Change Your Image
antoniocenteno-87266
Ratings
Most Recently Rated
Reviews
Vikingulven (2022)
It was a nice mash Up of things
Thrillers are good, werewolves movies are good, putting them together makes a surprisingly good mix, and this is the type of movie that won't let you expecting for things to heppen, It constantly builds on, honestly, known premises about lycantropes and murder móvies
The acting was solid for the most part, even so a little cheese here and there for two charachters. The people in the film really feels like actual people Who get confronted with the premise of a Giant wolf killing folk.
The Script is Maybe it's weak point, this because rellies over other werewolves movies, like Gingersnaps and American Werewolve in London, but is makes Up for It when the carnage is unleashed.
Overall feels good, quick and to the point.
Giù la testa (1971)
Best Obscure Spaghetti Western ever
Somehow, this movie is not Heard about enough as the more famous Dollars trilogie movies or the magnific Once upon a time even though maestro Sergio Leone directed this one aswell.
Man, this movie hits different, is by far Leone's darkest western, great direction, great music, amazing setting and great perfomances.
You can't help but Love mexican Revolution westerns, and this might be the finnest due to it's thrilling emotions, constant humor and blasting action, It just never leaves you breath and in this cade that's a good thing.
Just watch the movie, you certainly won't be dissapointed at all.
Jurassic World Dominion (2022)
Fast paced action/adventure movie
The end of the Jurassic Saga, or at least until the evil company Universal ressurects it again for profit.
In all seriousness, this movie in unrelenting, a very fast paced octane feature wich gives no rest to the viewer, a lot of that due to the Plot been very small. So yeah, there is that, the plot is thin, non the less, it doesn´t need a big Plot, the history of the charachters really goes a long way, a concept that in this movie works really well. This movie did a great job with the action scenes and the dinamics in the film are so fast that truly evoques the golden times of adventure movies.
This movie has beautiful cinematography too, really good sound mixing and thankfully in this entry they didn´t try to over do the music like in past films so it made for some good atmosphere through the movie.
Acting was spot on by the cast of JP, Neil, Goldblum and Dern will live as some really good actors while the new charachters of Dallas, Pratt and the girl did a solid job, this movie did not relly on them and that is a good thing cause they can play to their strenghts in the actions sequences.
Still there is a couple of lows in the movie, it capitalizes on nostalgia big time, something sometimes feels a bit out of place; it moves a couple of charachters out of the way since they are not important to the plot and there was a big premise delivered through the pomotional material that did not live up to the hype.
However i feel like this movie is truly better than the past two, this one been far better paced and far faster than the other two, a lot like Mad Max in that sense, at the end is unrelenting start to finish with a thin plot, beat that.
Rogue (2007)
Best croc movie i´ve seen, Bite me.
Rogue is a survivial thriller wich involves a group of tourist and a 21 foot massive killer croc hell bent on run them out of his territory or else he´ll eat them, which ever happens first. The thing about this movie is that is fast paced and don´t over stay it´s welcome, it´s gruesome, has violent killings, good enough casting and charachters. Something i enjoyed a lot was it´s overall somber tone opossed to it´s fast paced rhytm, makes a good balance for a quick movie that don´t transforms into an action flick.
A great thing about this kind of movies is they don´t follow traditional movie rules like charachters archs, big finales, romatic interest, ecc. Not saying those rules are not good, they exist for a reason and i´m not saying there isn´t a bit of them involved in the movie, they are involved, but the main focus of the movie is survival rather than charachter development or story, therefore charachters are as human as they get, they act like desperate, shocked people about to been devoured and making not the best or most humanitary decitiones to try keeping alive, therefore they feel like actual people, a park guide, some dorks, bussines dudes, family members, tourists.
The Croc really steals the show, other movies opted for mega crocs that could only be finded on earth millions of years ago, this movie presents a realistic (still gigantic) crocodile, a 21 foot monster that is thick. The creature feature was barely in the movie but every second of the beast on the screen is worth it, is mean, is big and unlike other animals on film it actually looks and acts like an animal (a bit overacted though, per say). Now that´s an art that is somehow very baisc yet very hard to many movies to get right.
Overall a quick and violent watch that follows non traditional movies rules, has a unique style, good charachters and massive croc.
La resa dei conti (1967)
A thrilling game of huner and prey.
This is one of the best Spagetthi Westerns i´ve seen, part of that must be Lee Van Cleef´s and Tomas MIllian´s acting, this duo really steal the screen whenever one of them is around in the movie.
Solima´s direction in this flick is on par with that of Corbucci in his top game but of all things Solima is more original to some extent and really brings something new to the table.
The movie itself is intriguing, the only bad thing was some editing and other limitations that Spaghetti Weserns are known for wich always hurt the vision of the movie, makes you think what could be if this directos had bigger budgets.
Ennio Morricone as always is amazing with thrilling music and original scores that really take you into the action and the feeling of the charachters, so the movie has that too.
This is a essential Spaghetti Western that you must see and put attention to, is very overlooked in later years but still holds up very weel.
C'era una volta il West (1968)
The greatest homage to Western of all time
It´s incredible to think that an Italian director played the game better than any american at directing Westerns, every Leone movie from the dollars trilogy changued the game of cinema about the wild west and by far influenced so much when it comes to how people watched that genre. Now imagine that, but is played as an hybrid between his spaghetti cinema and traditional western movies. That´s what makes this movie so amazing and great. Been honest i praise more the Good the bad and the Ugly as the ultimate western (and personal all time favorite) but Once upon a time in the west is just a different beast and was Leone´s more realistic movie at the time.
This movie is a long drag but is a good one, the plot kicks in really slowly, you don´t know what the movie is about untill around 45 minutes after it started and finally is moving at around half the movie, when you see it objectivly the plot isn´t that big, other filmmakers will do a one hour and 45 minutes of film, but not Leone, there´s several long long shots with amazing cinematography and landscapes new to his movies.
Leone´s close ups work here in a different way too, he was the kind of director that let face acting make the difference, but his previous movies where full of angry faces, fury and violence, here is a different story in the acting, we see concern, grief, greed and remorse, wich made Bronson, Fonda, Robards and Cardinale give a wide charachterization for their, well, charachters.
The music in this movie is fantastic, Ennio Morriocne even called it the best he did in colaboration with Leone, it really puts you in the mood and is so haunting, gives the scenes so much power that is unreal.
Once upon a time in the West is definetly a must see for people that love Westerns and movies, easly one of the greatest ever made and a true experience to the eyes.
Jurassic Park (1993)
Spielberg´s finnest adventure movie.
A classic among classics in Adventure and Sci-fi, a movie that seems like an unrealistic achivement for its time, you´ve seen in it like a million of times, yet here you are reading reviews in IMDB looking for more fun stuff about this movie, don´t worrie, we all do that.
This is Spielberg at his very best, he is well known for his heart warming adventure movies and flawless serious movies, Jurassic Park is right there in the middle of both, yes it has gret CGI and thrills but is a very heavy themed movie about growning up as an adult, the movie is full of Sam Neil going around facing "kids stuff" wich he don´t like, yet his like a child around Dinos, he gets forced to growing up and comming full circle with his demons wich are represented by the same Dinosaurs he admires so much, that´s how Spielberg really makes this movie so great, Dinosaurs are exciting, terrifying and fun, still he used them to his advantage to make a story out of the Charachters in the movie.
William´s score is bombastic and fits this movie better than what i´ve seen in any other movie, he really let himself go and help teling the story and thrill the audience along the way. The perfomances are on point, Spcially Jeff Goldblum and Richard Attemborough. The Dinosaur action is just out of this world, you really feel like they are alive, and the T rex, that damn T rex.
At the very end go watch this movie again, show it to your childrens, family, friends, any one you like, you know you never gonna be dissapointed by it, is Spielberg at his very best.
Per qualche dollaro in più (1965)
When westerns grow stale bounty hunters arrived.
"Where life has no value sometimes death has a price". Damn, that is a statment when you get into a movie, really gets you into the idea of the film itself and gives an idea of how this movie is more cold, brutal and thrilling than any other western released at the time.
This movie gets slamed right in the middle of the Dollars Trilogy of Leone-Eastwood, it really feels like the must underrated western ever made, probably overshadowed by the third film of the trio, at the same time this one is a complete different beast and introduced to mainstream the concept of cool bounty hunters.
As the other two movies wecan talk about Leone´s Direction, Morricone´s music and Eastwood perfomance, as well the cinematography and themes of the movie for ages, still that´s beend done several times, so for save your time let me say: IT´S AS GLORIOUS AS ALWAYS. So Let´s try talk about other aspects that differnced this movie and gave a big step forward to this kind of cinema.
This movie was a gigantic improvement over A Fistful of Dollars, that movie had good pacing, shots, direction, score adn acting and everything here is much better, taking some limitations that slowed the other movie and improving them, like lightning and close ups. Lee van Cleef gives such a great perfomance in this movie as a smart ass Colonel one step over the Man with no name, this movie really takes the time to develope a feud with Gian Maria Volonte as el Indio wich makes the final confrontation so good and takes some spotlight away from Eastwood´s charachter that let the movie feel like a fresh take on this instalment.
The only real sin i´ve seen in this movie is a peace of scene where for some reason Manco has a black face wich remind me a lot of Arnie Scharzzeneger in Predator, some seconds after the black face is gone and really that shot wan´t worth it, but that´s it.
This is a classic Westerns saddly overshadowed by Leone´s next two movies but definetly a classic and a new take on Spaggethi Westerns.
Il mercenario (1968)
Corbucci and Nero finnest Western.
Watching a spaggethi western, made by italians, filmed in spain, on a american mainly themed genre but takes place in Mexico, this movie really is more a guacamole western rather than spaggethi or tortilla Western. Jokes aside, this movie really stand out there in the genre, giving trilling perfomances, new locations and Corbucci having something to say, yet again.
Franco Nero is amazing in this movie as the Polish or Polaco, been a gunner selling for the best price and giving something new to this kind of movies with his perfomance, Tony Musante and Jack Palance really add something else as well with good perfomances and great chemistry between this trio.
Corbucci really showed his skills in this movie, trying to give something different to the usual Spaggethi movie and at the same time retaining the essentials that made this genre so special, filming in Spain really helped the movie, there´s some shots on the landscape that are very impressing.
Plot wise the movie is fine, altough it rushes to the end , a couple of extra minutes would help the movie much more giving more weight to the final duel, wich at the same time is a weird hybrid metween Corbucci´s theme for the movie and the trio with the duels of the first two Segio Leone´s movies.
At the end this movie is a hidden geme for Westerns and should be talked more, specially the Morricone score, wich is really great here and orignal.
Per un pugno di dollari (1964)
A fistful of changing cinema
When westerns got stale in america italian directors took on the genre as a tounge in cheek review of american westerns and this movie changued cinema forever, Truth be told, for american cinema the later The good, the bad and the ugly by the same director Sergio Leone was far more influential and was the first of his movie trilogy to be released in America, but A Fistful of Dollars was in order first and changued the way directors wanted to do westerns in europe before GBU. This movie was panned by critics at the time for been far too violent and dark for it´s time, it´s aged much better than most american westerns though and definetly mark the way movies will be made in the years to come defining Sergio Leone carrer as a director, Clint Eastwood first and iconic movie role, Ennio Morricone music for this genre and putting the Spaggethi western on the map, spaning several look alikes. This movie is also an unofficial remake of Yojimbo by Akira Kurosawa who actually fined Leone, both of them settled it on court for 15% of the earnings of the movie.
The acting in this movie is good and in some ocations really great due to Sergio´s direction and classic close ups wich sometimes let the faces of the actors express far too more than words could even do for the movie, there´s some shots in the final act of the movie that really let you see what is going through the mind of the charachter, specially a very intense close up to Eastwood face that make you belive he is comming out of hell to eat your soul. Eastwood, by the way, proved how much of a power star he could be for movies like this one, this perfomance as the Man with no name (nicknamed in this movie Joe) is more heartwarming, yes he is as cool gunslinger, but also has some charisma and you see him doing stuff he rarely does in other movies like eating, drinking, cheking out a women, was a far cry from american heroes but he was no near as cold blooded as he apperead in the other movies from the trilogy, yet he marked the way for anti heroes to come and is still present today.
The cinematogrpahy in this movie is good, really let you take a darker and more realistic look won the west, presenting it as a place of poverty and desperation, some really long shots and everything on the screen when we get to the main place for the movie, wich was the town between rojos and baxters, with the rest in the middle and how the charachters interact within eachother in it is beautiful.
Morricone score was really good here, altough he keep getting better with every movie he made with Leone, still this was his breakthrough movie in wich he really put a score that put you in the place of the action.
The movie is not perfect though, many times the dubbing in this type of movie has been under the eye of critics and in this movie was an issue, altough wasn´t that bad sometimes is a bit disctracting. However my main problem with it is the poor editing in the shots that take place at night, when the charachters are around a house or a keep you see the night as we look at it in real life, however when they take on horses and ride through the plains at night is obvious that they shoted the scene at day and later downgraded the color to make it look as if it takes place at night and it looks bad, at one moment you have pitch black night, then you have this afternoon like enviroment, then pitch black again, it was weird, lightning was not the strenght of this movie.
That aside this is as classic as other Leone´s movies, altough he did improved much more his formula in the movie to follow, still everything started here and this is a must watch movie, a really good western an a game chaning movie that inspired countless copies, changued westerns and movies forever, there´s countless scenes that Leone, Eastwood, Corbucci and several other re used from this one.
One last advice: If you ever watch the other Leone´s westerns, not including duck you sucker, you should start for this very first one as you will find the other movies where muh bigger improvements and you might feel a bit let down when you find that this movie ain´t as good as it´s followers, again is a really good movie, but For a few more dollars is even better and GBU and Once upon a time in the west are by far some of the greatest movies ever made.
Anaconda (1997)
Half good/Half bad entertaining movie.
Oh my, where to start while reviewing Anaconda? I gave it a 7, due to a score below 5 was awarded to it in march 2020 when i wrotte this review. IN all truth i feel this movie is a 5-6.
Is a really weird film, with a really weird crossing of good and bad stuff. The plot of the movie is very basic, another creature feature movie, this time motivated by a National Geographic expedition and on the other side Paul Sarone who wants money, so far so good, then they find the titular Anaconda wich starts reying on them one by one a la Jaws.
One one hand you have John Voight over the top yet really good and cautivating acting in his perfomance, with Jonathan Hyde and Erick Stoltz supporting some really good acting and giving the movie really good weight; on the other hand you have J-lo, ice Cube and Owen Wilson been just them and bad, truth be told, Ice Cube is not bad through the movie but a seriously weird decition for a main charachter.
The score of this movie really stands out though, beautiful and haunting music wich really give tention to the attacks of the Snake through out the film, again, this is followed some really doubious writting for the movie. The cinematography is very unique on it´s own way altough direction is just accetable among all things.
At the end of the day is a movie that you have to see and make your mind about if you like it or not, nothing terrible, some spectacular stuff, some other not so spectacular.
A good point is that for its time most of the CGI stand out and keeps good to this day, there´s some really cool creature features and practical effects that really give credibility to the movie.
Two Mules for Sister Sara (1970)
Eastwood´s must underrated Western
Set in the Mexico desert, this movie is stronger that what the title makes you belive, Directed by Don Siegel and music Composed by Ennio Morricone, is a very strange combination but nonthless really effective.
The Plot in this movie is really straight forward with a little twist at the end, but that let the action and the charachters kick in and make for a really good story, Eastwood and Mclaince where amazing in this movie as a duo and there´s some romantic tention towards her wich was new to any Eastwood perfomance.
When this movie starts is really beautiful, the Mexican landscape is amazing and it really takes it time to introduce wich kind of enviroment we are dealing with in this movie including some shots with the animal wildlife in the movie wich where ashtoning and fresh to anyone that has ever watched Westerns.
On the bad side of the movie there´s a really bad moment including an animal wich was obviously fake and seen it today is just cringy; and Nun Sara big reveal wich was teased towards the film and then it just kind of happens and is dissapointing how they resolved that, wich leads to the only problem in the film: It rushes its climax, the Climax itself is good but the last steps to that point just happen in a rush.
Otherwise is a really good film and definetly a recommended watch, also Morricone´s music really elevates this movie, it´s a dangerous and fresh score wich reflexes the Mexican enviroment in wich the movie takes place.
High Plains Drifter (1973)
Clint Eastwood sets hell to any coward on his way in this self directed dark Western.
After Eastwood part ways with legend maestro Sergio Leone he was the star in a couple of Westerns, however his first directed Western was stronger than any of those previus non-Leone related Westerns.
Here this movie is clearly influenced by both Leone and Don Siegel movies, wich help Eastwood in his breakthrough carrer, Still this movie is very much different to any of the films of those directors. Eastwood had never portrayed a charachters as villanous as the Drifter in this movie, alleged Raping, abuse of power, murders and alleged raping again made this charachter something else for this movie, yet we felt for him and really wanted him to overcome the odds.
Theres really good acting in this movie from some supporting charachters, the cinematography is good when it needs to be good, the plot is abit simple, but is nothing that distract ourselves that much from a really good film.
Action in this movie is far more realistic to its time, quick gungslingers are replaced with more human shooters and that adds to the theme of vengance in the movie really well
Il grande silenzio (1968)
The cold, brutally and brilliant western in the big white.
Westerns and Spaggethi westerns had come and go to many places though all their years of existance, and altough snow wasn´t new to them, a Western shooted in winter, in the end of that specific era of wild west was a groundbreaking experience for the genre. This one is what people now call a Subversive film, it played the same notes of many other films of the genre, but did them backwards; Spaghetti Westerns had already played and twisted the principles of the genre but this film twisted even the same base and principles of Spaggethi films. This is Sergio Corbucci at his finnest.
Segio Corbucci proved to be a force to be recogned in the genre with this film wich was an improvement over his already released movie "Django" (Yes, the one with Franco Nero and the machinegun) in wich violence was a big theme in the movie, but here he did something else, his beautiful shots in the snow are right there with Leone´s and Ford´s Lanscapes, he introduced this charachter Silenzio and make him and instantly a badass but yet simpathethic charachter, a smart hired gun wich can´t trade a word due to a early life trauma and he will gun you down if he needs to. The there is Trigrero (Loco) wich is every bit as a bad boy as the bad dudes from big western films, played wonderfully by Klaus Kinski, in the first twenty minutes of the film you get to hate him.
This film crossed papers for good and bad guys earlier than most movies in the genre, making the savages poor people wich want to respond to the law, tired of hiding, tired of being persecuted by the law, and they end up been protected by Silenzio who is payed by them (and arguably feels for them); and then you have the Bounty killers, wich are bad guys protected by the law whoe do as they wish in order to satisfy their rhutless needs and make some profit along the way.
