Reviews

11 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Better than I expected
20 February 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Not a great movie but not at all a bad one, either. Well produced, solidly directed and very good acting all around. Only real issue for me is the story, which doesn't really take you much of anywhere. The most compelling, interesting part of the story is how Damien learns of his true identity and struggles with it at first. Or at least for one scene. Had the main plot of the story been about Damien's journey of self discovery and acceptance, I think that would have been much more interesting. The young actor who plays Damien, Jonathan Scott-Taylor, proves himself to be quite a good actor and I think could have handled it. Instead, he's mostly a passive, only occasionally active participant in his slow and steady march toward Satanic domination. So by the time you get to the end (SPOILER), except for the Lee Grant thing, which I kind of saw coming about half way through, you're kind of left to shrug at a feeling of inevitability, which I didn't find very compelling. But all in all, it kept me engaged, and I thought it was pretty good. Certainly better than I expected.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
King Richard (2021)
8/10
Compelling story, told well, exceptional acting
7 February 2022
King Richard is excellent. Long, but very good. Richard Williams is definitely the hero of this story, shepherding his daughters, Venus and Serena, past seemingly impossible odds, fighting through the deeply entrenched barriers of access, privilege and racism, as well as the challenges of his own circumstances, with a deep sense of belief, principle, determination and grit. At the same time, it doesn't completely lionize him, either. He has his own blind spots. The characterization is more of determination than nobility. And while the eventual outcome is never in doubt, the challenges are so deep that there is still a lot of tension, even a little doubt.

Will Smith is excellent. Completely disappears into and embodies the character. Nothing showy or gimmicky. In fact, the acting all around is really extraordinary. Everything feels absolutely real. Aunjanue Ellis as Brandy Williams is a rock, a force to be reckoned with. And the girls. I don't know where they found them but it's some of the most real, believable, down-to-earth acting by child actors that I've seen in awhile. They don't feel like they're acting.

Only thing is that it's long. But it's worth it. Highly recommended.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Vicious (2013–2016)
8/10
Season one is pure sit-com comedy gold
19 December 2021
When I first encountered this wonderful little gem of a sitcom, I thought two things. First was that the writing, production values, and acting were like a throwback to 1970's sitcom - ridiculously broad, blatantly obvious, and almost offensively stereotypical. The second thing I thought was, wow this is fun! In the hands of two brilliant, world-class actors, and the wonderful cast, even the most sit-comm-like jokes somehow get spun into comic gold. I enjoyed nearly every moment of the first season, laughing many times, sometimes laughing so hard my stomach hurt. It has become one of my favorite series that I return to when I need a lift. Unfortunately I feel like it lost a lot of steam in the second season and was nowhere near as enjoyable. But the first six episodes of season one are pure gold.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Soapdish (1991)
3/10
All in all, meh. Horrible ending.
31 July 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Soapdish has a few scenes that are generally funny but all in all it falls flat. It actually starts with some good, promising satire, with ridiculously good looking people getting cast as a rabble crowd of homeless people, and scenes about the casting couch. And Kevin Kline playing Death of a Salesman in bad dinner theater in Florida. Genuinely funny stuff. But it very quickly gets lost in a very uninteresting story about failed attempts to derail Sally Fields' character's career (attempts that, despite the hyped up acting, never has any real teeth or even sense of high stakes) and her triangle relationship with her supposed niece and Kevin Kline's character. So much wasted talent here! Kathy Najimy, a brilliant comedic actress, is completely wasted in a throwaway role as a costumer. Even worse with Carrie Fischer! She gets one hilarious scene, making me want to see more of her and her character, and then she basically disappears for the rest of the movie. So disappointed. But the worst for me was the end, which relies on a horrible and very offensive transphobic joke.

The best satires are grounded in some version of reality. Part of the fun is recognizing the truth in even the most ridiculous of situations, since the truth itself is often ridiculous. The Soapdish producers seem to have felt that if you just mix in a few jokes with an otherwise uninteresting story, you'll have good satire. Instead they settled for a few cheap laughs. What a waste of a talented cast.
5 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Brooklyn ghetto in LA?
22 July 2021
Dumb, frivolous, pointless movie. Also, it's hilarious that it takes place in LA but over half the cast talk they attended the same school where Mr. Kotter of Welcome Back, Kotter taught!
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
I'm supposed to care I guess because why?
13 July 2021
I've never read the F. Scott Fitzgerald novel on which this film is based but a film needs to stand on its own, regardless. It seems to be a well made film. Beautifully shot and well acted, considering what little the script has given anyone in terms of character, character development, conflict, etc. I kept waiting for the moment when it would land for me. When the story would become interesting, when any of the characters would become people that I cared about or in whom I felt in anyway invested. The moment never came. Why am I watching this? At the very least I should have gotten some sense as to what Harold Pinter found so interesting about this story that he wanted to adapt it as a screenplay or accepted the job to adapt it. Same with Elia Kazan as the director. Why should I spend my time watching this instead of just reading the book? And if I had read the book, what does this movie bring or add or reveal about the characters or story that the book doesn't? I have a feeling this film has no answer to that. It does not seem to know why it exists other than to be a filmed version the book. And not a very interesting or compelling one at that. Also, I'm very tired of movies in which the female characters serve no purpose other than being objects of a male character's affection or rejection. Frustrating.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Kid 90 (2021)
3/10
A trip down her memory lane
14 March 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Watched the documentary Kid 90 on Hulu last night. The premise - Soliel Moon Frye, aka Punky Brewster - explores her experience of moving from child to teenager to adult during the 1990's by diving into her vast collection of of surprisingly intimate and personal homemade videos and journal entries. It includes clips of many other teenage actors and celebrities at the time - her co-hort and community - and contemporary interviews with those who made it to adulthood. Tragically, a number did not. It promises to be really interesting, personal, vulnerable and insightful. Unfortunately, it ends up being only minimally any of those things. Personal? Yes, absolutely. But not particularly insightful. It manages to be vulnerable and superficial at the same time. Like a Hollywood map of scars. I got this scar from the time that this happened and that scar from the time that that happened (oh my god we were so effed up but it was so amazing), and coming up next on the right...

It's too bad because she touches on so many things, so many deep veins that deserve exploring, so many things that I was willing to spend time exploring with her. But she never seems interested in exploring, just pointing things out. It's frustrating.

Toward the end, thinking back on the friends who tragically took their lives, she talks about how much she sees now that she missed twenty years ago. What she doesn't say is that she missed so much because she couldn't see very far outside herself. By the end I was left with the impression that she still can't.

Rather than exploring someone's journey with them, I instead just spent the last 90 minutes with someone while they waxed nostalgic over their old photo albums. And I still haven't gone grocery shopping.
91 out of 127 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The good (and there is some) gets buried by the bad
27 December 2020
Warning: Spoilers
I was a fan of the original 1970's TV series Wonder Woman when I was a kid, even when it got to be ridiculous. I remain a fan of the current Wonder Woman but unfortunately, WW84 also got to be ridiculous. There are parallels, both good and bad.

I am a sucker for super hero TV shows and movies, particularly (and this was especially true when I was a kid) those with women super heroes. Also, Linda Carter so perfectly embodied Wonder Woman that I would have watched her play Wonder Woman in anything and enjoyed it, even if it was really bad, just because of her. In the first season's original 1940's setting in WWII era America, the story and character seemed grounded and had a clear reason for being, even as it occasionally embraced a kind of self-conscious campiness. When it transferred to "modern-day," 1970's America, its reason for being got lost, the modern-day setting seemed arbitrary, the story lines became more and more ridiculous, and it lost its campy mojo. And it introduced head-scratching new Wonder Woman outfits, such as the full body swimsuit and the Wonder Woman skateboarding outfit, complete with helmet and elbow and knee pads (a perfect example of a lost opportunity for camp or self-conscious humor. Had the elbow and knee pads deflected bullets, it would have been SO MUCH BETTER). But it still had Linda Carter, so I was in all the way.

With Wonder Woman 1984, Gal Gadot continues to perfectly embody the character, imbuing her with a deep sense of integrity, warmth, strength and, despite Wonder Woman's god-like nature, humanity. I am a fan. The story itself is honestly a mess. However, she keeps the central theme of the movie grounded - that a hero's strength is not defined by winning but is rather built and strengthened by one's willingness to accept loss and move on. For me, that was enough to see me through and keep me interested. But there's a lot to get through.

I enjoyed Kristin Wiig as Barbara Minerva / Cheetah, and I really liked the story that started to develop between her and Diana Prince / Wonder Woman. I wish theirs had been the primary focus. Unfortunately, it's another character named Max Lord who serves as the primary foil for Wonder Woman's character and story arc. His similarities to a certain US President are unmistakable. He's a deeply insecure megalomaniac who is motivated to attain increasingly immeasurable power to fill a gaping hole in his soul. His special power springs from his charlatan nature of telling people what they want to hear and, eventually, empowering them to realize their deepest, darkest desires, regardless of consequence. As an idea, it sounds great. As executed, it's uninspired and boring, which makes the secondary focus on Cheetah all the more disappointing.

Then there's the somewhat tangential story arc with Chris Pine's Steve Trevor. I like Chris Pine as an actor and I like him as Steve Trevor. But while the character plays an important role in Wonder Woman's story line, too many of the scenes between them are superfluous and silly. So when he gets to the point where he realizes, yeah, you don't need me here, I'm just getting in the way, I thought, yeah, I was there about 40 minutes ago.

And there is a strange new costume that's not quite as bad as the full-body swimsuit but close. And there are a couple of new super powers that are introduced (including one that's introduced by something that feels like a last-minute special effect idea. I thought, "Oh, yeah, Sookie Stackhouse on True Blood had a similar special effect." Or was it intended as some kind of homage to the magical costume change light burst from the original series?). The super powers, btw, are not new; they come from Wonder Woman lore. Still, they felt a little odd for some reason in this context.

But like I said, it still has Gal Gadot, so despite everything, I'm still in. In all likelihood I will watch it again. I will also likely be the only person in my house to do so.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
It's actually decent escapist entertainment
8 June 2020
Watched this last night (because my husband and I have been Charlie's Angels fans since we were kids), and I wondered why there was so much negativity around this movie. Sure it's schlock but it's decent, well-made, entertaining schlock. I enjoyed this as much as I did the last Mission Impossible move. Neither is art but both are entertaining. Each of the characters are interesting, each of the actors are good in their roles. I enjoyed it more than the last re-boot. I'm sorry that this flopped because I would have watched the sequel.

This did not deserve the hate it got. If you're looking for fun, escapist entertainment, this is a pretty good option.
9 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Who are these people??
26 February 2020
The great thing about this documentary is seeing some of the archival footage. But then the commentators start commenting and I wondered, who the hell are these people? The first few people aren't even dancers! Just people with opinions. Why do I care about what these people think? Why should their perspectives matter to me? Then you see two choreographers and group of dancers talking and suddenly it's no longer about Bob Fosse but about what these dancers think. Well, ok, that's nice but why do I care??

Very frustrating. I gave up on it.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
It's a fun ride
27 May 2018
I did not think I would bother with this movie. I was feeling Star Wars fatigue, and the trailers did not exactly fill me with yearning. Then I started hearing good things about it and decided, ok, let's give it a shot. Admittedly, it did not take much. Despite my protestations and the prequels-that-shall-not-be-named... and Return of the Jedi..., ok, in spite of 60-70% of the Star Wars movies made so far, I am still and have always been a fan.

Solo is a fun, roller coaster ride of a movie, plain and simple. A fun, enjoyable action/adventure movie. It is not AWESOME but it sure knows how to show you a good time. Kind of like the Saturday movie matinees that Lucas presumably had in mind when he made the first one.

Ever since Joseph Campbell declared Star Wars to be an excellent example of the Hero With A Thousand Faces myth, and George Lucas decided, "It is? Oh. Well, um, why YES! Yes it is. That is what I had in mind all along!" Star Wars movies have had the weight of their own perceived significance hanging around their necks. Even the more recent ones that have made a concerted effort to incorporate some levity have not fully been able to escape that weight.

This one does. There is no Force or fate of the universe hanging in the balance (not directly, anyway). There is corruption, of course, and oppression that influences the characters and the decisions they make. And while those things are important and motivating, the characters' endeavors to overcome or escape their oppressive pasts are done as part of their own individual journeys rather than as part of some larger, galactic moral battle. The movie's hues are grays, browns and darker, more muted colors but it still feels light and fleet.

I did not think I would like Alden Ehrenreich as Han Solo but I did. I thought I was kind of done with Chewbacca but this movie finds something new about the character - more like it reboots him instead of resurrecting him for the umpteen-millionth time. When I heard that Woody Harrelson and Emilia Clark were in it I thought, "Really? Why?" but they're both great. Donald Glover as Lando is also great. In fact, I kind of wanted more of him.

So, yeah. It's a fun ride.
0 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed