1/10
Embarrassingly bad
14 April 2003
Nicolas Cage is an interesting actor, but this is not one of his finest moments, or rather, he's the only interesting aspect of an otherwise forgettable movie--interesting because his performance is so over-the-top. The film is neither "stylish," nor "erotic," nor funny (well, the fake teeth scene is funny for a while). The plot is ludicrous and disjointed and the film can't seem to decide it it wants to be comedy, horror, or drama. This isn't a conventional vampire film in any sense of the word, aside from the silly bat at the beginning of the movie and Jennifer Beals as a "real" vampire (the character Rachel). Since Cage's character is in therapy and obviously quite disturbed, one of the underlying plot threads is that his behavior is really the result of a paranoid mind--that is, he is not, nor has he ever been, a vampire. Oh well. Fortunately Cage went on to make some interesting films with better direction and comprehensible plots.

Even though I do like vampire films as a genre, this was one of the worst I've seen.
12 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed