4/10
more often silly than sinister...
5 January 2003
more often silly than sinister, more of a curiosity than a classic. some very nice sets and moments where elements actually coalesce into something interesting, but i'd have to say this is not one of price's better films. made ten years after corman's poe adaptations, and even several years after rosemary's baby, this film lacks any real sophistication and intelligence. the plot often plods, and certain scenes just fail completely, yet the film has it's moments, just too few to make it really worth the investment of time to watch it. unless, of course, you are one of the many people that like their horror films to be a bit schlocky, in that case you might like it. not really my taste, hence 4 out of 10 stars.
13 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed