1/10
Almost painful to watch, steaming pile of turd. I put more thought into this review than they put into the movie.
23 July 2015
Warning: Spoilers
The stars have cameos as a favor to a stuntman/double. Ignore the 9s & 10s. I wonder why a director, having had visions of creating a polished, well acted, cinematographically beautiful movie, blindly refuses come to the realistic conclusion that what he actually produced was a steaming pile of manure. This movie is horrible on almost every level: - Awkward angles and shots - horrible editing in the fight scenes - atrocious, harsh sound - Was it filmed with an old, dirty super 8?

Its almost as if the writer/director thought good fight scenes (of which there are NONE due to the horrible camera-work and editing) figured he didn't need a plot, lighting, any semblance of acting, etc etc to make a good movie. Look at the vastly inflated bio of the writer/director/producer- (he's somebody with some martial arts training who forgot that you need to know how to make a movie to make a movie) explains his arrogance in thinking that this can actually be called a movie. I'm surprised that Hannah, Rourke, even Roberts w/his B-movie filmography, haven't had their names stripped off this junk heap. My nephew could have done better with his i-phone, friends and a laptop. I put more thought into writing this review than they put into this movie.
29 out of 49 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed