Change Your Image
dejavue52
Reviews
CSI: Crime Scene Investigation: The Finger (2002)
Great episode; bad reviewers
Really good episode. It keeps you guessing all the time.
I guess there's one thing that bothers me about the previous reviews. The reviewers never seem to get the plots or their developments correct. There is one reviewer who said that Catherine met Logan in a bar. That is incorrect. She drove the car to that Diner to wait for a call that they were expecting. Yes, her colleague Sara is dining with a date but Catherine does not leave her a finger in a glass of ice water. She leaves the finger in a glass of ice to preserve it for them to get information off of it that they can. And there is another reviewer who doesn't know that Catherine spells her name with a C not a K.
CSI: NY: Commuted Sentences (2007)
Wrong person gets a lecture
In response to the poster ccthemovieman-1 the person that Mac has the given the lecture to on Justice is not Stella, it is one of the suspects. It is confusing to viewers of an episode whenever someone posts something as if it is true and it is attributed to the wrong individual. How in the world would you have thought that Mac would be lecturing Stella on such a topic? On another note--what was with the look that was exchanged between the killer and the formerly accused as they passed each other in the hallway? Was there some other connection between them that only they know of? Even Stella noticed it.
Perry Mason: The Case of the Vanishing Victim (1966)
Some Observations and a Correction
The scene between Perry and Burger outside his office was worth a 10 in itself.
When Lt. Drumm was at the airport when the FAA was searching through the rubble they had collected, he said that he was looking for the flask that the pilot had been chugging out of before he took off. Then Det. Brice came over with the large plaid fabric container in which the flask had been. How did it get into the container when the pilot had been drinking from it just before he fell out of the sky?
The poster kapelusznik18 said that the exchange between Perry and Burger in the courtroom was "shyster-like double-talk". It was perfect rule of law and if you want to understand it, use CC on your TV. And if you've watched PM episodes for a while you should be familiar with the way lawyers speak at times in court.
Also I have a correction to a Goof posted where Lorraine Keely came out of the shower to see Mr. Mason sitting in her living room instead of her landlady and her hair was piled on top of her head. It was not wet as a poster had assumed. It was dry, so in order to have it absolutely dry as she left in her car all she had to do was undo the clips, comb it out, and voila she's done.
Perry Mason: The Case of the Fifty Millionth Frenchman (1964)
Poster errors
I have said before on Perry Mason summaries that people really need to do some research before they start talking about the actors and actresses in the series. Too many of the reviewers have stated in this episode that the French accents were ridiculous or not at all what they should have been. Did they ever even look to see if the actor and actress who were the main French speakers were indeed French? In this episode yes the two were either French or French Canadian so the accents were authentic. Also there is one reviewer who completely messed up in the telling of the story because they said that the character of Ninette was the one who went to Perry Mason to get her friend out of trouble. She only did that after her friend did it first and this person who posted this review got this completely backwards. Also there was another poster who said that the line that had to do with the title was spoken by Perry Mason at the end. This is not true; it was David McCallum as Philippe who said it.
Perry Mason: The Case of the Skeleton's Closet (1963)
Errors in the reviews and Goofs
I believe this was not the first Perry Mason episode to feature an African American judge.
In regards to the review by kfo9494: It is incorrect that they stated that the man who wrote the tell-all and was subsequently murdered was Harry Collins. It was not Collins but Richard Harris. It would be nice, if one goes to all the trouble of writing a review, that at least the characters mentioned are correct. It would save the readers of these reviews some confusion.
In the Goofs is an offering about the purse that Mrs. Layton brings to Mr Harris's study. The review says that the purse is tubular before the shot is fired. After the shot is fired it says that the purse is rectangular and also in the wrong spot. I believe the Goof is not a Goof but is just an error in viewing the scene.
Now, I have a question about the papers that were supposedly seen in the desk drawer. Mrs. Layton says she saw them in the bottom drawer and there were about 400 to 500 pages in a cover. In my multiple viewings of the scene there were no such papers like that in a drawer anywhere to be seen. I believe the script was too ambitious in that regard.