Spielberg and Latt had a tough mountain to climb. Wells wrote about a very charismatic every-day man and had him commit suicide at the end of his journey. That's not really set for a Hollywood big ending. Plus the fact that (at least in the original text) the main guy is not pro-active. He doesn't try to take down the aliens. He doesn't try and be the hero. His main goal is just to survive.
So with that in mind both stories center around two leads...and what to do? Spielberg made Ray (Tom Cruise) a divorced dad, unliked by his children, with no direction. And when the aliens attack, he has no goal except to bring his kids back to Boston so the 'mom' can deal with them. Plus Ray kills a human being in cold blood in the middle of the movie without provocation. This is hardly reason to get behind a character. Spielberg made me not like Ray from the get-go. He didn't make me join his journey and he didn't give me any ending that I could support.
By contrast you have Latt's film whom I believe spent a lot of time on their lead character. C. Thomas Howell plays a loving father who's only goal is to re-unite his family. He is going to DC because he needs to see/touch/be with them again. He's not the hero. He doesn't try to take on the aliens (like Wells' book). He just survives. When he thinks he lost everything, you believe him. You understand why he walks up to the alien at the end.
Yes, Latt's story is slower...and it's more character driven...and don't get me started on the lame aliens. They're a joke. Really.
But, I am so much on the side of Latt's story, that the only thing that Spielberg's offered were cooler effects. And sure, when you're watching a popcorn film maybe that's all that you need...but in the end all you are left with is a bad buttery taste in your mouth.
So with that in mind both stories center around two leads...and what to do? Spielberg made Ray (Tom Cruise) a divorced dad, unliked by his children, with no direction. And when the aliens attack, he has no goal except to bring his kids back to Boston so the 'mom' can deal with them. Plus Ray kills a human being in cold blood in the middle of the movie without provocation. This is hardly reason to get behind a character. Spielberg made me not like Ray from the get-go. He didn't make me join his journey and he didn't give me any ending that I could support.
By contrast you have Latt's film whom I believe spent a lot of time on their lead character. C. Thomas Howell plays a loving father who's only goal is to re-unite his family. He is going to DC because he needs to see/touch/be with them again. He's not the hero. He doesn't try to take on the aliens (like Wells' book). He just survives. When he thinks he lost everything, you believe him. You understand why he walks up to the alien at the end.
Yes, Latt's story is slower...and it's more character driven...and don't get me started on the lame aliens. They're a joke. Really.
But, I am so much on the side of Latt's story, that the only thing that Spielberg's offered were cooler effects. And sure, when you're watching a popcorn film maybe that's all that you need...but in the end all you are left with is a bad buttery taste in your mouth.
Tell Your Friends