Reviews

3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Rudy (1993)
3/10
Depressing
24 May 2021
Rudy is the story of a mentally challenged young man, whose obsessive-compulsive disorder leads him to pursue one, and only one, goal in life. The pursuit of this goal is met with deserved scorn and derision. Though the goal is ultimately "achieved" through the pity and misguidedness of those around him, Rudy learns nothing about how the real world works and becomes destined to a life of reliving that one moment again and again via a series of "inspirational" lectures at local middle schools. In short, Rudy is a cautionary tale about the pitfalls of the United States mental health system from the 1970s right through to today.
8 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Cop Land (1997)
3/10
What a Wasted Opportunity
1 March 2006
This movie falls short on so many levels, it's hard to completely identify all of them here and do each one justice. Let's start with what was probably the major selling point of the film when it first came out: We were going to see Stallone finally give a real, nuanced performance. What a letdown. As others have said, his Freddy character comes across more as mildly retarded than broken-spirited. Next up: The great cast. Another huge underachievement. Some of the best actors turn in some of their worst performances. Kietel brings none of his usual charm or depth to a role that required at least a fake persona of trustworthiness, to make his ringleader role seem believable. DeNiro (whom, admittedly I have always found a tad overrated and limited in the types of roles he can play) absolutely mails this one in. The others are given little else to do except stand around and play tough guy/disenchanted wife/scared subordinate as the case may be. Sure, Ray Liotta chews some scenery, but it somehow winds up seeming out of place compared with the tone of the movie. Finally, the plot is absolutely ludicrous. The idea that "Superboy" would somehow live in a water tower after the events that transpired is comical. And does Freddy have absolutely no one else he can call when transferring Superboy out of the police station, so much so that he gets jumped, alone, by two of Kietel's goons in broad daylight right outside the station? Ever heard of a phone Freddy? To other Jersey cops, to the media, to the FBI? All in all, a bizarre and just plain "weird" movie that winds up being so much less than the sum of its parts. In that regard, I have to agree with a previous poster named Yisraelh, who says that there is just something "wrong" with this movie that is hard to identify. I know exactly what he or she means. Even having listed many of its flaws above, there is still something about this movie that is just not right, that is hard to put a finger on, though God knows I've tried. In this way, the comparison to "Sleepers" is completely apt. Another movie that seems to miss the mark for elusive reasons (though I could detail some of the exact same complaints for that movie regarding performances, plot, etc.) On a final note, I grew up in exactly the same area that this movie is supposed to have taken place, and it does a very half-ass job of capturing the sense of location. Geography gets screwed up, and the areas directly over the GWB are portrayed as being a lot more working class/blue collar than they actually are. That area is further south, closer to Cliffside Park/West New York/Weehawken. A minor complaint for most who are not familiar with the area, but just one more thing for me that adds to this movie's distanced and "out of touch" feel.
4 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Jacob's Ladder (I) (1990)
9/10
Fantastic Movie/One Problem
5 January 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I definitely fall into the "Loved this Movie" category. It works on so many different levels--as horror, suspense, mystery, thriller, even love story. In fact, I don't think this movie could've worked nearly as well if you didn't actually feel for this guy (Robbins) wholeheartedly. You can tell that this guy really loved his wife and his child. That's a testament to Robbins' performance. As others have said, I think the movie makes complete sense: Everything in the movie that occurred after Vietnam never really happened. He is simply imagining/hallucinating/dreaming it all as he lay dying in Vietnam. That's not to say that some of those events that he dreams about didn't really happen; for instance, his son really has died and he is now remembering him. And he really did work at a post office and probably had a crush on one of the workers there (Pena), so he is imagining a separate life with her. It all fit very well for me. However, I do have one problem with my own theory, and it's somewhat small, but important in my opinion. If everything after Vietnam never really happened, how did he find out about "The Ladder" (Bad LSD) as he lay dying? In the movie, an ex-Nam buddy tells him about it back in the States. But if he never actually went home, he would never have known about it, being that one of his own soldier-buddies attacks and mortally wounds him in the jungle. My best rationalization for this is that as he lay dying, he overheard some doctors or military personnel discussing what the bad LSD had wrought. Jacob then transposes those conversations into his own dreamlike state, creating the character of the hippie LSD scientist who created it. Yet it seems as though we are meant to believe that the scientist (Craven) actually did create it. It's the one part of the movie, for me, that crosses the line between the two worlds (reality and dreamlike/nightmare) and expects us to accept it. I wonder if anyone else has the same problem with this one pat of an otherwise fantastic movie.
36 out of 45 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed