Change Your Image
askrapitsalex
Ratings
Most Recently Rated
Lists
An error has ocurred. Please try againReviews
Jellystone (2021)
C.H. Greenblatt's take on the classic H.B. characters will satisfy fans young and old!
C. H. Greenblatt (known for his early works on SpongeBob and Billy & Mandy and later creating Chowder and Harvey Beaks) gives us a surreal and comedic take on the H. B. characters. There are plenty of Easter Eggs and references for older generations that grew up with the familiar all the way down to the most obscure characters. The jokes are hit-and-miss, the animation is nicely done, some characters are different (most notably half of the characters are gender-bent, which I am perfectly fine with) while others maintain their traits from the classic era. Overall, a good and funny tribute to the classic Saturday morning cartoons that longtime fans and newcomers will enjoy.
The Secret Life of Pets 2 (2019)
A funnier and entertaining improvement
While the Despicable Me franchise continues to reign as the commercially successful non-Disney animated franchise, Illumination gives the sequel treatment to their previous projects, including The Secret Life of Pets.
Looking back at the first film, I still find it cute for its interesting premise, colorful animation, catchy musical score and a cast of memorable, side characters. My only issue(s) were that the plot was predictable and Max & Duke, while not intolerable, didn't leave much an impression for me.
However, my expectations began to blossom ever since the marketing for the sequel came out. After months of anticipation, the movie took me by surprise on how much it improved.
The sequel has three stories:
1. After Katie got married and has a son, Max (Patton Oswalt) became overprotective of his new playmate and must learn to overcome his fears.
2. Gidget (Jenny Slate) tries to rescue Max's favorite toy from an apartment room full of cats.
3. Reformed villain Snowball (Kevin Hart) dons a superhero alter-ego and must save a tiger from an abusive circus owner (Nick Kroll).
In hindsight, the plot would sound like a mess and have a lack of focus on which story to follow. In practice, however, the stories intertwine pretty well and does deliver an entertaining and intense climax in the third act. The plot is one of the major improvements over the original. The stories are more character-driven and sticks more close to the title of the franchise more than Max & Duke's buddy-comedy journey, which took majority of the first. The comedy is also a set-up from the predecessor where the jokes are more hit than miss. In fact, laughed out more than chuckling a few times in the past.
One of the highlights of any Illumination movie is the animation. Sure, some may argue that the Illumination animation quality and the character designs are too simplistic and doesn't visually stand out comparing to other animation studios. As an animator myself, I sense that the animators continue using heavy emphasis on shape on the animals' design that are executed well in their movements and humor. You can tell the animators had fun referencing how the animals move and behave, and animate them to their full potential. As for the setting for New York City, it retains its colorful appeal from the first film. They also added new scenery to give a different atmosphere from a pet's perspective. It can whether Max & Duke visiting the upstate farmland or Snowball venturing through the carnival fairgrounds. For the latter, it also provided some decent and energized action sequences.
Most of the characters return and they are still likable and funny, thanks to the actors' performances. There are couple of characters worth mentioning. I'll start off with Max. First, he is now voiced by Patton Oswalt replacing Louis C.K. after exposing his...history. He is, for the most part, a fitting replacement. But, there are times when his voice can be a little noticeable since both said actors have different pitches and deliveries. Outside his performance, Max goes through a major character development where he and Duke become friends with Katie's son, Liam. But, Max slowly and progressively becomes brave and less worried. I consider Max to be more likable than he was last time. Snowball went through a major transition from villain to a happily living as a pet while determining to helping others as a superhero (though at times, pretends for fun). As the for the new characters, they are mostly welcoming additions and provide their own charm. The only exception(s) that I felt weren't interesting enough were Katie's husband Chuck and son Liam. Again, not bad characters, they didn't leave much of an impression. On Snowball's side of the plot, we have Daisy, a kind-hearted Shih Tzu who idolizes Snowball's alter-ego and wants to be like him. Hu, the captive white tiger that gives out more personality than words with behaving like a house cat and having a childlike innocence. If I had to pick two of my favorite new additions of the pack, it would be Rooster and Sergei. Rooster (voiced the first time and remarkably well by Harrison Ford) is the farmdog that acts as Max's mentor on how to overcoming fears. I'd classify Sergei as the most menacing villain in Illumination history for his dark and threatening design and nature, comparing to the comedic, over-the-top villains from other movies.
Overall, The Secret of Life of Pets 2 is a major improvement over the first film, thanks to a well-thought out story, appealing animation, good laughs and great performances. If you are an animal lover, Illumination fan, or have kids, I'd definitely recommend this movie. It'll be fun to sit through and a good appetizer before Toy Story 4.
Brightburn (2019)
Refreshing concept that ALMOST shines
Whenever you think of a "superhero", you would always classify that character as an individual with gifted, unique powers and must take responsibility on benefiting humanity whether good or bad. But...what happens if that said person didn't wanted to protect the world and instead uses his/her abilities for evil and destruction? That rhetorical question sums a brilliant concept for a superhero horror film.
Keep in mind, there have been superhero movies with horror elements used. Yet, they are mostly used to establish atmosphere and action would be thrown in to let audiences who's the good or bad guy. The "Blade" movies are a prime example. Then, there are superhero movies that were dark on unintentional levels, such as DC's Man of Steel and Batman v. Superman.
Speaking of "Superman", the whole set-up for this movie is like watching a horror parody of "Superman" except it IS intentional.
A young alien boy (Jackson A. Dunn) who is raised on Earth discovers he has superpowers and begins using them to cause mayhem.
With an interesting concept and James Gunn producing it, you would come in and expect something grand and an interesting study into the main character's psyche and motivation. ...Almost. The key word is "almost".
Before I get down to the negatives, there are some positives worth mentioning about this movie.
The acting is the most genuine element throughout this picture. Elizabeth Banks carries a believable performance as the titular character's loving mother who goes through a struggling arc whether to continue or end her relationship with her son. Jackson A. Dunn is surprisingly not bad. While pretending to play innocent wouldn't convince anybody, you will feel a sense of fright every time he either flies, use heat vision, super-speed, super-strength and murders anyone in his path. He is a living embodiment of scary more than an actual character. The other performances are passable, especially with Matt Jones.
As a horror movie, there are nicely executed components that will keep horror movie buffs satisfied: jump scares, built-up music and tension, and death/gore scenes. With having a low-budget, the movie contains a fair amount of practical and CGI effects.
However, the main issue I have with the movie is what I mentioned earlier: an interesting study into the main character's psyche and motivation. While Brightburn imposes as a threat, there isn't much more about him what the concept has promised. He seems fine for the first third of the movie. But, during the rest of the film, he acts confused, emotionless when lying easily get frustrated when committing these acts. He doesn't even justify on his actions; he does what the script says so. I understand that's the point being presented as a superhero horror movie. Yet, the story still acts vague on his motivation. Once in a while, we get hints his native alien race, like his own symbol and language. But, none of that answers HOW and WHY is he doing this. Even the movie ends on an awkward note. It would've been stronger if we had more time to know the character more.
Overall, Brightburn is a superhero-horror movie with an interesting premise, solid acting and decent scares. Nonetheless, the movie provides less more than it promises. If you are a fan of Jame Gunn or yearning for a dark superhero movie that isn't Man of Steel...you'll like fine. Admittedly, despite its unintentional dark nature, Man of Steel AT LEAST provided me with enough entertainment value and a character who justify his actions.
** 1/2 out of ****
Aladdin (2019)
A pleasant movie worth wishing for
When it comes to the 1992 Aladdin, it is considered to be one of my favorite animated Disney movies of all time, next to Beauty and the Beast and The Lion King. It was straight-forward full of action, comedy, well-crafted colors and animation, memorable songs, and much more. But, when a live-action remake was announced, audiences were worried. For me, I always reserve judgement till the final product.
So...is it as bad as everyone thought it was going be...? ...No. Does it pay respect and love as the original provided...? ...Yes...mostly.
To kick things off, the story is what everyone would expect when coming on: peasant Aladdin (Mena Massoud) falls for the beautiful princess Jasmine (Naomi Scott). Soon, he finds a magic lamp with a Genie (Will Smith) and makes three wishes to win Jasmine's heart while the royal vizier Jafar (Marwan Kenzari) plots to steal the lamp for total power. Conceptually, the same story but executed differently. To the movie's credit, it is not a complete shot-by-shot remake and it maintains the spirit of the original. That is what I expect from these Disney live-action remakes nowadays. With having an extended running time, it fleshes out more of the primary characters and their motives, which works to an extent. Since the movie is directed by Guy Ritchie (whom I have little knowledge of) and producer Dan Lin, the movie provides a little more emphasis on action and chase sequences during key scenes. There will be moments where you will feel an adrenaline rush when you see Aladdin running and jumping through the streets of Agrabah. Though for others, it would make them feel a little weird out after a while.
The visuals are usually a challenge since there are elements in the original that stick out like a sore thumb. But, to be fair, the movie does provide its own visual identity. Lavish is the best way to compliment the looks. Thanks to the nicely built sets of Agrabah and the vibrant, detailed costumes of the characters, I felt comfortable and became basked into the Arabian culture throughout the film. As for the CGI, it is average. There are times where it works well on emoting the animal characters and the matte landscapes. Then again, there will be times where the CGI would become noticeable and uncanny. The original still had more of an artistic advantage due to being animated. The colors easily visualize and establish the mood of the characters. The character animations and visuals also gave the animators more freedom to express their creativity and imagination.
The performances are a huge mix. I'll start with the blue elephant in the room: Will Smith as the Genie. I admire Robin Williams and how much he made an impact he provided to his character with fast-paced energy and improvisations. Yet, it is worth noting that everyone has to understand and accept: no one could copy Robin Williams and his comedic influence. Disney knows it; Will Smith knows it. Even other animated Aladdin projects had their own comedic genies and no one complained about it. With that said, Will Smith did a pretty good job. Whether in his standard CGI genie or human form, he is pretty likable thanks to his own style of humor and relationship with Aladdin. Mena Massoud and Naomi Scott maintained their charm and chemistry with their characters from the original. My personal highlight is Scott's breakthrough, original solo song called "Speechless", which was written by Pasek and Paul, from La La Land. Nasim Pedrad is a nice new addition to the cast and gets an occasional laugh.
However, Marwan Kenzari never convinced me once that he was Jafar. I'm sure he's a decent guy and acted fine in other movies. Even when the movie gives him a backstory and I'm not say he has to be a carbon copy of Johnathan Freeman, he is missing something very important: acting evil. Sure, in hindsight, the original Jafar would be characterized as a one-dimensional villain. But, at least, he was cunning, sneaky, master of tricks and disguises, and a psychotic threat. This guy, however, is a complete joke. And when does gain power, his performance becomes laughably bad.
Iago is nothing worth mentioning, either. He's basically acts and talks a like a real parrot, that's it. Granted, Alan Tyduk's voice was serviceable, but nothing beats Gilbert Gottfried.
Lastly, the songs and music provided again by Alan Menken are ear-pleasing to listen and recapture the Arabic feeling despite the tempo is being slower than the original (i.e. "A Whole New World" and "Prince Ali"). The main stand-out songs are "Arabian Nights" which sets the story-telling mood well and "Speechless" thanks to Naomi's surprisingly powerful voice.
Overall, despite a weak villain, average CGI and nothing special added, Aladdin is a pleasant re-telling that retains the original's sense of wonder with great performances, lush visuals, and nice music.
Rating: *** out of **** ( MARGINALLY RECOMMENDED)
Shazam! (2019)
DC's Spectacle of Fun
Warner Bros. came a long way through transitioning the DC Extended Universe. It started out dark with questionable casting and decisions that polarized critics and audiences together. However when "Wonder Woman" became a critical and commercial success, the studio slowly starts making their future projects lighthearted and fun. Sure, "Justice League" made an awkward first impression with through its heavy re-shoots and editing, but "Aquaman" was swimming into the right direction with its adventurous tone. With their next installment, "Shazam!" exceeded my expectations and easily become one of my favorite DC movies of the decade.
A teenage foster child named Billy (Asher Angel) was magically chosen by an ancient wizard (Djimon Hounsou) where he was given the power to transform into an adult superhero known as Shazam (Zachery Levi) every time he shouts his name. Now, with help from his fanatic foster brother Freddie (Jack Dylan Grazer), Shazam must learn to control his new powers while protecting the world from the evil Dr. Sivana (Mark Strong).
Hearing this synopsis alone, the story sounds conceptually generic with some cliches you've seen before in most superhero movies. However, in terms of execution, the story works pretty well. Imagine the concept of the Tom Hanks classic "Big" combined with the campy nature of the Sam Raimi "Spider-Man" movies. It SOUNDS crazy but once you SEE it, it works. The movie also has good use of foreshadowing when it comes to the story and characters.
Horror film director David F. Sandberg really surprised me on how much fun and humor you could make into a superhero flick. Throughout this movie, there will be familiar and refreshing jokes that will make you laugh non-stop. Sometimes, you'll come across references from previous Sandberg and DC movies. The action scenes are energetic and blends well with the comedic tone.
The cast did a phenomenal job with their performances throughout the movie. Asher Angel captures the rebellious yet kind-hearted nature of a child while Zachary Levi provides big laughs as both the "child-trapped-in-grown-up's body" trope and a mighty superhero. Billy's foster family are so likable and charming, especially with Jack Dylan Grazer cleverly portraying a fanboy who mentors an adult superhero.
As for Mark Strong, his role as the villain would be debatable among others. On one hand, he plays a typical power-hungry villain who seeks Shazam's powers for reasons I will not give away. On the other hand, once you do see why, you will feel sympathy towards his character.
Did I forget to mention it takes place around Christmas? Ever since "Iron Man 3", you will get a feeling that this movie will become a new holiday classic for unique reasons.
Overall, if you're in the mood for a superhero film with fun and laughs, this is a must-watch. Being released on the same month as "Avengers: Endgame", it is considered an appetizer before settling on "Endgame" as the main course.
Shazam!!!
RATING: *** 1/2 out of **** stars (HIGHLY RECOMMENDED)
A Dog's Journey (2019)
Good boy, Universal; You earn a treat for improvement
Making movies about dogs has always been a challenge for the entertainment industry. As a dog lover myself, it is hard to tell whether these type of movies are made to make audiences go "aww" with no substance provided outside or made with hard work and effort to create an emotional experience that would entertain anyone. I am leaning towards the latter. I have a history seeing movies about dogs, especially family-orientated films where dogs talk. There are many to count, but that is a different story.
I recall my viewing experience with A Dog's Purpose, based on the best-selling novel by W. Bruce Cameron, which was released a week before my birthday. While not "bad" or "controversial" as critics and audiences called it, the concept was refreshingly intriguing, it had decent drama and solid acting, especially with Josh Gad. My only issues are the story and tone felt consistent at times. Of course, the movie was a commercial success and it spawned a spin-off and a sequel this year.
Bailey (narrated again by Gad) now lives happily with his original owner Ethan (Dennis Quaid) and his wife Hannah (Marg Helgenberger). He also bonds with their infant granddaughter, C.J.. Until one day, her mother Gloria (Betty Giplin) takes C.J. away from the family and Bailey's time is near. Now, Bailey goes on a new journey through multiple lives while vowing to find and protect C.J. (Kathryn Prescott) at all costs.
As unnecessary as it sounds, the movie has pleasantly surprised me throughout. The main improvement that the sequel provided is the story. It is coherent where it maintains its focus on the dog's goal. The drama hits its marks at the right moments and you will feel the emotions. You will smile, you will chuckle, you will cry, you will be anxious, you will be relieved, etc.
While Josh Gad may provide a few chuckle-worthy moments, his innocence and valor nature continues to carry the heart of the story over the drama. Granted, some would argue that there will be occasional moments where the story would get dark and make you too depressed, especially if young children are watching it. Then again, to the movie's credit, it doesn't go too far and its keeps the emotional level in balance.
The acting from the human characters remains solid, thanks to the directorial debut of Gail Mancuso. Kathryn Prescott and newcomer Henry Lau provide charm and a genuine chemistry to their characters as childhood friends with a building romance.
On a side note, the way how the dogs were trained for certain scenes took risk and prevailed without causing controversy as the last film did.
Overall, A Dog's Journey is a slight improvement with a linear story and enough entertainment value for families and dog lovers to enjoy. If you are seeing it with younger children, be cautious for the occasional dark and downer moments.
RATING: *** out of **** (7.5 out of 10) (RECOMMENDED)