The Guardian (1990)
5/10
A treehugger's variation of Hansel & Gretel. (spoilers)
3 August 2005
Not a bad horror film. During the age of the druids, there were supposedly people who worshipped trees, even going so far as to make human offerings to them. There were, however, those that worshipped the trees in order to raise some sort of good spirit while others did it to praise its evil spirit. An English woman posing as a babysitter is one of the latter. She takes a job as a sitter for an oblivious newlywed couple who have yet to suspect other plans for their newborn son. That is, as the cliché usually goes, until someone learns the woman secrets (usually as witnesses to her bizarre behavior) and tries to warn the naive couple. But not without the retaliation of the English woman, her pack of coyotes, and the spirit of the trees. But, as most horror movies also go, it is not long before the couple will have to do their best to save their son and get rid of the evil that has befallen their unsuspecting family. This is, as the filmmakers allude to in the introduction, a modern variation of Hansel and Gretel.

Typical material follows horror film conventions completely by the book, but it's rather unique setting (a dangerous tree hugger) and ignorance of the blah couple for most of the film, make it a decent horror film. Horror fluff, but entertaining nonetheless. Don't be fooled, however, by director William Friedken's name attached to the publicity as this lacks much of the exciting suspense and power of his early masterpiece, The Exorcist. If nothing else, if your in the mood for a horror film with sophisticated sprinkling of gratuitous nudity and a cheesy story, you might not be disappointed.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed