Change Your Image
lince18
Reviews
Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
Not a Sequel just a remake changing dates
What do you get for your money, and lots of time, watching this picture? not a sequel, it's the worst thing about this movie, they sold it as if it was a sequel, but it's only a remake ( and not a good one).
It has nearly the same argument, Blade Runner chasing a special replicant, the same end, Replicant dies being more human than most humans and Deckard goes away with the girl, and thousand of copied winks from the original 1982 movie.
But we're not in 1982, and what then was fresh and new, today are abused clichés, and technical improvements could not fill the gap between a master piece of cinema, and a "cheap" remake
CSI: NY: Heroes (2006)
Goof
There's a Goof in this Episode, when the burned body is discovered in the car, they said that only the inner car of the car has burned and it has done so violently because the windows were closed and so the fire stopped when the interior run out of Oxygen....but, every time there's a Fhlasback showing the car burning, the right window is OPEN. Commenting the episode, I think that the writers lost an opportunity to make a more emotional ending although is possible that they avoid it because crossing images of two official funerals with pipe sound and the rest will had been very obvious. At least this episode must have been shooted at New York, because there are some images taken aboard The USS Intrepid Museum ¿or not?