The beginning of this movie is beautiful, with really long shots of snow presenting the Silenzio charachter, giving some exposure and then falling into the wonderfull score written by the always great Ennio Morricone, wich again made a gorgeous theme for this film. The we get into Tigrero, the Sheriff with a heart of gold but brains of a cow and the Black Lady, the themes of the movie start kicking in slowly, when there´s action in this film is brutal and really extended, making it hard to watch at times, all the way up to that finale, wich you won´t see comming until you watch the film.
However this movie does have some issues that make it suffer and keeps them to achive something greater. I´ll be brieff as anyway they ani´t that much of a trouble, Some spoilers ahead. First, the Silenzio charachter is the Man with no name yet again, the second movie in wich Corbucci retales the story of a silent badass gunslinger first been Django, wich is a heavily inspired in a Fistful of Dollars. I know this kind of charachter is meant to be silence, but this is ridiculous (I´m just gonna let that joke sink in); see the problem is that even if he has a new gun, new clothes and is arguably different to other anti heroe charachters Silenzio is still model after that of the Man with no name, therefore almost impossible not compare them both, specially when the end of the movie is approaching and you think how Joe or Django would done things different, then, there is the flashback wich made a lot of sense in the movie, but you can´t really hel but think you´ve seen it before, then you remember, you´ve seen it in Once upon a time in the west, with both movies been released very much in the same time of the year is hard to state who had the original idea, however we did know Corbucci re*done a lot of Sergio Leone´s content and borrowed ideas from him a lot, regardless of who had the idea first, still is hard to deny that Leone did it best . Second is the sound, not the score, the sound, that was always an issue with SW movies, and the Corbucci ones suffered a bit more, is not terrible or bad, specially for it´s time, but even in it´s native Italian sometimes is a bit rough, we can say technollogy wan´t tehre yet, specially for Corbucci, still there is a big fat awful sound editing in the movie. SIlenzio is getting a beating (Like the man with no name, yet again) and suddendly he has to scream from pain due to a reason i won´t spoil, so as his charachter is muted it makes sense he can´t scream, however, the whole Scene goes silent for some seconds, wich was awful as you lose the feel of the scene, takes you out of the movie for a bit, why Corbucci went with this is a mistery to my logic.
However, noted that i must clarify, those are little things in the movie at the end and this is Sergio Corbucci at his finnest directing, he mad a really cold movie, you can feel the cold in the charachters, also re imagined some of the rules common to this kind of film and achive arguably the darkest Western ever made and known to mankind. It inspired many other films, including Tarantino´s "The Hateful eight". At the very end i a must see film, not only for Spaghetti Western lvoers, but Westerns lovers overall and film goers, this is the kind of movie that will let you with something in your mind, cold in your bones and tear in your eyes.
The Ghost and the Darkness (1996)
An adventure movie with a great heart, not perfect, but really good.
I remember watching this movie as a kid and been immediatly amazed by it, i guess Lions really get your attention when you are a youngster, however as an adult i still find a lot of this movie very enjoyable, as part of wathcing this movie again i read the Book wich contains the story of the "Lion man-eaters of Tzavo" written by Col Patterason, then i re watched the movie. You know, we all know hollywood take liberties when making their movies, that´s a fact, so i found hilarious that the exagerated parts of the movie where the addition of charachters wich wasn´t there and some little changues in the story while most of the Lion man killing stuff was pretty much faithful to what Patterson related.
Now, this movie ain´t perfect, the introduction of Michael Douglas into the film really hurts a bit of logic in the movie, however, once it picks from there it´s really a good movie again, there are some cool beautiful shots of the African landscape, it has a decent pacing and decent acting, everytime the Lions are on screen they just stole the movie, there are some really haunting themes in the movie as well. This movie fails in delivering a much heavier story for Patterson, his motives and other carachter related stuff, but it doesn´t feel like the movie wa really aiming for it, overall is a really good experience.
This movie really had it´s heart on the right place at the end and that prevailed all during the film, of course it has more issues, like some continuity erros in the final moments, and some effects that donpt really hold up to this day, but if you are looking for a fun, gury adventure in Africa this is a most see film. At the end, let the Movie haunt for what is worth.
Il buono, il brutto, il cattivo (1966)
A Fantastic breaking rules movie that defined the genre and Cinema on the way.
The Good, the Bad and the Ugly, Where to begin reviewing this movie?. This is one of those movies that you can speak for days and not be over with all the many good things it did, is almost crazy to belive that this movie was panned by critics at the time, probably a response to a product of it´s time but from another country, we should agree. However critics where proved wrong with this movie and had to appreciate a Western that in many ways was more revolutionary and arguably better than anything produced in Hollywood.
Sergio Leone Direction for this movie is iconic and now one of the things that distinguish this type of movies, with beautiful and slow cinematographic long shots, extreme close ups, the storytelling he used and how graphich it was visually (At the time), but most iportant the build of tention he did in so many scenes, when you know something gonna happen but you have no idea when would happen, but when does happen it marks the movie and your life.
The acting in this movie is very underaprecciated in general, the main Trio has so much presence by them selves that they stole every inch of screen they are in, Ellie Wallach as Tuco is funny yet ragging, charismatic and just enbodies "The Ugly" as a word better than anyone has done; Lee Van Cleef as Sentenza "Angel Eyes" is so menacing, there´s no scene including him that make you think contrary, his incarnation of "the Bad" is just that, someone that appears to have no soul and would kill twisting his own rules at bennefit; and finally Clint Eastwood as Blondie, "the Good" that isn´t exactly good, a bounty hunter that has dubious moral codes, he is so unpredictable in what he is gonna do and how he is gonna do it, yet has some good in him and is the smartest of the trio, not to say the better gunslinger (in all movies arguably). The rest of the supporting cast does a good job at it, never outmatching the main charachters but doing really good carachterization and making the film have more weight, the shop owner, the soldiers, the Generals, the killers, all of them have a poruse on the film and add something special to the film.
The Score is another big one of this film, Ennio Morricone is a genius mind and there´s no better man to writte music for this genre of film than him, he easly outmatches most composers of Western movies and composers in movies in general. His score really put you in the mood of the scene, in how you are supossed to feel the film, in how raw the life was back then, the Main theme, Eacstsy of Gold, The Trio, the Sundown are great pieces of music, that´s how movie themes should work and how they have to make you feel.
This movie really broke the rules of typical film making as well, is one of those movies that don´t really care that much about the plot, wich in any other movie would feel wrong, but this one makes their scenes so heavy and so much happens on screen at the same moment that the plot becomes almost a non factor for the film, is a movie about circumstances that happen to their carachters and how they deal with them in that exact moments not really caring when it would get to the end of the plot, is much more about their stories and what they leave behind, however there is a plot but the film don´t rushes into it, it takes it´s time to get there and is so satisfying.
We already talked about the acting, but it´s worth talking about how this movie was one that popularized double sided charachters, specailly with Tuco and Blondie, it really don´t let you make up your mind about what you feel about them, the only thing you know is that they might be bad or good any moments, specailly that of the Man with no name, altough Wallach´s acting stole the show, Eastwood is one fo those presence actors that just need to put a cigar in his mouth and he will change movies forever and his charachter in this movie, cold, smart, few words spoken, and overall bad ass really changued movies to this very day, there´s so many movies that stole that concept and implemented into their own, not only in westerns but in action movies and Sci-Fi, there would not be Han Solos, Snake Pilskims or even Indiana Jones withouth the grandad of dirty players wich was Blondie.
There´s too much to talk about this movie again and most of all is positive to excelent, so whenever you have the chance go and Watch it, is the final instalment of the Dollars Trio or the Man with no name trilogy, yo surely won´t be dissapointed.