up a sequel or pandering to a bizarre Disney Cinematic Universe and was about two extravagant fashion designers trying to out play each other, it would be great fun! But instead the fun is continually cut-off by the unnecessary pandering to what came before.

Side character #1; "Hey, look at this car, it's called Devil" Side character #2; "no no no, it's pronounced De Vil!"
  • no waay, is it really guys?!


Problem I now have is despite all of the above, there is a lot to like with Cruella. Gillespie's direction is consistently strong and occasionally impressive, but gets consistently outshone by the brilliant costume design, make up and cinematography. Emma Stone is also wonderfully maniacal as Cruella, the soundtrack that, while very on the nose, is a lot of fun and Paul Walter Hauser provides some comedic highlights despite a horrific London accent.

But oh my word, five people have writing credits for this film and it shows and also, please, for the love of all thing's cinema, please note that NOT EVERY FILM NEEDS A POST-CREDITS SCENE!
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Death of Stalin Review
17 March 2021
In terms of body count, Stalin is responsible for more deaths than Hitler and the Nazis. So why make a comedy about the demise of, arguably, the most evil man in history? Because it is rightfully hilarious.

Steve Buscemi's conspiring "Nikita Kruschev" competes for power against Simon Russel Beale's equally conniving "Lavrentiy Beria" as they both try and maintain order and control Stalin's panicked central committee. Based off the French book of the same name - "La mort de Staline" - the film takes us through a rollercoaster ride via the Russian people's response, the various committee meetings and Stalin's funeral service, showing different aspects to this landmark in history. Steve Buscemi reclaims former acting glory, spouting out lines faster than any of the committee members running to comfort Stalin's daughter and gain her favour. Jason Isaacs also gives a surprisingly strong performance as the domineering head of the Red Army "Georgy Zhukof".

The Death of Stalin is a rare treat for comedy lovers as, currently, we are in an age of 'simple comedy', meaning a lot of movies now rely on the stupidity of characters and slapstick to get laughs. Thankfully, the death of Stalin does not subscribe to these same ideals. It is very much a black comedy, with the humour relying on clever lines, character interactions and the absurd situations that the individuals involved find themselves in. The director, Armando Iannucci, uses his impressive writing skills to not only keep the viewer laughing, but also giving us time to reflect on the events unfolding. I confess that I have no real knowledge of this point in history, yet I still found it a delight, meaning anyone who loves history, especially Russian history, will absolutely adore this picture.

Of course, being a British-French comedy, it is inevitable for scepticism being aimed at the validity of events being shown. This is certainly the belief of current Russian cultural ministers who are considering a ban on the film. However, after doing some brief research online, it is apparent that the majority of the film is accurate to real life which, in the end, makes the film that much more hilarious. Although, the film is not perfect, whilst being a black comedy it certainly lies heavily on the comedic side giving less thought, than may be necessary, to the horrors that our protagonists have committed in the past. As a result, it loses the thought-provoking angle of if we should support the people we are viewing or otherwise. Furthermore characters, such as Olga Kurylenko's Stalin-hating "Maria Yudina", are criminally underutilised. Also, the film does jump around a lot, occasionally revealing what felt like a couple days being a few weeks, this can take you out of the film, but it doesn't affect overall enjoyment.

If you feel like a Russian guard debating whether to investigate the death of one of the most tyrannical men in history, consider it as a new take on history. Even though it it may not take itself as seriously as the subject matter may require and there is no sign of a Russian accent anywhere, the death of Stalin is still a shining light for comedy, similar to what it was for history.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Psycho (1960)
9/10
So much more than that shower scene!!
17 March 2021
Despite being 60 years old, Psycho holds up remarkably well. This is thanks to a wholly unique soundtrack that, whilst simple in nature, maintains tension throughout the film.

Despite knowing the infamous shower scene and the shocking twist ending which the film is known for, I was pleased to know there was so much more to enjoy with Psycho.

To my surprise, Bates Motel doesn't feature until approximately 30 minutes into the film, yet by then, the viewer has become enthralled in the supposed beginning of a cat and mouse chase with Janet Leigh's Marion stealing $40,000 and about to be hunted by her sister, employer, lover and police (er). As such, it is clear to see why the murder in the shower is as iconic as it is. It shatters any preconceived notion for where a first-time viewer would think the story is going. It shifts the protagonist from the innocent yet determined Marion, to Anthony Perkins' consistently panicked motel manager with extreme parental issues.

On top of the music, Hitchcock's makes the scenery so vivid you nearly forget it's all in black and white. Furthermore, the dialogue is flawless, with a final line that could rival Silence of the Lambs for being spine chilling in its potential repercussions. The definition of classic!
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Annihilation (I) (2018)
8/10
Bizarre, strange but somehow works!
28 February 2021
Coming back from the fantastic Ex_Machina, director Alex Garland presents another science fiction thinking piece packed with mystery and uncertainties. One thing that is certain however, is that this film will be talked about for a long time.

Our guide through this world comes in the form of Natalie Portman's Lena, a former solder and biologist, who decides to venture into a mysterious location referred to as "The Shimmer", after her husband, Kane (Oscar Isaac) returns as the only survivor of the most recent expedition. From there we are exposed to increasingly imaginative and wonderous visuals the further into "the shimmer" we venture. Lena is joined by a physicist (Tessa Thompson's Josie), a psychiatrist (Jennifer Jason Leigh's Dr Ventress) and a paramedic (Gina Rodriguez's Anya) all giving strong performances and adding weight to this rich story. Although based off Jeff VanderMeer's book of the same name, Annihilation diverts from the source material providing twists and surprises for book readers as well as general audiences.

Fundamentally, Annihilation is a thinking piece, meaning that it takes a more leisurely pace than other science fiction films. However, this is not a criticism, as what Alex Garland does brilliantly, as with Ex_Machina, is use this leisurely pace to intrigue us further. By that I mean, he presents us with a concept, in this case, the area called "the shimmer", he then spends the next 20 or so minutes letting the audience develop questions by telling us the limited information characters already know, such as, the only survivor being Lena's husband. This way, when we delve inside "the shimmer" we are in full anticipation of every event and development. As a result, when action does take place, it is gritty, shocking and haunting, especially one particular scene with one of the most ingenious creatures I have ever seen.

Whilst I praise the story structure for being expertly laid out, that doesn't mean you will not come away with questions on what you have just seen. However, these are not traditional questions where you are wondering what a character will do next, but more what has the character done? what does that say about humanity? and what was the meaning of certain actions? Annihilation manages to give rise to all those questions whilst still telling a coherent story and being a single, complete film. Thus, despite the book's sequels, this film will not be receiving one, which in the end makes it all the more original and unique in today's movie climate.

Annihilation is a must watch for fans of sci-fi or even movies in general. Minor issues involve a subplot with Natalie Portman's character which is by far the weakest aspect, as well as the very first scene, which I feel is not necessary. Other than that, Annihilation is a beautiful, haunting, original tale and is, in my opinion, one of, if not, the best film of 2018 so far. Plus, it's now on Netflix.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Aliens (1986)
10/10
Far better than it has any right to be!
18 February 2021
Warning: Spoilers
A sequel to Ridley Scott's iconic sci-fi horror Alien? Sounds like a recipe for disaster! However, despite everyone, including lead actress Sigourney Weaver, having doubts, James Cameron and a crew of unruly Brits with undying loyalty to Ridley Scott managed to do the impossible and actually pull it off!

Aliens picks up with Sigourney Weaver's 'Ellen Ripley' 57 years after her first encounter with the eponymous Alien. She and her cat 'Jones' are found in hypersleep and immediately the genius of Aliens shines through. With a slideshow of her dead crew playing behind her, Ripley despairs as the upper management of Weyland-Yutani dismiss her claims of a supposed horror-inducing alien being on LV-426 because a colony site (Hadley's Hope) has happily lived on the planet for over twenty years. However, almost inevitably, the colony then ceases contact causing Ripley and a rag-tag group of marines to go to Hadley's Hope and investigate.

Ripley - 'You're going out there to destroy them, right? Not to study. Not to bring back, but to wipe them out?'

For an Alien film, it is shocking that no 'Aliens' appear until literally one hour into the carnage. However, this does not matter as, alongside an early and disturbing dream sequence, James Cameron draws out our fear, dread and tension by expertly placing Ripley as our surrogate. The audience is Ripley. We despair at the over-confident marines. We roll our eyes as they show off their muscles and guns. We exude prejudice toward the android 'Bishop' thanks to the actions of his Alien counterpart. As such, exacerbated by a deafening soundtrack that also utilises equally deafening silences, we the audience, alongside Ripley, become the embodiment of fear, dread but also determination upon the return to LV-426.

Hudson - 'Game over man! Game over!'

One risk that comes with having multiple 'aliens' is that the initial threat of the creatures is subdued resulting in them more closely resembling cannon-fodder instead of an actual antagonist. Thankfully Aliens avoids this trope by imbuing an impressive amount of variety to its action. Whether it be a dramatic tank-based escape from the hive, a claustrophobic attack by facehuggers or a firefight followed by a chase through air vents, every action set-piece works to progress the story, increase stakes and force the characters to adapt to new situations. Although the special effects have not aged especially well (particularly any scene involving the shuttle taken to reach LV-426), the set design, puppetry and costume design remain practically flawless. Thus, it allows the intended tension and suspense for these scenes to remain firmly intact.

Newt - 'They mostly come at night... mostly.'

Despite an intriguing story, strong direction from James Cameron and a recognisable brand supporting it, Aliens could have easily fallen into obscurity if not for the strong performances by all involved, multiple iconic lines and a script that is far better than it has any right to be. This all culminates in Sigourney Weaver's Ripley. What. A. Legend. Not only is she intelligent, capable and fierce, she also feels human. Her dread towards returning to LV-426, her quick, logical thinking and her motivation to protect a child all help to make her easily one of the most identifiable characters in all of cinema. Nowhere is this more apparent than when she gears up and descends into the Xenomorph hive to rescue Newt. With no words, Weaver shows fear, composure, intelligence and sheer bloody determination. No wonder she got nominated for best actress! Then, in an almost perfect parallel to Ripley, answering the question we didn't know we had of 'where do the eggs come from?' the Alien Queen is revealed in all her puppet-based glory... and cinema magic was made.

Ripley - 'Get away from her you b***h'

Aliens is a rare type of film. It was not a cash-grab. It respects its predecessor and provides a continuation that feels natural and earned. It delivers a commentary on Vietnam and a brutally accurate depiction of corporate greed all while providing intense thrills, iconic characters, and endlessly quotable lines. Testament to the film's quality is proven as when dated effects do appear, you simply do not care! An achievement I doubt many of today's blockbusters will claim in 35 years' time.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Why do I keep coming back?
25 January 2021
Warning: Spoilers
The third entry into Edgar Wright, Simon Pegg and Nick Frost's Cornetto Trilogy, The World's End is commonly seen as the weakest chapter of the three, usually being overlooked in comparison to its cult classic brothers. Despite this however, The World's End is the one I return to more frequently than the others and initially, it is difficult to see why.

Out of the three, Hot Fuzz is the greater (good) film. All the jokes land, the action is relevant to the story, the characters are iconic, and the plot is intriguing for a first watch and only gets better with each subsequent viewing. Shaun of the Dead is the funniest, with so much parody-based humour mixed with original ideas that even thinking about them puts a smile on my face (ie: The Plan). The World's End doesn't reach the comedic heights of Shaun of the Dead (the fence gag being a huge missed opportunity) and the story involving a robot (sorry err, blank?) invasion while certainly engaging, is wrapped up poorly in my opinion. So, was it naïve to believe that The World's End could match the greatness of Shaun of the Dead and Hot Fuzz? Almost definitely. However, it is my belief that The World's End earns its place in the trilogy and deserves to be viewed on parr with its two counterparts.

My first source of reasoning revolves around Edgar Wright, the trilogy's director. What a genius! If you have seen any Edgar Wright film you will know that there are few who can match his energy, pacing and eye for detail, and all of that and more is on full display in The World's End. This is exemplified in a frantic pre-titles montage giving us not only an introduction to our protagonists, but also a summary of the film's events before they have even happened (yes this also happened in Shaun of the Dead, but it's fully realised here with Wright recreating numerous shots from the montage). This level of detail continues throughout the film with everything, from one-off lines, to set designs, to even clothes hinting at what is to come or calling back to something prior. But this is all classic Edgar Wright, so how do we know The World's End is not Starbucksing itself and just copying what came before?

Well one aspect Wright definitively changed was the action. Before Mission Impossible 6, The World's End probably had the greatest fight scene ever... to take place in a bathroom. The action is gritty, fluid and stylised whilst also being used for character development and occasionally comedy (ie: Gary struggling to down a pint during a Blank onslaught but stopping only to protect a friend). Furthermore, with the music keeping time and the camera weaving around individual character skirmishes, it all feels like Wright practising for Baby Driver a few years later. But action isn't everything and besides, Hot Fuzz can arguably rival The World's End's action with its final shootout. So why do I re-watch The World's End more than the other two?

The answers are in the characters. It appears that both Wright and Pegg put in great effort to make each of the 5 musketeers well-rounded and at least somewhat relatable characters. Each have their own mini arcs, with Oliver starting shrewd only to later enjoy himself and life (and then get brutally mulched and replaced). Pete who remains anxious and avoids conflict at all costs, who, upon facing a childhood bully, gets a cathartic and violent release (but is then also brutally mulched and replaced). Then also Steven who finally escapes self-comparisons to Gary and gets the girl of his dreams (and as a bonus, doesn't get mulched!). However, the real stars are Pegg's Gary King (his best performance to date) and Frost's Andy Knightley. The duo is at their most beautiful and heart-breaking best here. This is exemplified with scenes such as Andy, the smartest of the group, risking his life multiple times in an effort to save Gary and show that despite what's happened in the past and present he still cares for him and will follow him to the end of the world to prove that. Then there is Gary who although initially appearing to be a narcissist, ultimately is revealed to be the most human of them all. Throughout the film, he withholds his reasoning for bringing everyone back to Newton Haven until the end where Andy discovers the suicide attempt and stands there in shock as a distraught Gary reveals that the start of his life never happened. That it never got better than that last night as teenagers and any help he received belittled him, effectively causing him to revert back to his youth, relive the past and feel free again - "They told me when to go to bed!".

I must have re-watched The Worlds End at least once a year since 2013. It's not perfect. As stated before, the resolution to the Blank story, while thematically appropriate, feels weak, but regardless the blanks serve well as antagonists and driving forces for our leads. But that criticism does not matter as upon each re-watch I have come to identify more and more with both Andy and Gary. Their relationship feels real. They act as two sides of the same coin, further proven by Gary's revelation which forces you to re-evaluate his actions in a new light. The theme of wanting to relive events in your past is a wish that so many have and through that theme and their bond, The World's End elevates itself to become more emotional, rich and cathartic than the rest of the Cornetto trilogy. As such, over time I hope it gains the appreciation it deserves.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Carey Mulligan is on fire.
24 January 2021
Candy-coloured with a dark core - a statement that can describe the protagonist, the antagonists and the film in general.

Although Carey Mulligan as Cassandra may be my favourite character from 2020!
11 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Citizen Kane (1941)
9/10
Why does Citizen Kane still impress, even after 80 years?
5 December 2020
Touted by some as the greatest film of all time (though I doubt any film is deserving of such a title), Citizen Kane depicts the saga of Orson Welles' narcissistic, self-destructive yet predominantly well-intentioned Charles Foster Kane. But in an age where popular and critically acclaimed films are forgotten within years (remember when Arrival was meant to be the 'next Alien'?) how is Citizen Kane surviving in an age of declining attention spans and immediate gratification?

The more you look at the film industry today, the more interesting this question becomes. Unlike 'It's a Wonderful Life' Citizen Kane is not attached to any particular time of year. Unlike 'The Wizard of Oz' Citizen Kane does not represent an innately obvious technical advancement. Unlike 'Psycho' Citizen Kane has not become a classic example of its genre. Furthermore, other than a David Fincher feature surrounding the making of the film, Citizen Kane is not part of a franchise, it is entirely in black and white and every original cast member has since passed away. However, I believe Citizen Kane's continual relevance is down to three key foundations

Firstly, it is a timeless story. Without even delving into the rich themes of the film, Citizen Kane starts off as a mystery. What is the meaning of Kane's dying word 'rosebud'? That mystery drives the film and as characters theorise about rosebud, its potential ranges from; a secret lover, an unattainable goal or an indication of Kane's deteriorating mind. The reason Rosebud as a plot device works is, although few features can define humanity overall, everyone has an innate curiosity surrounding the unknown. Many films have used this curiosity to its advantage and Citizen Kane, through rosebud and the character's theories, expertly exploits this fact to draw in both old and modern audiences alike.

Secondly, though not initially obvious, Citizen Kane does represent an impressive technical achievement. Citizen Kane was one of the first films to truly show the capabilities of 'deep focus'. This is the technique of keeping everything in the frame in focus. That may not sound impressive today, but with Citizen Kane deliberately crafting shots to parade this technique, it imbues the cinematography with both a classic and almost modern aesthetic. This is so effective that at times you could mistake the film for being a modern-day piece that's trying way too hard to be 'artistic' with a black and white filter. The result thus gives Citizen Kane the story and look of a modern feature.

However, the final feature that is crucial to Citizen Kane's continuing relevance among modern audiences (and what I believe to be the most important) is its editing. As said before, we live in an age of immediate gratitude. Audiences want their entertainment short, quick and to the point. Citizen Kane's editing works to this effect. There is no pre-amble before the death of our titular character draws viewers in. Then, following a quick-fire newsreel surrounding the now dead man, the rosebud mystery is established as the plot-device and we are away, discovering the immersive life of Charles Foster Kane. As a someone born in the 90s, I am aware that I am susceptible to the same immediate gratification bias of modern audiences. However, whilst watching Citizen Kane for the first time I realised that every scene is near-perfectly paced to match its purpose. No shot overstays its welcome. No discussion/ character interaction feels drawn out and thanks to the impeccable cinematography and 'deep focus', each scene feels as important as the one before, forcing the audience to maintain their attention throughout the evolving story.

As a result, it is of my belief that Citizen Kane (at least from an artistic standing) was ahead of its time. Its editing is fast paced, its story of mystery, character and death is intriguing and its' deep focus filming technique (though ground-breaking at the time) is ingrained into a modern audiences '4k' mindset. Though despite all I've just said maybe it's the still relevant themes of somebody controlling media, telling people what to think and claiming election victories are 'fraud' that has allowed Citizen Kane to stand the test of time.... but I suppose we will have to wait another 80 years to see if there is any truth in that.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Nightcrawler (2014)
10/10
A psychopathic industry and Jake Gyllenhaal
14 November 2020
"I will never ask you to do anything that I would not do myself". To the uninitiated these words sound reassuring, however, when spoken in 2014's psychological thriller Nightcrawler, it encapsulates the discreet horror which makes it a contender for the best film of the 2010s. Jake Gyllenhaal (Prisoners) stars as Lou Bloom, a hard-working psychopath who discovers the urban world of nightcrawling, where stringers and journalists film crime scenes and sell the footage to the highest paying news outlet. As his profits grow, so does his desperation to film stories, increasingly pushing moral and legal boundaries of news reporting whilst also providing a deeper message that criticises the consistent fear-mongering and sensationalist stories generated by the news today. Everything in Nightcrawler, from the screenplay, to Dan Gilroy's direction, to the actors, including Riz Ahmed (Rogue One) and Rene Russo (Thor), culminates in a truly riveting, terrifying and occasionally comedic cinematic experience. However, the greatest praise owed to Nightcrawler is that of it's lead, Jake Gyllenhaal. Snubbed for any major award nominations, he gives his best performance as a villain we love to empathise with but also makes us shiver whenever he succeeds. Despite a hauntingly unnerving character study that chips away at the audience's sense of safety, Nightcrawler unfortunately represents a dying breed of film. However, paired with its' standout lead performance, impeccable script and one of the most intense third acts put to film, Nightcrawler, like Lou Bloom himself, manages to excel above and beyond anyone's expectations and become a true dark horse when considering the best film of the decade.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Does the MCU stick the landing?... mostly
14 November 2020
Finally, the culmination of 11 years, 21 films and over 80 characters, the Endgame is here, but can Marvel do the unthinkable and actually pull it off?

Avengers: Endgame is the sequel to 2018's Avengers: Infinity War and follows the surviving heroes attempting to come to terms with everything they have lost and experienced as well as their plans to avenge the fallen.

The film begins with a very sombre and mature outlook on our heroes. They are in mourning. They are tired. They are scared, with some having been pushed to their darkest places, all as a method to cope with the incomprehensible loss of 50% of all sentient life. This all gives the first act a "slow" pace. Slow in the fact that with the majority of superhero films, the opening act is exciting and action-packed, whereas with Endgame it is not. However, that's for the best as in place of action are true character moments for all involved, especially that of Robert Downey Jr's Tony Stark (Iron Man) and Chris Evan's Steve Rogers (Captain America), who are, arguably the main characters in this ensemble film.

However, after the first act concludes, the fun begins. The plot traverses a route that is on the one hand expected and seen in many other films, but then on the other hand, perfect in the film's purpose of celebrating the last 11 years. This provides us with laughs and aids in building our heroes back up for the final act. And what a final act. Now, when people say that some movies need to be seen in cinemas, thoughts harken back to films such as Interstellar, Avatar and Titanic. The final act of Avengers: Endgame needs to be in that list. It is a site to behold. The cinematography masterfully sets the scale of events, whilst the action flows between each major character giving them time in the spotlight, allowing us to keep track of others' movements and enjoy the ride.

Despite the praise I am giving this film, there are areas I disagree with. The direction a particular character goes in is a questionable one for me and is predominantly played for laughs even though if with a slightly more serious tone, it would have been impactful as well as comforting to many others. However, that is one character in about 20, meaning despite any flaws I have with the film, they are small in relation to the achievement of managing to successfully conclude a 22-film arc without it being a convoluted mess. This is due to the Russo Brothers taking a page from Guy Ritchie and balancing all plot points over a set time and then letting them collide at precisely the right moments. As such, what forms is a beautiful swansong for the Marvel Cinematic Universe, that, not only respects its characters, but also respects its audience.

In an ideal world, Avengers: Endgame would be the last MCU film. Unfortunately, that is not the case. Which ultimately is a shame as what we have is the finale of a TV show that has captured the hearts of millions upon millions of people and will continue to do so for generations to come. However, the series will go on, whether that is for better or worse is yet to be determined, although I would not be surprised if Avengers: Endgame marks the beginning of the end for the MCU.
2 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
It's amazing how a bad script can tank a film!
14 November 2020
The wizarding world returns with the sequel to the spinoff based off a textbook for the 8-film long series based on a 7-book long best-selling franchise. Is there still life in this universe? Or is it time to leave Hogwarts and the magic behind for good?

Our returning guide into this world is Eddie Redmayne's forever charming Newt Scamander who is on the hunt for Johnny Depp's Grindelwald. There is a mix of new and returning characters such as Ezra Miller's Credence, Katharine Waterson's Tina Goldstein and Jude Law's younger Dumbledore. Matched with fantastic and ingenious visual effects this a-list cast gives life to this ever-expanding world.

However, this film has a flaw, and it is the writing. JK Rowling wrote the script for this film and it is a messy, convoluted and overstuffed story that has a few too many plot-twists which, according to many "Potterheads", contradicts the lore. There is a good story in the film somewhere, or more accurately, there are about three good stories piled into it. The problem is there are too many characters with their own arcs that the film keeps harshly cutting to. As a result, you will see one character move forward in their story, then not see them again for another half an hour, meaning it is very difficult to keep track of any of the plotlines playing out. Furthermore, the ending sets up the next film and encourages a far more interesting film, which, in my opinion, is the one Rowling wanted to write. Unfortunately, she had to write this mess to get the characters into the correct place.

However, the film does have positives in the form of the effects and acting. Whilst there are not as many Beasts as the title implies, the visuals are still wildly creative, especially any scene involving France's version of Diagon Alley. Plus, thankfully, the magic battles have evolved beyond the wizards pointing at each other as hard as they can and turned into wizards being more imaginative with their spells and thus provides a visual treat. Furthermore, the majority of the cast play beautifully nuanced versions of witches and wizards, although I am not sold on Jude Law's Dumbledore.

I confess, I am not a huge Harry Potter fan, I have read all the books and seen all the films, but its universe has not captured me as much as others. Despite this, I have enjoyed the majority of the franchise, including the first Fantastic Beasts, however this film was a disappointment for me. Ultimately, the film is a set up for another sequel, and whilst it introduces interesting plot lines, it takes way too long to get there and wastes too many opportunities. For example, I am not normally a fan of an obligatory love interest, however a character is introduced and is perfect for Newt but is completely side-lined in favour of someone else who has about as much chemistry with our lead as a brick wall.

Fundamentally, Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald acts like a crime epic but fails to realise that's not its purpose. Despite strong acting, spot on visuals and a beloved established universe, Fantastic Beasts unfortunately is not the chosen one and will more likely be the film that must not be named.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Joker (I) (2019)
9/10
Does Joker get the last laugh?
14 November 2020
I cannot have been the only one worried about "Joker". With our most recent cinematic Joker being disastrous in Suicide Squad, a director (Todd Phillips) best known for the mixed-bag that is the Hangover Trilogy and with Warner Bros's tendency to take popular characters and miss the mark completely (Fantastic Beasts' Dumbledore anyone?), the odds were certainly not in Jokers favour.

Joker follows Arthur Fleck (Joaquin Phoenix) a depressed 'clown for hire' who has pseudobulbar affect, a condition summarised by a card he hands out which defines it as sudden, 'frequent uncontrollable laughter that does not match how he feels'. Arthur aspires to appear on a talk show hosted by his idol Murray Franklin (Robert de Niro) yet finds himself living in a depressed tower block with his mother (Frances Conroy) and their neighbour Sophie (Zazie Beetz). However, due to events eerily similar to those in real life, Arthur begins a transformation into a man that will haunt the city of Gotham for decades to come.

The first praise Joker must receive is that of its lead. Joaquin Phoenix is phenomenal. He manages to do the unthinkable and provide a performance that rivals the late Heath Ledger, whom many consider as the definitive Joker. Regardless of whether the scene involves shocking acts of violence, moments of true tragedy or even interpretive dance in a bathroom, Phoenix manages to depict precisely where Arthur is on his journey to becoming the Joker. However, nearly everything else about this film deserves to be praised. From its directing, which deliberately places a constant state of tension and dread on the audience, to its score which blends joyous circus music with creepy drones to provide a hauntingly unique experience that could only work when dealing with the clown prince of crime.

The beauty of Jokers' story, and an aspect I feel a lot of the recent controversy surrounding the film has missed, is that whilst you do support and empathise with Arthur, you are ultimately rooting for him not to snap under the weight of his life. This relates heavily to Joker's theme of distorting comedy into a dark, unsettling tragedy, as even though by the film's close Arthur will have finally found something to truly laugh about, it will still be a mournful end to his character. However, this is not to say that the plot is simple, on the contrary, by respecting its comic-book source, Joker's storyline runs deeper than a 500-word review can detail and thus lends itself to multiple different interpretations. Therefore, by refusing to provide a definitive origin story, it allows the audience to use the film as a start point to come up with their own theories and origins for the infamous character.

Ultimately, Joker potentially signifies the dawn of a new type of comic-book movie. One that steps away from the loud, action-packed explosions of the MCU and instead takes a quieter, yet more adult approach on what would drive a man to evolve into one of the most infamous villains of the 20th and 21st centuries.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Telemarketers, where do they come from anyway?
14 November 2020
We have all been there, doing our daily routines, relaxing until suddenly, we get a ring from an unknown number. We answer and on the other end are the words "Sorry to bother you" followed by a sales pitch. However, now, through the eyes of first time writer and director Boots Riley, we get to see how that phone call is formed.

Set in alternate present-day America, our protagonist Cassius Green (Lakeith Stanfield) is propelled into the surreal world of telemarketing. However, where his friends and colleagues unite and fight the depressed system, Cassius rises, finding himself in a bizarre world where greed is king and morals come to die. Joining us in this alternate world is Cassius's girlfriend Detroit (Tessa Thompson), a budding political artist with earrings to die for, and Salvador (Jermaine Fowler) who brings Cassius into telemarketing unaware of the insane consequences of that action. The secret to Cassius's telemarketing success comes in the form of the film's comedic highlight of "the white voice". This is a term, used by an elder telemarketer, to refer to a voice that sounds like the owner has everything; they are comfortable, they are content, and they want to share that with you.

Despite the fairly in-depth review of the plot above, it only scratches the surface of this intricate, complex and fresh interpretation of greatness from poor beginnings. Whilst other films, such as the current Fantastic Beasts outing, fail to balance a multitude of story lines, 'Sorry to bother you' blends its' plotlines together allowing the threads to seamlessly weave in and out of each other, providing the viewer a grand sense of the world it takes place in.

Upon release, the film has been harkened back to three pieces of popular media. Firstly, its' themes on race and class relations, especially in the USA, allows 'Sorry to bother you' to be coined as a "social horror" being likened to 2017s "Get Out". Secondly, by presenting a surreally twisted alternate setting, as well as the worst sides of humanity, the film provides connotations with Black Mirror. Lastly, the third act, with one of the most outrageous and jaw-dropping plot twists of recent times, results in a direct association with the infamous revelation from 1973's Soylent Green. These three inspirations combine to form a funny, intense and beautifully directed film which truly leaves a lot to think about.

Despite this, 'Sorry to Bother You' is not for everyone. Even with genius strokes such as costume design, the third act, whilst jaw-dropping for me, will be polarising for others and does have the ability to ruin what has come before. However, whilst it may not claim awards, cult status is ultimately what awaits this marmite gem of a film.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A breath of fresh air
14 November 2020
It is fair to say that out of all the Marvel superheroes, Thor has not had the best run, commonly viewed as having the worst solo outings. However, that all changes with the recent release of Thor: Ragnarok, his third film, proving that the character still has life in him yet.

We follow Thor, played by returning star Chris Hemsworth, as he attempts to take on the magical knife-weilding Hela "The Goddess of death" (Cate Blanchett). We see Thor join up with a wide multitude of characters including Loki (Tom Hiddleston), Valkyrie (Tessa Thompson) and The Hulk/ Bruce Banner (Mark Ruffalo). Although the standout is the hilarious newcomer of Korg, played by the director: Taika Waititi, who steals every scene he is in. The film is very reminiscent of Guardians of the Galaxy due to the fact, a large portion takes place on alien planets and relies on a very similar type of humour - which to say the least, is a good thing.

Thor Ragnarok is primarily a comedy. It is hilarious. Anybody could go into this film and then come out of the cinema with a huge smile on their face. Being a superhero film, there are several highly stylised and well shot action scenes allowing Taika Waititi, to show his skill. The most memorable being the fight between the Hulk and Thor, which is pure spectacle. It is not just the action scenes that are well shot, it is most scenes in general. Granted, it is no Blade Runner, but every scene is packed with so much colour that you can't help but admire it. Being the 17th Marvel movie, it is fair to say that a lot of people are feeling a "Marvel fatigue". I know I did with Guardians of the Galaxy 2. However, Ragnarok, thankfully, breathes new life into its characters and its universe, as there are events that will have consequences in future Marvel movies. Before Ragnarok, Thor was very much a background character, for example; if someone asks you to name a superhero, you would probably say quite a few before even considering Thor. But Ragnarok increases the characters likeability immensely, doing for him what the first Iron man film did for Tony Stark. That being said, it is not perfect. If the film has to choose between a serious scene, or a joke, it will choose the joke. This can affect the flow of the film and the gravity of a situation, but it by no means ruins the film.

I highly recommend getting to see this one, especially if you want a break from the seriousness of life, it is guaranteed to put a smile back on your face. With a stellar cast, spot on action, hilarious jokes and a surprising story, Thor Ragnarok is the Marvel movie to see.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Wild Rose (2018)
7/10
The superior A Star is Born
14 November 2020
With American musicals sweeping the box office, what can be expected from the Scottish A Star is Born.

With the recent box office success of The Greatest Showman, Bohemian Rhapsody and the Mamma Mia series, it appears we are in a modern-day renaissance of musicals, which can be exemplified by the recent success of the fourth rendition of A Star is Born. However, whilst that has claimed mountains of praise, a film from the small country of Scotland is attempting to capitalise on the winning combination of a young singer rising from nothing with the aims of stardom.

Our story focuses on Jessie Buckley's 'Rose-Lynn', a young Glaswegian, who has dreams of being Nashville's next big country singer. However, her journey is not without troubles as she faces the challenge of raising two kids, clawing out of the shadow of her prison sentence and coming to terms with the notion that country singers don't come from Scotland. To aid and assist our country star is her employer and friend 'Susannah' (Sophie Okonedo) and Rose-Lynn's mother, 'Marion', played by the forever captivating Julie Walters.

Whilst it is true that the general theme of this film follows suit in a similar fashion to 2018's A Star is Born, I personally believe that Wild Rose is the superior rendition. Whilst A Star is Born focuses on the aspects of a singers life we are familiar with, the performances, the award shows, the record deals etc, Wild Rose provides a much more human story. By showing the strength, determination and passion to just even get that first performance, we as the audience give greater respect to Rose-Lynn than to Miss Gaga who was lucky enough to be found in a bar. Furthermore, instead of grand, stadium wide performances, the songs in Wild Rose are played for personal effect, with the final performance being used as the perfect poetic end point to our time with Rose-Lynn.

Wild Rose also isn't as sombre as others in it's genre thanks to truly laugh out moments involving Julie Walters being sassy to anyone and everyone. This in turn leads to the film's cinematography as, being predominantly set in Glasgow, involves working with different shades of greys and browns. This works to represent all Rose-Lynn wants to leave and is exemplified upon her journey to Nashville where she is met with bright lights and colours to truly portray where she belongs.

Despite having the greater budget and talent working behind it, I was not moved nearly as much by A Star is Born, as I was with Wild Rose. Where A Star is Born is bleak, depressing and with an ok acting job by Lady Gaga, Wild Rose is uplifting, moving and truly inspirational.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Sigh
14 November 2020
Can't dignify it with a full review, I'm not a huge star wars fan but this was just terrible.

Only good thing is that the prequels look like masterpieces in comparison.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Hunt (2012)
9/10
Best seen with no expectations
14 November 2020
Warning: Spoilers
I knew nothing of The Hunt, though I was surprised to have never heard of it. It had gained strong reviews, Mads Mikkelsen was the lead and it had been nominated for many awards including an Oscar. That was all I knew, and I am glad that was all I knew, which is why, though I don't discuss details, I have said the review contains spoilers.

The Hunt is a haunting film. It brutally attacks the very nature of the court of public opinion. Mads Mikkelsen plays Lucas, a nursery carer and father who is accused of a crime the audience knows he did not commit. However, whilst Lucas is the focal point of the film, the actual message of The Hunt lies with the town that shuns, condemns and attacks Lucas for his alledged crimes. Though I obviously cannot speak for anyone, I can guess that most people who have read/ seen a news story of a crime has made a snap decision over whether a suspect is guilty or not. I know I have. I also know I have done so with next to no knowledge of the crime. Yet therein lies the cruel, ultimately human, nature of our judgements.

The Hunt forces viewers to rethink that judgement and does so to full effect. It's further helped with camera work taking a documentary style approach, commonly starting with still frames before zooming in on characters as they react and deliver their lines. This further grounds the film, planting the audience in the seemingly lovely danish community. This is further sold by every actor in the film. This ranges from Mads Mikkelsen himself giving a more heartfelt and emotional performance than he usually provides, to even the child actors who manage to give convincing enough performances to spread doubt into the characters and even the audience.

The Hunt was a surprise. It is an important film and unfortunately an unrecognised one due to it being, for the most part in, danish. However, with a beautiful performance from Mikkelsen, a unique story that has rarely been explored and one of my favourite final scenes i've seen for a while, it is definitely one to look out for.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Tenet (2020)
8/10
Nolan's masterpiece..... on the second watch..... maybe?
14 November 2020
Armed with the word Tenet and an overbearing threat of the end of the world, we follow John David Washington (Blackkklansman) as he discovers the power of time inversion and all the visually spectacular prospects that concept can bring. However, the real draw for film fans is the question of what happens when Christopher Nolan takes Memento, Inception and James Bond and merges it with top-of-their-game actors, a Hans Zimmer impersonator and full monetary backing from Warner Bros. The answer is Tenet, the newest time-based sci-fi action film from Christopher Nolan.

Tenet, to put it mildly, is a lot to wrap a first-time viewer's head around. It acts, in a bizarre way, like an educational course. The first act is the lesson, exemplified by characters throwing heaps upon heaps of exposition at the audience in an attempt to get them ready for the coursework of the second act and the exam of the third act. As such (like with exams) it helps to know the answers beforehand which is why that (perhaps by design) Tenet is improved greatly upon a second watch. Trust me, the opening concert scene makes more sense with a second viewing.

If there is one thing Christopher Nolan is a master of, it is spectacle and Tenet has this in spades. With its' central concept of inversion and time reversal, Tenet can put visual twists on common concepts to make them feel new, exciting and viscerally thrilling. Whether this is a fist fight, a car chase or a full-scale armed assault, Tenet is able to use its' time reversal technique to keep the film visually impressive, regardless of whether audiences understand what's going on or not. Thankfully, along with impressive (and mostly practical) visuals, John David Washington inhabits a charismatic protagonist that rarely fails to lose the audience's investment in the plot. Furthermore, Robert Pattinson successfully crushes any doubts surrounding his upcoming role as The Batman/ Bruce Wayne with his supremely sophisticated yet deadly 'Neil'.

However, Tenet is far from the best Nolan has created. It lacks the emotional attachment that inhabited Interstellar, the perfect pacing of The Dark Knight or the innovative storytelling of Memento. Furthermore, any praise that could be given to its' dialogue is not possible as multiple scenes have background music and sound effects which drown out voices via some horrendous sound mixing (did anyone hear the boat race scene in its' entirety?). This does all unite to make a film that, whilst techinically, visually and narratively (insofar that it's not completely incomprehensible) impressive, is ultimately very hollow in execution

Overall, even with the aforementioned limitations, due to the film's ability to consistently provide additional information upon re-watch, I would not be surprised if Tenet slowly crept up the ranks to become a classic amongst Nolan's collection (or at the very least a cult classic). Still, regardless of my thoughts on the film, I was just happy to be back in a cinema again tbh.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Wow Kaufman... just wow
14 November 2020
I'm thinking of ending things. 2020 was so close to becoming a skippable year in cinema history with releases being delayed, hollow cash-grabs filling streaming services and many anticipated films failing to live up to expectations. But despite everything, gems have risen from a coronavirus-laden industry and Kaufman's newest emotionally and mentally draining jewel is one of the brightest.

I'm thinking of ending things. We follow Jessie Buckley (Wild Rose) as she travels with her new boyfriend Jesse Plemons (Breaking Bad) to meet his parents and contemplate a range of historic, poetic and philosophical concepts. However, as with most Kaufman films, nothing is what it seems and it is that mystery, enhanced by captivating performances that work to keep the audience invested in what could have been a very slow, self-important and ultimately forgettable film.

I'm thinking of ending things. By far and away, the real genius of the Netflix original is the expert editing, directing and dialogue that permeates through every scene which helps draw viewers deeper into the unfolding mystery. This comes in a variety of forms such as subtle changes to characters' looks occurring between camera cuts, speech being out of sync with lip movements and seemingly mundane conversations twisting into nauseatingly intense confrontations. Whilst it makes for confusing viewing, it ultimately succeeds at challenging and motivating the viewer to catch any and every detail that hints at a true meaning behind the unfolding plot.

I'm thinking of ending things. Despite there being a limited number of settings, the editing and directing also work to maintain a sense of uncomfortable tension throughout the film. This is even more impressive when at least a third of the run time is dedicated to two characters conversing in a car. The cinematography capitalises on this. Utilising a 4:3 aspect ratio, it beautifully frames characters and actions forcing audiences to maintain focus on the scene. This is never more wonderfully present than during scenes inside the parent's house where the combination of set design, character clothing and shot composition help to perpetuate the uneasy sense that our protagonist is far from safe.

I'm Thinking of Ending Things might be the most complex, yet ultimately rewarding film of 2020. The layered storyline, depressing yet tense tone and bizarre adoration of the Oklahoma musical means Kaufman has created something truly unique. Even though some scenes drag for longer than necessary and one particular scene at an ice cream parlour presents mysteries that never get explained, the film succeeds at presenting a unique view on relationships, life and the 'what ifs' that fill them... It also works as a feature length version of The View from Halfway Down.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

Recently Viewed