A solid legal thriller that pushes little consolation to more than a reflection on the nature of imperfect justice. The justice that triumphs in the film is that of the State, the "reasons of state", a justice, therefore, very different from that of men is basically a moral and ideological. The originality of the film is, in my opinion, not so much emphasis on the scandal of a reason to assert that the State does not hesitate to trample the truth and civil rights, but rather in alerting the impossibility of judging the moral behavior of men. The film, in hindsight, the final two: the first, which concluded the trial of the conspirators, with its death sentence, and the second where you tell the story of a son who cowardly, but may, does nothing to prevent the condemnation of the mother. This poor figure is the real scandal of the story because his guilt, especially morality, and despite the evidence self-incrimination which is perceived by public opinion, can not be recognized because of insufficient evidence and is likely to remain unpunished. One more reason to reflect on the nature of the law far from perfect, far from regular and satisfy justice in accordance with the wishes and aspirations of men, actually reveals his true vocation as a full subservience to the state. It, like politics, morality and does not know, just like politics, too many times is incomprehensible to men.
Review of The Conspirator
